...Economic Inequality in the United States According to the Gross Domestic Product, also known as GDP, United States was measured the “largest” economy in the world (Mahoney 10/27/2015). However, all Americans do not share the high standard of living in the U.S. Levels of income and wealth inequality have always been high in the United States. While it is ideal for a democratic country like the United States to have political equality, the reality shows that this is not the case; as economic inequality ultimately causes political inequality under the current system of government. Income inequality has not only been prevalent, but has been polarizing further since the 1970s. Currently, twenty-percent of the population takes home 50% of the total income and the top 1% takes home 25% of the income and owns 40% of total wealth (Mahoney, 2015 October 27). While CEOs of the Fortune 100 makes over $14 million a year, an average worker makes $45,230 a year; this is a clear illustration of the income disparity in the United States. Further, it is worth mentioning that such trends are not necessary common; the United States has always had higher levels of income and wealth inequality when compared to other rich democracies (Mahoney, 2015 October 27). The average household income is currently stagnant, which suggest that the average household cannot easily grow economically in the U.S and cannot help close the income inequality gap. In the movie Inequality for All, the manager of Circuit...
Words: 1329 - Pages: 6
...If we are to decipher economic inequality, there are several stems that create the divide, and one of them is the educational system. In 1779, a suggestion was made by Thomas Jefferson for an educational system that gave citizens one of two categories to fall under, “labor or learning”. Thomas Jefferson believed this method would be helpful in “raking a few geniuses from the rubbish.”(Raceforward) Essentially, the wealthy were categorized to learn prosperous career skills while those not as fortunate would be provided the basics and taught labor work skills. The U.S. still holds on to this antiquated way of thinking and, as a nation, continue to divide people by their economic stature and have private schools for the wealthy and public schools...
Words: 367 - Pages: 2
...Chapter seven of American Democracy in Peril has Hudson describing economic inequality, which is both the lack of equality in opportunity, including income mobility, and the diminishing equality of condition present in the United States. Hudson argues that due to wealth and income shifting greatly in favor of the rich at the expense of all other Americans, economic inequality is threatening political equality. I agree with Carnegie’s view on investing in the people rather than hoarding, but Hudson shows that the latter is what the United States has been building to over the last 50 years. Instead of investing in ourselves and improving the standard of living for all, the United States now has less income mobility than the countries people...
Words: 909 - Pages: 4
...effects on economic inequality Maastricht University | | | | School of Business & Economics | | | | Place & date: | 18th November 2014 | | Name, initials: | Große Entrup, Carina | | ID number: | I6096321 | | Study: | International Business | | Course code: | ebc1009 | | Group number: | 46 | | Tutor name: | Emre Ergin | | Writing tutor name: | Kirsty Donald | | Writing assignment: | Main Paper (Task 10) | | number of words: | 1990 | | carina.grosseentrup@maastrichtuniversity.nl Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Government intervention 3. Government intervention to reduce income inequality 3.1 In-kind transfers 3.2 Minimum wage 3.2.1 Effects of minimum wage on labour market 3.3 Income tax 4. Conclusion 1. Introduction Although income grew by almost three percent per year for all income classes in the period from 1950 to 1980, the ones that were mostly blessed with the highest income growth were the top earners (McDowell, 2012). Income can differ enormously between the different classes of a society and the range between the top earners and those at the bottom of the society becomes larger and larger. Income inequality is a wide discussed topic by all social classes. The well earning upper-class, people who have to struggle with a minimum living wage and the shrinking middle-class, which has to worry most about its future living situation, are affected by it (Mankiw, 2012). Economic inequality...
Words: 2340 - Pages: 10
...levels of human and financial capital (Block and Wagner, 2010; Lippmann et al., 2005; Reynolds et al., 2002; Verheul et al., 2010). Concurrently, opportunity entrepreneurship is expected to have a greater potential to foster productivity levels (Block and Wagner, 2010; Wennekers et al., 2005; Wong et al., 2005) by contributing to the technological shocks that neoclassical economists identify as the key drivers of economic growth (Kydland and Prescott, 1982). Although necessity entrepreneurship can potentially contribute to growth too, its economic impact is more likely to be redistributive (Lippmann et al., 2005). The motivation to pursue and engage in entrepreneurship is expected to be influenced by the surrounding socioeconomic conditions, comprising a vast array of contextual factors that may buffer or promote entrepreneurial intentions, motivations, and actions by individuals in a given country (Carsrud and Brannback, 2011; Lippmann et al., 2005; Verheul et al., 2010). Here, we provide a novel empirical study of the influence of economic inequality on the...
Words: 577 - Pages: 3
...–Plutarch. Inequality has been a problem for a long time, and every country has some form of inequality. It can be economic, social, and gender. Inequality is an issue, but there need to be poor for there to be rich. The problem is the gap between the rich and the poor. The distribution of wealth is too uneven. The main purpose of this essay is to address the question that many people are asking themselves: is inequality a consequence of too much or too little government intervention. The government intervenes in the economy in four ways. First, it produces public goods and services, such as education, infrastructure, national defense, and health care....
Words: 933 - Pages: 4
...Of all industrialized and advanced, countries the United States has the most unequal dispersion of income. At a time of significant economic inequality, those with more money should pay more tax than others who make less than half of their earnings, progressive taxation. The gap between CEO pay and the pay of the typical workers has risen dramatically since the Great Recession, as shown in the movie Inequality for all, the typical male worker in 1978 was making approximately $50,000 as to where the typical 1% was making about $390,000 and by 2010 the typical male worker was earning less then he did then where the person at the top earned more than twice as much as he did before. As said by Robert Reich “instead of eliminating the tax on rich people, we should increase it back to level it was in the late 1990’s” due to the fact being that the economy did well back then. When the division between both classes progresses over a precise aspect, it...
Words: 559 - Pages: 3
...You might’ve heard that economic inequality in the United States has been rising with the richest 1% of its population percent of the countries annual income.The USA is much higher than in any other developed country in the world including the United Kingdom ,Germany Japan and etc but why is this a problem with the best majority of economist. An international organization quality is bad economy one reason being that it limits opportunities for people with lower incomes to get the education and also it is because consumers to buy the goods and services being produced or business. Service is being produced or business it would go bankrupt but it’s not like the very rich are going to buy 1 million thousand watches.Instead they land a large...
Words: 274 - Pages: 2
...Capitalism is one of the most distinguishing feature of American society, and its success sets our country apart from others in many ways. Economic market exchanges promote freedom and individual power. Yet, in some ways, capitalism may undermine democracy and increase inequality both within the United States and across the globe. The role of capitalism is to increase economic activity, and the role of democracy is to enable citizens to collectively decide how this economic wealth generated should be divided and to decide what rules apply to public and private goods. This sounds ideal, but capitalism can widen inequalities of income and wealth, created a heightened sense of job insecurity, and create environmental hazards. Ownership of wealth gives you the upper hand; once you have it, it will only get easier for you to attain more. Children who are born into families with immense amounts of wealth are guaranteed money and a greater quality of life, therefore setting them up for more success than those children of underprivileged children. This generates inequality from the very beginning of life. Under the concept of concentration of power lies the market dynamic. Winners in economic...
Words: 507 - Pages: 3
...1. The United States became a leading industrial power in the nineteenth century because of new technologies, and railroad network. Since farmers moved to western to find large cheap land, and the improved of farm tools: mechanical reapers, the agricultural productivity developed (Roark 305). The Mechanization reduced labor demand but increased productivity on manufacturing (Roark 306). Railroad network expanded in nineteenth century speeding up transfer and lower the cost (Roark 306). The development of science and technology caused the US economy had been rapid development. 2. The economic inequalities were a shadow of the free-labor ideal and showed the difference (Roark 311). The economic inequalities were considered to be the inevitable...
Words: 437 - Pages: 2
...3. Economic growth is arguably a very important factor to eliminate poverty or reduce inequality. However, along with the creation of jobs and reduction in poverty, there has been evidence that suggests this is not always the case. E.g. Both China and India have witnessed widening inequality as their growth rates picked up over the 1990s (Department for International development). Economic growth will only reduce poverty if the wages of the lowest paid workers rise faster than the average wage rate and the growth increases job opportunities, which reduces unemployment levels, alongside a few more factors. Also, if everyone benefits and there is pro-poor growth, then EG will reduce poverty, which the Kuznets Curve demonstrates. This states that...
Words: 390 - Pages: 2
...I agree with the text that with individual discrimination that it is better to address the problem with the individual, implement a punishment, and move on from the issue. However, with institutional discrimination, because it is pervasive and ongoing within business and organizations deciding who deserves rewards. It is difficult to see this in everyday interactions, but that is because it is tied into the way everything is done within the organization. An example the book gives is a performance evaluation for advancement. This is very common in business. I experience a job evaluation for all of my raises or attempts of advancement at walmart. However, because I am a young woman I never had enough “experience” to get past the “job evaluation” part of advancement. Every time they always chose a male that had less education than I did so I do not feel the evaluation was of any purpose except to hold individuals back from higher positions. I find it very interesting that lookism is being addressed by the ADA in any way. It does seem that it would very hard to prove that you are unattractive and that it causes impairment. The authors’ suggest the looking glass as a more appropriate metaphor because it recognizes the complicated nature and obvious hidden barriers to advancement in organizations such as stereotypes, attractiveness, or choices. I think that this relates to what I said about my experience trying to advance in walmart. There are systems in place to make things...
Words: 634 - Pages: 3
...Income inequality in Turkey and its causes and effects on the Turkish population Maastricht University | | | | School of Business & Economics | | | | Place & date: | Maastricht,08 December 2014 | Name, initials: | Canli, T | ID number: | 6091093 | Study: | International Business | Course code: | ebc1009 | Group number: | 1 | Tutor name: | Pierfrancesco, Guarino | Writing tutor name: | Campbell, Gabriel | Writing assignment: | Main Paper (Task 10) | | | t.canli@maastrichtuniversity.nl Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Income Inequality and its components 2 3. Gini coefficient and inequality 3 4. Turkey´s economic structure 3 5. Wage distribution in Turkey 4 6. Main causes of inequality 5 6.1 Return on capital and increase of economic input 5 6.2 Relationships between people and social mobility 5 7. Effects on Turkish population 6 7.1 Education, child labor and social mobility 6 8. Possible solutions 7 9. Conclusion 8 10. Works Cited 9 11. Figures 10 12. Tables 10 1. Introduction In the past decades the topic “Economic Inequality” has risen in popularity. The reason for this trend is mostly because economic inequality has risen drastically around the world. There are many forms of economic inequality, e.g. gender inequality, regional disparities, and wage inequality, only to name a few. Thus many politicians are discussing about economic inequality, particularly in Turkey. The largest driving...
Words: 2421 - Pages: 10
...Globalisation has intensified inequality Globalisation has built a set of prospects for mainly large firms around the world with declines in tariffs or creation of free trade areas (Celik 2010). Although globalisation has increase economic growth substantially it does however also increase the economic and social gap within and between countries. Income inequality in particular is the effect of globalisation through foreign direct investment. According to the World Development Indicators 2005 (World Bank, 2005), the richest country Norway has a per capita income of $43, 400 whereas the poorest countries Burundi and Ethiopia have a per capita income of $90. These show the huge gap between the poorest and richest countries per capita income. These numbers raised the question “Has globalisation led to a greater income inequality or less?” In the article ‘Is globalisation reducing poverty and inequality’, Wade (2004) questions the empirical basis of the neoliberal argument. The neoliberal argument says that the distribution of income between the entire world’s people has become more equal over the past two decades and the number of people living in extreme poverty has fallen. It states that these progressive trends are due in large part to the rising density of economic integration between countries, which has made for rising efficiency of resource use worldwide as countries and regions specialize in line with their comparative advantage. This is partially true as...
Words: 1646 - Pages: 7
...Confronting Inequality In the article “Confronting Inequality” Paul Krugman compares the new millennia to the 1970’s and has many financial stats to back his theory of income inequality. He backs up his claims with facts and figures, but also gives his own solutions to these problems. Krugman states, “ The ugliness of our politics is in large part a reflection of the inequality of our income distribution.” He states that in the 1960’s was that the governments was in place to sere the best interests of society and that many in modern society believe that government only serves “a few big interests”. His other argument is comparing or capital gains tax to that of other countries. Paul backs up his argument,...” very highly trained British employees face an effective tax rate almost 48 percent in France people with 15 percent in the United States”. Another point he made, he quotes Eric Uslaner and Mitchel Brown is, “In a world of haves and have nots those at either end of the economic spectrum have little reason to believe that most people can be trusted... social trust rest on a foundation of economic equality.” This quote makes me think that in his view everyone serves a function. Some more tan others and strive for economic equality is what we base our lives around. We need people to work in Slaughterhouses, build our cars, and clean our sewers. The fear is that people will not do these jobs without a monetary stimulant. How I interpreted Paul Krugman’s response was the...
Words: 748 - Pages: 3
