Hypothesis
H1: Internet causes truancy.
H2: Student fell asleep in class because of late use of internet.
SS: A significant percentage of students in the academically impaired subgroup in this study reported that their Internet use had kept them up late at night, that they sometimes felt tired the next day, and that they missed class due to Internet use. (Kubin, Lavin & Barrows, 2001).

H3: Internet improves the quality of educational.
SS: Internet usage has the potential to improve the quality of education. (Laurillard ,1992)

H4: The use of internet differs by gender.
The male gender dominated internet usage in cyber cafés. (Haseloff (2005), Furuholt et al. (2005), Adomi (2007), Alao and Folorunsho (2007), and Olatokun (2009))

H5: Adolescents is most frequently use of the internet
According to Haseloff (2005), the most internet users were young children and teenagers that belonged to the age group 19 and below.
According to Furuholt et al. (2005), Adomi (2007), Alao and Folorunsho (2007), Adebayo (2008), and Olatokun (2009), the most respondents were in the age group of 20–30 years old.

H6: Children with low levels of internet use had significantly higher test scores than children whom utilized the internet more frequently.
SS: Cant find https://etd.ohiolink.edu/rws_etd/document/get/kent1270316819/inline kate

H7: Adolescents’ Internet use has a direct effect on their internalizing problematic
According to Chou and Hsiao (2000) (as cited in Tahiroglu, Celik, Uzel, Ozcan, & Avci, 2008) reported that some respondents are problematic internet and users spent 20 to 25 hours a week online

H8: Respondents would not show a tendency to use the internet in a cyber café at a particular time of the day when grouped according to profile
H9: Respondents would not show a tendency to use the internet in a cyber café at a particular time of the day when grouped according to profile
Determinant of profile of the respondents, the following constructs were adopted: place of residence (Adomi, Okiy, & Ruteyan, 2003; Olatokun, 2009), age (Furuholt et al., 2005; Adomi, 2007; Alao & Folorunsho, 2007; Ishii & Wu, 2006; Olatokun, 2009), sex (Haseloff, 2005; Furuholt et al., 2005; Adomi et al., 2004; Adomi, 2007 ; Adomi et al., 2003; Olatokun, 2009), employment (Furuholt et al., 2005; Adomi et al., 2004; Ishii & Wu, 2006), educational background (Haseloff, 2005; Furuholt et al., 2010; Adomi et al., 2004; Ishii & Wu, 2006; Adebayo, 2008; Olatokun, 2009), religious affiliation (Williams, Yee, & Caplan, 2008; Griffiths, Davies, & Chappell, 2004), civil status (Furuholt et al., 2005; Wahid, Furuholt, & Kristiansen, 2004; Alao & Folorunsho, 2007; Adebayo, 2008), personal computer ownership (Gurol & Sevindik, 2006), and income (Furuholt et al., 2005; Ishii & Wu, 2006; Adebayo, 2008; Olatokun, 2009). Is it correct?zzz

H: Excessive usage of internet among undergraduate students is high.
SS: If the users do not know how to use the internet wisely, it may bring bad effects to their studies, health, social relationship and etc (Fatin, 2012).

H: Student spend more time on surfing internet.
SS) Students have broadened their uses of the Internet and increasingly incorporated it into their daily lives (Jones, 2009).

H: Social networks as a significant influence in the academic performance of students.
SS) According to Saba Mehmood and Tarang Taswir (January, 2013), Use of technology such as internet is one of the most important factors that can influence educational performance of students positively or adversely.

H: Internet brings benefit to undergraduate students for academic purposes
H: Quality of the work improves when using the Internet
SS) Internet brought about positive changes to teachers and instructors, who taught students to learn, work, communicate, and play. (Charp, 2000)
SS) Internet enables students to find information and experts, as well as allowing users to think critically and creatively, become collaborative and cooperative, and solve problems (Dryli & Kinnaman , 1996)

H: The portion of student that surfing internet is higher than student that do not surfing the internet.
SS: The International Information & Library Review (2006) found that the portion of student that surfing internet is higher than student that do not surfing the internet from the survey result they obtain. 1. Top of Form 2. Bottom of Form