...Employment-At-Will Doctrine Lisa Dunn Dr. Charles Fleming LEG 500 Strayer University April 22, 2013 Many workers in the United States believe that satisfactory job performance should be rewarded with, among other benefits, job security (Muhl, 2001, 3). There is an employee (Jennifer) that seems to be unable to learn the computer applications that are basic to her job responsibilities, but, consistently “tells” her boss that she is “a good worker and a genius” and that he does not “appreciate her”. Even after a few months of training and support for the accounting firm she works at, she is unable to use the computer tools to be productive and efficient in completing the required tasks. This employee is banking on the employment-at-will doctrine. The employment-at-will doctrine avows that, when an employee does not have a written employment contract and the term of employment is of indefinite duration, the employer can terminate the employee for good cause, bad cause, or no cause at all (Halbert & Ingulli 2012, 46). With this scenario of Jennifer’s behavior the manager needs to review the lists of abilities that she wrote on her application or resume. If those abilities are false and she cannot perform her duties of the job, then depending on her employment contract she either needs to be formally written up or terminated for lying on her resume and not being able to perform her duties. Jennifer went through the training and...
Words: 1462 - Pages: 6
...Employment -A-Will Doctrine I am the newly appointed Chief Operating Officer (COO). I have discovered multiple personal problems needing my immediate attention. I will work closely with my Human Recourse Manager (HRM) to evaluate the following issues in light of the employment-at-will doctrine. The employment-at-will doctrine gives employers broad discretion to fire employees “for a good reason, a dad reason, or no reason at all” (Halbert & Ingulli, 2012, p. 46). The first concern is our employee John posted a rant on his Facebook page in which he criticized our company most important customer. After further investigation I collaborate with my HRM and decided to terminate John. The fact that John bad-mouth the customer on social media is bad for business. It is my responsibility as the COO to clearly send a message to our employees that social media is not the place to air concerns or criticize clients. I can legally according to the employment –at-will doctrine (At-Will) fire John because his criticism of the client was not a matter of public concern. As an employer we must have a significant control over our employees’ word and actions because of the possible impact on operations for example if the client left and we must limit our liabilities. The ethical theory which best supports my decision is free market ethics. Legal challenge: The woman sued, claiming that she was fired in violation of her First Amendment right to free speech. The employer countered that because...
Words: 339 - Pages: 2
...Employment-At-Will Doctrine Alicia M. Malone Law and Ethics in the Business Environment Professor Michelle Olmstead, JD MBA July 22, 2012 The concept of employment-at-will holds that both employer and employee have the mutual right to terminate an employment relationship anytime for any reason and with or without advance notice to the other. Specifically, it holds that an organization employs an individual at its own will and can, therefore, terminate that employee at any time “for a good cause, for no cause, or even for cause morally wrong, without being thereby guilty of a legal wrong” (p.49). Over the last two decades, however, terminated employees have challenged the employment-at-will doctrine by filing lawsuits against former employers on the grounds of wrongful discharge. However, in the last several years, such suits have put limits on employment-at-will provisions in certain circumstances. For example, organizations were guilty of firing employees who filed workers’ compensation claims or took excessive time off to serve on jury duty. More recently, however, the courts have ruled that employees may not be fired for exercising rights protected by law. Those protected rights are covered by a few exceptions such as public-policy exception, implied-contract exception and covenant-of-good-faith exception. In this paper discussed will be four scenarios as they relate to employment-at-will doctrine and liability of an employer based on actions and responses to...
Words: 1382 - Pages: 6
...Employment-At-Will Doctrine Introduction Employment-At-Will is a common legal doctrine that an employment contract of indefinite duration can be terminated by either the employer or the employee at any given time for any reason. In essence, an employer can discharge an employee for any reason which can be good, bad, or no reason at all. At the same time, the employee is equally free to cease work at any time without giving a reason to the employer. This doctrine of Employment-At-Will has been well established in the American legal system since the 19th Century, but nowadays employers find it confusing and with potential liability. This paper will provide different scenarios where employees’ behaviors trigger the Employment-At-Will ruling and how the newly hire Chief Operating Officer (COO) should address these scenarios following the company policies and the law to limit the company’s liability, as well as, the Whistleblower Policy. Scenarios Scenario 1 John posted a rant on his Facebook page in which he criticized the company’s most important customer. In my opinion, the COO has grounds to fire John because there are several clauses in the employee handbook that talk about the limitations on sharing information of the company and its customers on social media such as Facebook. Specially, if John has placed the name of the company in his profile. John can be terminated immediately due to his critics against the company’s most important customer because this could lead...
Words: 1695 - Pages: 7
...The Employment at Will doctrine generally provides private sector employees free reign to fire employees the employer believes to be insupportable. However, Several cases have ruled that an employer who gains unauthorized access to an employee’s password protected blog, and subsequently fires the employee for anything appearing on that blog have violated the Stored Communications Act (SCA) of 1986. The Stored Communications Act of 1986 (SCA) makes it unlawful to intentionally access without authorization a facility through which an electronic communication service is provided (Crane, 2012). In addition, the SCA notes that it is illegal to intentionally secure unauthorized entry and obtain, alter, or prevent authorized access wire and electronic communication while it is electronically stored. This also extends to social media sites such as facebook, twitter, and my space. However, some courts have previously question the interpretation of SCA, which suggest many disagreements. Nonetheless, prior to the dismissal of an employee, an employer should seek legal advice, to ensure that their actions are correct, thus avoid possible civil penalties. To be successful at obtaining a favorable civil verdict against an employer, the fired employee must be able to show that the employer purposely placed privacy settings on his or her social networking site, excluding the employer from access. The employee must also prove that employer did in fact gain unauthorized access and used information...
Words: 560 - Pages: 3
...Employment-At-Will Doctrine In the United States, employees without a written employment contract generally can be fired for good cause, bad cause, or no cause at all; judicial exceptions to the rule seek to prevent wrongful termination. There are three exceptions to the doctrine that are recognized across the 50 states. These exceptions address employment terminations that are in line with the doctrine requirements but are probably not justified [Muhl, 2001]. Public-policy exception Under the public-policy exception to employment at will, an employee is wrongfully discharged when the termination is against an explicit, well-established public policy of the State. For example, in most States, an employer cannot terminate an employee for filing a workers’ compensation claim after being injured on the job, or for refusing to break the law at the request of the employer. The public-policy exception is the most widely accepted exception, recognized in 43 of the 50 States [Muhl, 2001]. Implied-contract exception The second major exception to the employment-at-will doctrine is applied when an implied contract is formed between an employer and employee, even though no express, written instrument regarding the employment relationship exists. Although employment is typically not governed by a contract, an employer may make oral or written representations to employees regarding job security or procedures that will be followed when adverse employment actions are taken. If so...
Words: 1109 - Pages: 5
...Employment at Will Athena Locklear Professor Ellen Kapalko Legal 500: Law and Ethics in the Business Environment July 22, 2012 Employment at Will Doctrine At will employment is a doctrine of American law that defines an employment relationship in which either party can break the relationship with no liability, provided there was no express contract for a definite term governing the employment relationship and that the employer does not belong to a collective bargaining group (i.e., has not recognized a union). Under this legal doctrine, any hiring is presumed to be “at will”; that is the employer is free to discharge individuals for good cause or bad cause or no cause at all. The employee is also equally free to quit, strike or otherwise cease work. “The right of an employee to quit the services of the employer, for whatever reason, is the same right of the employer, for whatever reason, to dispense with the services of such employee” (Halbert/Ingulli, 2012). Since 1959, several common law and statutory exceptions to at-will employment have been created. Common law protects an employee from retaliation if the employee disobeys an employer on the grounds that the employer ordered him or her to do something illegal or immoral. However, in the majority of cases, the burden of proof remains upon the discharged employee. “The earliest adjustments to the doctrine of employment at will were made as workers fought for the right...
Words: 1719 - Pages: 7
...Employment-At-Will Doctrine Employment-at-will doctrine Summary The employment-at-will doctrine is a legal doctrine that gives employers the ability to fire employees “for a good reason, a bad reason, or no reason at all” (Halbert & Ingulli, 2012, p.46). This doctrine was developed in the 19th century under the theory that it would be just as fair for an employer to terminate an employee for any reason, as it would be for an employee to resign from employment at any time. There have been a few exceptions to this doctrine, but because they are so broad, the conditions under which an employee can claim their termination is unlawful is difficult to prove. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there are three exceptions to the employment-at-will doctrine. These address terminations that do not seem just although they technically comply with the doctrine requirements (Muhl, 2001). The first exception is a termination that undermines an action that would be beneficial for society, or is a violation of a State’s public policies. The next exception prohibits employee termination after an implied contract has been established from written assurances, a company handbook, policies or behavior. Finally, an implied covenant of “good faith and fair dealings” between employer and employee is an exception that is the least used among the 50 states. In certain cases, such as those protecting financial service sectors and federal employees, whistleblowing is not a legal ground...
Words: 1578 - Pages: 7
...| Employment-At-Will Doctrine | | | Alishia Bush | | Kimberly Ford, Esq. LEG 500 10/23/2013 | | Employeement-at-will Doctrine/Evaluation The employment-at-will doctrine was established giving employers autonomous power to terminate employment at will for no reason, a good reason or for being found morally wrong, even if they aren’t wrong in the eyes of the law. Within this doctrine the employer or employee, without a written employment contract, can terminate the employment relationship without warning at any time and with or without cause. There are exceptions to this rule. One being that the employer cannot use this doctrine to intimidate or coerce their employees. Employer initiated termination must not be discriminatory or violate specific state or federal laws. This exception is known as the public policy exception. Under this exception, an employee is unjustly discharged when the termination is in contradiction of public policy of the State. Public policy can be determined either by a State constitution, statute, or administrative rule. The second exception of the employment-at-will doctrine is when an implied contract is formed between the employee and employer. The last exception focuses on that in which is an implied promise of “good faith and fair dealing” or implication of contract terms from the employer’s handbook, policy statement or behavior (Halbert, 2012). This exception is the covenant of good faith and fair dealing which...
Words: 1640 - Pages: 7
...The Employment-At-Will Doctrine Employment-at-will refers to American Law's doctrine that defines an employment relationship in which employer or employee can right away terminate the employment relationship at any time with or without any notice. Also, no subsequent liability is considered, provided there was no express contract for a definite term governing the employment relationship and that the employer does not belong to a collective bargaining group. Any hiring in the United States is presumed to "at will" which means that an employer is free to fire an employee for bad or good cause or no cause at all while the employee is free to strike, quit or cease working (Gibson & Lindley, 2010). There are some pertinent exceptions to the doctrine...
Words: 1139 - Pages: 5
...Employment-At-Will Doctrine Falian Oliver LEG 500 The Employment-at-will doctrine states that an employee may depart from a company for any purpose and conversely, an employer may terminate an employee for any reason that they see fit. The premise is that there is no contract thus either party can part ways at will. However, there are some exceptions such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Whistleblower Protection Act. The Civil Right Act of 1964 provides protection to the employee and restricts an employer from terminating anyone on the basis of race, color, national, origin, age, disability, religion or sex. The American with Disabilities Act of 1990 prohibits employers from discriminating against individuals for hiring, firing, promoting, salary, job training, and other privileges of employment. This stands true for employers with 15 or more employees. The Whistleblower Protection Act protects employees from reprisal when the employee reports any wrong doings of the employer. The Act makes it illegal for an employer to reassign, demote or fire employees for reporting fraud, abuse or any unlawful practices. John posted a rant on his Facebook page in which he criticized the company’s most important customer. John can be legally terminated. In my opinion, John’s actions could have a negative impact on the company’s corporate culture. As the newly hired COO, I know that my...
Words: 1056 - Pages: 5
...has praised her performance as highly functional. I will have a meeting with Jennifer; along with a lead discussing a 60 day performance improvement plan. The lead will serve as a witness and Jennifer’s preceptor. The meeting will begin with presenting Jennifer’s previous measurable errors. The meeting will begin explaining to Jennifer that the goal is to develop a partnership to continue her employment at the firm (Boston Medical PIP; page 2). The duration of the PIP will be 60 days. The first 30 days will be a shadowing period only. Jennifer will be encouraged to as ask questions about computer tools to increase her efficency. At the end of the 30 days a meeting with Jennifer, the Lead, and I will take place. The meeting will re-emphasize the encouraged partnership. The last 30 days Jennifer will continue shadowing, but will function on her own with the support of her preceptor (Lead). Jennifer’s behavior will be addressed by Human Resources within the first thirty days. At the end of the 30 day an evaluation will be conducted and a recommendation for continued employment will be decided. Explaining why people do what they do at work has been the goal of behavioral scientist for nearly 100 years (Barrick & Mount, 2013, p.1). The perception of having a job; but not knowing whether it is secure has been classified as one of the more stressful burdens that an employee can shoulder (Hartley et.al. 1991; Ironson 1992.) Jennifer is a valuable contributor to the firm...
Words: 1132 - Pages: 5
...Strayer University-LEG500 | Assignment 1 | Employment-at-Will Doctrine | Question 1 Since the employer has completed the required training classes and the employee is still unable to complete their duties then the only option the employer would have would be to terminate the employee. Based on the employment-at-will doctrine the employer has the right to terminate the employee at any time. Since the employee cannot perform the duties she was initially hired for then the employer has the legal right to find a qualified replacement. The employer could prove that she was unable to complete her required duties even after months of being trained therefore the employer would have legal rights in terminating the employee. The employee would not have much of a case if for whatever reason they decided to sue the employer. The employer did everything in their power to train and help the employee but in the end they weren’t qualified for the position. If the position required specific skills the employer should have been more specific and selective when choosing an employee. They should have made sure they had all the skills or at least most of the skills needed to complete the required daily duties. The small amount of skills they didn’t have could have been acquired within a short amount of time with necessary training. This case doesn’t fall into any of the exceptions when it comes to employment-at-will. The employer hired an employee and they were unable to complete...
Words: 1125 - Pages: 5
...Assignment 1 Employment at Will Doctrine 1. Describe what steps you would take to address the following scenario involving skills, competence, and abilities: "Employment at Will" basically means that an employer may terminate an employee without notice or cause. While companies generally adhere to progressive discipline, it is not bound or obliged to do so. It is up to the company's sole direction to terminate at any time with or without a cause. The situation that the employer is facing with this employee is somewhat difficult however it is manageable. The employee is unable to use the computer tools to be productive and efficient in completing the required tasks of her position. I would inform the employee of her performance particularly her deficiencies abilities and reiterate the skills necessary to fulfill the job she was hired to do. Typically, most corporations have a policy compliance handbook which rest with human resources department to describe the actions to be taken in this situation. Management must familiarize themselves with these policies. “Progressive discipline is an employee disciplinary system that provides a graduated range of responses to employee performance or conduct problems”(nolo.com). When there is a lack of performance, management typically will follow the policies guidelines in the handbook and do the following, an analysis of performance and areas of improvement. Usually this is done twice or once a year, but if it is necessary...
Words: 1672 - Pages: 7
...ASSIGNMENT 1 EMPLOYMENT AT WILL DOCTRINE ROBERT COLEMAN LEG 500 LAW AND ETHICS IN BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT PROFESSOR TERESA SMALLWOOD J.D., MDiv. April 21, 2012 It has been brought to my attention that our recent hire Jennifer has been having a number of issues during her employment. I am going to have to review a number of things to determine what we are going to do about the situation. The first issue at hand is the lack of competence and skills that she is showing when it comes to her assignment. The right of an employee to quit the services of an employer, for whatever reason, is the same as the right of the employer, for whatever reason, to dispense with the services of such employee (Justice Harlin, 1908). The employment-at-will doctrine that was developed gives us the right to dismiss any employee at will for good cause or no cause at all. Our company handbook clearly states that each employee has a 45 day grace period that allows for them to get the proper training and learn their particular tasks. After 60 days of employment Jennifer is still struggling with the basic concepts of the job. Her resume of employment listed that she had the skills necessary to apply for the job and she also tested well on the assessment tests. Jennifer does not seem to be taking things seriously and thinks we are not treating her fairly. Additional training for Jennifer might be the best way to get to the bottom of this problem. Also reviewing the company manual on job...
Words: 1531 - Pages: 7
