Premium Essay

Durkheims Theory of Division of Labour

In:

Submitted By sikoo619619
Words 1936
Pages 8
Essay on Durkheim’s Theory of Division of Labour

by Sikandar Khan Essay on Durkheim’s Theory of Division of Labour – Durkheim’s “Theory of Division of Labour” is often regarded as his major contribution to the field of sociological thought. Durkheim’s doctoral thesis, “Division of Labour in Society” – 1.893, is his first major book. In this, the influence of Auguste Comte is clearly evident.

The theme of this book is the relationship between individuals and society or the collectivity. It is indeed a classic study of social solidarity. In this book he reacted against the view that modern industrial society could be based simply upon agreement between individuals motivated by self-interest and without any prior consensus. He agreed that the kind of consensus in modern society was different from that in simpler social systems. But he saw both of these as two types of social solidarity.

In his famous work “The Division of Labour in Society” Durkheim tried to determine the social consequences of the division of labour in modern societies. A major theme in all Durkheim’s writings is the importance of shared social norms and values in maintaining social cohesion and solidarity. He argued that the nature of this social solidarity depends on the extent of the division of labour.

Meaning of Division of Labour:

The concept of “Division of Labour” has been used in three ways:

(i) in the sense of the technical division of labour, it describes the production process;

(ii) as the sexual division of labour, it describes social divisions between men and women;

(iii) as the social division of labour, it refers to differentiation in society as a whole. [It is in the third sense that Durkheim uses this term.]

In a general sense, the term division of labour involves the assignment to each unit or group a specific share of a common task.

As used by the

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Discuss Durkheim’s Theory of Social Solidarity and Organic Solidarity.

...LEGAL ETHICS Discuss Durkheim’s theory of social solidarity and organic solidarity. Durkheim’s theory states that a society is like an organism with different structures and functions, he acknowledges the presence of individuals and social solidarity. He believed that a society is held by a division of labour and that the structure can be changed over time. His basic argument is that there are two types of social solidarity, mechanical solidarity and organic solidarity.. Societies with limited division of labour fall under mechanical solidarity and societies with high division of labour fall under organic solidarity.In both societies individuals act according to what they are obliged to do for others,so each person is recognized for their contributions to the society.Social morality in this sense is ‘strictly necessary’ for solidarity between people to occur; without morality, “societies cannot exist.’” (Grabb, p. 79).According to Giddens (p. 73), the main substantive problem for Durkheim stems from “an apparent moral ambiguity concerning the relationship between the individual and society in the contemporary world.” Mechanical solidarity is the solidarity that comes with likeness,the early societies tended to be small and simple.Durkheim also adds that mechanical solidarity mean the common ideas and tendancies of members the societies are larger in number than individual ideas and tendencies.The division of labour was little and it was divided by sex and age.In this...

Words: 1097 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Classical Social Thought

...varley@nuigalway.ie Course Description: The classical sociological tradition has been heavily dominated by the writings of Marx, Weber and Durkheim. Each of these three theorists has carved out a distinctive approach to the study of society and, in the process, has contributed substantially to our understanding of the transition from pre-modern to modern society. There are many who would argue that the ideas of these three classical figures continue to have much to offer to an understanding of contemporary society and politics. There are several possible ways to study the ideas of Marx, Weber and Durkheim. In this course we will attempt to take a thematic and comparative approach by comparing the views of Marx, Weber and Durkheim on a number of central topics. We will look therefore at their ideas concerning the methods appropriate to the study of society, their views on class and the division of labour, on democratic politics and the state and on culture, religion and ideology. Our discussion will begin with a consideration of what a ‘classical’ tradition might look like in the social sciences; and of why Marx, Weber and Durkheim merit inclusion as the most significant members within such a tradition. For a fuller appreciation of the classical tradition in social theory there is no substitute for a reading of the original writings of Marx, Durkheim and Weber. As these writings are very extensive, we will rely on a number of commentaries – principally those by Morrison and Giddens...

Words: 2278 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Emile Durkheim

...STUDIES COURSE CODE: SWD112 COURSE TITLE: INTRODUCTION TO SOCIOLOGY QUESTION PICK ANY SOCIOLOGY FOUNDING FATHER, WRITE HIS OR HER CONTRIBUTION TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIOLOGY BY HEZEKIAH KELLY .M.O. D12SG0016 DATE: JUNE 2013 EMILE DAVID DURKHEIM (1858 – 1917) BRIEF HISTORY AND EARLY LIFE STAGES OF DURKHEIM Durkheim was born in the eastern Pascoag providence of Lorraine, which at that time was part of Germany, on April 15th 1858. He came from a long line of conservative French Jews but, he decided early in his life he would not follow in his family’s footsteps. He led a completely secular lifestyle. he never completely detached himself from his family or the Jewish community. Many of his colleagues and students were either from the Jewish community or of blood relation. In 1879 Durkheim entered École Normale Supérieure, as a very promising student. That year’s class was one of the most brilliant in the nineteenth century. Many of his classmates, such as Jean Jaurès and Henri Bergson, went on to become very influential to France’s history. Very early in his career, Durkheim became interested in the scientific approach to society by reading works by social scientists, Herbert Spencer and Auguste Comte, and studying with Numa Denis Fustel de Coulanges. Thus, he found many problems with the French Academic System, because they had no social science curriculum. After studying social science...

Words: 1798 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

The Last Hoper

...finally a positive explanation. The positive explanation is derived from an objective examination of the phenomena. Comte believed that students should concern themselves only with phenomena that have an objective, "positive," existence. This belief forms a basis of positivism. He also has given importance to "social static and social Mobility" and cleared that changes of society can be understood on these basis. His contribution in field of Social reconstruction is related to social welfare of human beings, which should be studied with social methods. Comte regarded all social thought as an interrelated whole, the laws of which can be found by assembling what he considered the facts. His ideas have influenced students of historical and social theory, and of criminology, and such authors as Herbert Spencer and John Stuart Mill, who were seeking a "science of society." Spencer, Herbert (1820-1903), was a British philosopher. He attempted to work out a comprehensive philosophy based on the scientific discoveries of his day. Spencer was greatly influenced by the English naturalist Charles Darwin. He applied his own and Darwin's fundamental law--the idea of evolution (gradual development)--to...

Words: 1330 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

“Contributions Made by Karl Marx, Max Weber and Emile Durkheim to the Research Methodology Used in Social Sciences”

...RESPONSE PAPER “Contributions made by KARL MARX, MAX WEBER and EMILE DURKHEIM to the research methodology used in social sciences” INTRODUCTION The paper mainly concerns the contributions of MARX, WEBER and DURKHEIM to the methodology in social sciences. The various methodologies in social sciences establish a connection with the societal implications which have a large impact over the society and its normative effects. Referring to the contributions by the following sociologists, all have a different and influential impact on the factors of society. The methodology of various sociologists reflects their attitude towards the society and its various customs and traditions. The following mentioned are the various methodologies adopted by sociologists in the field of social sciences. Marxist sociology emerged around late 19th/early 20th century, influenced by the thought of Karl Marx. Marx is seen as one of the most influential thinkers in early sociology, alongside thinkers such as Max Weber and Émile Durkheim. KARL MARX The theory propounded by Karl Marx is Marxism; in a nutshell it is the theory and practice of working-class emancipation. Marxism is also a method of looking at the world. One of the most important foundations of Marx's method was dialectical thought. Marx relied a lot on historical materialism and dialecticism to propound his theories in social science. Marx relied heavily on these two methods for social...

Words: 1776 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Assess the Contribution of Functionalism Theories. (33 Marks)

...Assess the contribution of Functionalism theories. (33 marks) Functionalism, devised by Durkheim and Parsons, is a structural theory focusing on the needs of the whole social system and how these shape society’s main features, for example social institutions and humans’ behavioural patterns. The theory is a consensus theory in which views society as based on value consensus (agreement) between its inhabitants about their values, goals and rules. Durkheim saw modern industrial society as based on a complex division of labour which promotes differences between groups, weakening social solidarity. He argued that the resultant freedom to the individual must be regulated by society to prevent extreme egoism from destroying all social bonds. Essentially, he saw society as external and independent to individuals, being made up of ‘social facts’ that constrain and shape people’s behaviour to meet society’s functional prerequisites (needs). Durkheim further believed that if any one thing (‘social fact’) exists, it has a function which will help meet society’s needs, the key ones of which are goals (met through political institutions, e.g. parliament), adaptation (meeting members’ material needs, e.g. through the economy), integration (socialising members into the shared values and goals of society, e.g. through education and the media) and latency (maintaining society through reproduction of its members). Functionalists describe society using an organic analogy and compare it...

Words: 1186 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Crime & Society - Durkheim's Theory of Crime

...normal occurrence and it was impossible to have a society totally devoid of crime, as all societies have rules and sanctions in case these are broken. Punishment deters crime but maintains social cohesion, setting boundaries and delivering order (“functionalism”). Healthy levels of crime are most likely in mechanical societies as they have a natural cohesion. An unhealthy level is more likely to arise in an organic society and is the result of the law being inadequate to regulate the interactions of the various parts of that society. The incomplete integrations gives rise to anomie, the result of which is excessive or unhealthy levels of crime. Durkheim used three levels of division: (i) a combination of financial crisis and industrial conflict, (ii) rigid and unnatural class division, (iii) an abnormal division of labour. Before anomie can be said to exist, the major factor which needs to be present is a financial or industrial crisis – a depression as in 1930s or unrealistic and precarious prosperity, stating “No living...

Words: 1020 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Religion

...]Introduction: Good afternoon ladies and Gentlemen. Welcome to the conference. Today Professor Durkheim will be addressing us on his views in terms of: Industrialization: Division of labour: Social Solidarity: Suicide: Religion: He has brought some of his esteemed colleagues, who will be assisting him in his presentation. Let’s Welcome Professor Durkheim. (Enter Shaun) Industrialization is associated with the urbanization of society, an extensive division of labour, a wage economy, differentiation of institutions, and growth of mass communication and mass markets. Durkheim believes that there are two aspects to the division of labour: 1. Increases both the reproductive capacity and skill of the workman, it is the necessary condition for the intellectual and material development in societies. 2. DOL has a moral character which is more important. It can create a feeling of solidarity between two or more people (Samantha) There are two types of solidarity: 1. Mechanical solidarity- links the individual to society without any intermediary. Society is organized collectively and is composed of beliefs common to all members of the group. The bond which unites the individual with society is completely analogous to that which links the thing to the person. The individual consciousness depends on the collective consciousness. 2. Organic solidarity- the society is a system of different functions united by definite relationships (83). This brings about the...

Words: 870 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Emile Durkheim

...Topic 2: Emile Durkheim Many company and corporate advertisements celebrate the values of community, such as this one from Starbucks (NYT Magazine 12/17/07, p. 83). It states: Community: “People you share space with, some that you know and some that you don’t. Your lives have a common thread, a tie that binds, whether it’s where you live or beliefs you have or the fact that you give when they need. Yes, it can be as simple as that.” Discuss how this Starbucks advertisement captures the different meanings of community associated with Durkheim’s concepts of mechanical solidarity and organic solidarity. Find additional examples that illustrate the value of community as both a local and a global phenomenon. Solidarity refers to the integration amongst groups of people and neighbors within society due to social ties that may arise from common responsibilities and interests. Social bonds are created between people from these communal ties which revolves around the principles of shared morals, values, kinship and association. According to Durkheim without the smooth correspondence of morality and social organization to form a properly functioning society through social cohesion and adaption social ties will be nonexistent hence creating anomie. This essay will be covering both mechanical solidarity and organic solidarity, showing the differences and overlapping factors in relation to the Starbucks advertisement. Following Durkheim's concept of mechanical solidarity and organic...

Words: 942 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Critically Asses the Usefulness of the Functionalist Perspective to Our Understanding of Society (33 Marks)

...in. There are many functionalists theorists who try to explain society which will be discussed below. A main Functionalist is Emile Durkheim who believes that sociology is a science. He is a structuralist and positivist and thus disagrees with empathy, meanings and the social action theory. Functionalists believe that society is based around a value consensus and social solidarity, which is achieved by socialisation and social control. Other theorists such as Marxists and feminists would argue against this. Durkheim sought to explain social stability through the concept of solidarity, and differentiated between the mechanical solidarity of primitive societies and the organic solidarity of complex modern societies. According to Durkheim, more primitive or traditional societies were held together by mechanical solidarity; these societies have people involved in similar roles so labour division is simple. Therefore, a similar lifestyle is lived with common shared norms and values and beliefs. They have a consensus of opinion on moral issues giving society a social solidarity to guide behaviour. As there is a societal agreement, there is pressure to follow the value consensus, so therefore most do. Organic Solidarity showed that Industrialisation meant population grew rapidly with urbanisation occurring. As society develops, a division of labour occurs. This is when work...

Words: 1083 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Introduction to Sociology

...Assignment Community and Family Studies Date of submission 14-11-2013 Word count 1362 The aim of this study is to compare and contrast Marx and Durkheim’s theories of society and social change. Compare draw an analogy between one thing and another for the purposes of explanation or clarification: (Anon., 2013) Contrast the state of being strikingly different from something else in juxtaposition or close association: (Anon., 2013) In conclusion Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx challenged the aspect of social structure in their works. Emile Durkheim is known as functionalist states that everything serves a function in society and his main concern to discover what that role was. In contrast Karl Marx, a conflict theorist, emphases that society is a complicated structure characterized by inequality and conflict that generates social change. Equally Durkheim and Marx were bothered with the characteristics of groups and structures rather than with individuals. Durkheim employed the concept of social intergration in his study of suicide particularly in relation to the strength of social bonds between the individual and society. ( slide number Lisa Walshe 2006) Marx was concerened with class conflict.He saw that the concentrations of industrys wealth were increasingly in the hands of a few “in a society so rich how could so many be so poor”...

Words: 1492 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Functionalism

...Assess the contribution of Functionalism and New Right theories and research to our understanding of society today. (33 marks) Functionalism, devised by Durkheim and Parsons, is a structural theory focusing on the needs of the whole social system and how these shape society’s main features (e.g. social institutions, humans’ behavioural patterns). It is a consensus theory, seeing society as based on value consensus (agreement) between its inhabitants about their values, goals and rules. The New Right is a conservative, political perspective that shares similarities with Functionalism (e.g. believing some people are more naturally talented than others) but contradicts it in arguing that the state should have less involvement in society (e.g. by cutting welfare). Durkheim saw modern industrial society as based on a complex division of labour which promotes differences between groups, weakening social solidarity. He argued that the resultant freedom to the individual must be regulated by society to prevent extreme egoism from destroying all social bonds. Resultantly, he saw society as external and independent to individuals, being made up of ‘social facts’ that constrain and shape people’s behaviour to meet society’s functional prerequisites (needs). Durkheim further believed that if any one thing (‘social fact’) exists, it has a function which will help meet society’s needs, the key ones of which are goals (met through political institutions, e.g. parliament), adaptation (meeting...

Words: 1668 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Chuvaek

...Emile Durkheim Biography Émile Durkheim was a famous French philosopher and sociologist. This biography profiles his childhood, career, works, achievements, trivia and timeline. Quick Facts ALSO LISTED IN Sociologists, Philosophers ALSO KNOWN AS Emile Durkheim, David Émile Durkheim, Durkheim FAMOUS AS Sociologist & Philosopher NATIONALITY French Famous French Men RELIGION Agnosticism BORN ON 15 April 1858 AD BIRTHDAY 15th April Famous 15th April Birthdays DIED AT AGE 59 SUN SIGN Aries Aries Men BORN IN Épinal DIED ON 15 November 1917 AD PLACE OF DEATH Paris SPOUSE: Louise Dreyfus CHILDREN Marie Durkheim, Andre Durkheim EDUCATION Lycée Louis-le-Grand École Normale Supérieure Leipzig University FOUNDER/CO-FOUNDER Modern Sociology Emile Durkheim David Émile Durkheim is regarded as the principal architect of modern social science and father of sociology. Born into a family of a long line of rabbis, he broke away from the Jewish tradition and produced many secular works. His first major sociological work, ‘The Division of Labor in Society’, discussed how modern society is held together by a division of labor that makes individuals dependent upon one another. In ‘Rules of the Sociological Method’, he put forward the need for scientific approach in the study of sociology, a revolutionary thought in that period of time. He set up the first European department of sociology and became France's first professor of sociology and also established the...

Words: 807 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Criminalization Of Homelessness In Ontario Women's Justice Network

...Durkheim believes that the division of labour was to count for the distinctions of classes. They don’t ever come in real social contact with one another (Lecture). As lemert puts it, “there might not be social bonds strong enough to unite the separated parts of the socially divided labour force. There is nothing to guide and encourage individuals to heal their social divisions and resolve their individual senses of confusion and isolation” (72). This division is problematic because those that are poor are penalized for being homeless because higher classes only care about power and wealth. The Ontario Women’s Justice Network says that “the homeless feel isolation because there is a growing public indifference to the needs of the very poor and marginalized, in addition to a toxic "punish the poor" mentality (1). The poor don’t always have a lot of public support from political and economic structures and in turn they feel confused as to how to improve their...

Words: 2014 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Outline and Assess Sociological Explanations of Social Class Stratification (40 Marks)

...socioeconomic tiers based on factors like wealth, income, social status, occupation, and power. Stratification is the relative social position of a person in a given social group. Functionalists such as Durkheim believe that class stratification exists because it is functional and beneficial towards social order and noted that societies are often characterized by a specialized occupational division of labour. According to Durkheim, members within a society are happy and comfortable within their position within the division of labour because there is a common agreement about how society should be organized which is referred to as value consensus. This also means that people accept social stratification as they see that different occupations should be graded in terms of their value to society and therefore those who have jobs which provide the most reward to society should in turn receive the most reward within a society. Durkheim also saw stratification as a benefit to society because it sets a limit to people’s aspirations and therefore people do not become overly ambitious and therefore disappointed when they are unable to reach specific goals. Instead, as the stratification system is regarded as equal and fair, people are contented with their position is society. However, Durkheim noted that there were some flaws within his argument as he saw that if people are unable to compete for jobs or specific roles within a job then moral consensus and solidarity could potentially break...

Words: 780 - Pages: 4