Do video games contribute to youth violence?
Video Games have been around for a while now and about 98% of the world is playing them. And about 1% of those people are 12 or older, meaning they can play violent games.

Violent video games have been blamed for school shootings, increases in bullying, and violence towards women. Critics argue that these games desensitize players to violence, reward players for simulating violence, and teach children that violence is an acceptable way to resolve conflicts.

Video game advocates contend that a majority of the research on the topic is deeply flawed and that no causal relationship has been found between video games and social violence. They argue that violent video games may reduce violence by serving as a substitute for rough and tumble play and by providing a safe outlet for aggressive and angry feelings.

Should college football replace the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) with a playoff system?
The Bowl Championship Series (BCS) was formed to put the top two BCS-ranked college football teams against each other in a national championship and eight other top teams play in four bowl games. Yes, college football should replace the BCS with a playoff system. If the top two ranked play each other every year you’re possibly watching the same school every year. College football should have a playoff to where a not so good team should play one of the top schools, like in college basketball, therefore if the one of the top schools lose then there really not a top school in college football.

Many football fans argue that a playoff system should replace the BCS. They contend that it is the only fair to determine a national champion and that the BCS method is subjective, profit-motivated, and sometimes leaves the best teams out of the championship game.
Other people argue that the BCS system is in the best interest of the athletes, fans, and sponsors because the bowl games generate huge profits for schools and their local economies, keep the season shorter for student athletes, and almost always have the two best teams playing each other for the national title.

Are social networking sites good for our society?
On social media sites like Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, and LinkedIn, users may develop biographical profiles, communicate with friends and strangers, do research, and share thoughts, photos, music, links, and more. In some ways social networking sites aren’t bad and in some they are. You just have to make sure what your doing before you do it.

Proponents of social networking sites say that the online communities promote increased interaction with friends and family; offer teachers, librarians, and students valuable access to educational support and materials; facilitate social and political change; and disseminate useful information rapidly.

Opponents of social networking say that the sites prevent face-to-face communication; waste time on frivolous activity; expose users to predators like pedophiles and burglars; and spread false and potentially dangerous information.