0. What two assumptions constitute the "Enlightenment Vision"?
The universe was completely intelligible and that the universe and that we were capable of a systematic understanding of its nature.

1. What six theoretical developments starting in the early 20th century challenged the Enlightenment vision?
The relativity theory, which challenged assumptions about space, time, matter, and energy. Second, discovery of the set theoretical paradoxes seemed to challenge the rationality of that very citadel of rationality, mathematics. Third, Freudian psychology was taken not as a gateway to an improved rationality but as a proof of the impossibility of rationality. Fourth, Kurt Gödel’s incompleteness proof seemed to deliver another blow to math. Fifth, on certain interpretations, quantum mechanics seemed simply unassimilable to our traditional conceptions of the determinacy and independent existence of the physical universe. Sixth, in late 20th century the rationality of science itself came under attack from authors such as Kuhn and Feyerabend, who argued that science itself was infected with arbitrariness and irrationality.

2. Does Searle accept the enlightenment vision?
Yes

3. What are Searle's three objectives in his book?
First, advance a series of theoretical claims, both about nature of mind, language, and society and about interrelations among them. Second, exemplify a certain style of philosophical analysis. Third, pass a series of observations about nature of philosophical puzzlement and problems. How to do phil, special problems doing it.

4. What is a "default position"? What five propositions make up the default position according to Searle?

Default positions are views we hold prereflectively so that nay departure from them requires a conscious effort and convincing argument. There is real world that exists independently of us, of