Free Essay

Film Insider

In:

Submitted By bilibiliyang
Words 1456
Pages 6
Zhibo Yang
Professor Collins-Porter
11/18/2015
FILM 101
Children of Men Children of Men, directed by Alfonso Cuaron, is a science fiction thriller film in 2006. After watching it, I start to think deeply because this film contains much information about political statements, philosophy, and religions. Children of Men tells the story of Theo Faron, one of the many bureaucrats from the energy department in UK. He seems like a common citizen, but does something uncommon later. In fact, the first thirty minutes is not quite interesting for me, but things has changed significantly after Julian is killed by shot. Later, Theo becomes a hero by rescuing Kee’s child, the child of miracle. This film has many advanced and significant aspects on many perspectives. So this paper is going to analyze the unique features in it.
Narrative
The story is located at the United Kingdom in 2027. At that time, human beings have experienced 18 years of infertility. Children of Men is a film with realistic narrative, because the story runs chronologically. And it follows the classic five-part narrative structure. We can clearly recognize the introduction: Theo hears the news about the death of baby Diego. Conflict and obstacles are throughout the story that Theo finds out Luke’s plan and helps Kee escape to “The Tomorrow”. Later climax comes with the ceasing fire of government army and revolt when they see Kee’s kid. And by the end of the film, we can hear kids laughing, which leaves us a hope that human beings can continue on. Meanwhile, this film contains many nondiegetic elements, which always attracts me and let me pause and investigate. At the beginning, the death of baby Diego comes from the news report on TV, which also introduces the background of the film. So we can easily understand what happens in the film without too much additional explanations from our main characters. Also, when Theo visits Jasper for the first time, there is a shot recording some photos and paperwork of Jasper. These things include: a family photo of Theo, Julian, and their little kid, Dylan, many slogans against war in Iraq, award of political cartoonist of the year for Jasper, news on infertility, and news about MI5 deny torture of photojournalist, who is Jasper’s wife. This scene tells audience tremendous information besides our main story, which completely shows audience a broad picture of the story and the background.
Cinematography and Editing By using many impressive long takes, Alfonso brings the audience to a sense of reality of London in 2027. These long takes make this film have the feeling of a documentary. Also, Alfonso uses only a few cuts, which makes the scene more effective because all the audience’s attention is focused on Theo. The lack of cuts also enables me to feel like I am exactly escaping with Theo in real time. Long takes and lack of cuts definitely provide audience with an authentic experience. This documentary style gives the feeling that the world in the story is the real world we live in. Long take also performs an important role in the scene when Julian gets shot. It is unbelievable to see there is only one take in the scene when Luke drives the car and escapes from the mob completed by a nice and impressive dolly shot.
The cinematography in Children of Men is one of the biggest dazzling points by using single-camera and single-shot movement for many parts of the film. This incredible framework makes a strong impact in the scene for audience. Children of Men is edited in a very linear way. There is no flashback. Every scene leads into the following scene and no time is omitted from the story. Each time the film cuts is the end of one scene and a new scene is going to start. This style also makes audience feel the world in the story is real. An example of this subjective camera movement is the scene where the car Theo is traveling in is attacked and the group has to escape by driving backwards. When the car finally comes to a stop the camera gets out with Theo as he exits the car. The camera then pans to the road and frames awkwardly on the dead officers before cutting, an edit that draws attention to the way the group murdered the officers and then fled.
Alfonso uses many new and innovative techniques in Children of Men to successfully create a sense of reality where audience are able to see the world of the film as if it were their own world. Carefully implemented editing techniques keep the audience focused on the important characters and emotions throughout the film.
Sound
Children of Men does well on both diegetic sound and nondiegetic sound. The director combines rock, pop, dubstep, and classical music pieces to create one of the most innovative sound effects. At the beginning, we hear the news report and know the death of baby Diego. After that, we experience the bomb explosion with huge sound effect. Also, at the end of the film, we could hear kids playing and laughing, which means to enlighten human being’s hope to survive and breed. We can also find that characters have their specific style of music. For example, Jasper, an old-time hippie with long hair and John Lennon style glasses, is fond of classic rock. We could hear “Ruby Tuesday” twice in the scene of his home.
In the film's second half, Alfonso uses less pop music and relies more heavily on augmenting silence with jarring sound effects - the burst of automatic weapons fire, saying, or the squawk of loudspeakers ordering fugees through a maze of cages. With the effect of sound, audience have the sense of feeling that the coastal town of Bexhill, transformed into a giant refugee camp that operates as a Third World city with a black market economy, is chaotic and troubling.
Acting
All of the characters’ performance gives me a strong feeling of authenticity. When Theo visits Jasper for the first time, Jasper acts like a hippie: he lets Theo taste the cigarette with strawberry flavor, tells joke about the “Human Project”, and dance with the music. However, for the second time Theo comes to Jasper’s home with Kee, Jasper’s attitude and behavior changes significantly. From this scene, we can see how deep their friendship is, which makes it reasonable when Jasper sacrifices himself to help Theo. He becomes very serious and helps Theo figure out difficulties to get to the border. When Fishes follows Theo to his home, Jasper uses delaying tactic by telling jokes again. Michael Caine has undoubtedly acted a loyal, humorous and optimistic friend of our protagonist.
Theory
The characters and scenes in this movie provide clearly religious elements. This film suggests a transformation of Christian messianic theology about the Son of Man who is destined to save humanity from a cosmic apocalypse. Theo is the typical example we can clearly see that he is closely related with Christian theology. Theo’s similarities to Jesus as messiah are evident in several ways. His character is non-violent, despite being surrounded by guns and bombs. While defending and protecting Kee, he never uses or carries weapons. Theo is also consistently surrounded by animals, which are used throughout the film as indicators of goodness and trustworthiness. The recurrent focus on free animals loving and surrounding Theo is set in contrast to the repeated caging of humans on streets and in camps. The caged humans become living symbols of the unfeeling, institutional systems that have led to apocalyptic conditions.
Ideology
Throughout the film, Cuarón sets intimacy and personal closeness in opposition to dehumanizing and punitive systems of social control. In the movie, Sid is an armed guard who sneaks Theo and Kee into Bexhill Refugee Camp, and who can be read as a human representative of fascist systems. Sid is unable to empathize with Theo, Kee, or Miriam, and laughs at their vulnerable situation. In order to verify Sid’s identity, Theo had to tell him the password – “You’re a fascist pig.” Sid’s inhumanity is underscored by speaking in the third person. “Sid doesn’t know why you want to get in. Sid doesn’t want to know.” His inability to speak in personal pronouns is further indicative of how fascist systems dehumanize people and disable personal recognition.
Children of Men has innovative ideas on telling a fantastic story about rising people’s hope in dilemma by using long take shot and lack of cuts. Meanwhile, actors do great work on delivering their characters’ personalities and traits. Sound also makes the film well developed with a mixture of different styles of music and sound effects.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

The Report on Film Insider

...The report on film “Insider” The most interesting thing is that the film was put on the events, which only recently had taken place in America. The real names of main characters of the story, played by Al Pacino and Russell Crowe, are Dr. Lowell Bergman and Uigand. Dr. Uigand actually testified in court against the tobacco company "Brown & Williamson" (by the way, the management of the company after the movie has filed a lawsuit against the producers of the film) and convinced the court of justice, so then in fifty U.S. states have filed lawsuits on tobacco companies for a total of 246 billion dollars. Many of these claims have been satisfied and called a real panic among the tobacco workers, because it was a first precedent when the tobacco workers were found guilty. Prior to this, tobacco companies do not ever lose in the court, spending on lawyers and attorneys huge money. I have already heard about these processes, and still could not figure out what it was about. But this film put everything in its place. This is not about that tobacco itself is addictive and harmful for health. The question is what chemical elements and compounds the tobacco companies add in production of cigarettes to have "better taste", "better smoke" and so on. Ammonia and nitrate - not all of that stuff, which adds a certain cigarette "taste", and many times increases the addiction to tobacco, the risk of lung cancer and other illnesses. That's the whole point. Smokers consciously endanger...

Words: 380 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Week 1

...nicotine is addictive and harmful. When Brown and Williamson executive Jeffrey Wigand (Crowe) tries to expose the industry's cover-up, he is threatened into silence. He eventually gets his story to 60 Minutes producer Lowell Bergman (AL Pacino), but CBS decides against airing it due to political and economic pressures, and the threat of lawsuit from Brown and Williamson. Before we start, I think it's important that you know a little thing about me, and where I'm coming from. I do smoke. But I believe that most of the lawsuits filed against the tobacco industry are unfounded, desperate attempts for people to put the blame on anyone but themselves. I think social security is a safety net for the financially irresponsible. I thought The Insider was a great movie from a strictly entertainment perspective (don't get ahead of me on this one!), and I enjoyed it very much. Russell Crowe is Jeffrey Wigand, a Brown and Williamson VP of Research and Development whose conscience compels him to blow the whistle on the industry. He claims that Big Tobacco has been covering up scientific research that proves nicotine is addictive and harmful. The writing puts a lot of energy into making sure that Wigand is a sufficiently complicated character, and one that we sympathize with. To be sure, he's not entirely one-dimensional. Initially, he does what most of us would do in his position: he takes the money and benefits that the company offers him in return for silence. After all, the guy has a...

Words: 1107 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

The Insider: Ethical Perspective

...The Insider is a film filled with ethical dilemmas, suspense, and controversy. It is based on a true story related to an episode of the CBS news show 60 Minutes that never aired. The plot puts Dr. Jeffrey Wigand (Russell Crowe) at odds with Brown & Williamson, the third largest tobacco company in the country. Wigand was fired from his position as Vice President of Research and Development, at which he was instructed to hide information related to the addictive nature of nicotine. The plot takes off when Lowell Bergman (Al Pacino), a producer for 60 Minutes, discovers that Wigand has a story to tell. The best way for Wigand to tell that story is with the help of Bergman, via an interview aired on 60 Minutes. However, tobacco companies have a history of viciously defending their profits, by whatever means necessary, and Brown & Williamson does just that. The story hits a climax as the interests and incentives of the television station CBS, 60 Minutes, Dr. Wigand and Brown & Williamson are played out. Portrayal of Business The film portrays business in an extremely negative light. It focuses on two central conflicts – one between Brown & Williamson and Wigand, the other between CBS Corporation and Bergman. Brown & Williamson is the primary antagonist. The film is ripe with examples of the bad things they do. Their principle, most damaging offense is deceit. They are charged with covering up the addictive properties of nicotine and finding ways to exploit...

Words: 1458 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

The Insider Movie

...The Insider (1999) is a film rife with ethical dilemmas, suspense and controversy. It is based on a true story related to a 1994 episode of the CBS news show 60 Minutes that never aired. The plot puts Dr. Jeffrey Wigand (Russell Crowe) at odds with Brown & Williamson, the third largest tobacco companies in the country. Wigand was fired from his position as Vice President of Research and Development, at which he was instructed to hide information related to the addictive nature of nicotine. The plot takes off when Lowell Bergman (Al Pacino), producer for 60 Minutes, discovers that Wigand has a story to tell. The best way for Wigand to tell that story is with the help of Bergman, via an interview aired on 60 Minutes. However, tobacco companies have a history of viciously defending their profits, by whatever means necessary, and Brown & Williamson does just that. The story hits a climax as the interests and incentives of the television station CBS, 60 Minutes, Dr. Wigand and Brown & Williamson are played out. Portrayal of Business The film portrays business in an extremely negative light. It focuses on two central conflicts – one between Brown & Williamson and Wigand, the other between CBS Corporation and Bergman. Brown & Williamson is the primary antagonist. The film is ripe with examples of the bad things they do. Their principle, most damaging offense is deceit. They are charged with covering up the addictive properties of nicotine and finding ways to exploit ...

Words: 1443 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Hum150

...nicotine is addictive and harmful. When Brown and Williamson executive Jeffrey Wigand (Crowe) tries to expose the industry's cover-up, he is threatened into silence. He eventually gets his story to 60 Minutes producer Lowell Bergman (AL Pacino), but CBS decides against airing it due to political and economic pressures, and the threat of lawsuit from Brown and Williamson. Before we start, I think it's important that you know a little thing about me, and where I'm coming from. I do smoke. But I believe that most of the lawsuits filed against the tobacco industry are unfounded, desperate attempts for people to put the blame on anyone but themselves. I think social security is a safety net for the financially irresponsible. I thought The Insider was a great movie from a strictly entertainment perspective (don't get ahead of me on this one!), and I enjoyed it very much. Russell Crowe is Jeffrey Wigand, a Brown and Williamson VP of Research and Development whose conscience compels him to blow the whistle on the industry. He claims that Big Tobacco has been covering up scientific research that proves nicotine is addictive and harmful. The writing puts a lot of energy into making sure that Wigand is a sufficiently complicated character, and one that we sympathize with. To be sure, he's not entirely one-dimensional. Initially, he does what most of us would do in his position: he takes the money and benefits that the company offers him in return for silence. After all, the guy has...

Words: 1020 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Weje

...1) Which are the stakeholders of CBS News? * Stakeholder of CBS news are Ms Helen Caperelli, Mr Eric Cluster, Don Hewitt, Lowell Bergman, Mike Wallace, Jeffrey Wigand, CBS corporate, and all the employees directly or indirectly related to it. 2) Had CBS News established trust in its relations with all its stakeholders? Please justify your answer. * No, CBS has not been able to establish relations to all its stakeholders. It was seen in the later part of the movie that when CBS management kill the story of doctor vegan by fearing that a law suit by big tobacco would put at risk its proposed merger with Westing house and the multimillion dollar bonuses that were to be paid to CBS executive. Hence, they broke up their trust with all its stakeholders by backing up just for the profit of the company. 3) Was trust necessary between CBS News and its employee/ sources? Why do you say so? Would your answer differ if the industry was different? Why? * Yes, necessarily there has to be trust between CBS and its employees. While honesty and integrity are the basis for stakeholder trust across the board, those stakeholders that interact extensively with the organisation need to perceive authentic concern for their well-being to continue their trust. In other words, even well-meaning, ethically driven organisations can destroy trust if they are seen as being “fair but callous” when it comes to managing relationships with their most important stakeholders...

Words: 574 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Psy 230 Week 2 Business Law Case

...1. Kelly would be entitled to the 20-foot strip if that was agreement stated in the contract and if Brown knew that Kelly’s main goal was to eventually regain possession of his 20-foot strip of land. However, if Kelly and Brown just orally agreed that the 20-foot strip would be reconveyed to Kelly than Kelly is not entitled to get his 20-foot strip back because it was a sale of real estate and it needed to be in writing. All contracts to sell land, buildings, or interests in land must be evidenced by a writing. The ethical issue is that Brown knew that Kelly wanted his 30-foot strip back but he doesn’t legally have to give it back to him because it was written down in their contract although they orally agreed to it. Brown is unethical for not giving Kelly’s 20-foot strip back. But, Kelly might be able to get his land back because this is an issue involving promissory estoppel and Kelly relied on the promise made by Brown in order to validate his decision to sell to Brown under the terms defined in the written contract. 3. Lawrence does not have a defense. The statute of frauds requires a contract for the promise by the executor or administrator of a decedent’s estate to pay a claim against the estate from personal funds to be written in a contract. Moore’s widow may have promised to pay the debt that her deceased husband owed Lawrence but without a written contract stating that she would pay her husband’s debt the promise cannot be enforced. The promise cannot be enforced unless...

Words: 540 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Gekko

...The Gekko was used influence tactic to Bud in the movie. Such as influence tactic about the film is push pressure tactic, upward appeal, exchange, pull the inspirational appeal, pull the personal appeal, pull ingratiation, and pull conclusion. The first influence tactic type was pushed the pressure Bud. For example, Bud had a lot of responsibility. Gekko pressured him to find out insider information that he needed to make specific decisions. Without those information, Gekko was not happy because he didn’t generate money from it. The second influence tactic types were upward appeal. Bud’s didn’t report anything to his boss. Also, Bud provides Gekko some inside information. For example, Bud pitches him stocks, but is unimpressed. Desperate, Bud provides him some inside information about Bluestar Airlines. The third influence tactic types were exchange. When began Bud told to him inside information, so Gekko wants Bud to spy on British CEO. Because he wants to make big money, if Bud don’t want to join him. Bud will be lose anything. The four pull influence tactic types was inspirational appeal. Just like movies Bud always looked up to Gekko before even meeting him. He aspired to be as successful as Gekko was in Wall Street. Because of this, Bud was easily influenced to go against his father’s beliefs became of he will success from knowing inside information. Bud would stop at nothing to impress the one who inspired him. The influence tactic types were pulled personal...

Words: 421 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Insiders Trading

...Insiders Trading: Is it unethical? Table of Content Introduction 3 Body 3-4 Appendix A 5 Conclusion 5 Work Cited 6 Introduction Insider trading occurs when a trade has been influenced by the privileged possession of corporate information that has not yet been made public. Because the information is not available to other investors, a person using such knowledge is trying to gain an unfair advantage over the rest of the market. You're acting on information not known to other investors. Using nonpublic information for making a trade disturbs transparency, which is the basis of a capital market. Information in a transparent market is disseminated in a manner by which all market participants receive it at more or less the same time. Under these conditions, one investor can gain an advantage over another only through acquiring skill in analyzing and interpreting available information. This skill is based on individual merit and awareness. If one person trades with nonpublic information, he or she gains an advantage that is impossible for the rest of the public. This is not only unfair but disruptive to a properly functioning market if insiders trading were allowed, then investors would lose confidence in their disadvantaged position and would no longer invest. Body The practice of insider trading is considered to be unethical by many people around the world. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) describe...

Words: 855 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Improving Insider Trading Enforcement in Canada (Ontario)

...CAN ONTARIO IMPROVE ITS INSIDER TRADING REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT BY ADOPTING POLICIES USED IN THE USA? Prepared by Muhammad Bilal Amjad 2B Accounting and Financial Management ID 20429857 AFM 231: Business Law School of Accounting and Finance University of Waterloo Friday, August 9, 2013 Abstract The purpose of this paper is to present potential suggestions on how Canada (more specifically, Ontario) can improve its insider trading regulation and enforcement. In order to do so, this paper will compare the insider trading regulation and enforcement in Canada and the USA. It will examine whether or not Ontario should take from the methods used in the USA in order to strengthen its regulation and enforcement of insider trading. Ontario was chosen in particular because securities regulation in Canada falls under the jurisdiction of provincial governments, with Ontario being home to Canada’s largest securities market. Introduction Insider trading is a subject of great significance in security markets all across the globe. Not only does it violate securities law in Canada and many other countries, it is also seen as highly unethical. It applies not only to equity, but also to bond and option markets. Insider trading is deemed illegal primarily because it is contrary to the public trusts upon which security markets operates; it undermines investor confidence, and as a result, discourages investment (Dessaulles, 2013, p. 9). In addition, it is viewed as being immoral because...

Words: 6882 - Pages: 28

Premium Essay

Insider Trading

...Abstract Insider trading is a serious crime. The general public is held accountable, and yet, it is legal for members of Congress. There are several cases involving members of society being prosecuted for their illegal activity of insider trading; while Congress has exempted their members from acting on the same type of information. This type of conduct has serious legal, ethical and moral considerations. This paper will address the definition of insider trading. The legal, ethical and moral considerations of insider trading will be outlined, through a snap shot of the legal precedence recently in the press involving congressional behavior. It will further look at cases that have made headlines in past years, to show the distinction of what can happen to the general public who participate in insider trading. During a recent article by Parloff (2011), he stated, “The problem arises with respect to market-moving information a congressman learns in the course of doing his legislative work.” This comment is at the heart of the issue involving insider trading and Congress. The people elect members to Congress to act in their best interest. When the people of society feel members of Congress have violated that trust under legal, ethical, or moral wrongdoing, the members of society make decisions based upon those standards set by Congress. Thus members of society participate in insider trading knowing it is legally wrong. Insider Trading Insider trading can be a severe crime...

Words: 3327 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Case Study: the Trial of Martha Stewart

...States of America is one of the few western countries which has no clear definitions for “insider”, “insider information”, and “insider trading” in its law system. Therefore, people are sending to prisons for a crime that has not defined yet. It is part of a due process that people have notice of what they are doing is wrong. Martha Stewart was sent to prison, because she sold her ImClone shares as a result of receiving tip from her broker on December 27, 2001. Bacanovic, Stewart’s broker, had routine access to the material, non-public information inside of ImClone which made him an insider. The argument here is whether Martha Stewart is an insider or not? Is receiving a tip makes her an insider? The same way, Sam Waksal, the CEO of ImClone, tipped his family members, an investment advisor, and a physician to sell their shares. However, none of the tippees was convicted with the insider trading crime, except for Martha Stewart. Martha Stewart was not holding any position in ImClone, nor had any routine access to the ImClone’s material, non-public information. Thus, how can she be possibly considered as an insider? It is very brutal to be convicted of a crime which has not been clearly defined in the law system, yet. The criticism here was that Martha Stewart was being used as a scapegoat, a victim. She could easily serve as an example of a high visibility celebrity who committed the insider trading crime. Also, it could be a credit for the United States Justice System in which...

Words: 612 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Pete Rose Case Summary

...The SEC addresses both legal and illegal insider trading applicable, but not limited, to corporate executives, directors, employees, friends and family of insiders, people who are privy to information as a result of working for a firm that has inside information due to interaction with the corporation (SEC, n.d.). The SEC governs securities, but the same guidelines can be applied to other forms of monetary investment or gambling where one party has knowledge that unfairly provides an opportunity to make a more informed decision than other participants. Insider Trading Limits and Pete Rose The Pete Rose case is an example of illegal betting with inside information. Pete Rose should refrain from betting on the success of his team because he has information about the players, opponents, and game plan that other betting parties do not. Further, there could be arrangements made with the other team to play differently and receive monetary compensation, compromising trust and integrity of the sport (Klosterman, 2014). Punishments should be more severe for betting on a loss since the ability to create the loss by intentional poor performance, for...

Words: 806 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Pete Rose Case Summary

...The SEC addresses both legal and illegal insider trading applicable, but not limited, to corporate executives, directors, employees, friends and family of insiders, people who are privy to information as a result of working for a firm that has inside information due to interaction with the corporation (SEC, n.d.). The SEC governs securities, but the same guidelines can be applied to other forms of monetary investment or gambling where one party has knowledge that unfairly provides an opportunity to make a more informed decision than other participants. Insider Trading Limits and Pete Rose The Pete Rose case is an example of illegal betting with inside information. Pete Rose should not be allowed to profit from betting on the success of his team because he has information about the players, opponents, and game plan that other betting parties do not. Further, there could be arrangements made with the other team to play differently and receive monetary compensation, compromising trust and integrity of the sport (Klosterman, 2014). Punishments should be more severe for betting on a loss since the ability to create the loss by poor performance, for example, is easier. Even with required disclosure and laws in place to deter insider gambling and...

Words: 844 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Scenario1

...Factual Scenario 1 Jeremy Jip is not considered Lulu’s employee. Based on the criteria used by the courts to decide whether a worker is categorized as an employee or independent contractor, Jeremy wouldn’t be considered Lulu’s employee. He would be considered an independent contractor because Lulu has no control over the details of Jeremy’s work performance. She does not exercise considerable control of his work, his occupation is distinctly different from that of Lulu’s, his work is usually done without supervision, Lulu does not supply his tools for his occupation, and the job that he’s hired for requires a high degree of skill. Also, his term of employment is only until the house is sold and his one-time fee is paid at the completion of the sale. According to the text, an independent contractor is “a person who contracts with another to do something for him or her but who is not controlled by the other nor subject to the others right to control with respect to his or her physical conduct in the performance of the undertaking. He or she may not be an agent” (Clarkson, Miller, Cross, 2012, p. 625). Lulu is not liable for Mary and Ollie’s injuries because, even though Jeremy Jip is an agent representing LuLu Lowlife, his day to day activities are still those of an independent contractor, not an employee. According to the text “To determine whether the relationship of the parties is that of employer and servant or that of employer and independent contractor, the primary test...

Words: 674 - Pages: 3