Free Essay

Economic System

In:

Submitted By Fatimaamjad123
Words 3605
Pages 15
ECONOMIC SYSTEMS

Assignment by: Fatima Amjad 0050 Elaf Anwar 0078 Sania Raza 0086

Introduction:

Economic systems are the means by which countries and governments distribute resources and trade goods and services. An economic system must define what to produce, how to produce it and for whom to produced it. They are used to control the five factors of production, including labor, capital, entrepreneurs, physical resources and information resources. Different economic systems view the use of these factors in different ways.

The world's economic systems fall into one of three main categories: market economy, command economy and mixed economy; however, there are unlimited variations of each type.

MARKET ECONOMY:

Market economy is also known as capitalism or the private enterprise system. The central thought of this system is that it should be the producers and consumers who decide how to utilise the resources. It is a system of society wide coordination of human activities, without central command. Thus, the market forces decide what to produce, how much to produce and for whom to produce. The efficient working of a free market economy requires that the producer firms must have incentives to work hard and produce goods and services at the lowest possible cost per unit of output. Market economies provide incentives to the firms and individuals by recognising and enforcing the property rights of the individuals and firms, to own the resources and goods and services produced by using them.

Features:

Property Rights: Property rights are social institutions that govern the ownership, use and disposal of resources, goods and services. There are three types of property which individuals and firms can privately own: real property which includes land, buildings, durable goods such as plant, capital equip­ment etc, financial property which includes shares and bonds, bank deposits, money kept at home and intellectual property, which represents the products of creative effort and includes books written, audio and video material, computer programmes. Besides, the owner is free to sell or dispose of his property in any way he likes. The two attributes of property rights, namely, the right of the owner to use the property as he likes and the right to sell it provide incentives to the owners to use their property efficiently.

Freedom of Private Enterprise: Freedom of enterprise means that everybody is free to engage in whatever economic activity he pleases. In other words, he is free to choose to work in any industry he likes or adopts any occupation or trade he desires. An individual or firm is free to engage in any economic activity he feels most desirable or profitable.

Profit and Prices: Profits are earned from undertaking the task of producing goods and services and introducing new products and new techniques of production. Profits earned by the firm depend on prices of goods and services pro­duced and cost incurred. In a perfectly competitive market firms are price takers that are they take price of a product or service as given. With a given price, firm’s profits will be larger, if cost per unit of output is smaller. Therefore, in order to maximise profits, firms try to minimise cost for producing a given level of output. Thus profits serve as incentive for the firm to produce efficiently. Prices of goods and services indicate how much money individu­als are prepared to pay for them. The goods and resources which are relatively more scarce will have higher prices in the market. On the other hands, the goods and resources which are relatively less scarce will have low market prices.

Competitive models: There are four competitive models in a market economy. Perfect competition is a theoretical market structure in which all the firms sell homogeneous (identical) products and are price takers. The prices are controlled by market forces and have small market share. The buyers in this market have complete information and there is freedom of entry and exit. Monopolistic competition is a market structure in which each firms make their own decisions about output, knowledge is widely spread between participants, there is freedom to enter on leave the market, the products are differentiated and firms are price takers. The firms are independent and said to be profit maximisers. Oligopoly is a market controlled by few firms. It is much like monopoly, in which only one company exerts control over most of a market. In an oligopoly, there are at least two firms controlling the market. As a result they can greatly influence price and other market factors. Also there is barrier to entry and exit. Monopoly is the extreme case in capitalism. It’s a situation in which a single company or group owns all or nearly all of the market for a given type of product or service. Monopoly is characterized by an absence of competition, which often results in high prices and inferior products. In a monopoly market, factors like government license, ownership of resources, copyright and patent and high starting cost make an entity a single seller of goods. All these factors restrict the entry of other sellers in the market.

Consumer Sovereignty: In a free market economy there is a freedom of choice for the consumers to buy goods and services which suit their tastes and preferences. In a market economy only those goods and ser­vices are produced if the firms producing and supplying them are able to sell them at a profit. Now, profits are made if goods or services produced are sold for more than what it costs to produce them. Therefore, firms cannot expect to make profits, if they do not make goods or services which are not in accordance with the preferences and demands of the consumers and also for which consumers are not willing to pay adequate price.


Advantages:

Harder working employees due to the threat of losing their job or being laid off because the product or service is not selling.
Friendly competition between companies will encourage efficiency among employees to lower costs for success.
Companies become creative in finding new products to sell or manufacture and less expensive ways to accomplish their goals.
As companies grow due to market economy, foreign investors will begin to take an interest and help expand.
Private companies take over activities and venues that were in the past public sector. This reduces the size, power and cost of state bureaucracies.
Production increases for the frivolities that will cost more money but people want. This is a classic example of supply and demand.
Social and technical skills needed to function within a market economy system are quickly learned as is the knowledge to succeed.
There is a larger variety of consumer goods available for a wide range of people ranging from middle-class to the very affluent.
Encourages people to step up and try their hand in the market economy. Encourages entrepreneurs to start up a business and sell merchandise or offer services at competitive rates.

Disadvantages:

The exploitation of workers is a large disadvantage because the working conditions and long hours for less pay and few benefits, if any. The large corporations have moved their production to countries where they can get cheap labor with few safety regulations for the workers.
Investment priorities and wealth becomes distorted. The wealthy keep getting wealthier and the public sector such as public education, transportation routes and public health does not get the needed funds to keep evolving and providing for the public’s needs.
Goods will be mass produced and therefore the cost will be driven lower. As a product becomes popular and overproduced, the manufacturers must unload the goods, even if that means lowering prices to where the general public can afford them.
Due to overproduction, industrial machinery will lay idle and therefore not producing a profit for the manufacturer. Until the prices drop the goods will remain unsold and people who cannot afford them have their needs unmet.
Unemployment rates go up due to the overproduction of goods. Workers are not needed to keep producing goods and therefore companies cannot afford to keep workers employed.
Having the market economy system will lead to periods of economic crises. The economy will stop growing when goods are overproduced and workers are then unemployed. The economic crisis will not end until the next item is founded that the wealthy just have to have. Then they cycle starts again.

Examples:

These countries are the examples of free market economy:

Hong Kong
Hong Kong achieved the top ranking in 2012 with a score of 89.9, out of a possible total of 100.
Hong Kong have a strong legal framework, especially its property rights and general support for the rule of law. It also commended Hong Kong for its low tolerance for corruption to support its regulatory efficiency.

Singapore
Singapore’s economy is 85.7% free. Virtually all commercial operations are performed with transparency and speed, and private enterprise has boomed. Inflation is low, and foreign investment is welcomed and given equal treatment. There are no tariffs. Singapore’s legal system is highly protective of private property.

Australia
Australia’s economy is 82.7% free. Its low inflation and low tariff rates buttress a globally competitive financial system. A strong rule of law protects property rights and tolerates virtually no corruption. Businesses enjoy considerable flexibility in licensing, regulation and employment practices.

United states
The economy of the United States is 82% free. The average tariff rate is low, although there are several non-tariff barriers. Financial markets are open to foreign competition and are the world’s most dynamic and modern. Corruption is low and the labor market is highly flexible.

New Zealand
New Zealand’s economy is 81.6% free. A globally competitive financial system based on market principles attracts many foreign banks, helped by low inflation and low tariff rates. A strong rule of law protects property rights, and New Zealand is the world’s second most corruption-free country.

United Kingdom
The United Kingdom’s economy is 81.6% free. The average tariff rate is low, although the government does implement distortionary European Union agricultural tariffs. Support for private enterprise is a world model, and the financial sector is modern and a historic world hub. The judiciary should be the envy of the world.

Ireland
Ireland’s economy is 81.3% free. Entrepreneurship is made easy by the light regulatory hand of government. Inflation is low, but Ireland’s monetary score suffers somewhat from distortionary EU agricultural subsidies. Property rights are well protected by an efficient, independent judiciary.


COMMAND ECONOMY:

Command economy is also known as centrally planned economy. An economic system in which economic decisions are made by the state or government rather than by the interaction between consumers and businesses. The government decides what goods will be produced, how they will be produced, and how resources are distributed and used. The government can determine the price of goods and services. In a centrally planned economy, it is assumed that the needs of the people are not met in a market economy and therefore the government needs to make the decisions.


Features:

Central economic plan: The government creates a central economic plan for all sectors and regions of the country. It starts with a five-year plan to set the overriding economic and societal goals.
The master plan is broken down into shorter-term plans to convert the goals into actionable objectives. 

Allocates all resources: The government allocates all resources according to the central plan. The goal is to use the nation's capital, labor and natural resources in the most efficient way possible. That eliminates unemployment by promising to use each person's skills and abilities to their highest capacity.

Production of all goods and services: The central plan sets the priorities for the production of all goods and services. These include quotas and price controls on all goods and services. Its goal is to supply enough food, housing, and other basics to meet the needs of everyone in the country. It has social priorities, such as mobilizing for war or generating robust economic growth.

Government owned monopoly businesses: The government owns the monopoly business in industries deemed essential to the goals of the economy. That usually includes finance, utilities, and automotive. There is no domestic competition in these industries.

Laws and regulations: The government creates laws, regulations, and directives to implement the central plan.

Advantages:

Resources are quickly and effectively mobilized on a large scale.
Industrial power is created and massive projects completed while attaining imperative social goals.
Individual self-gain is no longer the driving force of success among businesses. The greater good of the society is the focus of the economy. The society as a whole benefits from the success and not just a select few individuals.
This type of economy is able to transform the society to conform to the government’s vision for the country or society.
Command economies can prevent abuse of monopoly power.
Command economies can prevent mass unemployment.

Disadvantages:

The needs of the society are often ignored for the betterment of the economy. Workers are not given options on where they can be employed or where they can move.
The black market explodes in a command economy. Due to the governmental restrictions, good and services that are not offered in the command economy began being offered on the black market.
The amounts of goods being produced are not balanced. One item will be mass produced whereas another will not have enough to support the economic needs. The government entity that controls the economy has difficulty obtaining up-to-date information about the needs of the consumers. Many times rationing becomes a way of life within a command economy. Government agencies usually have poor information about what to produce.
Exporting goods becomes problematic because it is difficult for the controlling entity to determine which products and prices will be most successful within the global market.
Unable to respond to consumer preferences.
Threat to democracy and liberty. A command economy creates a very powerful government which limits individuals rights to pursue economic objectives. This invariably creates a climate where governments can extend their control into other areas of people’s lives.

Examples:

Cuba
Cuba is a good example of command economy. Although certain market reforms have been made in recent years, such as letting people become independent contractors (e.g. plumbers) as they can earn more going to consumers directly this way (before Cubans often waited years to get their toilet fixed, which often ended up just being a replacement). The government has also discovered this income can be taxed, so generating more revenue.

Iran
Since the Revolution in 1979 when major businesses were nationalized, though recently they have begun to privatize them.

North Korea
A known basket case, is currently the only entirely planned economy (excluding the black market which they all have).

Saudi Arabia
Their oil industry, the source of most national wealth, is state-owned and run.

MIXED ECONOMY:

An economic system that features characteristics of both capitalism and command economy. A mixed economic system allows a level of private economic freedom in the use of capital, but also allows for governments to interfere in economic activities in order to achieve social aims. This type of economic system is less efficient than capitalism, but more efficient than command economy. There are elements of both public and private enterprise.
In reality most economies are mixed, with varying degrees of state intervention Mixed economies start from the basis of allowing private enterprise to run most business. Then the governments intervene in certain areas of the economy, such as regulation, and spending money on public services.
The mixed economy may be classified in two categories:

Capitalistic Mixed Economy:
In this type of economy, ownership of various factors of production remains under private control. Government does not interfere in any manner. The main responsibility of the government in this system is to ensure rapid economic growth without allowing concentration of economic power in the few hands.

Socialistic Mixed Economy:
Under this system, means of production are in the hands of state. The forces of demand and supply are used for basic economic decisions. However, whenever and wherever demand is necessary, government takes actions so that basic idea of economic growth is not hampere

Features:

Co-existence of Private and Public Sector: Under this system there is co-existence of public and private sectors. In public sector, industries like defence, power, energy, basic industries etc., are set up. On the other hand, in private sector all the consumer goods industries, agriculture, small-scale industries are developed. The government encourages both the sectors to develop simultaneously.

Personal freedom: Under mixed economy, there is full freedom of choice of occupation, although consumer does not get complete liberty but at the same time government can regulate prices in public interest through public distribution system.

Private property allowed: In mixed economy, private property is allowed. However, here it must be remembered that there must be equal distribution of wealth and income. It must be ensured that the profit and property may not concentrate in a few pockets.

Economic planning: In a mixed economy, government always tries to promote economic development of the country. For this purpose, economic planning is adopted. Thus, economic planning is very essential under this system.

Price mechanism: Under this system, price mechanism and regulated price operate simultaneously. In consumer goods industries price mechanism is generally followed. However, at the time of big shortages or during national emergencies prices are controlled and public distribution system has to be made effective.

Profit motive and social welfare: In mixed economy system, there are both profit motive like capitalism and social welfare as in socialist economy.

Check on economic inequalities: In this system, government takes several measures to reduce the gap between rich and poor through progressive taxation on income and wealth. The subsidies are given to the poor people and also job opportunities are provided to them. Other steps like concessions, old age pension, free medical facilities and free education are also taken to improve the standard of poor people. Hence, all these help to reduce economic inequalities.

Control of monopoly power: Under this system, government takes huge initiatives to control monopoly practices among the private entrepreneurs through effective legislative measures. Besides, government can also fake over these services in the public interest.

Advantages:

Mixed economies help lessen the amount of government control and government regulation that is prevalent in command economies. There is equal ditribution of control.
Most industries and businesses can now be left to the private firms. These private firms are more likely to be efficient compared to firms controlled by the government as they have profit incentive for cutting costs and being innovative

With business left to private enterprises, the government can focus on the regulation of the market to improve economic stability and the country as a whole. When correctly implemented, the government’s policy decisions may seem counter intuitive to the interests of businesses at first, but will actually provide greater stability in the long ru
.
This type of economic system is known for allowing government regulations in areas where market failure is experienced. This means that a region will have more space to develop and grow to attain economic success

Disadvantages:

One of the biggest issues that come with a mixed economy is finding a balance between wealth equality and market freedom. This is seen by a number of socialist and progressive thinkers. This problem can lead to lack of social mobility and wide-scale poverty.
Identifying the government’s exact role in private enterprises is sometimes a guessing game that results to unfair practices exhibited on both sides. According to Libertarians, the government tends to manage an economy poorly, and as such, any of its involvements is considered wrong

Free market economists also criticize a mixed economy, as it allows excessive intervention of the government. Most governments are invariably influenced by short-term political factors

More state intervention in the economy, of course, requires greater investment from the government, which largely comes from tax revenues. An argument against such intervention is that the more it is, the more the need for people to be taxed. This will lead to negative consequences, such as decreased motivation in work, as employees see a large proportion of their earnings going to the taxation agency

Under this system, both the sectors are ineffective in nature. The private sector does not get full freedom, hence it becomes ineffective. This leads to ineffectiveness among the public sector. In true sense, both sectors are not only competitive but also complementary in nature

There are no such comprehensive planning in mixed economy. As a result, a large sector of the economy remains outside the control of the government

Examples:

All the economies are mixed. Some of economy is managed by the government, the rest left to private firms and individuals These are some of them with share of government spending as a % of GDP:

Iceland (57%)
Sweden (52%)
France (52.8%)
United Kingdom 47.3%
United States 38.9
Russia 34.1
China – 20% of GDP
Hong Kong 18.6%

However, there are different degrees of state intervention. European economies such as Sweden and France have a generous level of social security spending. Education and health care are free at the point of US. In the US, government spending as a share of GDP is lower, but health care has to be paid for.
As economies develop, the government often take a higher share of total spending. Developed countries, such as in Western Europe, often choose to provide state welfare support, and greater government regulation of the environment and business environment.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Economic Systems

...Lindsay MacIsaac Concept 1 – Economic Systems DEFINITION An economic system allocates a nation’s resources among its citizens. Different systems vary in who owns and controls these resources, which are known as the factors of production (labour, capital, entrepreneurs, and natural resources, as well as physical resources and information resources). A command economy relies on a centralized government to control all or most factors of production and to make all or most production and allocation decisions. In market economies, individuals—producers and consumers—control production and allocation decisions through supply and demand. Most countries rely on some form of mixed market economy—a system featuring characteristics of both command and market economies. ROLE A major determinant of how organizations operate is the kind of economic system that characterizes the country in which they do business. To be successful, an organization must recognize how much control it has over the production and allocation of the factors of production. Operating in a command economy, such as communism or socialism, requires much different business strategies than operating in a market economy, such as capitalism and input and output markets. Unlike command economies, market economies function on a circular flow of supply and demand between firms and households. APPLICABILITY Canada’s mixed market economic system resembles a type of market economy known as “laissez-faire...

Words: 397 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Economic Systems

...Economic systems There is 3 main types of economic systems, difference between them are how much Government controls economy. • Free Market economy • Command economy • Mixed market economy Free Market Free market economy is also called Capitalism. Nearly all of the country's factors of production are owned privately. Basically, firms can sell anything they want. They effectively respond to the consumers, who are allowed to buy anything that is sold by the producers. Everyone in this system is motivated by pure self-interest. There is very high level of competition in this type of market and it has numerous buyers and sellers because there is no barriers to entry or exit. Firms are seeking to maximize their profits while consumers seek the greatest benefit for the lowest cost. Also workers are trying to maximize their wage relative to the cost of working. Individuals are free to make their own decisions like where to work or what to buy. Firms are free to choose what to produce and who to sell to. Prices are determined by supply and demand – prices may rise if there are shortages of a product or demand is high. Problems with free market economy: Some consumers are unwilling to pay for merit good or public goods i.e. health, education Demerit goods are really cheap, they are goods which are over consumed such as alcohol or cigarettes. Inequality of power in the market – the well off are in a position to pay high prices and so goods are produced to satisfy their needs...

Words: 686 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Economic Systems

...Which economic system is best suited for handling a crisis of epic proportions (hurricane, flood, blizzard, forest fire, etc.)? Why? (9 points) Describe and explain why a socialist system might be the best in responding to the needs of people struck by an emergency situation like the earthquake that occurred in Haiti in January 2010. (9 points) Use the laws of supply and demand to explain why the cost to heat our homes and businesses goes up in the winter time. Be sure to explain your answer fully (9 points) Include APA style in-text citations, as well as a reference section. (3 points) Economic system is the policies that define a society’s particular economic structure. The rules by which a society allocates economic resources. Communism * State ownership of all major productive resources * Absence of economic classes * Few opportunities for entrepreneurship Socialism * State ownership of certain productive resources * Managed efforts to minimize dramatic differences between economic classes * Opportunities for entrepreneurship, with varying degrees of restrictions Capitalism * Private ownership of most productive resources * Few efforts to minimize differences between economic classes * Government policies actively support entrepreneurship All economic systems are based on certain fundamental principles about how a country should allocate its resources to satisfy the needs of its citizens. Most modern economies exhibit a combination...

Words: 440 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Economic System

...Microeconomics Paper: Economic systems Yang Cong Professor Memmos Aug 1st, 2012 Table of Contents 1, Introduction of economic systems 2, the analysis of capitalism 3, Example of capitalism: the U.S. 4, the analysis of socialism 5, Example of socialism: China 6, the analysis of communism 7, Example of communism: North Korea 8, my favorite one is socialism 9, Conclusion There are three main economic systems in the world which are capitalism, socialism and communism. Nowadays, most developed countries are capitalism and they have certified that capitalism is better; the greatest developing country which owns the second high GDP in the world, China, is socialism, it seems that socialism is not bad; only a few countries are still communism like North Korea which has a low economic increment speed. Different systems have their own advantages and disadvantages, so it is necessary for the government to figure out which one is suitable for their countries. “Capitalism is an economic system that is based on private ownership of the means of production and the creation of goods or services for profit. Competitive markets, wage labor, capital accumulation, voluntary exchange, and personal finance are also considered capitalistic (Wikipedia).” Capitalism can greatly promote economic development, this is the main feature of capitalism. The necessary material of human is produced by human labor, the purpose of economic activity is to save labor time which is also the greatest...

Words: 1923 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Economic Systems

...Economic Systems (Brief Descriptions) Command System A command or “planned” economy is an economic system where economic decisions are made by a centralized planner (usually the government). The centralized planner(s) determine what types of goods and services to produce, the amount to produce, the prices and where to distribute them. The government (or the centralized planner) also owns the land, factories, and machines and decides how the goods and services will be produced. The government decides who will work where, and what machines and raw materials will be available to them. Finally, by establishing the pay and benefits available, it also decides for whom the goods and services will be produced. Through this system, a fairer distribution of income may be achieved, unemployment reduced/eliminated, and the assurance of production of socially useful products. However, unpopular decisions about the future may be made, unrealistic/ inaccurate estimates may be made thus resulting in over production or underproduction of certain items in the market. Market System A market economy relies heavily upon the market forces to determine the prices and quantities of goods, and the allocation of goods and resources. The higher the demand for certain goods, the higher the prices will be. Businesses will produce/supply the goods and services that are in demand because they are motivated by profits. What to produce is determined by the dollar votes of consumers. How to produce is determined...

Words: 604 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Economic Systems

...Command Economic System: When we talk about the term “command” in historical context; whether it relates to economic, political or warfare, command has always been vested in the hands of the few. If we relate “these few” to a group of people who exercise power in terms of making decisions (be it economic/social/political etc) for ALL the people they govern, we call this process or system a “Government”. In a command economic system, this government basically owns and controls most of the economic resources of the country. This “Command” economic system is also known as “socialism” or “communism” (McConnell – Economics) In any economic system decisions have to be made regarding production of goods and services, price setting, education, expenditure on infrastructure, resource allocation, resource/property ownership, resource distribution, establishment of industries and businesses, salaries for individuals etc. In a Command Economic System, all these decisions are taken by the Centre/Government. Public in general/ individuals in general do not have any “say” in such government decisions. Practically speaking, “Absolute” command economy doesn’t exist in this world, even near perfect “command economy” of Soviet Union/Russia had private/market influences in its system. McConnell states North Korea and Cuba as near to perfect Command Economic Systems. Pakistan too took a step towards socialism/nationalization in Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto’s era in 1970s, which later had to be discontinued...

Words: 1729 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Types of Economic Systems.

...Types of Economic Systems. Socialism Socialist economic systems (all of which feature common ownership of the means of production) can be subdivided by their coordinating mechanism (planning and markets) into planned socialist and market socialist systems. Additionally, socialism can be divided based on the ownership of the means of production into those that are based on public ownership, worker or consumer cooperatives and common ownership (i.e., non-ownership). Communism is a hypothetical stage of Socialist development articulated by Marx as "second stage Socialism" in Critique of the Gotha Program, whereby economic output is distributed based on need and not simply on the basis of labor contribution. The primary concern for socialist planned economies is to coordinate production to directly perceived satisfy human needs/economic demand (as opposed to generate profit and satisfy needs as a byproduct of pursuing profit), to advance the productive forces of the economy while being immune to the perceived systemic inefficiencies (cyclical processes) and crisis of overproduction so that production would be subject to the needs of society as opposed to being ordered around "capital accumulation".[7][8] Capitalism Capitalism generally features the private ownership of the means of production (capital), and a market economy for coordination. Corporate capitalism refers to a capitalist marketplace characterized by the dominance of hierarchical, bureaucratic corporations. Mercantilism...

Words: 379 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Economic Systems

...Lindolfo Lazareth Mireles III AP Macroeconomics – 1B Mr. W. English 2 September 2013 Traditional Economy VS Command Economy In economics we study how individuals and society seek to satisfy needs and wants through incentives, choices, and allocation of scarce resources. We know that we cannot have everything, we have to make choices. We then asked ourselves, “How will society choose between what they do and don’t have?” that’s why economic systems were created. They were created specifically to answer the three economic questions. What should we produce? How should we produce it? And Who should get it? There’s different ways we can answer these questions, it all depends on the economies goals and values. The first type of economy I will be discussing is Traditional economy. This type of economy is found in rural, underdeveloped countries such as Vanuatu, Pygmies of Congo, Eskimos, Indian tribes and Belarus. Which are all very small groups. In this kind of economy customs govern the economic decisions that are made, so they do things based on the ways they’ve always done them. The advantages of this economic system are that people have very specific roles, they have a sense of security in the way things are done. Men and women usually have very defined roles, usually very gender specific. There’s no question on what you’re going to do or how you’re going to do it, you will do it the way that they’ve always been done. The disadvantages are that there is absolutely no technology...

Words: 654 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Economic Systems and Their Impacts

...Economy systems and their impact It is possible to argue this in two ways.  It is possible to say that a market economy would handle this situation best, but it is also possible to say that a command economy (the more socialist the better) would be more efficient. But local citizens, fire departments, police, or anyone who is in the immediate area and also the local government are the first to respond. They help to search for living people and try to rescue and aid as many victims as possible. National non-profit organizations like the Red Cross and other Non Government Organizations (NGO’s) are normally on the scene relatively quickly to try to ease the suffering and aid in the humanitarian causes of searching for survivors. However, it is also possible to argue that a market economy is the best system for dealing with disaster.  The argument here is that governments simply do not work efficiently, regardless of how much power they have.  The various people in government do not have much of an incentive to work their hardest to make the recovery happen.  By contrast, firms in a market economy would have a motive (the profit motive) to work quickly and efficiently.  They would also tend to have the expertise needed to accomplish the task.  This is, for example, why some people argue that large stores like Wal-Mart, Lowe’s, and Home Depot were better able to get supplies to places that were hit by Hurricane Sandy than the government was. But I would rather go with  Socialism...

Words: 820 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

The Islamic Economic System and Socialisim

...The Islamic Economic System and Socialism The last 500 years, Islam could not be brought in the public affairs of social, political and economic domain and remained in the religion sphere, the foundation of Muslim’s getting in troubled water and finding no way out to reach to its shore. In the absence of Islamic economic system, the West – devoid from the moral and spiritual foundation- has taken over to steer the world economy. That is resulting in unprecedented human misery to the world economy starting from economic derailment to collapse economic system of many world giants flexing economic muscle. The felt need is to touch the facts lurking below the surface of the present economic order - source of unforgettable human suffering across the world, resulting even losing of human lives. Lacs of jobs are curtailed and people are getting jobless and find no social and economic patronage. Companies are being bailed by the public paid taxes to protect existence of multi nationals with the common people’s hard earned money. Even the economists are not sure the depth of deficiency and how long it will take come on track. Islam puts a different economic system which categorically forbids charging the interests for loans. The Quran says, “The interest which imposes seeking to increase your health will not bring about any increase in sight of God. Rather it is zakat which you pay for the sake of God alone, that brings about such increase of your fortune”. The Quran advocates...

Words: 838 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Planned Economic Systems at Its Best

...planned economic system is best suited. In a planned economic system the government controls the allocation of resources and limits freedom of choice in order to accomplish government goals (Bovee & Thill, 2014). The government will have a group of organizations already prepared for a crisis of epic proportions and expect no profit to be made. On January 12, 2010 an earthquake struck Haiti. The quake flattened houses, hotels, and government buildings, including the National Palace and UN headquarters (Smith, 2010). I remember watching the news on TV and seeing what was left of Haiti. The next day the president of the United States Barrack Obama was on television telling everybody that he had the situation under control. Obama comes from a mixed capitalism. When he heard of the earthquake in Haiti he probably thought, this is my chance to help save millions of lives and make money. A month into the disaster, the U.S. and UN were managing to feed only 1 million people, leaving more than a million people without relief aid. Instead of mobilizing to provide water, food, and housing for the victims, the U.S. focused on occupying the country with 20,000 U.S. troops and surrounding it with a flotilla of U.S. Navy and Coast Guard ships (Smith, 2010). In my opinion Obama did everything he said he will do, but with a price. I’m sure he helped a lot of people, but just not as many as he should of. After all Barack Obama is a capitalist and in a capitalist system only those...

Words: 598 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Economic Systems

...Economic Systems: Which is the Best and How is the Public Effected by the Cost Intro into Business and Technology DeVry University Economic Systems: Which is the Best and How is the Public Effected by the Cost In our textbook, Bovee and Thill (2012) define economics as the study of how a society uses it scarce resources to produce and distribute goods and services. Within economics, you can find economic systems and how they work for society. A variety of economic systems exist around the world. Each system is defined by the policies of a particular society’s structure. The best system for a society is based upon the necessary core principles that fulfill the needs of said society. The three major systems are communism, socialism, and capitalism. So let’s answer three questions about economics and its systems. Which economic system is best suited for handling a crisis of epic proportions and why? Why might a socialist system be the best in responding to the needs of people struck by an emergency situation? Why is the cost to heat our homes and businesses higher in the winter season? Socialism is arguably the best suited economic system for handling a crisis of epic proportions such as a hurricane, flood, blizzard, etc. Socialism can be defined as an economic system consisting of socially owned production used for the needs of the society’s citizens and does not include generating profits. It is true that all economic systems have their strengths and weakness relating...

Words: 815 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Economic System

...Chapter 2 - The U.S. Economic System 1. Principles of the U.S. Economic System (p. 25-27) the economic system of the United States is known as capitalism. Capitalism is founded on certain principles, they are listed below; (16 points) a. Free enterprise: Free enterprise is an economic system that provides individuals the opportunity to make their own economic decisions, free of government constraints, and as private profit-potential businesses. The system allows for the privilege of individual ownership of property and the means of production. b. Private property: Having the right to private property means allowing individuals to own property and use it in any lawful manner they choose. In this U.S. economic system, people’s right to buy and sell private property is guaranteed by law. c. Profit motive: Economists describe the willingness of entrepreneurs to risk financial loss by organizing and launching a business enterprise as the profit motive. Profits are what remain after the expense of doing business is subtracted from a firm’s income. Business firms try hard to keep costs down and increase their income from sales. The better they succeed at this, the higher are their profits. d. Consumer sovereignty: In the end, it is the customers, or consumers, who determine whether any business succeeds or fails. Consumers are said to have sovereignty- the power or freedom to have final say. Consumers are free to spend their money for Product X or...

Words: 2288 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Economic System

...An economic system is an organized approach to producing and distributing goods and services. It is an organize way to answer the three economic questions of what, how and to whom to produce. Although every country must have an economic system to answer these three economic questions, their method of producing and distributing largely depends on the country’s historical experience, form of government, objectives and ideologies. To some people, government intervention in the economy are consider significant to protect against the worst elements of capitalism while others thing that such regulations are unnecessary invasions of their freedoms. To what extend should the government get involve in the economy. The government should take a limited role in the economy while allowing private enterprises because such involvement would eliminate the negative aspects of capitalism while adopting the positiveness of Socialism. This would benefits the economy in variety of ways. Firstly, government regulations allow businesses to remain in the private hands while removing some of the worst abuses of pure capitalism. Secondly, a government intervention protects the consumers, producers, and the community as a whole. Finally, limited government involvement prevents crises such as inflation, unemployment and depression. The nineteenth century period was a memorable period in the history of human kind. The industrial Revolution transformed society from an agricultural to a mechanized society...

Words: 1027 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Economic Systems

...(a) Using the production possibility curve, explain the concepts of scarcity, choice and opportunity cost. [10] (a) The concepts of scarcity, choice and opportunity cost can be explained with reference to the production possibility curve. Scarcity leads to choice and choice leads to opportunity cost. Although factor inputs are finite, human wants are infinite which leads to the problem of scarcity. Scarcity is the situation where finite factor inputs are insufficient to produce goods and services to satisfy infinite human wants. Scarcity necessitates choice. In other words, due to scarcity, society must choose what goods and services to produce. The opportunity cost of a course of action is the benefit forgone by not choosing its next best alternative. When a choice is made, an opportunity cost is incurred. In other words, when society chooses what goods and services to produce, it is choosing what goods and services not to produce. The production possibility curve (PPC) reflects scarcity, choice and opportunity cost. Suppose that there are only two goods produced in the economy. The PPC shows all the different combinations of the two goods that can be produced in the economy when factor inputs are fully and efficiently employed, given the state of the technology. The above diagram is the PPC. Although the points inside and on the PPC are attainable, the points outside the PPC are not. Scarcity is reflected by the unattainable points that lie outside the PPC, such as point...

Words: 499 - Pages: 2