F.J. Deane: Summary: The look of well-dressed Indian boys and girls has shown admirable

education provided by residential schools.

Perspective: F.J.Deane expresses appreciation regarding the contributions of residential schools.

Deane applaud for Residential school’s efforts on training Indian children to get adapted into the

white culture. And, he’s proud of that accomplishments shown by his way of speaking.

Madeleine Dion Stout/Keteskwew: Summary: While every single visits of her parents are

unforgettable, Madeleine had already adapted to the moments of goodbyes, knowing her parents

will come and go, never stays. She comes to a conclusion that Residential school kids were never

heard and emotionally abused.

Perspective: Madeleine view the residential schools as a non-sense system that abuses children’s …show more content…
She shares her personal feeling on restricting her basic contact with her parents, to

prove her perspective on how the schools acted as “emotion bullies”.

Phil Fontaine: Summary: Residential schools have shown disrespectful racist premises which

destructed every Indian’s identity, thus the residential school was totally wrong.

Perspective: Phil shows anger against residential schools. He states residential school as a

mistake in history, that needs a formal apology for all mistakes made by the government.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper: Summary: Stephen Harper apologized for taking indian

children away from their family, raping their culture, failing to protect children’s rights, and

negatively impacted future generations of Indians.

Perspective: Prime minister Stephen Harper sees residential school as a sad chapter of the history

that needs an apology. He states the residential school has done nothing but to destroy