Discussion A The debate on whether or not God exist has been ongoing for many centuries now, philosophers, scientist theologians and other like-minded people have been searching for proofs since time immemorial. I personally found the cosmological argument of God existence to be more effective in explaining gone existence. In its proof, cosmological argument captures a fundamental concept which to me is more important; the concept of everything having a cause. This in real life is very true; I mean everything that exist have its own initial origin. Taking that into consideration, cosmological argument is clearly on point in its argument that there just be that cause that was prior to all other causes, and the prior cause clearly must just be the first existence which will be no other than God.
It is in my personal opinions that philosophers should not stress themselves in seeking Gods existence proofs, however it is also important as doing that keeps people at ease and make those who are already believers to continue supporting their believes even they are posed with oppositions.
Discussion B
This one is a little bit challenging, knowing what present day computers can do. It would be a surprise to me knowing that a computer just requires the right programs and can be in a position to lie and consequently, effectively give human like feedback. Having said that, it’s indisputable that what distinguishes computers from human beings is their inability to possess emotions, feelings and even creativity.
I will thus proceed and ask the computer the following questions: why did your mother named you, who you are today? Here, in many cases there is always a story to tell about one’s name and the computer can’t be in a position to figure that out, it will only be general and very short.
Where do you want to see yourself in ten years’ time? Here it is so evident that human beings have goals and target in life where computers don’t, thus the computer answer would be based on time and also based on materials.