The question of is it acceptable for a student to use a solutions manual to answer a problem or case lies at the core of the Delta State Graduate Catalog. According to the Delta State Graduate Catalog, the university expects all students to adhere to the highest moral academic standards while attending the university. In compliance with this policy, it would be unethical for a student to use a solutions manual to help solve any problem or case assigned.
Using a solutions manual would fall under the definition of cheating that is clearly outlined in the Delta State Graduate Catalog. In an example listed it states the use of notes or any other aid not specifically allowed or approved by the instructor as cheating (DSU Graduate Catalog, p. 26). Within the scope of the definition, the use of the manual would only be permitted if the student receives permission from the instructor (DSU Graduate Catalog, P. 26).
In this case, since the instructor did not allow for the use of the manual, the student is in violation. If the student is suspected of using the solutions manual, the instructor can schedule an appointment with the student for the appropriate action to be taken. Penalties can range from the failing of a final exam to dismal from the university (DSU Graduate Catalog, p. 28). Students are allowed to appeal the recommend punishment stated in the university’s undergraduate and graduate bulletins (DSU Graduate Catalog, p.28).
The IMA Statement of Ethical Professional Practice is very clear on the importance of ethical behavior it expects. IMA has overarching principals that include: honesty, fairness, objectivity, and responsibly. The IMA believes that all members should adhere to these principles. Under current IMA ethical guidelines, it would not be ethical for a student to use a solutions manual on the take home exam.
