Free Essay

Economic Policies of Khrushchev and Brezhnev

In:

Submitted By AnnabelleBarnes
Words 994
Pages 4
2015 A-Level paper.
Received high level 4

How successful were the economic policies of the USSR from 1953-82?

The economic policies of the USSR from 1953-82 were quite unsuccessful. The agricultural policies were unsuccessful, but the industrial policies were successful. This essay will measure success by the impact on the economy, for example whether the industrial change met or succeeded their targets. In 1953, Stalin died and Khrushchev succeeded him as leader of the Soviet Union. Between then and his fall from power, he had to legitimise his leadership, as well as introduce his policy of de-Stalinisation. In addition, Khrushchev wanted to reform failing policies, while still keeping to his successful policies. Brezhnev then succeeded Khrushchev as leader of the Soviet Union and then died in 1982. He wanted to move away from Khrushchev and consolidate his position as leader of the Soviet Union. To measure the success of these policies, this essay will focus on Khrushchev's Seven-Year plan, sovnarkozy and the Virgin Lands Scheme. In addition, this essay will also study Brezhnev's reforms of agriculture, his ninth Five-Year Plan and the Kosygin reforms.

It can be argued that the economic policies of the USSR from 1953-82 were not successful under Khrushchev because of the failure of the Virgin Lands Scheme and the agricultural policies under Brezhnev. Under the Virgin Lands Scheme, 6 million hectares of new land was farmed, mostly by the Komsomol, expecting an output of 20 million tonnes. Only 120,000 tractors were provided for this scheme. The failure of the Virgin Lands Scheme was that the land was dry and not suitable for grazing, especially in places like Kazakstan. Kazakstan caused other problems because of the hurricane in 1963 which destroyed a majority of the grain, worsened by the poor harvest in 1963. Moreover, the early sowing of crops led to wheat infestation and without irrigation, the plants died. Even the harvested crops often weren't used because the transport was poor, and so some crops rotted on the road side. The shortages of crop harvests caused millions of livestock to be slaughtered. The Virgin Lands Scheme was also unsuccessful because the USSR had to import 20 million tonnes of grain from North America and Australia and was a significant contribution to his dismissal in 1964. The failure of the Virgin Lands Scheme caused the agricultural change to be introduced by Brezhnev in order to solve the huge agricultural problems. The economic policies of the USSR from 1953-82 were unsuccessful because of the changing agricultural policies under Brezhnev. The Politburo invested 26% of all investment in agriculture by 1976. This plan gave particular attention to fertilisers and there was a bigger role of production on peasant's private plots. The agriculture policies also offered grain brigades so that peasants in collectives could decide how profit was used and distributed. This new policy caused a greater inefficiency and the growth in agriculture fell from 3.7% to 0.8%. This policy was unsuccessful because the prices of food doubled, but there was food shortages. In addition, the USSR still had to import US grain and fodder crops to germinate for the following year.

On the other hand, it can be argued that the economic policies of the USSR from 1953-82 were successful. In 1957, Khrushchev introduced the 105 Regional Economic Councils- Sovnarkhozy- to supervise enterprises and run the industrial complex. This was a policy to decentralise the economy, yet still centralised at Moscow and the presidium, and introduce economic councils. Khrushchev also began the Liberman Plan in 1962, which fell apart in 1964 when he was sacked. This plan gave factory workers more freedom, which was successful because it took into account more local circumstances. Another major economic policy that Khrushchev introduced was the seven-year plan from 1958 to 1965, which placed emphasis on the fuel and chemical industries. The success of this plan is notable in the output of consumer goods, which had previously been in decline during Stalin's Five-Year Plans, had risen from 100 to 184 in the years 1958 to 1965, succeeding the target of 180. In addition, emphasis on the fuel industries resulted in coal increasing from 493 to 578 million tonnes. Through the seven-year plans, Khrushchev was able to overtake the West in technology and consumer goods, with a larger economic growth of 7.1% compared to the economic growth of the USA which was 2.9%. Because of the rise of consumer goods, the standard of living for most of the population rose, which shows the success of Khrushchev's economic policies in the USSR.

Khrushchev's attention to consumer goods were continued by Brezhnev through his ninth Five-Year Plans, which focused on consumer goods. The production of consumer foods was higher than heavy industry. This plan resulted in 85% of families owning a television and 70% of families had a washing machine by 1980. In addition to this, sewing machines nearly doubled and although only 9% of families had a car there was a large investment in public transport. Production was so great that some Russian manufactured goods were exported abroad, including cars, photographic equipment and radios. This increases the success of the plans because living standards rose and the economic growth achieved was impressive. This shows that the industrial policies in the USSR from 1953-82 were successful.

To conclude, the economic policies of the USSR from 1953-82 were quite unsuccessful because of the failures of the Kolsygin reforms and the agricultural policies introduced by Khrushchev and Brezhnev, in particular the failure of the Virgin Lands Scheme. These agricultural policies were unsuccessful because they caused food shortages and the USSR had to import grain from the USA. The industrial policies were generally more successful than the agricultural policies because they raised the standard of living, thus some policies were successful and made the overall failures of the policies less effectual and catastrophic.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Economic Policies Under Stalin, Khrushchev, Brezhnev and Mao 1924-1980s

...When Stalin came to power in 1924 Russia was facing several economic problems. Firstly the industrial production was still very low after the hardships of WW1. Secondly a lot of food was needed for the growing industrial population and the export of food would also give an extra raise in economic growth. Stalin’s main policies to face these problems were the five year plans to increase industrial productivity and the collectivization of farms to increase agricultural productivity. In a speech 1931 he made the goals of his policies very clear, “We are 50 or 100 years behind the advanced countries. We must make good this distance in 10 years. Either we do it or we will be crushed”. The first five year plans were a great success, and by 1940 the USSR was comparable to many of the more advanced western countries concerning the export of heavy industrial products. The collectivization however were less of a success, even if production and export increased it caused great suffering to the Russian farmers and many animals were killed resulting in great famine in parts of the USSR. This model of economic policies would become the way of Russia and China until the late 1970s. At this time China was in a civil war crisis where the KMT turned out to be the dominant figure at first. The leader of the party Chiang Kai-shek was right-winged and favored the landowners before the peasants and no great economic reforms were made. Although the country was officially under KMT rule the Warlords...

Words: 764 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

How Did Khrushchev Survive The Soviet Union

...Introduction Nikita Khrushchev and Leonid Brezhnev were two monumental post-Stalin, pre-Gorbachev leaders of the Soviet Union during periods of reform. The two leaders both sought to adjust the economic and domestic policies of the Soviet Union. They shared a common goal: to lead without the constant mass fear and terror imposed by Stalin’s brutal regime. However, they also wanted to achieve such a goal without directly undermining the foundation and the integrity of the Soviet Union or the Communist Party. This concept can be labeled as de-Stalinization without de-Sovietization. However, Khrushchev and Brezhnev inherited a rigid Soviet system that was intertwined with Stalin’s personal legacy and the inner circle officials that survived the...

Words: 631 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Sino Soviet

...over how best to pursue the notion of a communist revolution. * The Soviets had Cominform and China had her own version of communism based on a rural society. * When Khrushchev came to power he reassessed the Soviet interpretation of communism, taking it back to a purer Leninist view point, this intensified ideological differences further. * Khrushchev’s belief that Capitalism was doomed to fail and so expansionism and aggression were unnecessary (peaceful coexistence) was juxtaposed with Mao’s adherence creating a communist revolution and military involvement to protest communist comrades e.g. Korean War. * Mao also wanted to continue with Stalin’s Five Year Plans and devised his own version The Great Leap Forward campaign launched in 1958 to increase industrial and agricultural progress. The campaign involved building dams, reservoirs, roads and establishing communes and setting up small-scale steel and iron furnaces in country areas.- This policy was a disaster resulting in at least 17 million deaths and prompted, due to frustration, Soviet withdrawal of economic aid in 1960. Individuals * Stalin, being the leader of the first major Communist superpower could rightly claim the title of senior partner in the Treaty of Friendship. Mao admired Stalin, tried to emulate his policies, relied on him for funds, experts and aiding the establishment of China as a Communist state. The Korean War highlighted their ability to cooperate * However, it was clear...

Words: 1374 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Russia During the Second

...The University of Houston Russia Energy and the Second Global Economy Mohammad Usman Aijaz INTB3354H – MW 2:30-4:00 Olivia Miljanic November 3rd, 2013 The Soviet Union, now Russia, heavily influenced the second global economy. From the reconstruction of Germany to the Cold War, the Soviet Union’s actions affected the world second only to the United States. While the second global economy is loosely defined as the era between the years of 1971 and 1998, the seeds of this time period were planted shortly after the end of World War II in the European theatre. Following the fall of Nazi Germany, the United States devised the Marshall Plan to rebuild the economies of war-devastated countries. As a world power, the United States believed it was their duty to prevent another world war. The Soviet Union agreed with the sentiment, but not with the approach the western nations took. To prevent the rise of authoritarian governments, the United States promoted democracies, constitutional rule, and capitalism. The Soviet Union, an authoritarian government, advanced their communist ideas to counter the Truman Doctrine. The result of the opposing ideologies was a strained relationship between the two influencers of the modern world, and the initiation of the Cold War. The Soviet Union was focused on spreading their political ideology for one reason: Protection (Service 2). While most of the world considers the establishment of communist regimes as Soviet expansion, the Soviet...

Words: 2500 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

‘Sino-Soviet Relations, in the Years 1958-69, Were Undermined Primarily by Conflicting National Interests.’ How Far Do You Agree with This View?

...in factors or events such as Sino-Soviet rivalry over Mongolia, Sino-Soviet border disputes such as Damansky/Chenbao (1969), China’s reaction to the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia (1968) among many others. Nevertheless, other factors such as ideological conflict for example competing Soviet and Chinese claims for the leadership of international communism, China’s negative response to Soviet de-Stalinisation, Soviet ‘peaceful coexistence’ versus Mao’s commitment to ‘continuing revolution’ at a time when China was confronting the USA among many others undermined Sino-Soviet relations. 1. Sino-Soviet rivalry over Mongolia Sino-Soviet rivalry over Mongolia. The Chinese regarded Mongolia in their own sphere of influence, yet Stalin and Khrushchev refused to reduce their ties. Despite the Chinese signing the Treaty of Friendship with the Soviet Union in 1950, the Chinese failed to get an agreement off the Soviets, promising to limit their influence in Mongolia. Obviously, this would generate tension as the Chinese disliked how their power was limited. 2. Sino-Soviet border disputes such as Damansky/Chenbao (1969) Sino-Soviet border disputes such as Damansky/Chenbao (1969). The Sino-Soviet border was long disputed and each side claimed the island was theirs. In 1969, armed clashes occurred along the Ussuri River – specifically at Damansky Island. Chinese soldiers attacked Soviet guards, causing 30 Soviet casualties. Further clashes resulted in over 600 Chinese deaths compared to...

Words: 1086 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Paper

...reforms; later reaction * policies of Alexander III (1881-94) and Nicholas II (1895-1917): backwardness and attempts at modernization nature of tsardom growth of opposition movements * significance of the Russo Japanese water: 1906 revolutions; Stolypin and the duma; the impact of the first world war (1914-18) on Russia * 1917 Revolutions: February/ March revolutions; provisional government and Dual power (soviets): October/November Bolshevik Revolution; Lenin and Trotsky * Lenin’s Russia (1917-24): consolidation of new soviet state; civil war; War communism; NEP; terror and coercion; Foreign relations * * Gorbachev and His aims/Policies (glasnost And perestroika) and (1931-1991) consequences of the soviet state * consequences of Gorbachev’s policies for Eastern European; reform movements: Poland- the role of solidarity; Czechoslovakia- the velvet revolution; fall of the Berlin wall * china: Mao (1935-1976) Conditions that produced authoritarian and single party states * emergence of leaders: aims, ideology, support * methods of force and legal used to establish authoritarian * form of government ideology establishment * nature, extent and treatment of opposition establishment * domestic policies and impact (structure and organisation of...

Words: 780 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

History

...unstable force that threatened social and political order and Lenin, leader of the Bolshevik Revolution, was to represent this. Allied countries Britain, France, USA and Japan had sent help to Bolshevik enemies during the Civil War therefore there were some hostile feelings towards them even after the war. The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk (March 1918) was a result of Russia withdrawing from the war, leading to a feeling of betrayal amongst the allies who were left to fight Germany alone. Communist groups in Spain and France grew in strength in the 1930s in response to the hardships of the Great Depression which placed strains on the USA. Britain’s appeasement policy towards Germany under Hitler’s leadership led to Stalin seeing it as an attempt to placate Hitler and a sign of Britain’s lack of enthusiasm for halting Nazi foreign policy. This meant mutual mistrust and hostility remained between the countries. The strains that existed in the Grand Alliance during World War 2 Despite the meeting at Tehran in November 1943 there were divisions amongst the Big Three. The opening of...

Words: 7667 - Pages: 31

Premium Essay

Yueuyt

...The Hungarian Uprising of 1956 and the Prague Spring of 1968 were key events that shaped the outcome of the Cold War. Both countries were under the Soviet control during the post-war period. After the death of Stalin, when Khrushchev became the leader and the secret speech of destalinization have seen the daily light both countries introduced their own paths to socialism, first Hungary and 12 years later the Czechoslovakia. Both of the events had similar and different causes and consequences, which will be analysed in this essay. Hungary as well as Czechoslovakia wanted to reform their system. Both countries wanted the reforms to find ‘National roads to socialism’, or as they called it in Czechoslovakia, ‘the socialisms with a human face’. Both countries before the reforms were led by hard line Stalinists, which were one of the clear causes that led to the destalinization and the reforms. In Hungary the leader before the introduction of the reforms was Matyas Rakosi, or as the Hungarian sometimes called him, ‘the Bald Butcher’. He was incredibly unpopular within Hungary; he has murdered many people, hard to estimate the number, and imprisoned over 200,000. He was closely linked with the Hungarian secret Police the AVH, which were even more unpopular and hated than Rakosi himself. As well as in Hungary, Czechoslovakia had their hard line communist dictator. His name was Antonin Novotny, and as well as Rakosi he was very royal to Stalin and Moscow. He wasn’t as hard-line as Rakosi...

Words: 1740 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Glasnost': the Decimation of the Ussr

...Glasnost': The Decimation of the USSR April 16, 2002 I) Since the beginning of mankind the world has been under various ruling powers with only one goal in mind. A) This led to the rise of monarchies with their kings and queens, the socialists with their presidents, and the communists with their tsarist rulers. B) In 1985, Mikhail Gorbachev brought upon the world the idea of Glasnost', which led to the changing of the largest ruling power in the world to a new power benefiting everyone. II) The Former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics before Glasnost'. C) Different styles of Soviet government from the early 1900s up to 1985. 1) Leninism to Stalinism to Khrushchev to Brezhnev. D) Coups and the Great Purge III) What lead to Glasnost' and what it is. E) In 1986, Gorbachev dismayed at the slow process of reform being conducted in the country proposed to the citizens of the USSR and the entire world a two new ideas to help bring reform to the country in a much more radical direction. F) Gorbachev called for a glasnost’ (openness or candor) in the media and culture. IV) Changes within Russia and Foreign changes. G) Banned works and speaking out are no longer dangerous crimes against the state. 2) Criticizing the government led to the formation of a large number of independent nationalistic movements in the USSR. 3) Scholars and scientists are allowed to share their findings with others...

Words: 2288 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Revision Cold War

...= 25% of total marks • Written exam: 2 hours • Answer ONE question from Section A (30 marks), and ONE from Section B (40 marks) - choice of 2 questions in both sections • Section A – discuss an historical issue • Section B – use source material & knowledge to discuss an historical event Section A – themes to explore in your revision: 1. The post-Stalin thaw and the bid for peaceful coexistence in 1950s: a) USSR: Khrushchev b) USA: the responses of Dulles, Eisenhower and Kennedy. • the continuation of the Cold War in the 1950s following the retirement of Truman & death of Stalin, despite the bid for improved relations on the part of the USSR in the form of unilateral cuts in the size of the Red Army and withdrawal from Austria and Finland. • the concept of peaceful coexistence & what motivated Khrushchev & the Soviet leadership, & why the USA under Eisenhower & his Secretary of State, Dulles, and later Kennedy and his staff, responded in the way they did. • the role of personality, particularly that of Khrushchev, in shaping relations in these years should be addressed & students should be aware of the Paris Summit, the U2...

Words: 13995 - Pages: 56

Free Essay

Ussr and Us

...  It was a contest based on  power politics, competing social and economic systems, and differing political ideologies that  lasted over fifty years and touched every corner of the globe.  A spiraling arms race eventually  brought the world to the brink of nuclear apocalypse.  While the war remained technically cold,  the fear of a nuclear disaster made it feel very different to the peoples of the world.    OVERVIEW    The Formation of a Bipolar World      Despite the lingering general animosity and mistrust that the Soviets and Americans  shared, at the heart of the cold war was a fundamental disagreement between political, economic,  and social systems.  Capitalism and communism, at least in the minds of the superpowers,  remained mutually exclusive.  The United States attacked communism and backed, at least in  theory, liberalism.  Consequently, the United States criticized the Soviet record on human rights  and the suppression of civil and religious institutions.  In turn the Soviets, led by Nikita  Khrushchev, were critics of the failings of laissez‐faire capitalism and the wide gulf between rich  and poor in western European and especially the United States.  Further, the Soviets recognized  the shortcomings of the collectivization and the brutal use of terror during the Stalinist years.  In  reality, both the Russians and Americans increasingly were practitioners of reformed versions of  communism and capitalism.      The heart of the American policy, as expressed clearly in the Truman Doctrine...

Words: 2416 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

History of Education

...History of Education Education Act of 1944. The Education Act of 1944 involved a thorough recasting of the educational system. The Board of Education was replaced by a minister who was to direct and control the local education authorities, thereby assuring a more even standard of educational opportunity throughout England and Wales. Every local education authority was required to submit for the minister's approval a development plan for primary and secondary education and a plan for further education in its area. Two central advisory councils were constituted, one for England, another for Wales. These had the power, in addition to dealing with problems set by the minister, to tender advice on their own initiative. The total number of education authorities in England and Wales was reduced from 315 to 146. The educational systems of Scotland and Northern Ireland are separate and distinct from that of England and Wales, although there are close links between them. The essential features of the Education Act of 1944 of England and Wales were reproduced in the Education Act of 1945 in Scotland and in the Education Act of 1947 in Northern Ireland. There were such adaptations in each country as were required by local traditions and environment. The complexity of the education system in the United Kingdom arises in part from the pioneer work done in the past by voluntary bodies and a desire to retain the voluntary element in the state system. The act of 1944 continued...

Words: 4110 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Unit 5 Ap World Review Guide

...AP* World History Study Guide and Graphic Organizers – Unit 5: The Modern World, 1914 CE – present 1. World War I Students are required to know the causes, major events, and consequences of WWI 1) Causes a) Imperialism i) No new lands to expand into – some nations didn’t have many colonies (Germany, Italy) ii) Rivalries as nations competed for colonies iii) Sometimes armed conflict in colonial lands for control over resources b) Nationalism i) Pride in one’s nation, want one’s nation to be the best and most powerful ii) Fostered conflict as nations competed to be the best iii) Justified imperialism, militarism iv) Caused disruptions in multi-ethnic nations (Austria-Hungary, Ottoman Empire); rebellions, revolts against foreign rule c) Militarism i) Build up of a country’s military; keeping a large standing army ii) Nations expanded their militaries as a show of power iii) Arms race: each nation needed to have a standing army because their neighbors had standing armies d) Alliances i) Bismarck: German chancellor behind alliance system in Europe ii) Germany, Austria-Hungary, Italy allied; France, Great Britain, Russia allied 2) Events a) Assassination of Archduke Frantz Ferdinand: Serbian terrorists kill the Austrian duke and his wife as they honeymooned in Sarajevo i) Austria demands Serbian submission ii) Russia offers to back Serbians in defying Austrians iii) Austria and Germany declare war on Serbia and Russia (along with Russia’s allies) b) Schlieffen...

Words: 3465 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Nicoolo Machiavelli

...mind such as Joseph Stalin. Joseph Stalin epitomizes the ideas put forward by Machiavelli by depicting that being neutral is never an option, going to war, and having discipline. Joseph Stalin is a certain individual who made the Soviet Union a world superpower. Joseph Stalin is commonly known for his harsh ways and his leadership skills. At a tender age, Joseph Stalin felt he has been treated unfairly his entire life, as a result it led to the desire for greatness and respect in his future. In 1922 Joseph Stalin was appointed as the General Secretary of the Communist Party’s Central Committee. Stalin utilized this new position to overpower the less fortunate. Stalin’s tenure as dictator was so harsh that when Nikita Khrushchev took over in 1953 he started a policy of “de-Stalinization.” Stalin, having the utmost fear of being overthrown he executed some of his best medium ranked leaders. Machiavelli was noticed for Realpolitik, a political and judicial action that fits the circumstances but is not moral and it would be considered a crime. Most European societies and nations have adapted to the idea that politicians behave like cheats, liars and thieves, because certain circumstances require it. Machiavelli is also known for introducing the idea of having the lesser evil, this is what many politicians abided by. The Prince is still used as a supportfor heads of government to keep the reputation...

Words: 2078 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Factors That Led to the Collapse of Communism

...collapse of the soviet empire is often heralded in the West as a triumph of capitalism and democracy, as though this event was a direct result of the policies of the Reagan and Thatcher governments. This analysis has little relation to measurable facts, circumstances and internal political dynamics that were the real historical causes of the deterioration of the Soviet empire. The key to understanding the reasons for the demise of the Soviet Union and communism in Eastern Europe is to be found not in the speeches or policies of Western politicians, but in internal Soviet history. Through our report we have attempted to discern the various complex factors that came together and led to the unraveling of the Soviet Union and the end of communism in Europe. This report contains an analysis of how social, political and economic factors culminated in the sudden and unprecedented collapse of the Soviet Union at the perceived height of its power. ACKNOWLEDGMENT We would like to thank … Contents ABSTRACT 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT 3 INTRODUCTION 5 LITERATURE REVIEW 8 ROLE OF PUBLIC OPINION IN COMMUNISMS COLLAPSE 11 ROLE OF SOCIETY AND CULTURE IN COMMUNISMS COLLAPSE 14 ROLE OF ECONOMIC FACTORS IN COMMUNISMS COLLAPSE 16 ROLE OF U.S FOREIGN POLICY IN COMMUNISMS COLLAPSE 19 CONCLUSION 22 REFERNCES 24 INTRODUCTION The Soviet Union in 1985 possessed much of the same natural and human...

Words: 4852 - Pages: 20