The idea of a gondola in the Hamilton region. The purpose of this essay is to persuade citizens that the idea of a gondola to carry people from the mountain to the lower part of the city is a good idea. The author is suggesting that the use of the land would've been much better spent on a gondola than what eventually got put there. The authors main points are that Gondolas add much to a dirt aesthetic, they are much cheaper than a light rail train would be, and that is would just be simply foolish to not consider it as a serious option. The author provides stats on the matter at hand, for example, that is would be cheaper than an LRT and he also points out that many “jurisdictions” have up and running cable cars or gondolas and Hamilton is simply behind the time. Some literary proofs that the author used was rhetorical question when he states “what if proponents had simply given up on it?” It is an effective use of a literary proof because it makes the reader think about what he asks, but then he follows it up with an answer. Based on the arguments that the author brought up, the idea of a cable car in the city of Hamilton to bring citizens from the mountain to the lower city, is a valid argument and would also add to the appeal of the city. Apple being “ordered” to provide a backdoor to a terrorist phone and private information. This article is about The FBI and the American government requesting apple to create a backdoor to their security software in order for the authorities to get into the criminals phone. The author is suggesting that this is a violation of privacy for the customers of apple products. The authors main points is that if the company were to create this “hack” for this one phone, that sensitive detail could be leaked. Leading to virtually every apple consumer’s phone being hacked into. Some literary proofs that the author used was cacophony. This is used when the writer states “The FBI does not contain the software to crack the phones passcode” This is effective because it makes the action sound much worse then it is, by using a harsh word. The evidence that the author provides is a direct quote from Apple’s COO stating how this is a violation of everything that Apple stands for and how they are refusing to create such a thing. I am convinced that this is a terrible idea. I do not stand with the government on this issue. I believe that if Apple created that it would easily be leaked and many people around the world would have their information stolen. After reading these two editorials, It is clear that editorial number one is the more effective one. The author from editorial number one beings up more facts about how it adds to the appeal of the city, how many other cities have it, and how it would be much cheaper than the cities idea of a light rail train.