Premium Essay

Federalist And Anti-Federalists Similarities

Submitted By
Words 1199
Pages 5
There are similarities and differences between Thomas Paine’s Common Sense and the Federalist and Anti-Federalist controversy. The Federalist and Anti-Federalist controversy explores the views of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The Federalists supported the Constitution, and they wanted the Constitution to become law or ratified. Moreover, the Federalists wanted and believed in a strong, central government. The Federalists consisted of Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison. On the other side, there were opponents of the Constitution (the Anti-Federalists). The Anti-Federalists thought the Constitution would give the government too much power and control; there was no Bill of Rights to protect the people and their rights from …show more content…
In Common Sense, Paine says government is important in a society because government protects the people, satisfies their wants and needs, and establishes morals and rules for the people to follow. For example, “For were the impulses of conscience clear, uniform and irresistibly obeyed, man would need no other lawgiver; but that not being the case, he finds it necessary to surrender up a part of his property to furnish means for the protection of the rest..” (Paine 501). Therefore, men gave up their land for the government to build their institution on to protect the greater good, society, and the people. Government is important in a society because they protect everyone in that society. The Anti-Federalists also wanted government to play an important role in protecting citizens and their rights. For example, “Its opponents (the anti-Federalists) argued that it gave too much power to a centralized, federal government, that it lacked a bill of rights to protect citizens against the coercive powers of the state” (McMichael 354). Thus, they wanted to see the government adopt a Bill of Rights with the citizen’s rights like freedom of speech, and the government would protect the citizens and their rights. Government’s purpose was to establish rules and morals that stopped …show more content…
The main point that Common Sense is trying to make is that society created government because society needed an institution to protect them, satisfy their wants and needs, and to establish rules. Society needed to depend on a source of power to help them to survive. On the other hand, the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Controversy defend their stances on if the Constitution should become law or not. The point in this writing is the Federalists are fighting for the Constitution to become law; they want a strong, central government to preside over the people with multiple duties like keeping them safe, protecting their rights, and more. The Anti-Federalists did not want the Constitution to become law because they thought the government would have too much power, and there was no Bill of Rights. Common Sense and the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Controversy have different points in their writings that they are trying to prove. Also, another difference between these writings is how they express their views. In Common Sense, Paine express his views on government and society through writings and points. For instance, “Some writers have so confounded society with government, as to leave little or no distinction between them; whereas they are not only different, but have different origins” (Paine 500). Paine explains his views through points, opinions, and evidence. He

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Similarities Between The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution

...The Articles of Confederation was the first type of operating system that the United States operated under. It first took effect in 1781 and then was replaced by what is the Constitution known today. The U.S. Constitution took effect in 1788. The Constitution shifted a lot of decisions, laws, and military authorization from the state level to the federal level, thus making every state have similarities. There were many simulations and differences between the two doctrines that ruled America. However there were more differences between the two then there are similarities. The major similarities between the two was that they were both written by the same people, just at different times. Both doctrines state that one state cannot enter into war by itself, the central government is in charge of the value of the money, term limits to the...

Words: 1550 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Anti-Federalists Vs Anti Federalist

...Paul, I do concede with what you have written; however, it is much deeper than this. After winning the Revolution our forefathers understood that a new type of government was needed. Although the Federalists and Anti-Federalists clashed both in ideologies and beliefs, many common principals are discussed throughout their essays. The preservation of liberty and the effects of human nature are two aspects of these similarities; in addition to, on the individual right to bear arms for hunting and self-defense. Although I do believe that The Bill of Rights was/is necessary, I do question a possible motive for the anti-Federalists intense preservation of certain state’s rights. The majority of anti-Federalists were pro-slavery and “they feared...

Words: 305 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Similarities Between Franklin And Patrick Henry

...The two speeches, “ Speech in the Virginia Convention” by Patrick Henry and “Speech in the Convention” by Benjamin Franklin, have many similarities and differences. One of the main difference is their stance (federalist or anti-federalist). They both had different views about when they should compromise and when they should fight for what they wanted. Patrick Henry wanted to fight for their independence while Benjamin Franklin wanted to talk and compromise with Britain. First of all, Patrick Henry and Benjamin Franklin had different views on how to get what they want from Britain. Henry was an federalist (agreed with the constitution) while Benjamin Franklin was an anti-federalist (opposed the constitution). Henry wanted to go war with Britain. In his speech he says, “I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!” (103). He thought that they have tried talking and compromising with the British far too long and haven’t gotten anywhere. He says,...

Words: 574 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Articles of Confederation vs. the Constitution

...Constitution are the historical documents that have been the building blocks of democracy that America is known for today. The Articles of Confederation are in many way an extension of what makes up the United States Constitution. In 1777, there wear a combination of thirteen states that came together to mold a type of government document that the United States could determine as “central” style of government. These states included New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. By late 1787, the Articles of Confederation were replaced by a more complete United States Constitution. There are several differences and similarities that lead to this American government transformation. The origination of the Articles of Confederation were a dynamic that was set into place in order to safeguard the union of states from any foreign control. It was a time in which the newly born states were yearning to be a set of sovereign states but stay independent from British colony control. Thus, the Articles of Confederation were originated. There were several important aspects of the Articles of Confederation that helped the United States reach a somewhat government goal. In the articles, states were allowed to collect taxes from its citizens in order to further the development and provide the necessities of that state. Each individual state was permitted to do business...

Words: 1524 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

James Madison Compare And Contrast

...Even though the Federalist had all of the major people and a lot of support, they still had a bug fight ahead of them. Their solutions were quite different from the political beliefs in this time. The federalist did not believe that the greatest threat did not lie in the hands of the central government, but could be found in what the federalist called excesses of democracy as seen in Shay’s Rebellion. The Federalist Party originated in opposition to the Democratic-Republic. The Federalist emphasized commercial and diplomatic harmony with Britain following the Jay’s Treaty. The party made a lasting impact by laying the foundations for the economy and creating a well-built judicial...

Words: 1640 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Confederation and Constitution

...in place. The Articles of Confederation led to the Constitution of the United States. Although similar in some aspects, very different in others. The articles had many weaknesses that were changed in the Constitution. There were many compromises made between the states in order to effectively draft the Constitution. Roger Sherman’s Plan kept the Constitutional Convention together which was later known as the Great Compromise. The fight for the Constitution had just begun and the ratification processes needed to take place. Even with some states being in favor of the Constitution it would take time to get the nine states needed to complete this process. The states in favor would called themselves The Federalist and those opposed were called the Anti-Federalist. The Federalist set out to change the mind of the remaining states with a series of letters that were written to newspapers. The Articles of Confederation were used as a base for the Constitution. The ideas from the Articles of Confederation were used in the writing of the Constitution. Both the Articles and the Constitution established “federal” systems of multiple sovereigns whose continued existence was constitutionally guaranteed. Despite the fact that both the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution established federal systems, there were certain fundamental differences between the two systems. The Articles of Confederation gave states the power of federal government whereas the Constitution derived its authority...

Words: 1610 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Hamilton vs Adams

...Chanice Lighty November 3rd, 2014 Harrold US History John Adams vs Alexander Hamilton Born October 30, 1735 in Quincy, Massachusetts. John Adams our 2nd president of the United States, grew up with a father who was a farmer, deacon, and town councilman. Adams was a federalist one of his famous attributes was the argument about the stamp act of 1765. He wrote a response to the act called “Essay on the Canon and Feudal Law” in which he argued that: ‘the stamp act deprived American colonist of their rights to be taxed by consent and to be tried by a jury of their peers.’ He also made it clear that the act was null and void in a speech he sent out to the governor of Massachusetts along with his council. In 1796, Adams was elected as the federalist nominee for president. Thomas Jefferson led opposition. During his presidency France and Britain began a war, which started a political uproar for the United States causing Adams administration to focus on diplomatic efforts for France, when France denied the United States and later after the war died down Adams lost his favoritism from the public and lost his re-election to once opposed Thomas Jefferson. Alexander Hamilton born January 11, 1755 on the island of Nevis in the British West indies. Hamilton was part of George Washington’s administration, and one of the leading figures. Hamilton was also a nationalist, who stood for the “wealthy elite” meaning he believed the government should protect the wealthy. Hamilton’s goal...

Words: 883 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Apush

...of Confederation, was unable to exercise real authority, although it did successfully deal with the western lands issue. The Confederation’s weakness in handling foreign policy, commerce and the Shays Rebellion spurred the movement to alter the Articles. Instead of revising the Articles, the well-off delegates to the Constitutional Convention created a charter for a whole new government. In a series of compromises, the convention produced a plan that provided for a vigorous central government, a strong executive, the protection for property, while still upholding republican principles and states’ rights. The Federalists met strong opposition from Anti-Federalists, especially in Virginia and New York, but through effective organization and argument, they succeeded in getting the Constitution ratified. By establishing the new national government, the Federalists checked the Revolutionary values of the popular republican government. Terms/names/topics:...

Words: 3481 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Influences on the Constitution Table

...University of Phoenix Material Influences on the Constitution Table Write one or two paragraphs in each section. Include citations for your sources. Documents | Summary | What was its influence on the Constitution? | Magna Carta | Charter drawn up in the attempts to stave off civil war against King John in 1215. The Magna Carta gave Englishmen certain human rights, freedom of religion, reform of justice system and regulated officials. The Magna Carta limited the king’s power and created what we know today as parliament. | Freedom of Religion, a maintained justice system allowing men a fair trial, freedom from oppression and unlawful persecution, that not one man should lead a nation solely, but a group of officials, and checks and balances. | Mayflower Compact | Men aboard the Mayflower bound for Northern Virginia in 1620 decided to land in what we know as Massachusetts. They signed the Mayflower Compact to enable that crew of men the right to self govern and have equal rights. | First constitution signed in The New World, organizing a local government of an elected governor and officials to regulate laws, and taxes. Basis for self government. | Articles of Confederation | With growing popularity in the ideas of independence from England, the colonies needed a way to unite them but not take away individual state/colony rights. Written in 1777 but not approved by all states until 1781. | Gave the idea of a central government while keeping most power within each...

Words: 1063 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

In Two Cities How Does Madame Defarge Finally Meet Her End?

...Charles, and their daughter have all fled to England, and are, at that time, in the process of doing so. When she gets there, she finds Miss Pross blocking a single doorway to the house. Defarge tries to get past her, and they fall to blows. Defarge endeavors to draw her pistol to shoot Ms. Pross, and succeeds in taking it out, but right before she fires it, Miss Pross strikes it upward, and Defarge kills herself unintentionally. 14. Who was the first governor of the Plymouth Colony? What happened to him? The first governor of Plymouth Colony was John Carver. While working in the fields one day during the unbearable heat, he collapsed of heat stroke and died shortly thereafter. 15. Who wrote the Federalist Papers? Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison collectively wrote the Federalist...

Words: 1942 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

History 309

...Objectives: WEEK ONE SUBMITTED ____________________________________________________________________________________ WEEK TWO **Individual Assignment** 2.     Resources: Ch. 6–10 of Colonial America and MyHistoryLab  Write a 350- to 700-word essay response to each of the following questions:   Question 1: How was trade in the New World a source of revenue for monarchies and for the colonies? Question 2: What are the similarities and differences between early colonial and contemporary American beliefs about religious freedom and tolerance? Question 3: Examine Bacon’s Rebellion or Leisler’s Rebellion and address the following questions:  What were its causes and consequences? Do you think the rebellion is best viewed as a precursor to the revolutionary war or as an unrelated event?  Cite at least one primary source in each of your short essays. Format your essays consistent with APA guidelines. Submit your essays in a single Microsoft® Word document.  _____________________________________________________________________________________   WEEK THREE  **INDIVDUAL ASSIGNMENT** 3.     Resources: Ch. 11–19 of Colonial America and MyHistoryLab  Write three 350- to 700-word letters; one written from the point of view of each of the following people:   Letter 1: A merchant living in a New England urban center Letter 2: The wife of a religious leader living in Pennsylvania Letter 3: A plantation worker living in South Carolina ...

Words: 698 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

The American Court System Behind Closed Doors

...established its judiciary system around the same time the 13 British Colonies became established as individual territories. When it came down to it, Federalist battled Anti-federalist over the writing of the Constitution of the United States. The Anti- Federalist were opposed to the idea of a one centralized government while the Federalists on the other hand were all for a centralized government. What came next was the establishing of the Judicial Branch known as Article III. The start of the first court system came along with Congress passing, The Judiciary Act of 1789. The act established the United States circuit courts which were also known to be United States federal courts and were located in each of the federal judicial districts. The act also established the United States Supreme Court and its justices. It wasn’t until 1912, that the district courts became exercised and became the new federal trial courts replacing the circuit courts as original jurisdiction. Circuit courts became known as federal court of appeals. They no longer have the right to try a case first, which is now the district courts role in the judicial system. With 13 circuit courts and 93 federal judicial districts the two courts make up most of the judicial system in our country. That’s why it is imperative that we know the differences and the similarities between each court. After observing both courts for about 5 or so hours, I really came to understanding how both worked. When you do field research...

Words: 3344 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Precedents

...Northwestern University – School of Law Public law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series Paper No. 09-12 ~and~ University of San Diego – School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series Paper No. 09-008 Reconciling Originalism and Precedent John O. McGinnis Northwestern University – School of Law Michael B. Rappaport University of San Diego – School of Law Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 103, No. 2, 2009 Copyright 2009 by Northwestern University School of Law Northwestern University Law Review Printed in U.S.A. Vol. 103, No. 2 RECONCILING ORIGINALISM AND PRECEDENT John O. McGinnis∗ & Michael B. Rappaport** INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 I. PRECEDENT, ORIGINALISM, AND THE CONSTITUTION ................................................... 4 A. B. C. II. A. B. C. D. E. F. The Supposed Conflict Between Originalism and Precedent ............................ 5 A Short History of Precedent ............................................................................... 7 The Consistency of Originalism and Precedent ............................................... 21 The Supermajoritarian Theory of Constitutional Originalism........................ 28 The Relative Benefits of Original Meaning and Precedent ............................. 29 Precedent Rules .................................................................................................. 34 Factors...

Words: 28150 - Pages: 113

Premium Essay

French Revolution (Timeline)

...French Revolution AOS 1 Revs Revision Notes – Part I AOS 1 – French Revolution Index: 1. PRE REVOLUTION FRANCE a. France in the 18th Century b. Power and Limitations of the King c. Privilege and its Spread d. Frances Taxes (How and What) e. The Estates 2. IDEAS, INPUTS AND CAUSES a. Very Short List of Causes of the Revolution b. Shift to Sensibility c. American Revolution Input d. The Liberal Economic Theory (Physiocracy) e. The Philosophes 3. FINANCIAL CRISIS AND MANAGEMENT a. Frances Financial Crisis b. Frances Finance Ministers (Comptroller-General) c. Compte Rendu d. Parlements and Their Role e. Assembly of Notables and Their Role 4. EVENTS PRECEEDING AND DURING EXILE AND RECALL OF PARLEMENTS a. Ségur Ordinance b. Diamond Necklace Affair c. Eden Treaty d. Calling of the Assembly of Notables e. The Dutch Crisis (Spring 1787) f. Last Chance with the Notables g. Notables Dissolved h. Attempts to Pass Reforms at the Parlements i. Exile and Recall of the Parlements j. Society of Thirty 5. EVENTS PRECEEDING CALL OF ESTATES GENERAL a. The Reduction of Parlement’s Rights b. The Day of Tiles (Grenoble) c. The Famine of 1788 d. The Calling of the Estates-General 6. ESTATES-GENERAL ...

Words: 32945 - Pages: 132

Premium Essay

Public Management

...ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY | PUBLIC MANAGEMENT | | | | 25/05/2012 | | | Sommaire INTRODUCTION 2 I. DEFINITION OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT 4 II. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION 4 III. THE PUBLIC MANAGEMENT MODEL 6 IV. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT AND GOVERNANCE 8 V. PRINCIPLES THEORIES OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT 9  Public Choice Theory 10  Transaction Cost Economics 11  Principal–Agent Theory 11  Microeconomic Theory 12  The New Economic Sociology 13 VI. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT AS CRAFT 14 VII. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT AS STRUCTURE 16 VIII. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT AS INSTITUTION 17 IX. NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES 21 CONCLUSION 24 INTRODUCTION Public management is the subject of a rapidly growing literature that is international in scope a multifarious in content. The common sense of public management is relatively straightforward. Good public managers, whatever their particular positions or responsibilities, are men and women with the temperament and skills to organize, motivate, and direct the actions of others in and out of government toward the creation and achievement of goals that warrant the use of public authority. Few public laws and policies are self-executing, and, in their formulation, all might benefit from managerial insight and experience. Under virtually any political philosophy or regime, then, the achievement of good government requires the responsible and competent use of public authority by a government’s...

Words: 7451 - Pages: 30