Starting back from the late 1800s to the 1960s there was a search for solutions for the development of four major approaches to management, classic approach, behavioral approach, systems approach and contingency approach; according to Evolution of Management. Scientists have been visually examining the demeanor of employees and managers due to collaboration between individuals and machines, inexperienced in running superior size factories, and the greater the business the more problems came with it. Each of these approaches is presented differently from one another in their own unique way.
First was the classical approach to management, which spotlighted mainly on the machines and systems that needed to perform each task efficiently. In the late 1800s the social desiderata of employees didn’t matter. It withal had two components, scientific management and administrative management. Scientific management was to help ameliorate the efficiency of work by systematic and scientific study of work methods, implements and performance standards. The administrative management accentuates that management as a function can be applied to any size or kind of organization. Its main purport was the organization holistically, and not individual workers in the workplace. Second, was the behavioral approach to management, which stressed management’s understandings of the importance of people’s needs, and attitudes within the company. After nine years of researching what conditions in the workplace had the maximum effect of employee output, they finally came up with a conclusion. They believed that proper social relationships in the company were what they needed to produce more efficiency. Third, was the systems approach to management, which viewed organizations as sets of interrelated components to be managed as a whole with the purport of a prevalent goal. This approach consisted of