Free Essay

Euthanasia

In:

Submitted By rubenroberto
Words 3615
Pages 15
Ruben Salcedo
Professor Palmer
English 112
10/5/15
Legalization of Euthanasia
Euthanasia is a topic that has been debated by many over the years. Although Euthanasia is presently illegal in the United States, physician assisted death, or PAD is legal in the states of
Washington, Oregon, Vermont and Bernalillo County, New Mexico. To understand Euthanasia, one must understand the way it differs from PAD. The key distinction between the two is that euthanasia requires either a physician or third party to administer the drugs, while in physician assisted death, the drug is administered directly by the individual. The debate over euthanasia dates back to the Greeks and Romans, but it reached the United States in 1870 when Samuel
Williams proposed using morphine and anesthetics to intentionally end an individual's life.
Debates continued for another 35 years when Ohio attempted to pass a bill which would legalize euthanasia in 1906. While the bill was never passed, it was the first of its kind, and laid the foundation for bills to come (Humphrys).
There are many arguments as to why Euthanasia should remain illegal in the United
States. Many individuals argue that it fits the definition of murder, and “For present purposes, murder can be defined as the intentional unjustified, unexcused and legally unmitigated killing of

another human being. Active euthanasia fits this definition on the basis that it is the, or a cause of, death” (Lanham 2).
Although there is some merit to the argument that euthanasia fits the technical definition of murder, there is an even more important factor to consider regarding the morality of compassion versus the technical definition of murder. Euthanasia is used when the quality of life is significantly reduced. When asked about the subject, author and physician Toula Drimonas asked important questions that negate the idea that euthanasia constitutes as immoral murder.
“Why should making choices about our last days be anybody else's business, most certainly in terminal and other untenable situations? Isn't preventing a person's choice to lessen their suffering simply inhumane and the complete opposite of compassion” (Drimonis)? Here, he addresses the concept that a person should still be able to make a decision on their own about whether or not they want to live, regardless of their physical capacity. He emphasizes that there is no compassion in making someone continue living when they are in agonizing pain. Dr.
Drimonas also spoke of the case of Paul Lamb who, “after being completely paralyzed, petitioned for the option to be euthanized to escape a life which he referred to as being “fed and watered” (White).
To withhold someone from ending a life they view as strictly suffering, is cruel and immoral; and goes against the wishes of that human being.
There are several options that some view as alternatives to euthanasia. Many people believe that Palliative care is a more effective method. Palliative care is the spiritual, physical and emotional care for a person dying from a terminal disease with no known cure. This method focuses on improving quality of life through support and compassion for the family and friends of the patient. It is expected that this kind of care will prevent an individual from turning to

euthanasia. The primary goal of palliative care is engaging successfully with the patient as a person, rather than a product or number the way many hospitals do. Palliative care shouldn’t be used as an argument against euthanasia, but rather as a step to prevent euthanasia. While
Palliative care should certainly be used as the first line of defense against an individual wanting to end his life, if palliative care is ineffective or the person is simply in too much pain to overcome, then they should have the right to make the decision to end their excruciating pain through euthanasia.
The intention for palliative care is to allow the family to spend maixmum quality time with their closest family members and friends, with the least amount of stress as possible. The crucial and overall goal is to arrange the last moments into something special so that the family can enjoy those final, precious moments. However, in many cases, eventually the individual;s pain increases to the point that it even hurts the family members to see their loved one endure such significant suffering. When a person reaches this point, they should be able to decide if they want to continue their life.
The most common and well known argument against euthanasia take the “slippery­slope approach, and insinuates that although something initially seeming harmless, overtime it will slide down a darker path. The argument is that once we allow for euthanasia to be legalized, health care services, like health insurance and doctors will begin ending the lives of patients without their consent in order to save money.
Many also believe that the increased access to euthanasia will increase pressure to do so for those who feel like they are a burden to their family, causing them to make a biased decision.
This would only be a valid argument if there were not regulations and laws. Netherland

demonstrates a great example of where euthanasia works effectively because of the regulations which accompany it. Due to strict regulations, about “... two­thirds of patients who apply to be euthanized are refused” (Morris), and unless the euthanization is conducted by a certified doctor, the individual involved will be charged with murder. Hospitals would certainly not attempt to end someone's life unjustly when the consequences are so detrimental. Claims that assert this are typically based on radical ideas as opposed to factual inquiries and research.
Majority of people would agree that in civilized society, no one enjoys seeing an individual in horrible pain because of a deadly disease. It is because of this innate human trait that many have lobbied for an alternative, to living out their last moments in excruciating pain.
The debate essentially depends on the method. For many people, they feel that the struggle of death somehow decreases their dignity, and they would rather pass away while they still have some control of their body.
Euthanasia creates a complex argument, because often it is seem as an “either, or” scenario. However, there can be compromises that allow for both parties to agree upon certain terms which shift the argument from legality to creating a humane solution. Despite the way many view the issue, euthanasia should not be seen as a religious, political or moral argument. It should come down to the fundamental idea that one’s life is their own. Many arguments used against euthanasia have fair points, but if ideas are taken from both sides a compromise can be found. Legalization, with the presence of the proper legal regulation allows people to control their own life and end their suffering. However, this doesn;t mean that every individual who is victim of a reduction of quality of life is required to be euthanized. Regulation protects those

who choose to opt out of the process, but legalization protects the rights of those who would choose to end their suffering.
Euthanasia can mean different things to different people, however to proponents of legalization, they do not see it as the end of someone's life, but rather as a “physician­assisted suicide contending that terminally ill people should have the right to end their suffering with a dignified, and compassionate death” (Should Euthanasia be Legal?). With this in mind, one must also remember that America operates as a democratic society where citizens are granted the right to make decisions over their own bodies. Any individual who is very sick should have the option to end their suffering on their own will, as it is their personal choice and society should not be able to withhold that from them simply because they need medical assistance to complete their wishes. In its most positive sense, Euthanasia ends the suffering of terminally ill people. Rather than live out their final days in pain, or even confusion. The individual has the choice to end their life in a way they see as more dignified. The end of pain continues with the family members as the grief they feel may be reduced, as the suffering can be shortened. Relevant illnesses can include, diseases like Dementia, “Anyone who has watched a loved family member sink into the abyss of confusion... as the person in question tries to juxtapose moments of clarity with the awfulness of knowing one's grip on reality ­­ and with it one's dignity and sense of self ­­ is slipping”(Nitschke). It is an all too scary notion to think of a family member slowly losing who they are. To reduce this suffering, before that individual is unable to make decision on their own euthanasia is a very possible alternative.

As previously mentioned, in order for euthanasia to be safe, compromise is needed in the legislation. Euthanasia should only be used for the most serious cases such as those that are dying of a fatal illness, or someone whose mind is deteriorating at a rapid rate. It must be the individual's decision on whether to take this form of action. Palliative care can act as a
“deterrent” from euthanasia in hopes that a patient can find increased comfort through this care, but that euthanasia is still an option if that is the treatment is unsuccessful or inadequate. This distinction will be made by the patient. An example of palliative care deterring euthanasia is, a
Chilean girl suffering from cystic fibrosis who after an outpour of support, stated “there are people who have led me to change my way of thinking" (Luna 1).
Palliative care can be an effective way of changing someone’s mind but if even after that, and they still choose euthanasia then there should be legal avenues for a patient to act on that decision. In conclusion, if euthanasia is properly controlled and regulated it would prove to be beneficial to many people and would secure a basic human right to determine their status of life and death. With the proper regulations in place, it would be very difficult for the practice to turn take on the “slippery slope” path. Worst case scenario is that indeed it could become method for patients to be taken advantage of which could be corrected through increased regulation.
Euthanasia should only be used in the most dire of circumstances for people in such excruciating pain that going on with life is even worse than death itself. Although this is largely determined by the patient themselves, regulation would be applicable in this area as well. No one wants to see an individual in such pain that they would rather die. However, in the tragic case that this fate occurs, and that patient chooses to end their life, then there is a human obligation to be compassionate enough to allow their suffering to end. Giving a patient

the option of Euthanasia allows them to embrace death on their own terms, rather than at the hands of a disease or illness. Legalization puts the power the disease takes, back in the hands of the patient, giving them one last chance to live their life; and that is the best justification there is.

Work Cited
"Anti­Euthanasia Arguments."
BBC News
. BBC, n.d. Web. 08 Sep. 2015
Drimonis, Toula. "Assisted Death Isn't Murder, It's Compassion."
The Huffington Post
. N.p., 23
May 2014. Web. 05 Oct. 2015
"Euthanasia ­ Should Euthanasia be Legal?"
ProConorg Headlines
. PROCON, 2 Apr. 2015.
Web. 28 Sep. 2015.
Humphrys, Derek. "Chronology of Assisted Dying." Chronology of Assisted Dying. N.p., n.d.
Web. 05 Oct. 2015.
Karaim, Reed. "Assisted Suicide:Should doctors be allowed to help terminally ill patients die?."
CQpress
. CQRESEARCHER, 17 May 2013. Web. 28 Sep 2015
Lanham, David.
Euthanasia, Pain Killing, Murder and Manslaughter (n.d.): n. pag.
AIC. AIC.
Web. 5 Oct. 2015.
Luna, Patricia. "Chilean Girl with Illness Changes Mind about Euthanasia."
Yahoo! News
.
Yahoo!, 22 Mar. 2015. Web. 28 Sep. 2015.
Nitschke, Phillip. "Euthanasia: Hope You Never Need It, but Be Glad the Option Is There."
CNN
. Cable News Network, 27 Nov. 2013. Web. 28 Sep. 2015.
"Rsrevision.com/gcse."
Euthanasia
. Ed. Paul Emecz. RS revision, n.d. Web. 28 Sep. 2015.
White, Hilary. "Paralyzed UK Man Petitioning for Legalized Euthanasia by Lethal Injection."
LifeSiteNews
. LIFESITE, 17 May 2013. Web. 05 Oct. 2015.
.

Rough Draft Ruben Salcedo
Proffesor Palmer
English 112
10/5/15
Euthanasia Should be Legal
Euthanasia is illegal in the United States, PAD or Physician aid in dying however is legal in the states of Washington, Oregon, Vermont and Bernalillo County, New Mexico. To understand Euthanasia, you need to know about PAD as well. The key difference between the two is that euthanasia requires either a physician or third party to administer the drugs, while
Physician aid in dying is administered by the individual themselves. The argument for euthanasia has been going on since the Greek and Roman times, and beginning in 1870 in the United States,
Samuel Williams proposed using morphine and anesthetics to intentionally end an individual's life. Debates continued for 35 more years when Ohio attempted to legalize euthanasia in 1906.
While the bill was never passed it was the first of its kind, and laid a foundation for bills to come.
There are many reasons as to why Euthanasia in the United States is illegal. Many individuals believe it to be murder, and “For present purposes, murder can be defined as the intentional unjustified, unexcused and legally unmitigated killing of another human being.

Active euthanasia fits this definition on the basis that it is the, or a cause of, death” (Lanham 2).
Beyond it fitting this definition, there is nothing that they can argue. Euthanasia is not murder it is compassion. Author and Physican Toula Drimonas asked these two question that completely go against the arguement that euthanasia is murder. I dont know whow to make this flow better“Why should making choices about our last days be anybody else's business, most certainly in terminal and other untenable situations? Isn't preventing a person's choice to lessen their suffering simply inhumane and the complete opposite of compassion? How is there compassion in making someone continue living when they are in agonizing pain, or in the case of Paul Lamb living his life completely paralyzed. Paul Lamb petition for Euthanasia as he said his life “ now consists of being “fed and watered,” and wants to die.” To withhold someone from ending their life when they themselves want their life to end is cruel.
Many people believe that Palliative care is a more effective method, than euthanasia.
Palliative care is the spiritual, phsyical and emotional care for a person dying when a cure is not possible. This involves support and compassion for the family and friends of the patient. It is expected that this kind of care will prevent an individual from turning to euthanasia. The primary goal of palliative care is engaging successfully with the patient as a person, rather than a product or number like how many hospitals do. Palliative care shouldn’t be used as an arguement against euthanasia but rather as the first step before euthanasia. Palliative care should be used as the first line of defense against an individual wanting to end his life, however if palliative care is ineffective or the person is just in too much pain then they should be allowed to end their life rather than be in excruciating pain.

The intention for palliative care is to allow the family to spend as quality time with their closest family members and friends, with the least amount of stress as possible. The crucial and overall goal is to arrange the last moments into something special so that the family can enjoy those final moments because they are precious. Eventually however the individual is in too much pain to where it even hurts the family members, seeing their loved one like that.
The most common and well known argument against euthanasia is the like any slippery slope argument it emphasizes on something initially seeming harmless, but then overtime it turning into something more serious. The argument is that once we allow for euthanasia to be legalized, that Health care services, like health insurance and doctors will begin ending the lives of patients without their consent to save money. Additional believed consequences is that individuals who are under constant supervision and care, will feel pressured to end their life so they are not burdening their family. This would only be a valid argument if there were not regulations and laws. Netherland is a perfect example where euthanasia is effective because of the regulations they put in place with it. Only “around two­thirds of patients who apply to be euthanized are refused” (Morris) and unless the euthanazing is done by a certified doctor, the individual involved will be charged with murder. Hospitals would certainly not attempt to end someone's life when the consequences are so dire. If an individual would think that a hospital would do such a thing then they are not looking at the medical field in a very positive manner.
Due to the legality of the whole issue and the morality of humans, it's hard to believe any medical professional would do such a thing.
No one wants an individual in horrible pain because of a deadly disease, and many would be okay with an alternative, then to live their last moments in excruciating pain, it just depends

on the method. Many people would rather keep their dignity than be seen struggling in their final moments. Euthanasia creates a complex argument, because often it is seem as an either or. One does not have to pick against, euthanasia, being either illegal or legal. There can be compromises that allow for both parties to agree upon certain terms. Euthanasia should not even be seen as a religious, political or moral argument. It should come down to the fundamental idea that one’s life is their own. Many arguments used against Euthanasia have fair points, but if ideas are taken from both sides a compromise should be found.. It is equally understandable as to why it should be legal, it ends people suffering, it is the individual’s choice and that person gets to go out on their own terms with dignity however they seem fit. .
Euthanasia can mean different things to different people, however to proponents of legalization, they do not see it as the end of someone's life, but rather as a “physician­assisted suicide contending that terminally ill people should have the right to end their suffering with a dignified, and compassionate death”(Should Euthanasia be Legal?). This is where it comes down to the fact that, we live in a democratic society where it should be the person's decisions, and that decision should be respected. Everyone has the right to how they treat their own body. Every individual who is very sick is in their own rights to have the option of euthanasia, as it is their personal choice and society should not be able to withhold that from them. In its most positive sense, Euthanasia ends the suffering of terminally ill people. Rather than live out their final days in pain, or even confusion. The individual has the choice to end their life in dignity. The end of pain continues with the family members as the grief they feel, can be shortened. Illnesses can include, diseases like Dementia, “Anyone who has watched a loved family member sink into the abyss of confusion... as the person in question tries to juxtapose

moments of clarity with the awfulness of knowing one's grip on reality ­­ and with it one's dignity and sense of self ­­ is slipping”(Nitschke). It is an all to scary notion to think of a family member slowly losing who they are. Before that individual can not make decision on their own euthanasia is a very possible idea.
Compromise is needed in the argument of euthanasia. Euthanasia should only be used for the most serious cases, of those that are dying of a fatal illness, or of someone whose mind is deteriorating at a rapid rate. It should be the individual's decision on whether to take this form of action. Palliative care can act as a “deterrent” from Euthanasia as if a patient can find increased comfort through this care then, that is the patient's decision. An example of palliative care deterring euthanasia is, a Chilean girl suffering from cystic fibrosis who after an outpour of support, stated “there are people who have led me to change my way of thinking" (Luna 1).
Palliative care can be an effective way of changing someone’s mind but if even after that, and they still choose euthanasia then that should be the individual’s choice. If Euthanasia is properly controlled and regulated it would be benefical to so many people. With these regulations in place it would be very difficult for the slippery slope scenario to become reality.
Worst case scenario is that indeed it could become a slippery slope. Euthanasia should only be used in the most dire of circumstances for people in such excruiating pain that going on with life is even worse than death itself. No one wants to see an individual in such pain that they would rather die. If that patient chooses to end their life then we as humans should have the compassion to allow that to happen. Giving a patient the option of Euthanasia allows them to have the option of dying on their own terms, rather than because of a disease or illness. Why would we withhold that from someone?

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

... INTRODUCTION TO CHRISTIAN ETHICS TOPIC: EUTHANASIA COURSE NO.: RELT 255 INSTRUCTOR: KIGUNDU NDWIGA, PhD BY: CHRISTINE W. THAIRU STHACH 1511 OCTOBER 2014 EUTHANASIA 'Euthanasia' is a compound of two Greek words - eu and thanatos meaning, literally, 'a good death'. Today, euthanasia is generally understood to mean the bringing about of a good death - 'mercy killing,' where one person ends the life of another person for the sake of this person whose life is to be ended. Euthanasia, also refers to the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering, and a deliberate intervention undertaken with the express intention of ending a life to relieve intractable suffering. It incorporates an agent; a subject; an intention; a casual proximity, actions of the agent lead to the outcome. A non-voluntary euthanasia is illegal in most countries. For voluntary euthanasia the process has to:- i) Include patient request ii) Take into consideration the amount of suffering the patient is experiencing iii) Discuss and pursue alternative course of action iv) Presented to the patient all available information A person who undergoes euthanasia usually has an incurable condition. In many cases it is carried out at the person’s request but there are times when they may be too ill and the decision is made by relatives, medics or courts. Very often people will call euthanasia “mercy killing”, perhaps thinking of it for someone...

Words: 1367 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...IssUEs Of EUThANAsIA: ARGUmENTATIvE EssAy Bilal S. H. Badr Naga Majd T. Mrayyan (1) Bilal S. H. Badr Naga., MSN, RN, Prince Sultan Cardiac Center in Qassim, Saudi Arabia (2) Majd T. Mrayyan., Prof, RN, The Hashemite University, Jordan Correspondence: Bilal S. H. Badr Naga., MSN, RN, Prince Sultan Cardiac Center in Qassim, Saudi Arabia Email: Bilal_badrnaga@yahoo.com Case scenario Abstract Euthanasia is one of the issues that has been the subject of intense debate over time. It has been a pertinent issue in human rights discourse as it also affects ethical and legal issues pertaining to patients and health care providers. This paper discusses the legal and ethical debates concerning both types of euthanasia. It focuses on both the supporter of euthanasia and the opponent of euthanasia. Several statements for the Euthanasia argument arediscussed: a merciful response that alleviates the suffering of patients which is sometimes wrongly perceived to be otherwise unrelievable; the autonomy in which the patient has the right to make his own choices; the regulation and legislation of existing practices of euthanasia to protect health care providers and patients. In this heated debate religious, political, ethical, legal and personal views are also included. Among all these, those who desperately want to end their lives because they simply cannot go on in any way, are the ones who suffer. Every individual or group has a different viewpoint regarding euthanasia. Euthanasia is considered...

Words: 7058 - Pages: 29

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...Euthanasia Euthanasia - Deep sympathy for the suffering Introduction Euthanasia is the deliberate killing either by omission or commission of a dependent person for their benefit. Arguments against euthanasia claim that the concern for happiness and human life and not their obliteration is the objective of any good governance. They say that the terminally ill are people who require protection from social, economic and family pressures, and who are particularly prone to this pressure as a result of chronic depression, pain and effects of continued medication. Arguments for euthanasia say it is impossible to maintain quality of life if a patient is dead. While there have been massive arguments, debates and campaigns against euthanasia, this paper will seek to support euthanasia because of the moral issues that relate to the topic. This paper supports that when a personal is physically dead, the only reason anybody wishes to keep them alive is for their selfish clinging onto them with the hope of a miracle and the fear of closure without regard to the wishes of the person. It supports the practice of euthanasia and seeks to evaluate the reasons why euthanasia should be legalized. This paper will have a general audience because of the controversy that it sparks every time it comes up Death is a dreaded subject for all human beings because it signifies leaving the known to go to the unknown. This is the reason why by its nature euthanasia is a hugely hushed up topic...

Words: 1514 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...nurses around the world have been discussing different topics to try to find cures for all kinds of health issues people are faced with. One main topic that has been discussed is Euthanasia, which is the act of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy. Euthanasia is also called medically assisted suicide by a lot of people. It was also originated from the Greek language and occurs in every race of people. Euthanasia should not be forced on anyone but has good reasons in some cases. “There are two types of Euthanasia, active and passive. Active Euthanasia is death by commission. Passive Euthanasia is death by emission.” (Mcmanaman 2). Active Euthanasia is very simple from a moral point of view. It is never justified though because it always amounts to murder. Passive Euthanasia can be of good and of immeasurable value regardless of the condition of the patient. (McManaman 2). If you are not very ill or in a dying state these actions will not be performed on you, because then it will just be just like murdering a patient. Either type of Euthanasia should only be able to be legally processed. If it is not legally processed whoever is a family member of one who has been killed by it can sue whoever was given the euthanasia to kill their family member. This is a very serious and offensive case so therefore the...

Words: 1948 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...Euthanasia According to Webster’s dictionary, euthanasia is “intentional killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for his or her alleged benefit”. Clearly, everybody hopes that his or her death is gentle and easy, and bypasses pain and suffering and loss of dignity. However, the question of whether people can legally passively or actively end their own lives raise many issues. Some argue that by allowing euthanasia will permit people to look down on human life, as if it is not important and can be used for certain criminal circumstances. On the other hand, others argue that permitting people to take their own lives actually maintains human dignity, since people should not have to die painful deaths. I believe that human dignity and the value of human life can best be protected and preserved by permitting people to chose to stop treatments which prolong their lives, but without legalizing the active taking of lives. The philosopher Dyck is representative of the the position that euthanasia should never be legal, because it does not entail compassion for one, or one owns human dignity. Dyck proposes an alternative moral argument to euthanasia, the idea of “benemortasia.” Benemortasia is the belief that a “good” death doesn’t need to be painless or be fully controlled by the person.. Not only does Dyck argue that our definition of good death should change, but he has multiple arguments for why euthanasia is morally wrong. First off, one who causes someone...

Words: 998 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

... 1 9 December 2012 Euthanasia Controversy In today’s society, health care is a major issue. Healthcare is preventions of illnesses. There have been many debates on how to solve the problem. Many professional doctors and nurses around the world have been discussing different topics to try to find cures for all kinds of health issues people are faced with. One main topic that has been discussed is Euthanasia, which is the act of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy. Euthanasia is also called medically assisted suicide by a lot of people. It originated from the Greek language. Euthanasia should not be strained on a single person but could be helpful in some instances. “There are two types of Euthanasia, active and passive. Active Euthanasia is death by commission. Passive Euthanasia is death by emission.” (Mcmanaman 2). Many people make a moral differentiation between the two but if you are not severely ill or in a dying state these actions will not apply to you, because then it will just be just like murdering a patient. If it is not legally processed , this is a very offensive case so therefore the consequences will be highly looked at. The way of using Euthanasia is looked down upon because of the way it devalues human life. The Government should not have the power of making it legal to end someones life because it is such a moral issue. However, Euthanasia could be good when used...

Words: 1240 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...Running head: EUTHANASIA Euthanasia: A Silent Plea for Mercy Shannon Curry University of Southern New Hampshire Professor Henson Tuesday December 23, 2014 Euthanasia: A Silent Plea for Mercy All over the world there are amazing technological advances in medicine happening every day, despite that there are neonatal patients suffering from painful life limiting medical conditions that have no treatment or cure. “Advances in medical technology make it possible to extend life, at times, the focus on ‘cure at all costs’ overshadows the obligation to provide dignified, humane, and compassionate care” (Rushton, 2005). In an effort to provide legal, humane and compassionate end-of-life care to infants, the Dutch developed the Groningen Protocol in 2003. Developed in collaboration with the prosecutor’s office, the Groningen Protocol was designed to guide a transparent medical and legal decision making process for parents and their doctors considering neonatal euthanasia (Catlin, 2008; Petrou, 2005). Neonatal euthanasia is the practice of hastening the death of a terminal ill newborn in an effort to relive their suffering.  Most countries current laws make it illegal for the neonatal population to benefit from euthanasia. Research is suggestive that albeit in secret neonatal euthanasia maybe disguised and illegally practiced around the world. Legalizing neonatal euthanasia would not only allow transparency...

Words: 2327 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...Euthanasia/Assisted Suicide Debate Marissa Burton HCA 322 Mark Metzger April 29, 2013 Dying has become a dilemma. The act of dying has transformed in recent technological advances by making it possible not only to lessen pain but also to extend life. However, when treatment fails and modern medicine has nothing more to present to patients, they may demand for a life ending act. When patients and their family become aware of the quality of life and a great deal of unbearable pain, conflict often introduces itself between health care professionals who are trained to save lives, and patients and their families, who desire to end all suffering. According to Pozgar (2013), the focal point of this conflict is on the concept of euthanasia and its position in the modern world. The issue has been at the middle of some very heated debates for many years (p.123). Euthanasia can be defined as the act or practice of terminating a person’s life in order to relieve them of their suffering from incurable conditions or diseases. Euthanasia is also known as “the mercy killing of the hopelessly ill, injured, or incapacitated”. The dividing of euthanasia into two categories, active and passive, is for many the most controversial aspect of this topic (Pozgar, 2013). Active euthanasia takes place when the medical professional, or another person, intentionally do something that causes the patient to die. Passive euthanasia takes place when the patient dies because the medical professional either...

Words: 1984 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Euthanasia

...look at euthanasia if positive or negative, history of euthanasia or where and how it began, what methods are generally used by nurses or doctors when euthanasia is asked by the patient and why it is an interesting research.) Here are the following ‘help’ question bases (make the nurse/doctor elaborate): 1. Pressure – dilemma 2. Situation with mercy killing applies. 3. Respondent (Ask the doctor & nurse OR 2 nurses) Hi Jessh, these are the following questions I have thought of for the Euthanasia Research Paper. Please ask the nurse more questions for you will be the one who will talk to him/her. 1. How long have you been a nurse? 2. How many patients have asked for assisted killing? 3. What are their age ranges? 4. What are the diseases? 5. Do you think you have the right to do euthanasia? 6. What methods have you done with assisted killing? 7. Do you feel pressure/dilemma while doing assisted killing? Can you explain this pressure/dilemma? 8. In which situations does assisted killing apply? 9. What are your feelings towards euthanasia? 10. Have you been caught? 11. Does the patient or the family of the patient desire assisted killing? 12. What do you think about euthanasia? 13. Do you feel guilt? 14. How do you inform the family members or the party about the death? 15. Do you think it’s cruel to end the suffering of one person if they still want to live? 16. Have you done euthanasia voluntary...

Words: 356 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...Marc Vinkler E1 d. 04-12-2011 Essay - about euthanasia What happens when a patient is terminal ill and decides for euthanasia? What would you do if it was a member of your family? Many people have not done any considerations about the question. Is it because we are afraid of the thought, or because we are convinced that we would not end up in the situation? Do you think that people should have the right to decide whether they would like euthanasia or live on with an incurable illness or a paralyzed body? The word euthanasia comes from Greek and means good death. But is euthanasia a good way to die? You can answer that question with two widely different points of view. When a person has been involved in a car accident, where he got paralyzed and also suffers from a lot of pain. Most people would agree that it is best to take the medicine from the person if he or she begs to die. In that way you can say that it is a good death because the person escapes from the pain hell. But if a person makes the wrong decision because depression and ignorance it is tragic. Because in some cases you can actually have a relatively good life even though you are paralyzed. Just read the story about Vivian Berzinski who was paralyzed in 1972 when she was 17 years old. Her doctors felt she would never be able to move, never be able to talk and never be able to breathe without a respirator. But since then she armed only with the love of her family and her own fierce will, she has married...

Words: 712 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...Euthanasia: Live and Let Die April 11, 2013 Euthanasia: Live and Let Die In 2004, Pope John Paul II said “A man, even if seriously sick or prevented in the exercise of its higher functions, is and will be always a man… he will never become a ‘vegetable’ or an ‘animal’. The intrinsic value and personal dignity of every human being does not change depending on their circumstances” (Pope John Paul II, 2004). Euthanasia or assisted suicide is the deliberate action of ending a life in order to relieve unstoppable suffering. Euthanasia is legal in Albania, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Switzerland, as well as some US states. In some of these countries, euthanasia is generally executed by a medical professional taking into account his patient’s needs and desires; but sometimes a medical professional can dispense the last medication ending his patient’s life without the patient’s consent. However, euthanasia and assisted suicide is forbidden in the majority of countries and could be penalized by a fourteen years prison sentence. (“Euthanasia and assisted, intro”). Legalizing euthanasia is extremely controversial moral and legal issue throughout the world, but achieving that goal is extremely necessary. Although legalizing euthanasia could cause negative effects for society, the positive side of this controversy indicates that asking for death is important for those patients who have decided that after a certain point, the pain has exceeded the desire of living. On the one hand...

Words: 1548 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...in the world today is to legalize euthanasia, and already several countries are considering the passing of legal bills to make euthanasia legal. Argument I: Euthanasia in our modern time is seen as a merciful solution, not as a crime, and it is justified by human feelings and understanding. A- Counter Argument: Euthanasia is nothing than an act of suicide, and hence, it is as morally wrong and unacceptable as suicide is. B- Refutation: Suicide and euthanasia are morally different because suicide is the choice of death as one of several options whereas in euthanasia it is the only choice to end permanent and unbearable pain and suffering. Argument II: Euthanasia should be legalized because this is the only way to regulate a concept that is practiced all over the world anyway. A- Counter Argument: Doctors who assist patients to commit euthanasia should be punished as criminals, because according to their oath, they are supposed to elongate the lives of their patients, not to end them. B- Refutation: Doctors who assist euthanasia cannot be treated as criminals if their intentions are to relieve patients of permanent and unbearable suffering. Medical assisted euthanasia is not in violation with the oath that doctors take to relieve their patients of unbearable and permanent pain. Argument III: Euthanasia has deep roots as it has been practiced by human civilizations. A- Counter Argument: Euthanasia was practiced by barbarian and inhuman...

Words: 1641 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...Outline ( Euthanasia-Why it should be allowed? ) Title : Euthanasia- Why it should be allowed? Specific Purpose : To inform my audience about definition, types of Euthanasia and the argument in favour of Euthanasia. Central idea : Euthanasia proposed on three arguments in favour of it which are the good death, right to maintain human dignity and justice. I. Introduction A. What is euthanasia? 1. The act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals (as persons or domestic animals) in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy. ( Wikipedia ) 2. Euthanasia is the intentional killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for his or her alleged benefit. B. Classifications of euthanasia. 1. Voluntary euthanasia 2. Involuntary euthanasia 3. Euthanasia by action C. Euthanasia results in the Netherlands.( Churches for Life, 2008 ) II. Arguments in favour of euthanasia. A. The good death. 1. described ideally as drifting into death in a pleasing environment as one falls asleep ( L Mishara, 2011 ). 2. Euthanasia can be seen as a way to assure that a person dies in a dignified and appropriate manner. a. Case on Mrs Boyes where she was requested for voluntary active Euthanasia. She was so...

Words: 635 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...Christian decision. Mainline and Liberal Christian denominations: Pro-choice statements have been made by the United Church of Christ, and the Methodist Church on the US West coast. The 'Episcopalian (Anglican) Unitarian, Methodist, Presbyterian and Quaker movements are amongst the most liberal, allowing at least individual decision making in cases of active euthanasia The BBC wrote in an Aug. 3, 2009 online article titled "Religion & Ethics - Christianity: Euthanasia - the Christian View" on www.bbc.co.uk: "Christians are mostly against euthanasia. The arguments are usually based on the beliefs that life is given by God, and that human beings are made in God's image. Some churches also emphasise the importance of not interfering with the natural process of death... Christians believe that the intrinsic dignity and value of human lives means that the value of each human life is identical. They don't think that human dignity and value are measured by mobility, intelligence, or any achievements in life. Valuing human beings as equal just because they are human beings has clear implications for thinking about euthanasia: • patients in a persistent vegetative state, although seriously damaged, remain living human beings, and so their intrinsic value remains the same as anyone else's • so it would be wrong to treat their lives as worthless and to conclude that they 'would be better off dead' • patients who are old or sick, and who are near the end of earthly life...

Words: 7225 - Pages: 29

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...Voluntary Euthanasia According to the Philosopher Helga Kuhse, she writes that 'Euthanasia' is a compound of two Greek words - eu and Thanatos. These words literally mean “a good death”. Today, 'euthanasia' is generally understood to mean the bringing about of a good death - 'mercy killing,' where one person, A, ends the life of another person, B, for the sake of B."  Euthanasia is putting to death of a very sick person's life in order to alleviate them from their agony. A person that usually request for euthanasia services has an untreatable condition but there are special cases where some people want their life to end. In many situation, it is implemented when the patient ask for it but there are occasions when the patients is too ill and cannot make the decision themselves but the requests is made by relatives, medics or, in some instances, the courts. The country of United Kingdom’s law is against the practice of euthanasia and it is illegal to help anyone kill him or herself. The punishment of euthanasia can lead to detention of up to 14 years. This issue has been at the centre of very intense debates for many years and is surrounded by religious, ethical and practical considerations. Euthanasia have different categorize which include voluntary, non-voluntary, or involuntary. Voluntary euthanasia is lawful in some countries such as United States Of America and Canadian Provinces. Non-voluntary euthanasia is banned in all countries because it is considered a murder...

Words: 2617 - Pages: 11