Name
Instructor
Date

Compare and contrast pieces of fine art Fine art has been considered as the major source of history, which has articulated several formatives that depict on the essence of humanity. Based on different sources, fine art has navigated some comparatives that portray the nature of history that equally aligns some prospects that site on the major differences on art. To start with, the major goal of the fine art is mainly to promote a unique active and thoughtful approach towards analyzing some specification of art history. Therefore the process requires taking into consideration by comparing and contrasting some essentials of the two pieces of art that attempt to approach the critical thinking analysis. This assumption invites availing the simple analysis of the information that ideally addresses the craft of an effective subtlety that is undertaken on the process. Every step that is articulated on the preparation of the early course on the fine art is depicted as an informative exhibit that is consolidated in organizing the discrete bits in a larger notion. This is well crafted on the practice of the fine art that distinguishes the level of thinking in the history of art. Based on that note, the major exercise that reviews on fine history has added the benefit of the emerging success on the concepts of well-crafted images of fine art. This equally announces the expected comparison that focuses on this practice. The completion of the moral abstract by the major artists is one of the satellites that denounce some well-drive affirmatives that have been already made in the series of the fine art. Therefore, by defining this essence of review history expands the exercise by introducing the directed presentation on what should be enhanced in this field. With that regard, the main goal of the presentation avails a precise piece as it shows different signatures that shows the uniqueness of colors on both the abstract and geometric shapes on the fine art (Carroll, Wilson & Forlini, 2001). It is realized that the precise piece such as that of Jackson Pollock on fine art anticipate on the highly recognized piece of art. This piece differentiates from the rest based on the organized orders that contrasts on the orders of planned shapes. For instance, the drip style those hold a definitive size that is covered by the different famous works that has equally created by famous works of art. When the pieces are viewed as the satirical pieces some important movements have respective line of work that basically shows the art movements that work within the industry. All these are important since the movement played in this perspective checks on the different similarities of the driven characteristics of fine. However, they are different significant movements that show the similar objectives (Carroll, Wilson & Forlini, 2001). For instance, this incorporates so much intrusion of pop cultural differences and this work within a few of some expressionism. In conclusion, comparing and contrasting fine art needs some major alternatives that show the differences between the two. Therefore the trench defines the major pieces of fine art that returns to ensure the responsibility looked at the businesses is achieved within a given period. This ensures that there is an appropriate skill which specifies the different disciplines that has been affirmed on the history. The works demonstrated on the visual analysis on the historical context makes some formal elements that typically show the concentration on both the cultural reasons as well as the socio-political or theological differences.

References
Carroll, J. A., Wilson & E. E., Forlini, (2001). Writing and grammar: Communication in action. Upper Saddle river, N.J: Prentice Hall.