...the death penalty. Death penalty is whereby a state through its judiciary system gives a court punishment for an offence as death. That person would be legally killed within a set period of time. This is an ethical question in that some people feel that death penalty is wrong, while others feel that it is justifiable in some cases. This is a great debate in most countries and the debate includes a lot of civic and religious groups. In some cases the discretion to give a death penalty is vested in a few people in the judiciary system. Looking at the issue of death penalty, there are varied reasons that support the penalty as well as some reasons that seem to suggest that death penalty is bad. In many countries the constitution tells whether or not the death penalty should be upheld in the country. Overberg (n.d) says that about 75% of the people in the United States indicated that they favour death penalty. The same author says that the Catholic Bishops and Jews are against the penalty. The contrasting thing is that in 1966, according to this same author only half the population in USA approved of the death penalty. This shift in number of people favouring the death penalty is suggested to come due to the increased number of murders and violent crimes. So some people believe that the death penalty would deter would be violent offenders to shun violence as the would fear the death penalty. It is reported that the USA government has a shift towards wanting the death penalty. The...
Words: 1321 - Pages: 6
...Head: Death Penalty Larry Williams Contemporary Issues in Criminal Justice CJA/313 University Of Phoenix Robin Rabiner May 10, 2009 Death Penalty There are crimes that take place throughout society. When crimes are investigated, and investigators have evidence that prove who were involved, there are consequences for their actions. In some cases, there are crimes that involve consequences such as the death penalty. This consequence can be one of the severe punishments that are placed in our judicial system. There are many people that are for, as well as those are against the death penalty. In many cases, the death penalty has its benefits, as well as its flaws. Unfortunately the death penalty seems to cause problems that leaves many mulling over. In this case, it seems that the flaws of the death penalty needs reinstituted. History The death penalty laws were founded in the early 1800s. This punishment was implemented for 25 different crimes. However, the death penalty establishment goes back as the early Fourteenth Century. “The death penalty was also part of the Fourteenth Century B.C.'s Hittite Code; in the Seventh Century B.C.'s Draconian Code of Athens, which made death the only punishment for all crimes.” (Death Penalty Information Center, 2009). As the centuries progressed, the number of death penalty crimes increased. By the early 1700s, there were over 200 crimes which systematize the death penalty...
Words: 1947 - Pages: 8
...Title: Comparing Constitutions Source: USA, GA, Irleland POLS 1101 Chapter: Three Due Date: 13JUN11 Name: Charles Holz | USA | Georgia | Ireland | Age | 124 years | 29 years | 74 years | Size | 29 (7,600 words) | 89 pg. | 30 pg. (15,000 words) | Form of Government | Democratic Republic | Democratic Republic | Representative Democracy | Siblings | 1 | 9 | 1 | Bill of Rights | Yes | Yes | Yes | Heads | 3 | 3 | 4 | Nobility | N/A | No | No | Abortion | Yes | Yes | No | Religious Freedom | Yes | Yes | Yes | Death Penalty | Yes | Yes | No | USA The Constitution of the United States was adopted on September 17, 1787, and is the supreme law of the United States of America. The Constitution is the framework for the organization of the United States government and for the relationship of the federal government with the states, citizens, and all people within the United States. The Constitution creates the three branches of the national government: a legislature, the bicameral Congress; an executive branch led by the President; and a judicial branch headed by the Supreme Court. It superseded the Articles of Confederation. The US Constitution does not specifically support or oppose titles of nobility, but the 14th Amendment does equate all men. Georgia The State of Georgia may not declare someone to be a noble. The Constitution of the State of Georgia is the governing document of the U.S. state of Georgia. The constitution outlines the three branches...
Words: 818 - Pages: 4
...judicial system, many criminals are getting away with very little or no punishment for the crimes they are committing. You could be walking down the street in your very own neighborhood looking for their next victim and you do not even realize it. These criminals have no remorse on what they do; they are just waiting to strike again. However, if someone asked what your thought is on the death penalty, most would probably say that they are against it that is until a family member or someone you love is walking down the street and that man who was looking for their next victim found them. It was a family member and you will never see them again. Capital punishment has been a topic of debate for a very long time and it still has no certain solution. The Supreme Court, in 1972 said that it was unconstitutional and had made it legal after the Furman v. Georgia case. They said that it was in violation of our eighth and fourteenth amendment citing cruel and unusual punishment (Shaw, 2001). They then reinstated the death penalty after the Gregg v. Georgia case in 1976 (Shaw, 2001). As of September 2010, fifteen states that do not have the death penalty ("Death penalty information center," 2010.) Today about seventy percent of Americans who support the death penalty (The pros and cons of the death penalty in the USA, 2011). While thirty percent are against the death penalty (The pros and cons of the death penalty in the USA, 2011). When seeking the death penalty, it...
Words: 2173 - Pages: 9
...Death Penalty In today judicial system, many criminals are getting away with very little or no punishment for the crimes they are committing. You could be walking down the street in your very own neighborhood looking for their next victim and you do not even realize it. These criminals have no remorse on what they do; they are just waiting to strike again. However, if someone asked what your thought is on the death penalty, most would probably say that they are against it that is until a family member or someone you love is walking down the street and that man who was looking for their next victim found them. It was a family member and you will never see them again. Capital punishment has been a topic of debate for a very long time and it still has no certain solution. The Supreme Court, in 1972 said that it was unconstitutional and had made it legal after the Furman v. Georgia case. They said that it was in violation of our eighth and fourteenth amendment citing cruel and unusual punishment (Shaw, 2001). They then reinstated the death penalty after the Gregg v. Georgia case in 1976 (Shaw, 2001). As of September 2010, fifteen states that do not have the death penalty ("Death penalty information center," 2010.) Today about seventy percent of Americans who support the death penalty (The pros and cons of the death penalty in the USA, 2011). While thirty percent are against the death penalty (The pros and cons of the death penalty in the USA, 2011). When seeking the...
Words: 2168 - Pages: 9
...Death Penalty Since the creation of humans, crime has been prevalent in our history. The most heinous crime a human could commit is and will always be murder. For a long time, the death penalty was the go-to punishment for murder. Recent research and studies have concluded that the death penalty is cruel and ineffective. The death penalty is ineffective in many because ways there have been many cases of wrongful convictions. It does not lower crime, and it is way too costly. The death penalty is morally wrong “an eye for an eye makes the world blind.” The government cannot succumb to the same level of murderers. By killing those that murder, we become the same thing we fear, murderers. Furthermore, there is a chance that someone may be convicted wrongly and executed by the death penalty. According to Amnesty International, “Since 1973, over 130 people have been released from death rows throughout the country due to evidence of their wrongful convictions.” There are many factors that can lead to a false conviction, including inadequate legal representation, perjured testimony and mistaken eyewitness testimony, suppression and/or misinterpretation of mitigating evidence, and political pressure to solve a case (Amnesty International). One such case where there was a false conviction was that of Daniel Wade Moore in Alabama. Moore was originally found guilty for murder and sexual assault of Karen Tipton in 2002, and he was sentenced to death by the judge. However, he was acquitted...
Words: 1184 - Pages: 5
...is the death penalty? ‘Punishments are imposed on a person, not on racial or economic groups. Guilt is personal. The only relevant question is: does the person to be executed deserve the punishment?’ (Ernest van den Haag, 1986) According to Amnesty International, 139 countries have abolished the death penalty. In 2010, only one country, Gabon, abolished the death penalty for all crimes. During 2010, 23 countries executed 527 prisoners and at least 2,024 people were sentenced to death in 67 countries. More than 17,833 people are currently under sentence of death around the world (‘The Death Penalty Worldwide’) According to the United Nations, the highest per capita use of the death penalty is in Singapore, with a rate of 13.57 executions per one million population for the period 1994-99 (‘Executions Under Fire’) The death penalty is the most extreme form of punishment a government can use on its citizens Pros for death penalty ‘Simply put there is a class of people whose crimes are so heinous…that the death penalty should apply’ (Paul Rosenzweig, 2003) It is believed that governments can protect people by retaining the death penalty for murder and serious crime Opponents believe that governments should not take a life under any circumstance International human rights law forbids the execution of people who are under 18 years of age at the time of their crime (‘Death Penalty For Minors’) Cons for death penalty Unlike other punishments, the death penalty...
Words: 616 - Pages: 3
...No Justification for Death Penalty Death penalty or the capital punishment is a severe punishment given by the government to a criminal for offending crimes that are categorized under the capital crimes like murder. When the criminals are convicted of capital crimes and are sentenced for death penalty, the government legally takes life of the criminal by hanging them to death, lethal injection or by electrocute. Death penalty used to be performed all over the world, but many countries have outlawed it with regards to its violation of human rights and religious causes. In United States, most of the states have the authority to give death penalty to criminals. Death penalty is a very serious issue that has caused a big controversy between its supporters and opposers. People who support death penalty argues that it is the right kind of punishment for the criminals, provides justice to the victims and the families as well help deter the crime rates. But I really don’t think death penalty has any justification because there is a maximum chance for innocent people being convicted, it is also a violation of human rights as well as a religious sin to take life of people, and the crimes have not lowered due to death penalty, rather it takes a lot of tax payer’s money to execute a criminal. I rather think that such criminals should be given life imprisonment without parole. The foremost reason for abolishing the death penalty is the wrongful conviction. There are lots of cases where...
Words: 1394 - Pages: 6
...Rafat Sawaged ENG 090 04/21/2014 Argumentative Essay First Draft Capital Punishment “Death Penalty” For the worst crimes, life without parole is better, for many reasons. I’m against the death penalty not because of sympathy for criminals but because it isn’t effective in reducing crime, prolongs the anguish of families of murder victims, costs a whole lot more than life in prison, and, worst of all, risks executions of innocent people. The death penalty keeps the population safe by providing a deterrent for crime. Without the death penalty, the consequences for committing murder are not as feared. According to an essay by Professor Jeffrey A. Fagan, “executions [do] not only deter murders” (Fagan 1) with the death penalty in use, many criminals would think twice about committing a crime. Without the fear of capital punishment, many would-be criminals become actual criminals. “The death penalty diverts resources from genuine crime control measures. Spending money on the death penalty system means: * Reducing the resources available for crime prevention, mental health treatment, education and rehabilitation, meaningful victims' services, and drug treatment programs. * Diverting it from existing components of the criminal justice system, such as prosecutions of drug crimes, domestic violence, and child abuse. * Emergency services, creating jobs, and police & crime prevention were the three highest rated priorities for use of fiscal resources. ...
Words: 258 - Pages: 2
...The Death Penalty Can one justify an action of a cold killer? Furthermore, should death penalty be abolish? Lastly, is it possibly to end the debate about death penalty and the abolition of it? William Otis comes with his arguments in “The Death Penalty Saves Lives”, 2006, for why death penalty should not be abolish and his opinion of the abolitionists own arguments for it. The death penalty or capital punishment is a legit system where a person, who has committed a serious crime, it put to death by the state as punishment. The death penalty consist of two parts, the death sentence, which is the judicial decree that the person gets, and the other part is the actual execution. Death penalty has been used for many decades, and are still being used today, but of course not as often. In the past, it was performed by most societies and the most common execution method was beheading, which were most often public. In the United States, death penalty is a legal punishment in 32 states as well as the federal civilian and military legal systems. Since 1976, the most common method used to execute an inmate is lethal injection. Furthermore, in that same year the death penalty was reinstated after a ten-year long moratorium, which is a temporary stopping of a certain activity, thirty-four states have performed executions. A year that is very interesting, as far as death penalty goes, is 2012, because it was the year with the lowest executions in USA and, furthermore, by information...
Words: 1248 - Pages: 5
...Capital Punishment Capital punishment or the Death Penalty is the execution of a person by judicial process as a punishment for an offense. Crimes that can result in a death penalty are known as capital crimes or capital offences. The death penalty has been a staple in the justice system of America since its inception. In the United States Death Penalty is agreed by almost 78% of Republican with approximately 52% Democratic. Though very controversial, it has stood the test of time as the ultimate punishment. Many countries are currently abolishing their death penalty practice. America, on the other hand, has 38 of 50 states with laws regarding the death penalty. It seems the United States requires the death penalty more than ever due to the increased rate of violent crime. In modern time, it’s a high controversial topic due to the increase of crime rates in USA and in other countries in the world. Death Penalty is an undivided part of history of mankind ever since humans have started to live in society. From, the time of Vikings to the time of Saddam Hussein Death Penalty is something that follows the Death Penalty for one or another reason! However, the main intense among all those is to reduce the crime factor in society. Death Penalty is sentenced to someone when he/she does something that harms others or the community severely. Such as, to kill someone, to attack someone with an intense to kill them, to physically abuse in other...
Words: 1124 - Pages: 5
...Welcome to WritePoint, the automated review system that recognizes errors most commonly made by university students in academic essays. The system embeds comments into your paper and suggests possible changes in grammar and style. Please evaluate each comment carefully to ensure that the suggested change is appropriate for your paper, but remember that your instructor's preferences for style and format prevail. You will also need to review your own citations and references since WritePoint capability in this area is limited. Thank you for using WritePoint. Should the United States allow capital punishment or should they do away with it? Many people think the United States should do away and many think they should maintain capital punishment. I am one who opposes capital punishment. Capital punishment, the death penalty, or execution is the sentence of death upon a person by the state as the punishment for an offense (Kronenwetter, 2011, P. 202). The United States as a county rank fourth in the number of executions every year. According to the Bible the Sixth Commandment “Thou shall not kill.” I believe this with all my heart. So I believe capital punishment is killing a person, therefore disobeying my God’s word. Not all the states in the United States allow capital punishments. There are many states that oppose it and many that support it. Capital punishment is different in every state though, the government determined whether capital punishment is allowed in their...
Words: 807 - Pages: 4
...cannot disregard it. Getting the justly alleged to an impartial sentence is crucial. Certain crooks are compelled to do an offense since they have no other choice to live, but some in particular do it for the fun. I do not promote death punishment for everyone. An individual, who took bread from a grocery stock, certainly does not be worthy of a death penalty. Nonetheless, a serial killer, who murders people for amusing himself or for his own gain, absolutely justifies death penalty. The society’s garbage can be eliminated by continuously using the penalty of death. Everybody does not deserve to die, but there are some people who definitely do. I support death penalty for numerous reasons. Firstly, death penalty helps in diminishing crime and serves as a deterrent. Secondly, although death penalty is irreversible is true, but a wrongly convicted person is difficult to kill due to the numerous chances given to the convicted to provide evidence for his innocence. Thirdly, by the elimination of these criminals using death penalty, safety of the society is assured. Finally, I believe in "lex tallionis" - a life for a life. Deterrence refers to punishing somebody as an illustration and thereby, creating fear in other people for the same. Death penalty would create panic in the mind of any sane person as it’s considered as one of the extreme punishments. "If we execute murderers and there is in fact no deterrent effect, we have killed a bunch of murderers. If we fail to execute...
Words: 1175 - Pages: 5
...in a whole different light. My own personal experience has made me look at capital punishment a completely different way. I have very mixed emotions on the death penalty; a part of me believes that if a person takes another person’s life that they should get the death penalty and than there is the other part of me that believes that the person should spend the rest of their life in prison without parole, so they can suffer the consequences of there actions. There are numerous families and loved ones of murder victims that support alternatives to the death penalty for many reasons. For instance, the death penalty process has a traumatizing experience on the families, which is often requires them to relive the pain and suffering of the death of their loved one for many years. Having life without parole provides certain punishment without the endless reopening of wounds. “There are hundreds of millions of dollars that are spent on the death penalty each year. If we were to replace the death penalty with life in prison without parole, we would save million of dollars which than could be spent on violence-prevention efforts, solving unsolved cases and increasing the victims services.” (Death Penalty ProCon.org) On the other hand there are numerous families and loved ones of murder victims that support the death penalty. The criminal gets caught, is tried and convicted of the crime. While the punishment is going to be severe, the person's life the criminal has taken can no...
Words: 985 - Pages: 4
...Amendment; while supporters of the death penalty counter that this clause was not intended to prohibit legal executions. In the 1972 court case of Furman vs. Georgia , the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that capital punishment was no longer legal. However, in Gregg v. Georgia (1976), the court allowed capital punishments to resume in certain states, and shortly thereafter, Gary Gilmore was executed by a firing squad in Utah. Since the reinstatement of capital punishment in the United States,a separate penalty trial has been required for some capital cases, at which time the jury reviews circumstances that suggest the need for capital punishment. In 1982, Texas became the first state to execute a prisoner using lethal injection; other common methods of execution used in the United States include lethal gas and electrocution. In recent years, the Supreme Court has made it more difficult for death row prisoners to file appeals. Nearly 3 of 4 americans support the death sentence as a form of punishment. The other third has condemned it and their list of claims against it is long. Opponents challenge proponents on issues of deterrence, economics, fallibility, and rehabilitation. Their indifference to capital punishment is founded on constitutional and moral grounds. In societies best interest and for the safety of individuals, capital punishment is a respectable form of retribution for a crime being committed. More information on recent U.S. Supreme Court Death Penalty Cases Since 1990. History: ...
Words: 1933 - Pages: 8
