Free Essay

Economics

In:

Submitted By BusinessCase27
Words 5619
Pages 23
omECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

University of Toronto, Department of Economics, ECO 204 2010 ‐ 2011 Ajaz Hussain TEST 3 SOLUTIONS 1 These solutions are purposely detailed for your convenience

YOU CANNOT LEAVE THE ROOM IN THE LAST 10 MINUTES OF THE TEST REMAIN SEATED UNTIL ALL TESTS ARE COLLECTED IF YOU DETACH PAGES IT’S YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO RE‐STAPLE PAGES. GRADERS ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR LOOSE PAGES TIME: 1 HOUR AND 50 MINUTES LAST NAME (AS IT APPEARS ON ROSI) MIDDLE NAME (AS IT APPEARS ON ROSI) FIRST NAME (AS IT APPEARS ON ROSI): U TORONTO ID # (AS IT APPEARS ON ROSI)

PLEASE CIRCLE THE SECTION IN WHICH YOU ARE OFFICIALLY REGISTERED (NOT NECESSARILY THE SECTION YOU ATTEND) MON 10 – 12 MON 2 – 4 TUE 10 – 12 TUE 4 – 6 WED 6 – 8 SIGNATURE: __________________________________________________________________________

SCORES Question 1 2

Total Points 60 40 Total Points = 100
ONLY AID ALLOWED: A CALCULATOR

Score

FOR YOUR THERE ARE TWO WORKSHEETS AT THE END OF THE TEST GOOD LUCK!
1

Thanks: Asad Priyo

Page 1 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

Question 1 [60 Points. All parts worth 10 points each] This question is based on the HBS case: The Prestige Telephone Company. For your convenience here is exhibit 1 from the case (figures below are for the Prestige Data services company January – March 2003) Exhibit 1: Prestige Telephone Company January 2003 February 2003 Intercompany Hours 206 181 Commercial Hours 123 135 Total Revenue Hours 329 316 Service Hours 32 32 Available Hours 223 164 Total Hours 584 512 In the case, the “commercial” price is $800/hour and the “intercompany” price is

March 2003 223 138 361 40 143 544 $400/hour:

Prestige Telephone Company
D

“Inter company” a Pi = $400/hr. t a

Other Services

Prestige Data Services

“Commercial”
Data

PC = $800/hr

Commercial Customers

The Prestige Data Services’ cost function was estimated to be (here is “hours of data services”): 223,436 28

The Prestige Data Services’ commercial inverse demand function in March 2003 was estimated to be: 1,466 4.83 Page 2 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

(a) Under the terms of a regulation ruling PDS’s intercompany billing are capped at an average of $82,000/month. What does this imply for the average intercompany hours that can be billed per month? Is Prestige Data Services abiding by or violating the terms of the ruling? Give a brief explanation. Answer: If intercompany revenues are capped at $82,000/month and prices are $400/hr then: 400 82,000 205 This implies that intercompany hours should be 205 hours/month on average. Is PDS billing 205 hours on average each month? Look at: Exhibit 1: Prestige Telephone Company January 2003 February 2003 Intercompany Hours 206 181 Commercial Hours 123 135 Total Revenue Hours 329 316 Service Hours 32 32 Available Hours 223 164 Total Hours 584 512 Notice that average intercompany hours from Jan – Mar 2003 were: 206 181 3 223 610 3 203.33

March 2003 223 138 361 40 143 544

Thus, PDS is abiding by the terms of the agreement. (b) What kind of returns does PDS have for its “variable” inputs? Give a brief explanation based on the figures above (not below). Answer: The Prestige Data Services’ cost function was estimated to be (here is “hours of data services”): 223,436 28

Since this is a linear cost function PDS must have constant returns. In particular, notice that: 28 28 Page 3 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

Since

is constant, PDS has constant returns.

(c) Recall that PDS has never earned profits. Calculate the breakeven number of commercial hours and the equation of the demand curve in the month when PDS breaks even. Show all calculations. Answer PDS sells data services to intercompany and commercial customers. Now profits are: Π Π Π Π Breakeven commercial output is when: Π – – Breakeven Breakeven Breakeven Assuming 28 and Breakeven 205 we have: 400 28 205 800 28 191 –

Π

Π



0

223,436

We can now compute the demand curve in the month when PDS breaks even. Assuming the “other factors” besides price are pushing the demand curve right we see that in the breakeven month, the demand curve has the same slope as the March 2003 demand curve:

Page 4 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

PDS Commercial Demand Curve in March 2003 P = 1,466 – 4.83Q
Commercial Price

$1,466

$800

J

F

M

?

123

135

138

Break even = 192

Commercial Hours

Thus, in the breakeven month: 4.83 Since $800 and 192 we have: 4.83 800 800

4.83 192 4.83 192 1,727.36

The commercial demand curve in the breakeven month is: 1,727.36 (d) In general, is it easier for the “commercial division” to breakeven if PDS comprises of “commercial and intercompany divisions” versus if PDS comprises of just a “commercial division”? Assume the two scenarios have the same total fixed cost. Answer With two divisions we had: Page 5 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

4.83

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

Breakeven

Let’s compare this expression with the case of a single “commercial” division: Breakeven

(i.e. the “other”, intercompany, division has positive contribution Notice that so long as margin), then the commercial breakeven quantity with another “profitable” division is smaller than the breakeven quantity if the commercial division was by itself. (e) [This part is independent of all other parts] Suppose that in March 2003, the government imposes a 10% excise tax on commercial data services. Assuming all commercial customers can be modeled by a single representative consumer with income $ and utility function , (where good 1 is commercial data services and good 2 is “everything else”) what is the marginal utility due to the excise tax on commercial data services? Please show all calculations and specifically state all assumptions. Answer: Before the excise has been imposed, the “representative” consumer, with an unknown income $ , consumes 138 hours of commercial data services and some unknown quantity of other goods. Let “everything else” be the base good so that 1 and assume the consumer has a quasi‐linear utility function of the type: , Here is any function of good 1 such that 0 the income is the consumer surplus of good 1: 0. In this case, the total utility of a bundle minus

Page 6 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

1,466 800

Pc
U(Q1, Q2 ) – Y

A Commercial Demand 138 Q1 Commercial Hours

Q2 (Everything Else)

Y/1 Q2
A

U(Q1, Q2 ) – Y

138

Y/800

Q1 Commercial Hours

That is at bundle A: , 138, 1 1,466 2 800 138 $45,954

Page 7 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

1,466 800

Pc
U(Q1, Q2 ) – Y = $45,954

A Commercial Demand 138 Q1 Commercial Hours

Q2 (Everything Else)

Y/1 Q2
A

U(Q1, Q2 ) – Y = $45,954

138

Y/800

Q1 Commercial Hours

A 10% excise tax raises the price of commercial services to $880 and reduces demand to: 1,466 880 4.83 1,466 1,466 4.83 4.83 880 121.33

1,466 880 4.83 Thus, at bundle B: , 121.33,

1 1,466 2

880 121.33

$35,550

Page 8 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

1,466 880 800 Pc
U(Q’1, Q’2 ) – Y = $35,550

B A

Commercial Demand 121.33 138 Q2 (Everything Else) Q1 Commercial Hours

U(Q’1, Q’2 ) – Y = $35,550

Y/1 Q2 Q’2
B A

U(Q1, Q2 ) – Y = $45,954

121.33 138

Y/880

Y/800

Q1 Commercial Hours

Therefore, the change in utility due to a 10% excise tax on commercial data services is: of a 10% excise tax on of a 10% excise tax on , , , , $35,550 , $45,954 , $10,404

Notice this calculation does not require knowledge of the actual level of income, the exact utility function, or the amount of good 2 being consumed. Page 9 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

(f) Recall that the PDS’s “variable” inputs were quasi‐variable power (denote by ) and quasi‐variable labor (denote by while its “fixed” inputs were quasi‐fixed power, quasi‐fixed labor and all other inputs. Denote all “fixed” inputs as capital . Suppose PDS’s production function is: Assume 1 and 0. Suppose the price of power is $ /hour, the price of quasi‐variable labor is $30.25/hour and the price of “capital” is . Given that $4/hour and $24/hour what is the price of quasi‐variable power ? Hint: Solve the CMP max
,

s. t. $4/hour and

and use the fact that Answer: We are told that:

$24/hour. Show all calculations below.

4 This means that: 4 To find we need to express the optimal demand for power in terms of the parameters and (hopefully) solve for . This means we have to solve the CMP. The total cost of hours of data services is: We could substitute values for some parameters now or we could work as long as possible in parametric form and then substitute numbers. We’ll do the latter so that you can see the algebra. The Cost Minimization Problem (CMP) is: min
,

s. t.

, ,

0

Now:

1 so that: min
,

s. t.

, ,

0

Page 10 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

Since the production function is of the Cobb‐Douglas form we know that for 0 we must use some power and labor so that , 0. As such, we can drop the non‐negativity constraints: min
,

s. t.

Now: max
,

s. t.

Setup the Lagrangian: max
,

s. t.

max
,

s. t.
,

0

max L The FOCs are: L 7 L L The 1st FOC implies: L 7 7 7 The 2nd FOC implies: 0 0 6 7 0 0

Page 11 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

L 6 7

6 7 7 6

0

Equating the ’s yields the familiar “the optimal input bundle is where the iso‐quant is tangent to the iso‐cost” result: 7 7 6 1 6 1 6 This allows us to isolate power (or for that matter labor) in terms of labor (power). For instance: 1 6 6 We can substitute this in the 3rd FOC: L 6 Page 12 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

0

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

6 6 6 6 Now, we are told that $4 which means that:

4 Substitute the expression for to get: 4 4 4 6 1 6 1 6 4 6 Page 13 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

4 1

4

1

1

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

4 Substitute $30.25 to get: 4 6

6

1

1 30.25 $1

0.9976

Page 14 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

Question 2 [40 Points. Parts (d) & (e) worth 5 points each, all other parts worth 10 points each] This question is based on the HBS case The Aluminum Industry in 1994. The following table contains the cost structure of the average CIS primary aluminum smelter, the average state primary aluminum smelter, and the average rational primary aluminum smelter (please note that cumulative capacity below is the total capacity of all smelters within a category (for example, the total cumulative capacity of all CIS smelters is 1.788 million tons per year): All cost figures are $/t Variable costs are in BOLD Average CIS Average State Smelter Smelter CIS CIS 243.73 148.62 382.13 63.69 4.51 76.92 39.57 17.80 68.76 67.11 1,788.07 (All CIS) 740.14 All over State 120.74 454.49 407.27 163.57 11.81 56.72 46.45 62.73 53.17 52.48 2,826.95 (All state) 1,135.25 Average Rational Smelter All over Rational 121.53 292.29 348.49 120.62 10.34 73.91 53.84 194.19 37.82 86.58 16,962.17 (All rational) 873.15

Smelter

Country Company Average Capacity (‘000s tpy) Total electricity cost Total alumina cost Other raw materials Plant power and fuel Consumables Maintenance Labor Freight General and administrative Cumulative capacity (‘000s of tons/year) (all smelters in a category) Total variable costs per ton ($/ton) =

Page 15 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

(a) Solve the profit maximizing problem for the average rational primary aluminum smelter: max Π s. t. 0, Here price of aluminum/ton, Total fixed Cost, = Total variable cost and capacity. Assume 0. Show all calculations. Answer Since the case reports cost figures in “$ per ton” we assume that all smelter’s have constant returns so that: constant constant This will be useful below. Now, a smelter’s profit maximization problem (PMP) is: max Π s. t. 0, Note that smelters are price takers so that is a constant. Recall that all inequality constraints must be expressed in the form . Therefore: max Π s. t. 0, max Π Having expressed all constraints in terms of max L
, ,

s. t.

0,

, form the Lagrangian: 0

max L
, ,

The FOC is:

L The Kuhn‐Tucker conditions are: 0, , 0

0

Page 16 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

0, 0, 0 Notice there are 4 possible cases that must be checked:

q = 0 (Check when λ2 ≥ 0)

λ2 = 0 (Check when q ≥ 0)

q = qc (Check when λ1 ≥ 0 ) Case A

λ1 = 0 (Check when q ≤ qc) Case B

q = qc (Check when λ1 ≥ 0 ) Case C

λ1 = 0 (Check when q ≤ qc) Case D

Case A 0, 0, 0. Need to check if > 0. Thus case A is impossible. Case B 0, 0 0, . Need to check if is automatically satisfied. Thus we need to check if

This requires that

0 and

Since 0 the KT condition with the FOC:

0. Start

L

0

Page 17 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

0 Substitute 0 Thus, for 0 we need: 0 0 0 Case B is the solution when the price of aluminum is lower than 0 . This is because the marginal st cost of producing the 1 unit is greater than or equal to the price, or the , of the 1st unit. 0 0 and 0: 0 0

Constant Returns Technology

$ MC

P
B

MR qc Qty

Thus, anytime curve):

0 the competitive firm’s supply curve is

0 (that’s not the same as the MC

Page 18 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

Constant Returns Technology

$ MC

P qc

MR Qty

Case B when 0

0

0

Since

0 Case C , 0 Need to check if 0, 0 0 the KT condition 0 is automatically satisfied. Thus we need to check if

0:

L

0 0

Substitute Thus, for 0 we need: Page 19 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

and

0: 0

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

0 Case C will be the solution if the aluminum price, the at full capacity: , is greater than ‐‐ the marginal cost

Constant Returns Technology

$ MC

P

MR

C

qc

Qty

the competitive firm’s supply curve is Thus, anytime competitive firm’s MC curve is not the supply curve:

. Again notice that the

Page 20 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

Constant Returns Technology

$ MC

P qc

MR Qty

Case C when Case D 1, 0 Need to check if 0, Start with the FOC: 0

L

0 0

Substitute

0 0

Page 21 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

This is the familiar ECO 100 result that a competitive firm produces where price equals marginal cost. The only problem is that we don’t know when case D will be a solution for sure. For that we need to the conditions under which 0 and . From: We have: Thus: 0 0 0 This gives us a condition for case D to be a solution and for the output supplied to be between 0 and full capacity. Intuitively, case D says that if the price of the product is between 0 and the firm will produce an output between zero and full capacity:

Constant Returns Technology

$ MC

P

MR

qc
Optimal output anywhere between 0 and full capacity

Qty

Page 22 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

Thus, anytime

0

the competitive firm’s supply curve is also its MC curve:

Constant Returns Technology

$ MC

P

MR

qc

Qty

Case D when

0 0

0

Putting all cases together we have a competitive smelter’s supply curve:

Page 23 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

Constant Returns Technology

$ Supply Curve

qc

Qty

Put another way, the quantity supplied is: 0, , , (b) Based on your answer to part (a) what is the impact on the average rational smelter’s optimal profits from, holding all else constant, a 1% increase in: • The price of aluminum? • Capacity? • The minimum output? • Fixed cost? Assume that $1,100/ton. Show all calculations. 0 0

Answer: We are being asked to investigate the impact on the average rational smelter’s profits due to a change in a parameter – the easiest way to solve this is by the envelope theorem. To do this, we must first find out the average rational smelter’s output. Recall that: Page 24 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

All cost figures are $/t Variable costs are in BOLD Average CIS Average State Smelter Smelter CIS CIS 243.73 148.62 382.13 63.69 4.51 76.92 39.57 17.80 68.76 67.11 1,788.07 (All CIS) Since we assumed all smelters have constant returns, the average rational smelter’s 0, 121.53]: for 0, $873.15 740.14 All over State 120.74 454.49 407.27 163.57 11.81 56.72 46.45 62.73 53.17 52.48 2,826.95 (All state) 1,135.25 Average Rational Smelter All over Rational 121.53 292.29 348.49 120.62 10.34 73.91 53.84 194.19 37.82 86.58 16,962.17 (All rational) 873.15

Smelter

Country Company Average Capacity (‘000s tpy) Total electricity cost Total alumina cost Other raw materials Plant power and fuel Consumables Maintenance Labor Freight General and administrative Cumulative capacity (‘000s of tons/year) (all smelters in a category) Total variable costs per ton ($/ton) =

Page 25 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

Average Rational Smelter Supply Curve

$

MC = 873.25 Qty qc = 121.53

Currently, the price of aluminum is $1,100/ton and since: $1,100 $873.15

The average rational smelter will produce at full capacity (i.e. case “C”):

Average Rational Smelter Supply Curve

$

P = $1,100 MC = $873.25

MR

Qty qc = 121.53

Page 26 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

Case C when Thus: 0 121.53 and: 1,100

0

873.25

226.75

Π Since 873.25 then 873.25 873.25 121.52 $106,117 . Moreover, adding up all average fixed cost items we have: $345 345 121.53 $41,928 Therefore: Π Π 1,100 121.52 41,928 106,117 133,672 41,928 106,117 $14,373 Π Notice that producing at full capacity maximizes profits in the sense that it minimizes loss. (As a study question, you should check that operating at full capacity is better than shutting down, confirming the rule that a rational company incurring losses should shut down when ). Now, what is the impact on the average rational smelter’s optimal profits from, holding all else constant, a 1% increase in: • The price of aluminum? • Capacity? • The minimum output? • Fixed cost? By the envelope theorem, the change in the objective (in this case profits) from a small change in a parameter is gotten by differentiating the Lagrangian with respect to the parameter, evaluated at the initial solution. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Optional note: Recall the Lagrangian was: Page 27 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

max L
, ,

0

Any solution to this problem must satisfy the KT conditions: 0, , 0 0, 0, 0 The “product” terms in the KT conditions imply that at the optimum the following terms are zero: max L 0
, ,

This is why differentiating the optimal Lagrangian is equivalent to differentiating optimal profits with respect to the parameter. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Envelope Theorem: the marginal profit due to a 1% increase in aluminum price The Lagrangian was: max L
, ,

0

Differentiating the Lagrangian with respect to aluminum price: ΔΠ ΔP

L

This is the impact on profits from a $1 increase in aluminum price. To find the impact due to a 1% increase in aluminum price we have: %ΔΠ %ΔP Evaluate at optimal solution: %ΔΠ %ΔP %ΔΠ %ΔP 9.3%

L
L L Π

Π*

121.52 1,100 14,373 9.3% % Δ P 9.3% 1%

%ΔΠ %ΔΠ

Page 28 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

%ΔΠ

9.3% 9.3% 0.093 0.093 Initial Π 0.093 Initial Π 0.093 $13,036 14,373

New Π Initial Π 100 Initial Π New Π Initial Π Initial Π New Π New Π New Π Initial Π Initial Π 14,373 New Π

A 1% increase in aluminum prices reduces the average rational smelter’s loss by 9.3% or from a loss of ($14,373) to a loss of ($13,036). Envelope Theorem: the marginal profit due to expanding capacity by 1% The Lagrangian was: max L
, ,

0

Differentiating the Lagrangian with respect to capacity: ΔL Δ

L

This is the impact on profits from a 1 unit increase in capacity. To find the impact due to a 1% increase in capacity we have: %ΔΠ %Δ Evaluate at optimal solution: %ΔΠ %Δ %ΔΠ %Δ 344.95 Π* 121.52 14,373 2.92% 1%

L
L L Π

%ΔΠ %ΔΠ

2.92%

2.92%

Page 29 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

New Π Initial Π 100 Initial Π New Π Initial Π Initial Π New Π New Π New Π Initial Π Initial Π 14,373 New Π

2.92% 0.0292

0.0292 Initial Π 0.0292 Initial Π 0.0292 14,373

$13,953.31

A 1% increase in capacity reduces the average rational smelter’s loss by 2.92% or from a loss of ($14,373) to a loss of ($13,953.31). Envelope Theorem: the marginal profit due to raising the minimum output by 1% The Lagrangian was: max L
, ,

0 we have:

We had required that 0. Re‐writing this constraint as max L
, ,

Differentiating the Lagrangian with respect to ΔΠ Δ

:

L

This is the impact on profits from a 1 unit increase in minimum output. To find the impact due to a 1% increase in minimum output we have: %ΔΠ %Δ

L
L L

0

L

0

There is no impact on optimal profits from raising the minimum output requirement by 1%. Why? Because the optimal solution is for the smelter to produce well above zero, so that the minimum output constraint does not bind – as such, there is no value in relaxing the constraint. Envelope Theorem: the marginal profit of 1% higher fixed cost The Lagrangian was:

Page 30 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

max L
, ,

0 :

Differentiating the Lagrangian with respect to ΔΠ Δ

L

1

This is the impact on profits from a $1 increase in TFC. To find the impact due to a 1% increase in TFC we have: %ΔΠ %Δ Evaluate at optimal solution: %ΔΠ %Δ %ΔΠ %Δ %ΔΠ %ΔΠ 1 1 41,928 14,373 2.92% Π* 2.92% 1%

L
L

1

L

1

Π

2.92% 2.92% 0.0292 0.0292 Initial Π 0.0292 Initial Π 0.0292 $14,793 14,373

New Π Initial Π 100 Initial Π New Π Initial Π Initial Π New Π New Π New Π Initial Π Initial Π 14,373 New Π

A 1% increase in TFC raises the average rational smelter’s loss by 2.92% or from a loss of ($14,373) to a loss of ($14,793). Page 31 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

(c) Graph the primary aluminum industry supply curve as if all CIS smelters behave like the average CIS smelter, all state owned smelters behave like the average state smelter, and all rational smelters behave like the average rational smelter. Answer: From the case we know that CIS and state owned smelters most likely behave as irrational smelter’s, i.e. they produce aluminum even if the price falls below . Put another way, irrational smelters produce aluminum regardless of the price. Recall that: All cost figures are $/t Variable costs are in BOLD Average CIS Average State Smelter Smelter CIS CIS 243.73 148.62 382.13 63.69 4.51 76.92 39.57 17.80 68.76 67.11 1,788.07 (All CIS) Page 32 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

Smelter

Average Rational Smelter All over Rational 121.53 292.29 348.49 120.62 10.34 73.91 53.84 194.19 37.82 86.58 16,962.17 (All rational) 873.15

Country Company Average Capacity (‘000s tpy) Total electricity cost Total alumina cost Other raw materials Plant power and fuel Consumables Maintenance Labor Freight General and administrative Cumulative capacity (‘000s of tons/year) (all smelters in a category) Total variable costs per ton ($/ton) =

All over State 120.74 454.49 407.27 163.57 11.81 56.72 46.45 62.73 53.17 52.48 2,826.95 (All state) 1,135.25

740.14

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

Assuming constant returns and that smelters produce at full capacity (for cases C and D) we see that together, the state and CIS smelters will produce a cumulative output of 1,788.07 + 2,826.95 = 4,615.02 ‘000s tons at any price while the rational smelters will produce 16,962.17 ‘000s of tons so long as 873.15:

Primary Aluminum Industry $ Supply Curve

873.25

Rational smelters CIS & State smelters
4.61m 21.588m Qty (m tons)

(d) [This part is independent of all parts below] Graph the primary aluminum industry supply curve from part (c) below and then show the impact of all rational smelters experiencing “learning by doing” (assume learning by doing has a small effect). Answer With learning by doing there will be a decrease in every smelters’ . However, since the state and CIS smelters produce at any price, there will be no change in the their “supply” curve whilst learning by doing pushes the rational smelters’ supply curve down:

Page 33 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

Primary Aluminum Industry $ Supply Curve

Rational smelters
873.25

CIS & State smelters
4.61m 21.588m Qty (m tons)

(e) Use the primary aluminum supply model in part (c) to predict the demand for primary aluminum for the case for the cases when (i) $800/ton, (ii) $1,100/ton. Please show all graphs below and explain your reasoning. Answer: Case (i):

$800/

. In this case:

Page 34 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

Primary Aluminum Industry $ Supply Curve

873.25 P = 800

Rational smelters CIS & State smelters
4.61m 21.588m Qty (m tons)

Notice that all CIS and state smelters will produce aluminum while all rational smelters will shut down. The total output will be 4.61m tons. Assuming no inventory buildups or rundowns, demand for primary aluminum will be 4.61m tons. Case (ii): $1,100/ . In this case:

Primary Aluminum Industry $ Supply Curve

P =1,100 873.25

Rational smelters CIS & State smelters
4.61m 21.588m Qty (m tons)

Page 35 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

Notice that all smelters will produce aluminum. The total output will be 21.588m tons. Assuming no inventory buildups or rundowns, demand for primary aluminum will be 21.588m tons. . The End ☺ WORKSHEETS

Page 36 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

ECO 204, 2010-2011, Test 3 Solutions This test is copyright material and may not be used for commercial purposes without prior permission

Page 37 of 37
S. Ajaz Hussain, Dept. of Economics, University of Toronto

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Economics

...Economics is the social science that analyzes the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. The term economics comes from the Ancient Greek οἰκονομία (oikonomia, "management of a household, administration") from οἶκος (oikos, "house") + νόμος (nomos, "custom" or "law"), hence "rules of the house(hold)".[1] Political economy was the earlier name for the subject, but economists in the late 19th century suggested "economics" as a shorter term for "economic science" that also avoided a narrow political-interest connotation and as similar in form to "mathematics", "ethics", and so forth.[2] A focus of the subject is how economic agents behave or interact and how economies work. Consistent with this, a primary textbook distinction is between microeconomics and macroeconomics. Microeconomics examines the behavior of basic elements in the economy, including individual agents (such as households and firms or as buyers and sellers) and markets, and their interactions. Macroeconomics analyzes the entire economy and issues affecting it, including unemployment, inflation, economic growth, and monetary and fiscal policy. Other broad distinctions include those between positive economics (describing "what is") and normative economics (advocating "what ought to be"); between economic theory and applied economics; between rational and behavioral economics; and between mainstream economics (more "orthodox" and dealing with the "rationality-individualism-equilibrium nexus")...

Words: 290 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Economics

...What is Econometrics? Econometrics is a rapidly developing branch of economics which, broadly speaking, aims to give empirical content to economic relations. The term ‘econometrics’ appears to have been first used by Pawel Ciompa as early as 1910; although it is Ragnar Frisch, one of the founders of the Econometric Society, who should be given the credit for coining the term, and for establishing it as a subject in the sense in which it is known today (see Frisch, 1936, p. 95). Econometrics can be defined generally as ‘the application of mathematics and statistical methods to the analysis of economic data’, or more precisely in the words of Samuelson, Koopmans and Stone (1954), ... as the quantitative analysis of actual economic phenomena based on the concurrent development of theory and observation, related by appropriate methods of inference (p. 142). Other similar descriptions of what econometrics entails can be found in the preface or the introduction to most texts in econometrics. Malinvaud (1966), for example, interprets econometrics broadly to include ‘every application of mathematics or of statistical methods to the study of economic phenomena’. Christ (1966) takes the objective of econometrics to be ‘the production of quantitative economic statements that either explain the behaviour of variables we have already seen, or forecast (i.e. predict) behaviour that we have not yet seen, or both’. Chow (1983) in a more recent textbook succinctly defines econometrics ‘as...

Words: 736 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Economics

...Economics is the social science that analyzes the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. Economics explains how people interact within markets to get what they want or accomplish certain goals. An economy exists for two basic reasons, firstly, human wants for goods and services are unlimited and secondly, productive resources with which to produce goods and services are scarce. An economy has to decide how to use its scarce resources to obtain the maximum possible satisfaction of the members of the society. Economics is studied so you can become a well-informed citizen. Political and social leaders often develop policies that have broad economic effects. International relations are also dominated by economic concerns. Economic knowledge is needed if you are to understand the effects of taxation, unemployment, inflation, welfare, economic growth, exchange rates, or productivity. We also study economics because it helps the individual make more informed decisions. Consumers, workers, and investors usually make wiser choices if they understand the likely economic effects of the choice to be made. Business executives have more insight for making decisions if they understand how the economy works and the likely effects of economic conditions on a business. Hypotheses are propositions that are tested and used to develop economic theories. Highly reliable theories are called principles or laws. Theories, principles, and laws are meaningful statements...

Words: 259 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Economics

...MAIN TOPICS OF MICRO ECONOMICS I. BASIC CONCEPTS OF ECONOMICS 1. Nature and Scope of Economics 2. Some Basic Concepts 3. Methodological Issues in Economics 4. Methods Laws and Assumptions in Economic Theory 5. Economic Models 6. Production Possibility Curve and Circular Flow of Economic Activity 7. Economic Statics and Dynamics 8. Economy Its Vital Processes and Basic Problems 9. Economic Systems 10. Price System and Mechanism 11. Equilibrium 2. CONSUMPTION THEORY 1. Neo-Classical Utility Analysis 2. Demand and its Law 3. Indifference Curve Theory 4. The Concept of Consumer’s Surplus 5. The Revealed preference theory of demand 6. Elasticity of Demand 3. PRODUCTION THEORY 1. Factors of Production 2. Characteristics of Land and Labour 3. Theories of Population 4. Division of Labour and Machinery 5. Capital and Capital Formation 6. Localisation of Industries 7. Scale of Production 8. Types of Business Units 9. Organisation 10. Laws of Returns : The Traditional Approach 11. Laws of Returns : The Isoquant and Isocost Approach 4. PRODUCT PRICING 1. Nature of Costs and Cost Curves 2. Market Structures 3. The Concept of Revenue 4. Supply – Its Law, Elasticity and Curves 5. Equilibrium of Firm and Industry Under Perfect Competition 6. Pricing under Perfect Competition – Demand and Supply 7. Applications of Demand and Supply Analysis under Perfect Competition 8. Joint Demand and Supply 9. Monopoly 10. Monopsony and Bilateral Competition ...

Words: 326 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Economic

...Thesis Economics Thesis The goal of an economics thesis is to solve a problem regarding the exchange of goods and services in an innovative way. To this end, the student may explore macroeconomics, the study of large economics systems, or microeconomics, the study of person-to-person exchanges of goods and services, in a completely unique manner or in a manner that simply expands on or addresses previous ideas. Students who are struggling to develop ideas for their economics theses may benefit from asking themselves what problems they have a passion for solving. For example, perhaps the student feels greatly irritated about gas prices and could develop an idea on how to cut costs. Perhaps the student has a fascination with the failure of communism and would like to develop a thesis on where the economic system went wrong and why. If the student cannot identify a topic that would produce a viable economics thesis, he or she should talk with the major professor and see if together they can brainstorm a usable idea. Economics theses may have concerns that most disciplines do not have, particularly in formatting. Because pictures can carry a great deal of information in a much more succinct way than text and because economics theses often handle highly complex issues, writers of economics theses may find it useful to include a number of charts, graphs, and tables both in appendices and in the body of the thesis itself. Depending on the complexity of those graphics, the student...

Words: 344 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Economics

...classified and analyzed. The first studies on the economic impact of port activity emerged in the United States in the second half of the 1960s. The ports of New York and New Jersey were the first to be taken into consideration. In the 1970s, the first methodological discussions took place, based on the development of the input–output model and its application to the measurement of the impact of ports. The main stances opposing this kind of study were advocated by Robert C. Waters, while those in favour had Semoon Chang as their main champion, and most of Waters’ criticisms were dealt with. 1. PORT ECONOMIC IMPACTS Ports contribute much to their economies, and port economic impact analysis is the major tool for documenting those contributions. The primary objective of port impact studies is to inform the public of the importance of port services, and additional benefits that may exist vary with particular studies. And also, the decision of local governmental agencies to construct port facilities is often preceded by a port economic impact study. The majority of existing port impact studies begin with definitions of port impacts, as an improper notion of port impact might well lead to an entirely wrong estimation of the total economic impact of a port. One of the major challenges in port impact studies is to identify the port-related industries and find out the degree of port dependency of these industries. Generally, economic impacts of port on the local economy can be divided...

Words: 5423 - Pages: 22

Premium Essay

Economics

...ECON3007 Economic Policy Analysis Topic: Institutions and Economic Reforms Wendy Carlin This topic focuses on the role of institutions in economic growth and the implications of this for the design of economic reforms. We examine why some large-scale economic reforms have been surprisingly successful and others have been disappointing. It will be argued that the consistency between existing institutions in the economy and the reforms is an important factor in determining reform success. We look at property rights and contracting institutions, at the experience of transition economies – both in the former Soviet bloc and China and at reform policies including privatization. The empirical techniques that we study include cross-sectional and panel regressions using aggregate (i.e. country-level) data and micro-economic data. Key readings: Institutions and growth: Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. and Robinson, J. A. (2001) (AJR) “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation”. The American Economic Review, Volume 91, Number 5. Use the UCL Economic Journals page and choose the Atypon link. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. (2005) (AJ) “Unbundling Institutions” Journal of Political Economy Volume 113, Number 5, 949-995. Use the UCL Economic Journals page. Deaton, A. (2009) ‘Instruments of Development: Randomization in the Tropics and the Search for the Elusive Keys to Economic Development’. NBER Working Paper 14690. Use google. Transition: China and Russia ...

Words: 1359 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Economics

...stirred up a massive cause for debate, and for the correct reason. The decision the English citizen is going to comprehend is crucial for the welfare for the English economy, and is known to be the ‘’most important decision you’ll make in a generation’’ As quoted by George Osbourne, Chancellor of the Exchequer, in an article about foreign relations with Brussels. It is a very important decision to the English taxpayer, but is equally important for the British economy, but I think, is arguably most important for the small or large, private or public, English Business. The English economy is growing by 1.5% per annum, this is not enough. Compared to foreign relations such as China, with a G.D.P growth rate or economic growth rate of nearly 9% a year, China has a faster economic growth rate by 6x. Now what do these numerical figures mean in contrast to leaving the EU? Well, whether or not to leave the EU has a massive effect on our economy, influenced by trade. But how does this correlate to affecting British businesses? Well a faster, well protected economy will allow businesses to run faster, trade faster, produce faster, and become efficient, which...

Words: 788 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Economic

...Economic Decisions Individuals and societies alike face many decisions. Individuals tend to make economic decisions when faced with trade-offs, and because of that, individuals are required to compare costs and benefits of their alternative actions referred to as the opportunity cost. Rational individuals tend to think of marginal change during the process of decision-making, and therefore, may respond differently to incentives whilst making economic decisions. This paper discusses the four principles of economics, a decision associated with marginal change, the incentive(s) that could lead to making different decision, and finally, how the principles of economics affect decision-making, interaction and the workings of the economy as whole. The Principles of Economics A trade-off is often referred to as the “technique of reducing or forgoing one or more desirable outcomes in exchange for increasing or obtaining other desirable outcomes to maximize the total return or effectiveness under given circumstances.” (BusinessDictionary.com, 2009) In brief, individuals choose something over something else, or give up something in order to get something else. Whatever “it” is that individuals sacrifice in order to get something, is generally “its” cost, and cost is often linked and associated with money, an opportunity cost however, could be the cost of anything i.e. time or health sacrificed in order to get something. Marginal changes are incremental adjustments individuals make...

Words: 853 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Economics

...single monopoly and share production and profit. However, if this price-fixing game is repeated indefinitely, it would come to a moment that one firm cheats on their collusive agreement. If the cheater cuts its price and the complier remains the agreed price. As shown in the figure, for the complier, ATC now exceeds price and for the cheater, the price exceeds ATC. The industry output is larger than the monopoly output and the industry price is lower than the monopoly price. The total economic profit made by the industry is also smaller than the monopoly’s economic profit. Therefore the complier incurs an economic loss while the cheater gains economic profit. If since both firms have an incentive to cheat as long as price exceeds marginal cost. In this price-fixing game, it will occur a situation that both firms cheat. If both firms produce more cigarettes than the number agreed, the industry output will be increased, the price of cigarettes will fall and both firms makes zero economic profit, as shown in the figure. -In monopolistic competition a company in the short run, makes its output and price decision just like a monopoly company does. The following figure illustrates the monopolistic competition in the short run. As you can see, when the marginal revenue equals its marginal cost (MR = MC), the firm charges the highest price (P) that buyers are willing to pay for this quantity, which is highly higher than the average total cost (ATC). Therefore the firm makes...

Words: 620 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Economics

...RESOURCE | 1 ECONOMICS RESOURCE | 1 ECONOMICS 2009-10: FUNDAMENTALS OF ECONOMIC THINKING Table of Contents Preface to the Economics Resource .................................................................................. 5 Fundamentals of Economics ............................................................................................ 7 The Basic Economic Problem—Scarcity ............................................................................................ 8 Production of Goods and Services .................................................................................................... 10 Increasing Costs ............................................................................................................................... 12 The Factors of Production ............................................................................................................... 14 Benefit-Cost Analysis – Marginal Decision-Making ......................................................................... 15 Marginal Utility and Waffles ............................................................................................................ 17 More on Marginal Utility and the Effect of Prices ............................................................................ 19 Individual and Social Goals .............................................................................................................. 20 Positive and Normative Economics .................

Words: 65448 - Pages: 262

Free Essay

Economics

...elderly population is twice what it is today. Much of this growth will be prompted by the aging of the Baby Boomers, who in 2030 will be aged 66 to 84—the “young old”—and will number 61 million people. In addition to the Baby Boomers, those born prior to 1946—the “oldest old”—will number 9million people in 2030. This paper assesses the economic dimensions of the 2030 problem. The first half of the paper reviews the literature and logic that suggest that aging in general, and long-term care services in particular, will represent an overwhelming economic burden on society by 2030. Then, a new analysis of burden is presented to suggest that aggregate resources should not be a major issue for the midcentury economy. Finally, the paper presents four key challenges that represent the real economic burden of long-term care in the twenty-first century. These challenges are significant but different from macro cost issues. What type of economic burden might be considered overwhelming? Existing literature never explicitly defines this but the sense is that the burden might be considered overwhelming if: (a) tax rates need to be raised dramatically, (b) economic growth is retarded due to high service costs that preclude other social investments, or (c) the general well-being of future generations of workers is worse than that of current workers due to service costs and income transfers. The discussion has significant implications for public policy and for private actors focused on developing...

Words: 373 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Economics

...Scarcity & Opportunity Cost Economics is a very important field of study in modern society. It helps us to understand the choices we have to make to satisfy our unlimited wants and needs to have a better life. Microeconomics is the study of households, firms, and government in specific markets. One of the main problems economics tries to address is scarcity. Scarcity is the term economist use to describe a situation when the amount of something available is not sufficient to satisfy the desire or demand for it. Scarcity can be applied to all aspects of economics and is one of the most crucial points to understand. Because we are consumers in a free market, we live on income constraints or budgets. Limited income forces us to make choices about goods and services we will purchase, as well as goods and services we will forgo. As a society, we also experience scarcity. Societies face scarce economic resources. Economist classify these economic resources into four categories: land, labor, capital, and entrepreneurial ability. Land is considered to be not only physical land but also water, oil, wind, and all other natural resources. Labor would be described as not only the workforce, but the quality of the workers in the workforce. Capital is the facilities, tools, machinery, and any other components that go into manufacturing a good. Entrepreneurial ability is outlined by the people who exploit opportunities in markets. Entrepreneurs combine economic resources with creative and...

Words: 657 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Economic

...Economics’ Approach to Financial Planning by Laurence J. Kotlikoff, Ph.D.  |Executive Summary | |Economists long have shown that when it comes to consuming lifetime economic resources, households seek to neither splurge nor hoard, but | |rather to achieve a smooth living standard over time. Consumption smoothing not only underlies the economics approach to spending and | |saving, it is central to the field’s analysis of insurance decisions and portfolio choice. | |Smoothing a household's living standard requires using a sophisticated mathematical technique called dynamic programming to solve a number | |of difficult and interconnected problems. Advances in dynamic programming coupled with today's computers are permitting economists to move | |from describing financial problems to prescribing financial solutions. | |Conventional planning’s targeted liability approach has some surface similarities to consumption smoothing. But the method used to find | |retirement- and survivor-spending targets is virtually guaranteed to disrupt, rather than smooth, a household’s living standard as it ages.| |Moreover, even very small targeting mistakes will suffice to produce major consumption disruption for the simple reason that the wrong...

Words: 6625 - Pages: 27

Premium Essay

Economics

...HW assignment 4 (Week9): Analysis of the Business Cycle. The main objective of this exercise is to get students thinking analytically and creatively about the two-edged nature of many economic phenomena so as to present a “balanced” perspective based on economics principles, theories and concepts against the backdrop of conceptual and analytical thinking. Visit the web sites or similar ones containing national economic data. National Economic Accounts at the Bureau of Labor Statistics at http://www.bea.gov , Bureau of Labor Statistics at http://www.bls.gov/data/, The Conference Board at http://www.conference-board.org/economics/indicators.cfm, US Census Bureau at http://www.census.gov/mtis/www/mtis_current.html, National Bureau of Economic Research at http://www.nber.org/releases/, The Federal Reserve at http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h15/update/ Review the most recent 8 – 12 months of data on real GDP growth, inflation/CPI, unemployment, Interest rates, consumer confidence index, consumer sentiment index, inventory level, and other relevant economic data. Based on the collected data, analyze the current macroeconomic situation and its impact on any two(2) Monopolistically competitive firms of your choice. Explore in particular how the two companies’ respond to the macroeconomic conditions in terms of their: • stock performance, • current and future sales revenue, • current and future profits, • labor costs, and • hiring decisions. Your paper should...

Words: 377 - Pages: 2