The first film I review was Ann Hornaday review about Ex Machina. She gave a great input in her article. From the Directors novel “The Beach” and other three movies “28 Days Later, Never Let Me Go, and Ex Machina.” Ann describes the Director as a spinning unsettling futuristic thriller with expertise and exquisite taste of a second veteran. Unfortunately, In the article, she doesn’t use any first person of what she said it’s more of a third person, such as He. The information that she includes is Caleb is a coder who works for Nathan. And created a Google Search engine called Blue book. She discusses that Caleb had won a ticket at work to see his boos in Alaska Mountain where he lived. Both spend a week together, discussing The introduction focuses on the plot she tells specifically little details about the movie trying to the reader’s apatite right before spoiling or giving away too much information about the movie. She discusses about the film techniques in her conclusion. She writes “film succeeding at ratching up the mood of quiet unease, provocatively engaging everything from intimacy, identity and agency to such hot button issues as corporate surveillance, sexual orientation and male …show more content…
David’s review is more of a shorter review than Ann’s. As for the introduction, David includes the Directors genre is a Sci-fi film. Basically, moral of the story, Caleb wins a ticket to go meet with his boss Nathan in the beautiful mountains in Alaska, but besides Ann mentioning that he mentions that Caleb traveled on a subterranean compound. Which took him to a Nathans house in the beginning of the movie. In his short film review, he doesn’t have any film techniques, but moreover, he does write that somewhat effect is indeed, marvelous, but what makes Ava amazing is all human. Also, he talks about thematic, including the gender of both Nathan and Caleb, and Ava. David does spoil the story a little bit by giving away Ava’s age in the text, for his