Free Essay

Ethics in Psychological Research Deception

In:

Submitted By GIGI7777777
Words 786
Pages 4
Ethics in Psychological Research
Deception

Deception in Psychological Research
Deception in itself is fraudulent behavior. When someone seldom tells and untruth it appears to be harmless to some, however the same act could be devastating to the next person. Deception can effect one or millions. Take the case of Bernard Madoff who took it upon himself to deceive his clients who trust him to manage their financial holding for them be investing and earning them money in return. Madoff’s level of deception affected and damaged many families. What frame or state of emotional or mental state was he in, what was the thing that initially triggered Madoff to initiate his scheming plan?
Ethics Code
The code of ethics as it relates to psychology pertains to the educational, scientific, and professionals and their activities in the field of psychology which include training, service to the public and communities, intervention, clinical research, counseling. Some other areas include development and conducting assessments, along with program design, organizational consulting, evaluation consulting. Code of Ethics in Psychology applies in these areas as well forensic activities and administrations. Other venues that is different from the private sector as it applies to the conduct or behavior of professionals in the field of psychology which spam in a large area like the postal service, telephone service, the internet and most electrical communication devices.
Detecting Deception
Detecting those individuals who tell the truth from those who systematically tell lies intentionally is discerning. People who deceive will do it in a way that is not out in the open it is not obvious people do it by withholding imperative information. Information that can be as devastating if it was just on a personal level or a worldwide level that will have a lasting damaging affect when the result of the deception is revealed.
However the person who sets out to deceive, his or her mind set is to mislead to accomplish some kind of personal gain either in his or her personal, professional, or social climbing lifestyle. This deception grows very deep when it has the ability to stump the authorities like the FBI, they have the ability to pull the wool over the eyes of judges with their lies in court, many have come into this and other countries right underneath the nose of our customs officers with fraudulent documents. Researchers have found that the confusion even puzzles the minds of drug enforcement officers and forensic professional, and the CIA. Being able to detect a person who is being sneaky with their continued deception it is very difficult to separate the lies from the truth. There is a 50/50 chance of being able to distinguish from who is telling the truth from those who are not, the chances of this being detected is just like flipping a coin or playing spin the bottle. Some are clever enough to upset a polygraph test to the point where the administrators believe the test is unreliable.
Tools of Engagement There are tools or methods used to aide in detecting individuals who engage in fraudulent behaviors. These method help to reinforce and detect dishonest behavior they include detecting and being able to read facial expression, positive and negative body language as well as individual style of hand writing. Psychologists are coming up with new developmental software that will analyze and detect and help a person find clues that will bring the deception to the forefront. The training is in progress by psychologist like Paul Ekman PhD. to prepare law-enforcement officers and other professional. Interviewing skills are another technique that is being utilized by a variety of federal agencies like airport security, foreign officers, terrorist interrogators, police counter agents including the FBI and the CIA agencies.
Necessary Deception In the field or practice of psychology it became quite necessary to use a certain amount of not so favorable tactics in order to accomplish some leverage or some goal. In order to accomplish the efforts of the psychologist it is imperative that certain step be taken by the researcher by his own effort he will sometimes withhold important information when given a test to an individual in order to reach a desired goal. Sometimes he or she will even go as far as to mislead the client in order to acquire a desire results. People behavior and exhibit different behaviors and attitudes and attribute when given certain information to lead them or guild them in the direction that the administrator would have them go just to obtain certain behaviors or patterns.

References http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx Detecting Deception: Adelson, R., (2004), Vol 35, No. 7 page 70
http://www.apa.org/monitor/julaug04/detecting.aspx

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Deception in Research

...is deception a controversial issue in psychological research Deception is defined as the provision of information that actively misled research subjects about particular aspects of the study being undertaken, ( as in Hertwig & Ortmann, 2008). This is a technique that has widely been applied by psychological researchers to collect information about human social behavior, justification given is that the research participant if given full disclosure may alter their behavior, and researchers end up with unreliable deductions and conclusions. Scientific researchers claim that not acquinting the research participants with full facts about the experiment does not constitute intentional deception, (Hertwig & Ortmann, 2008), since this prevents them from inferring the hypothesis being tested for and reduces bias in the study. The approach of deception infringes on one of the most important aspects of research, which has been the source of controversy for a quite sometime, it is participants informed consent. According to the American Pychological Association code of conduct states that it is imparative that the potential research participant be given information about the particulars of the research such as the kind of procedures that may be used and what is expected of them during the course of the research and whether they will be exposed to danger or not. This information gives the participant to make an informed decision whether to participate or not in the research, (American...

Words: 673 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Milgrams Background

...Psychology is known to be a complex field of study; the ethics for individual and social are undefined. Though ethical codes could stretch back through history of the Ancient Greek. There have been many up to date versions of ethical codes since then, such as being respected when taking part in psychological research conducted (McGaha & Korn, 1995). Within the departments of psychology there are various ethics committee, the aim of every department is to avoid participants experiencing distress and making sure participants welfare and dignity is kept. Ethics within psychology means the researcher’s key focus have to be to reduce any sort of discomfort or risks which are involved within the study. Also preventing the participants from experiencing any long-term undesirable consequences as well as having to notifying participants on all features of the study which could have an influence on their decision to take part (Hobbs, 1948). Throughout the psychological history many research studies have been conducted by various psychologists. There have been some which have been ethically critisied, with the lack of ethics taken into consideration. The most commonly discussed research study which has many ethical issues is known to be conducted by a behavioral psychologist Stanley Milgram (1963). Leading to many discussions Milgram (1963) purpose of his study was to investigate how far an individual would obey a figure of authority (Bernstein, 2011). Stanley Milgram (1963) introduced...

Words: 1546 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Ethics in Psychological

... Ethics in Psychological Research Paper Lillie Johnson Psych/540 March 3, 2013 Cindy Fouhy Use of Animals 2. Introduction Through the study of animals in different forms of research, psychologists have introduced to us a understanding that is better of human issues in which solving a problem have been easily found. Issues in human like aging, drug addition, side effects, and anxiety have been built through the use of animals. In psychological research, the rules of ethics is a important idea. The rules supply an outline in which researchers are obligated to supply information concerning the motive of the research, deception in research, the use of animals in studies of research, and human care. My paper will focus on the use of animals as an issue of classical ethics in a psychological research. It will explain the benefit ratio as well as the concept of risk in using animal for experiments and determine what influence does the use of animal in research has...

Words: 1083 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Milgram Disobedience Study Ethical

...Kim: This serves as a rebuttal to Waltenburg regarding her stated position that the Milgram Disobedience Study was ethical. Waltenburg asserted that deception is common place and warranted in many psychological research studies. She provided an example in which research participants are frequently provided with sugar pills versus other subjects given the drug being tested. Regarding Milgram’s study, Waltenburg stated that Milgram properly conducted an interview with all subjects just as soon as the study was over with and that all participants appeared to be well. This response will feature scholarly evidence that deception, while common place, is never ethical; and Milgram did not properly conduct debriefing interviews with all participants...

Words: 492 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Psyc

...the research study titled “Monsters in the Dark and Other Scary things: Pre-schoolers self- report” by Loxton and it will evaluate whether this study was conducted in a child-friendly and ethically accountable way. Research is the gathering and forming of collections of information focused on a particular topic or task and with regards to psychology, qualitative research is found to be the most useful and accurate as it tries to find a deeper understanding of the person’s inner most emotions and experiences. Research ethics “are guidelines researchers have to follow to protect the rights of humans participating in research” (Louw & Louw. 2007: 43) and serve the purpose of protecting the rights of participants in any research and consists of a number of guidelines in which researchers have to adhere to. This essay will evaluate this study according to the guidelines provided by the Psychological Society of South Africa which ensures that all the rights of participants participating in research are protected. Research and tests conducted using humans need to be consistent for the group of people in which are being used, such as different cultures or nationalities as well as being “valid, reliable and normed.” (Louw & Louw. 2007: 43) The research ethics committee of South Africa defines its role as “to safeguard the dignity, rights, safety and well- being of all trial participants” (Research Ethics Committee South Africa Health Department. 2005) and any research wanting...

Words: 2694 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Tuskegee Syphilis Research Study

...Tuskegee Syphilis Research Study Leslie Valentine ME1415: Medical Law and Ethics and Records Management Ultimate Medical Academy Zakevia Green Abstract In this paper I am going to answer the following questions as the relate to the Tuskegee Syphilis Research Study found on page 264 in the Medical Law and Ethics textbook by Bonnie F. Fremgen. The questions are: 1. Could this type of research be conducted today? Why or why not? 2. What should the public have done, since they knew about the study? 3. In your opinion, how should the data be used that is obtained from an unethical experiment and how can we prevent this from happening again? 4. Discuss the code of ethics as it relates to this study? 5. What are your personal thoughts on the ethical standards exhibited through this study? Tuskegee Syphilis Research Study Any research like the Tuskegee Syphilis Research Study could not be conducted today. There are many reasons as to why this type of research study cannot be conducted today. One reason is because people of all races are more aware of diseases that today’s society has now than they were back then. Also, people nowadays want to be treated for the disease(s) that they have whether than be experimented with. People in today’s society are also more aware of the researches that are taking place to not allow this type of study to be conducted. In my opinion, the public should have not allowed this type of research to be conducted. In the research study on page...

Words: 752 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Irb Human Training

...Research with human subjects has a long and often troubled history in the United States (U.S.) and throughout the world. Chances are you already have heard of some of the most egregious and well-known examples of unethical research in the biomedical sciences, such as the experiments conducted by Nazi doctors and scientists on concentration camp prisoners during World War II, and the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) study titled "Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male" (Tuskegee Study). These abuses led to the creation of codes of research ethics in Europe and the U.S. In the wake of the Second World War, the subsequent Nuremberg Trials on war crimes produced the Nuremberg Code, which outlined ten points for conducting ethical research with human subjects. Nearly two decades later, the World Medical Association (WMA) developed a code of research ethics known as the Declaration of Helsinki, published in 1964 and subsequently revised. This document is built on both the Nuremberg Code and the physician's code of ethics known as the Declaration of Geneva. In the U.S., news that researchers deceived and withheld treatment from subjects who suffered from syphilis in the Tuskegee Study led to the creation of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (National Commission or "the Commission"). The Commission was charged with establishing a code of research ethics for U.S. research involving human subjects. In 1979...

Words: 4059 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Unit 22 Workbook

...Unit Aims This unit aims to develop learners’ understanding of the purpose of research in the health and social care sectors. Learners will be able to explore different research methodologies, enable them to plan and conduct their own research relating to a health or social care issue and evaluate the success of the outcomes. Unit Objectives 1 Understand the function of research in health and social care 2 Understand ethical issues relating to research in health and social care 3 Understand research methodologies relevant to health and social care 4 Be able to plan for a research project 5 Be able to conduct research relevant to a health and social care context 6 Be able to interpret research findings WHAT IS RESEARCH? Research is a planned process in which information is collected systematically for a specific purpose, analysed and reported. Research can have many different functions in health and social care. Functions of Research In pairs read through the following study and discuss the function(s) that the research can be used for. Aim:  Hofling (1966) aimed to discover whether nurses would comply with an instruction which would involve them having to infringe both hospital regulations & medical ethics. The intention was to test the strength of the doctor-nurse relationship, regarding how far a nurse would go to comply with doctor’s orders against their own code of professional conduct. Procedure: ...

Words: 1700 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Research Critique Psychological Methods

...This piece of work aims to analyse the research methods concerning its use in the field of psychological research. The work will begin by rationalizing the importance of research and will identify the relevant body regulating psychological research in the UK. It will endeavour to present, an give an overview of the main research methods employed by researchers. The advantages, similarities and limitations of two of the methods will be explained. Finally, the ethical issues and criticisms identified in particular psychological experiments will be discussed. Psychologists use several methods of research, each of which provides information about human behaviour. These methods include: naturalistic observation, survey method, correlational method, the experimental method ( laboratory, field experiments) the correlational method and case studies. In general psychological research methods attempt to: Describe mental and physical behavior; explain the reasons for that behaviour, and predict the circumstances under which it might happen again (Mcleod 2012). None of the methods is able to study all aspects of human behaviour and thought. For example, In naturalistic observation methods participants are carefully observed in their natural setting without interference by the researchers. Researchers observe and record behaviour without trying to influence or control it while participants are not aware of observation. In survey methods a large group of people are questioned about...

Words: 1803 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Stanley Milgram

...Stanley Milgrams Experiment- Ethical or Unethical? February 16 2012 Stanley Milgram conducted a psychological experiment on the problem of destructive obedience and how it serves numerous productive functions in society. Although journalist Diana Baumrind questioned his experiment as to whether or not it was ethical, Stanley proved his case thoroughly by proving that all of his actions were well planned and very ethical. He did this by following the guidelines of ethics and social science research including protecting his participants from long lasting physical pain or psychological harm, informing all the subjects of potential risks and procedures involved, and also using necessary deception for the purpose of deceiving the participants so they are not influenced by the real purpose of the experiment. Stanley Milgram proves his case thoroughly and with the utmost confidence. Stanley ensured that all his participants were protected from long lasting physical pain and psychological harm. Although Diana stated that “It has become more commonplace in psychological laboratory studies to manipulate, embarrass and discomfort subjects...Milgrams study is a case in point”, she was clearly mistaken. Milgram ensured that post-experimental treatment was administered to all the subjects. Although some patients during the experiment experienced some very unexpected symptoms such as twitching, sweating, groaning and nervous laughter fits, four out of five subjects felt that this experiment...

Words: 576 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Ethics in Psychological Research

...benefits and risk, and defining ethics of the use of animals in research. Animal research is a topic which is ethically sound and a concerning manner to researchers of the psychological field. There are issues of tests run on the animals which are controversial in manner and a part of the (APA) American Psychological Association ethical issue. The APA is a organization for psychologists in the United States, and designs rules and guides the profession of psychologists as well as other medical personnel. The impact of the testing of animals in the research of psychology will be included in the discussion. Ethics in Psychological Research Paper Animals in Research Ethics help guide researchers around ethical dilemmas that may arise when conducting research. Example questions would be is it acceptable to avoid telling the participant of a study as to what the researcher is looking for and testing about? In what instances is it acceptable and when is it not? The development of research ethics helps guide researchers to find the necessary answer to the different question types (Shaughnessy, Zechmeister, & Zechmeister, 2009). Conducting a scientific research is when researchers look for facts, try to prove theories, and declare the findings the truth, and those conducting research must use the ethics guidelines (Shaughnessy, Zechmeister, & Zechmeister, 2009). The research study or projects could be a loss if the start of the research begins with a lie because the information...

Words: 1175 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

APA Ethics Case Study

...The American Psychological Association (APA) provides leadership in formulating ethical principles standards (Cozby and Bates, 2015, P. 47). APA ethics code consists of five principles and they are beneficence and nonmaleficence, fidelity and responsibility, integrity, justice and respect for right and responsibility (Cosby and Bates, 2015, P. 47). The principle of beneficence informs researchers to make sure there are greater benefits and to not harm their participants. Fidelity and responsibility is for psychologist to establish a great relationship with participants and the people they are working with. Psychologists have to make sure that they keep their word and accomplish everything that they agreed to negotiate with participants. Integrity mean for psychologist to not engage in any negativities activities such as fraud, cheat or steal (Cozby and Bates, 2015, P. 48). Psychologists also have to understand that everyone have the right to a fair justice. Last, psychologists have to respect people’s right, privacy, confidentiality and self-determination (Cosby and Bates, 2015, P. 48)....

Words: 544 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Stan

...McLeod (2007), for research to be considered as being ethical, there should be informed consent from the participants. Informed consent can only result if all participants have been given adequate information on the purpose of the research and the procedures to be used in the study. Additionally, informed consent depends on the participant’s full understanding of any dangers they may face during the research. However, in the Stanford case, participants were not fully debriefed on risks of participation in the experiment (Chang, 2015). Additionally, the researcher, Zimbardo promoted an unpredictable research that himself could not predict the outcome. Consequently, any consent may have been gotten through deception (McLeod, 2007). Again, the research was unethical as it exposed participants to unknown dangers. As a result, two participants had to remove from the experiment before its conclusion. Indeed, participants playing the role of prisoners were exposed to psychological and physical abuse. For instance, one participant who played the role of a prisoner had to be released before the due time because of uncontrollable bursts of screaming and crying after being subjected to abuse (Rubina, 2015). Again, the Stanford research was unethical since it was ended prematurely before fully debriefing participants about its success or failure. More importantly, the study broke research ethics by exposing participants to emotional trauma. Research ethics required the researcher...

Words: 299 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Milgram Experiment

...Although the results of Milgram’s experiment astonished much of the psychological world, the reliability of the experiment is often questioned due to unethically perceived procedures of the study. In Milgram’s famous study researching the implications of authority figures on obedience, subjects of the experiment were deceived into thinking that they were the “teachers” of an experiment testing how a stimulus could affect learning; these teachers were instructed to shock the learner, which was actually a confederate in the study, after they incorrectly answered a question, and throughout the experiment the shock intensity would increase for every wrong answer. Throughout the study, the subjects would hear prerecorded screams, cries, and begs...

Words: 1197 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Stanford University Experiment

...McLeod (2007), for research to be considered as being ethical, there should be informed consent from the participants. Informed consent can only result if all participants have been given adequate information on the purpose of the research and the procedures to be used in the study. Additionally, informed consent depends on the participant’s full understanding of any dangers they may face during the research. However, in the Stanford case, participants were not fully debriefed on risks of participation in the experiment (Chang, 2015). Additionally, the researcher, Zimbardo promoted an unpredictable research that himself could not predict the outcome. Consequently, any consent may have been gotten through deception (McLeod, 2007). Again, the research was unethical as it exposed participants to unknown dangers. As a result, two participants had to remove from the experiment before its conclusion. Indeed, participants playing the role of prisoners were exposed to psychological and physical abuse. For instance, one participant who played the role of a prisoner had to be released before the due time because of uncontrollable bursts of screaming and crying after being subjected to abuse (Rubina, 2015). Again, the Stanford research was unethical since it was ended prematurely before fully debriefing participants about its success or failure. More importantly, the study broke research ethics by exposing participants to emotional trauma. Research ethics required the researcher...

Words: 299 - Pages: 2