...EOC Sues Kmart for Disability DiscriminationEEOC Sues Kmart for Disability Discrimination A known leading retail store, Kmart in Baltimore is said to have violated federal law. It was claimed that Kmart refused to hire an individual who had disability, that individual needed reasonable accommodation, so the United States EEOC, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission decided to file a lawsuit. The Hyattsville store was said to have rejected the individual who applied for a position due to his kidney issue. EECO argument was that after Lorenzo Cook received a position at Kmart, the hiring office had made an appointment for Cook to finish the new hire paperwork and was required to provide a drug screening. Cook then met with the official and he let the official know that he did suffer from kidney failure and he was not able to give a urine sample because he was under dialysis. Cook did not refuse a drug test, he asked if there was a way to go about other drug testing such as blood or hair testing, any drug testing that would not need any urine sample. Management then stated that they needed to discuss this with her other employment officials. Two weeks or so later management let cook know that it is store policy that all new employees must take a standard urine test; they did not even discuss any alternatives. Kmart then denied Cook of the position because he could not take the urinalysis. This action that was taken place towards Cook violates the ADA, the American Disabilities...
Words: 325 - Pages: 2
...Wal-Mart and the Ethical Dilemma Presented to: Dr. Robert D. Gulbro In completion of MGT 5013 Organizational Behavior Florida Institute of Technology By: Felix Knight Wal-Mart was started by Sam Walton in 1962; the first store was in Rogers Arkansas. By the beginning of the 1970’s, Wal-Mart had grown to 1,500 employees and 44.2 million dollars in sales. The company also went public in 1970. The company’s growth continued throughout the decade, with the employee count reaching 21,000 by 1980 with $1.2 billion dollars in sales. Wal-Mart made its first acquisition, buying 16 Mohr-Value stores. In 1983, the first Sam’s Club warehouse opened followed by the first Wal-Mart Supercenter in 1988. By the end of the decade, the company had over 1,402 Wal-Mart and 123 Sam’s Club locations and $26 billion dollars in sales – an increase of 2,600% over the decade. Today, Wal-Mart is the world’s largest retailer, with $405 billion in sales, over 4,300 stores, and 2.1 million employees (Duke, 2010, p. 0). One hundred shares of Wal-Mart stock purchased for $1,650 when the company went public would have grown to 204,800 shares worth over $10.1 million as of July 9, 2010 for a return of 613,431% (“Dividends & stock splits”, 2010, July 9) (“Wal-Mart (WMT) stock quote” 2010, July 9). Daft (2008) stated “Wal-Mart is the largest retailer in the United States” (p. 129). Wal-Mart’s 2010 annual report provides the mission statement of the...
Words: 4186 - Pages: 17
...Employment-at-Will Doctrine LEG 500 May 3, 2014 Summarize the employment-at-will doctrine Justice Harlin, in Advir vs US. 161 (1908) stated “the right of an employee to quit the services of the employer, for what so ever reason, is the same as the right of the employer, for whatever reason, to dispense with the services of such employee (Halbert & Ingulli, 2012).” The doctrine of employment at will emerged as the predominant rule in wrongful discharge cases in America during the latter part of the 19th century. With Employment at Will, known as EAW, even if there is cause to fire someone, their reason does not have to be just, in the sense of being appropriate to the level of performance or the nature of the misconduct. This doctrine states that the “business should have the freedom to discharge or retain employees at will for good cause, for no cause, or even for bad cause, without thereby being guilty of an unlawful act. It is a right which an employee may exercise in the same way, to the same extent, for the same cause or want of cause as the employer. In essence, the doctrine recognizes that the wage owner’s the full owner of his labor services, and the business the full owner of his capital. Each is free to exchange on whatever terms they see fit (Sentell & Robbins, 2008).” The United States remains the last major industrialized country without comprehensive just-cause protection against arbitrary dismissal. The American EAW permits an employer to...
Words: 3474 - Pages: 14
