Hamilton County Judges try thousands of cases per year. This study is to provide the newspaper with how well the judges are performing. With the results of Kristen DelGuzzie of the Cincinnati Enquirer that conducted the study of the cases in Hamilton County for a three year period. Providing analytical results on how well each and every judge is doing. With the results, the Cincinnati Enquirer will be able answer the question of which judge is performing a good job and which is not performing a good job. By evaluating the results from the data collects. The company of Annette is hired to assist in the data analysis.

Case: Hamilton County Judges
A Review by the Company of Annette Over a period of three years, Kristen DelGuzzi of the Cincinnati Enquirer created a study to see which Judges were performing the best and worst. Appeals are the result of a mistake made by the judges. Disposed is when the judge throws out the case. And Reversed is when the judge reverses what was said during a pervious case. With this study I will being answering the following questions:
1. Who is doing a good job?
2. Who isn’t doing a good job?
3. Why does the company of Annette think so?
With answering the questions. This report will also provide the results from:
* The probability of cases being appealed and reversed in three different courts
* The probability of a case being appealed for each judge
* The probability of a case being reversed for each judge
* Rank the judges within each court.
* Due to the use of Microsoft excel, the result with will have multiple numbers after the decimal point, no set amount.*

The purpose of this report is to evaluate the performance of the Hamilton county judges, in three different courts. The data is compiled from information gathered over a three year period and includes a total of 182,908 cases handled by 38 judges in Common Pleas