1. The video begins with Chris Webber, Jalen Rose, Juwan Howard, Jimmy King, and Ray Jackson each talking a little about themselves. It showed how and where each of them grew up. It showed how the recruiters kept trying and trying to get them all to come and play for the University of Michigan. Juwan Howard was the first one to sign to play basketball there. As the movie goes on, it shows how they get the starting line up. It was a huge step for the University of Michigan because 5 freshman were on the starting lineup and almost every game. After they lost to one of the hardest schools, Duke, they went on a little vacation to Europe to help get their minds off the tough loss. They played a little basketball there. They also had some team bonding while they were in Europe. It was well needed because some of the upperclassmen were being rude to the 5 new freshmen. The Fab Five started to complain about how they can’t work because of all the time and effort baseketball takes up and they need money for gas, food and other necessities. The movie ends with Chris Webber and the trial. The trial happened with the Grand Jury because Chris Webber was accused of accepting a lot of money from booster member Ed Martin. Ed Martin was illegally gambling, them giving the money to all the boys to help with their needs. He was hoping that they would eventually return all the money he loaned to them when they went pro. Obviously that didn't happen and they all got caught. When Chris Webber wouldn't talk to the president of the school board, they took away their titles and took the banner out of the gym. I believe they chose to put the movie this way because you would grow to like the team and realize they did nothing wrong until the very last chapter when everything starts to pour out of their mouths. Like when Chris takes an extra timeout, and the whole money scandal. If they were to put the bad stuff in the beginning of the movie they wouldn't be able to keep everyone's attention for the whole 2 hour movie.

2. No, I don't think there is a difference. They are both wrong. I don't think someone should research mean/rude things to say to another player. I also don't think it is right to write mean and hurtful things in letters, Atleast if you research mean things to say to players you are saying it maybe under your breath. Sometimes they might not even be able to hear you. If you write it down in letter from, it can be re-read over and over again, and they won't be able to get those words out of their heads.

3. I believe the main argument of the film is even though they made a huge mistake that they will have to live with for the rest of their lives, people shouldn't just be focused on that one event. They should focus on everything else they had accomplished together as a team. They all shouldn't be punished for just one teammates actions. The money that Chris spent does not define them as a team. All 5 members of the fab five grew up in a rough part of town. They weren't exposed to this much fame before they were college basketball stars. Just like must all celebrities. they do crazy things just out of all the fame and fortune they have.

4. I believe it does because Chris Webber was a major part of everything and he was apart of the Fab Five. It definitely does not support the argument at all, in fact i believe is makes it weaker because we don't have Chris’ side of the story which is understandable because he doesn't want to admit to anything because during the trials, he didn't admit or deny to accepting the money from Ed Martin.

5. I don't believe college athletes should be paid. But I do think that they should get a little “allowance”. The allowance would be for the small things like nutritious food. I think that they should have the necessities like healthcare, and nutrition clinics and food and gas and all that stuff already paid for by the college. College students that get full-ride scholarships shouldn't have to necessarily get a salary. They are already getting paid through a good college education.

6. In a sense I think the punishment fit the crime. In the documentary, it supports the fact that it is a team sport. As a team they win some, lose some and tie some. Your teammates are with you through it all. Your teammates should stick up for you. If you get in trouble, they all should face the repercussions with you. That's how you grow as a team.

But I also think the punishment doesn’t fit the crime. The whole team gets punished for something that one single person did. His actions got the titles taken out of the gym. It wasn’t fair for the rest of the team who worked hard that whole season just to get those titles.