...1. Invitation to Treat v. Offer to the World at Large A contract may be defined as ‘a promise or set of promises which the law will enforce’ or as ‘an agreement giving rise to obligations which are enforced or recognized by law’ . An ‘offer’ is an expression of willingness to contract made with the intention (actual or apparent) that it shall become binding on the person making it as soon as it is accepted by the person to whom it is addressed . An offer may be addressed either to an individual or to a specified group of persons or to the world at large; and it may be made expressly (by words) or by conduct. A communication by which a party is invited to make an offer is commonly called an ‘invitation to treat’. It is distinguishable from an offer primarily on the ground that it is not made with the intention that it shall become binding as soon as the person to whom it is addressed simply communicates his assent to its terms. A statement is clearly not an offer if it expressly provides that the person who makes it is not to be bound merely by the other party’s notification of assent but only when he himself has signed the document in which the statement is contained . Apart from this type of case, the wording of the statement is not conclusive: it may be an invitation to treat although it contains the word “offer” ; while a statement may be an offer although it is expressed as an “acceptance” , or although it requests the person to whom it is addressed to make an “offer”...
Words: 1484 - Pages: 6
...Invitation to treat The legal term ‘invitation to treat’ refers to an statement indicating that someone is interested in negotiating a business deal. It is not a binding obligation or offer, and all parties involved can choose not to take up the invitation to treat without suffering legal penalties. This allows people to make preliminary negotiations without having to commit, creating an opportunity for making business deals without obligations that might discourage parties from exploring the deal. For example, a price tag in a store window is considered an invitation to treat in many areas of the world. It is not a binding offer. A customer can approach and ask to bargain down the price and negotiations may be carried out. The store can also refuse to sell the item, falling back on its right to refuse services because it has not entered a contractual obligation with the customer. This is true even when stores promise ‘special offers’ or price-matching programs. In a book contract law, second edition by Mindy Chen-Wishart state that no offer is made when a party communicates his proposed terms unless he also communicates his commitment to be bound on the other’s acceptance of the terms. A communication may only be a request for a supply of information, not an offer. For example, in Harvey v Facey (1893), H sent a telegram to F asking ‘will you sell us Bumper Hall Pen? Telegraph lowest cash price.’ F replied ‘Lowest price for Bumper Hall Pen, $900’ and H purported...
Words: 3949 - Pages: 16
...Q1. Distinguished between the term agreement and contract under the Contracts Act 1950 (Revised 1974) A contract is legally binding agreement reached between two parties, the terms of which the courts have the authority and obligation to enforce. An agreement is less formal creation of an obligation between two parties. An agreement usually lacks one or more of the essential elements that are required to be present in order to form a valid contract that will be considered legally enforceable by curt of law. Contract outline, the terms of the relationship that should be formed between two parties to the contract. An agreement also outlines the terms of relationship between the two. However, the difference is that the contract outline is far more rigid than that of a contract. The essential difference between an agreement and a contract is that usually an agreement will only modify a contract that is already in place but does not place an obligation on either one of the parties to provide consideration to the other party, which a contract requires. A contract can be involve in the exchange of promises between the parties to the contract, while an agreement may simply involve one party accepting the offer from another party. The approach taken by the Contracts Act 1950 (Revised 1974) to distinguish between agreement and a contract was noted by the Supreme Court in the case, Beca (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd v Tan Choong Kuang & Anor [1986] 2 MLJ 390. It was held that there...
Words: 11539 - Pages: 47
...explain the requirement of a valid offer and acceptance which lead to the formation of a contract provided other essential elements, In other word intention to create legal relations and ,in most cases, consideration are also present. problem also arise in connection with the need for writing in some cases and the capacity of the parties. That it decides that where an offer is in the form of a promise for an act, the performance of the act is the acceptance and that offers of this type may be made to a particular person or to the world at large ,In other word to any unmentioned person or persons. Definition of contract A contract may defined as an agreement enforceable by law between two or more persons to do or abstain from doing some act or acts, their intention being to create legal relation and not merely to exchange mutual promises. I order to decide whether a contract has come into being, it is necessary to establish that there has been agreement between the parties .In consequence, it must in general be shown that an offer was made by one party(called the offeror )which was accepted by the other party(called the offeree).i Offer is one of the elements that make for a valid contract, and is the main focus of our lesson.there are six elements to a contract. These elements include, offer, acceptance, consideration, capacity, form a contract Offer Offer is an announcement of a person willing to enter into a contract. An offer may be made a particular person or...
Words: 5381 - Pages: 22
...contract; this is an invitation to treat. And on another hand Mr. C made verbal agreement not to sell the book to anyone else until Mr. A phones him back in three days with a new offer, this is a new contract, but it does not exist yet. In the case of Mr A and Mr C, Mr A can claim that these was an agreement, and intention because it was a commercial arrangement, he also claim he providing consideration by offering to call back with a new offer. Mr C can defend himself by saying that Mr A argue's was not variable considerable. In the case of Mr D and Mr C: However, next morning when Mr C took deposit from Mr D to hold the book for him till his 18 birthday, that mean he is bound an agreement between him and Mr D, but in meanwhile Mr C breach his a verbal agreement not to sell the book to anyone else until Mr A phone back in three days with new offer, breach his a verbal agreement by making another or new agreement with Mr D next morning, However, there is a contract between Mr D and Mr C but still is avoidable contract, the law apply its validity factors in contract one of the following factors a capacity of Mr D under age 18, that contract can terminate any time before his 18 birthday. The law apply the contract is a valid until it is avoidable. Where is there a contract? how does the law apply? For a distinction grade you should make a supported case for who owns the book. In case of Mr A and Mr A: so there is an agreement, and consideration between Mr A and Mr E, before...
Words: 848 - Pages: 4
...legally binding. a. Offer There must be a definite, clearly stated offer to do something. For example: A quotation by sub-contractor to the main contractor and an offer to lease. An offer does not include ball park estimates, requests for proposals, expressions of interest, or letters of intent. An offer will lapse: * when the time for acceptance expires * if the offer is withdrawn before it is accepted * After a reasonable time in the circumstances (generally the greater the value of the contract, the longer the life of the offer). Invitation to treatAn invitation to treat is a mere declaration of willingness to enter into negotiations; it is not an offer, and cannot be accepted so as to form a binding contract. An agreement is not created if there is an acceptance of the invitation to treat.An invitation to treat is part of the preliminaries of negotiation, whereas an offer is legally binding once accepted, subject to compliance with the terms of the offer. For example: Invitations to treat are advertisements, price lists, circulars and catalogues. | b. Acceptance Only what is offered can be accepted. This means that the offer must be accepted exactly as offered without conditions. If any new terms are suggested this is regarded as a counter offer which can be accepted or rejected. There can be many offers and counter offers before there is an agreement. It is not important who makes the final offer, it is the acceptance of that offer that brings the negotiations...
Words: 2981 - Pages: 12
...Offer and acceptance analysis is a traditional approach in contract law used to determine whether an agreement exists between two parties. An offer is an indication by one person to another of their willingness to contract on certain terms without further negotiations. A contract is then formed if there is express or implied agreement. A contract is said to come into existence when acceptance of an offer has been communicated to the offeror by the offeree. One party, the offeror, makes an offer which once accepted by another party, the offeree, creates a binding contract. The Key concepts in relation to offer and acceptance include the distinction between an offer and an invitation to treat, The case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke ball co. is...
Words: 1755 - Pages: 8
...mean the same thing, actually the term “contract” can be distinguished from the term “agreement”. Every contract involves an element of agreement but not every agreement will results in a contract recognizable by law. This is because sometimes the parties to an agreement may not intend to create legal relations; for example, agreements on social arrangements. Some agreements also do not result in contracts because one or more of the principles governing contractual relations may not have been satisfied; for example, when the purpose of the agreement is illegal, or there is a lack of consideration. The word “contract” may be defined as “an agreement enforceable by law”. In other words, a contract is an agreement which is legally binding between the parties. The legislation in Malaysia governing contract is the Contract Act 1950 (Act 136) (Revised 1974). However, when there are no provisions in the Contract Act 1950 to deal with a particular subject...
Words: 830 - Pages: 4
...1. Formation of the contract Offer and Acceptance * “The law’s treatment of advertisements and the displays of goods in shops reflect ideas of freedom of contract as well as common sense in commerce.” Discuss. Postal Rule * “The postal rule may have been justified by the forms of communication at the time the rule was articulated but its continued use is akin to ‘flogging a dead horse.'’’ Discuss. * “The postal rule may seem anachronistic, yet although it does reflect the age in which it came into being, it remains applicable in the age of electronic communications.” Discuss. * “The postal rule may have been the correct rule to apply to the acceptance of an offer at the time it was created, but in an age of electronic communications it should be abolished.” Discuss. * With reference to the postal rule, critically assess the way in which literature and history can shed light on a principle of law. * The postal rule may have made a lot of sense at the time it was first articulated but it is not suited to modern forms of communication. Discuss. Intention to create legal relations * “The requirement that parties ‘intend to create legal relations’ is an outdated, unjust and unnecessary element of the law of contract formation.” Discuss. * Explain the test or tests that have been used to distinguish between: (1) an invitation to treat and an offer and (2) a counter offer and a request for further information. * “The law on the requirement...
Words: 959 - Pages: 4
...219 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). Under that rule, intangible matter or energy, such as smoke, noise, light, and vibration, are insufficient to constitute a trespass. Id.; Larry D. Scheafer, Annotation, Recovery in Trespass for Injury to Land Caused by Airborne Pollutants, 2 A.L.R. 4th 1054. 2. [23] Nuisance Defined: Restatement §822 defines a private nuisance as a substantial non-trespassory invasion of another’s interest in the private use and enjoyment of land and is either intentional and unreasonable or unintentional and the result of negligence, reckless conduct, or ultrahazardous behavior. Rule of Law: Where the intrusion consist of intangible things such as dust particles, smoke, vibrations, noise, odors, etc., Some courts treats the intrusion as a nuisance...
Words: 4044 - Pages: 17
...Chapter 13 Intention to create legal relations ‘Honour’ clauses: not entered into as formal agreement. expressly intention: consider term expressly and clearly state the parties intention. Implied intention: the courts have to determine objectively whether the parties intended the agreement to be legally enforceable. Society agreement: ones made b/w friends or acquaintances.. other domestic agreement: voluntary agreement, commercial or business agreement. Government contract,AD, 1. Trevey v Grubb (1982) social 中奖一人独吞A three person syndicate won in the lottery. The ticket was in the name of D, who refused to share the prize. This was a social agreement. The nature of the agreement betw. parties was that they must have agreed that it would be enforced in the event of them winning. Thus, there was a contract and P was entitled to share of the winning in proportion to her contribution. 2. Balfour v Balfour [1912] domestic 成功拒绝付生活费D left apart with his wife, and promises to pay $30 a month. But he refused to continue pay. This was a domestic arrangement ‘bcs. the parties did not intend that they should be attended by legal consequences’. At the time the agreement was made the courts did not consider that the marriage had broken down. 3. Merritt v Merritt [1970] family 离婚,但是还要给利息The D left his wife. The parties reached an agreement whereby the D was to transfer his interest in the jointly owned matrimonial home to P. P should succeed, bex. the parties are separated. The agreement...
Words: 6157 - Pages: 25
...apartment for an eight month period. He will pay $ 800 per month. After the tenant had moved out, and when the property was left unoccupied. The tenant had decided to leave the property and early termination of the contract was agreed to by the landlord on the basis that replacement tenants were found. According to the scenario; apply and describe the elements of contract in formation of Rental Contract.Second business scenarioAs an employer, you want an employment contract that protects you and your business, while ensuring a suitable work environment for your employee. When both interests are equitably served, your company and your employee reap benefits. Providing an employment contract essentially replaces the standard hiring understanding between you and your...
Words: 9878 - Pages: 40
...Contract Law Notes Contracts ‘A’ Offer - Bilateral contracts - Unilateral contracts - Offers to the public at large What is an offer? - Mere puff - Supply of information - Invitation to treat Categorizing transactions - Advertisements a) Advertisements in a catalogue or a curricular b) Advertisements in newspapers or magazines c) Advertisements appearing on the internet d) Display of goods - Auctions a) Advertisement of auction b) Auctions with reserves c) Auctions without a reserve - Tendering - Standing offers ➢ Options Communication of an offer Termination of an offer - An offer may be terminated by a) Revocation by the offeror b) Rejected by the offeree c) Lapse of time d) Failure of a condition subject to which the offer was made e) Death Acceptance Requirements of acceptance Acceptance must correspond to offer - Offeree must have knowledge of and act in reliance to an offer Page 9 Page 9 Page 10 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page14 Page14 - A counter offer is not acceptance - Acceptance must be unqualified - Mere enquiry does not constitute acceptance Notification to the offerer of the fact of acceptance - Method of acceptance a) Method of acceptance stipulated by offer b) Acceptance by silence c) Acceptance by conduct - Instantaneous communication: Acceptance must be communicated a) General rule b) Meaning of instantaneous...
Words: 20962 - Pages: 84
...Contracts ‘A’ Offer - Bilateral contracts - Unilateral contracts - Offers to the public at large What is an offer? - Mere puff - Supply of information - Invitation to treat Categorizing transactions - Advertisements a) Advertisements in a catalogue or a curricular b) Advertisements in newspapers or magazines c) Advertisements appearing on the internet d) Display of goods - Auctions a) Advertisement of auction b) Auctions with reserves c) Auctions without a reserve - Tendering - Standing offers ➢ Options Communication of an offer Termination of an offer - An offer may be terminated by a) Revocation by the offeror b) Rejected by the offeree c) Lapse of time d) Failure of a condition subject to which the offer was made e) Death Acceptance Requirements of acceptance Acceptance must correspond to offer - Offeree must have knowledge of and act in reliance to an offer Page 9 Page 9 Page 10 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page14 Page14 - A counter offer is not acceptance - Acceptance must be unqualified - Mere enquiry does not constitute acceptance Notification to the offerer of the fact of acceptance - Method of acceptance a) Method of acceptance stipulated by offer b) Acceptance...
Words: 20964 - Pages: 84
...Elements of the law of contract Catharine MacMillan Richard Stone 2009 LLB 2650040 Diploma in Law 2690040 page 2 University of London External System This subject guide was prepared for the University of London External System by: u Catharine MacMillan BA (Victoria) , LLB (Queen’s, Canada), LLM (Cantab), Lecturer in Law, School of Law, Queen Mary, University of London and u Richard Stone LLB (Soton), LLM (Hull), Barrister, Professor and Head of Law, Lincoln Law School, University of Lincoln. In the 2004 edition of this guide Catharine MacMillan was primarily responsible for Chapters 1–2, 4–5, 7–8, 10–14 and 16–17. Richard Stone was primarily responsible for Chapters 3, 6, 9 and 15. Catharine MacMillan was responsible for the 2009 revision. This is one of a series of subject guides published by the University. We regret that owing to pressure of work the authors are unable to enter into any correspondence relating to, or arising from, the guide. If you have any comments on this subject guide, favourable or unfavourable, please use the form at the back of this guide. Acknowledgements Figure 15.1 has been reproduced by kind permission of: u Figure 15.1: © Illustrated London News Picture Library. Photographs © C. MacMillan, 2003 Publications Office The External System University of London Stewart House 32 Russell Square London WC1B 5DN United Kingdom www.londonexternal.ac.uk Published by the University of London Press ©...
Words: 24271 - Pages: 98
