Drug courts are specialized courts designed to handle the adult, nonviolent offenders with substance abuse problems, incorporating an intensely supervised drug treatment program is an alternative to standard sentencing (Levinthal, 2012). Several of the characteristics of drug courts include early identification and placement of eligible participants, drug treatment with clearly defined rules and goals, a non-adversarial approach, a monitoring of abstinence, judicial involvement and interaction with the participants, and a team approach which judges, defense attorneys, prosecutors, probation officers, and treatment counselors coordinate their efforts. Those offenders who complete the program successfully may have their charges dropped or sentences …show more content…
Accessible rationales nearly take after devices that can be imaginatively utilized by performing artists to accomplish individual and hierarchical objectives. A nearby investigation of court transactions enabled the investigator to distinguish the rationale that is accessible to these on-screen characters, indicate how they are utilized, and show how their utilization influences the seriousness of the court's choices. The investigators look at the manners by which experts with four particular sensible introductions, the rationale of criminal discipline, recovery, network responsibility and proficiency, utilize rationale to arrange choices in a drug court. These experts give proof of the optional utilization of these rationales, determining the procedural, definitional, and dispositional imperatives that cutoff on-screen characters' caution and propose a clarification for why experts stray from their "home" rationale and "seize" the rationale of other court performing artists. Inspecting these micro-level procedures enhances our comprehension of how nearby on-screen characters utilize rationale to oversee institutional unpredictability, achieve agreement, and get the work of the court