...years in poverty and in and out of prison. Throughout this time he was married four times, the first three marriages ended very quickly but the last marriage in the 1950’s would last longer. Gideon and his wife settled in Panama City, Florida after having three children who would later be taken away by welfare authorities. Gideon found work as an electrician but gambled to subsidize his low income. Gideon would not go back to jail again until 1961. On June 3, 1961 four fifths of wine, twelve bottles of Coca Cola, twelve cans of beer, about five dollars from the cigarette machine and sixty dollars from the juke box were stolen from Bay Harbor Poolroom which belonged to Ira Strickland Jr. A twenty-two year old resident that lived close by, Henry Cook, told the police that he saw Gideon get into a cab after walking out of the pool hall with a bottle of wine and pockets filled with coins. Consequently, Gideon was arrested in a nearby tavern and ordered to stand trial. On August 4, 1961, Clarence Earl Gideon appeared for trial before Judge Robert L. McCrary, Jr. in the Circuit Court of the Fourteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida for Bay County. The trial transcript begins as follows: (Lewis P9) The Court: The next case on the docket is the case of...
Words: 3150 - Pages: 13
... one of which is the story of Clarence Earl Gideon. Gideon Petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States of America for a writ of certiorari, founded in his belief that he, a poor man, should have the right to an attorney after he was convicted of robbing a pool house in the early 1960’s. Despite originally being found guilty, Gideon was determined to appeal to the courts and gain his freedom under the premise that his right to due process of law was violated. He created a movement in history that led to the establishment of universal right to counsel within the United States legal system. After a tedious case, that did not look as though it would bode well for Gideon, he was successful in persuading the Supreme Court to accept his appeal....
Words: 1331 - Pages: 6
...Md. Musa Shifullah Professor Porter Introduction to legal process Course code-126 Mandatory Response paper (two) about the Supreme Court case decision for Gideon v. Wainwright The plaintiff Gideon been accused by the State Court of Florida for committing felony. The hearings commenced, and Gideon requested for a defense lawyer to be appointed by the State of Florida, on account of the law that he has the right to get state-appointed counsel as he is indigent. However, this request had been declined by the state Court, as they said that indigent defendants have the right to appointed counsels only when they have been accused of a capital offense. It was held that the right to be represented by a counsel was a right fundamental to having a...
Words: 644 - Pages: 3
...lawyers in all court cases? Gideon versus Wainwright is a case that will decide if indigent defendants will. The case of whether indigent defendants should be provided with lawyers. There have been many other cases similar to this, like Powell versus Alabama, Palko versus Connecticut, and Betts versus Brady. Indigent defendants should not be provided lawyers in court unless their offense is capital. The case started in 1961 when a homeless man by the name of Clarence Earl Gideon was caught “Breaking and entering into a Panama City, Florida, pool hall and stealing money from the hall's vending machines” (Mcbride). He stole less than one hundred dollars and some...
Words: 746 - Pages: 3
...Case Citation Gideon v Wainwright 372 U.S. 335 (1963) Court U.S. Supreme Court Facts Defendant was charged with a felony in a Florida State Court. He was charged with breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor. He was not appointed counsel even though he was not able to afford one. He was forced to act as his own counsel and was convicted. He was sentenced to five years in a state prison. Defendant was denied counsel due to Florida Law. The law stated that the only time and indigent defendant would get a counsel was if he is charged with a capital offense. Gideon filed a petition for habeas corpus attacking his conviction and sentence on the ground that the trial court’s refusal to appoint counsel denied his constitutional rights and rights guaranteed him under the Bill of Rights. The Florida State Supreme Court denied relief. Because the problem of a defendant’s constitutional right to counsel in state court continued to be source of controversy since Betts v. Brady, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to again review the issue. Issue The issue at hand is whether A prior decision of the Court’s, Betts v. Brady, 316 U.S. 455 (1942), held that the refusal to appoint counsel for an indigent defendant charged with a felony in state court did not necessarily violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court granted Gideon’s petition for a writ of certiorari – that is, agreed to hear Gideon’s case and review the decision...
Words: 280 - Pages: 2
...Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) In Gideon v. Wainwright, Clarence Earl Gideon was convicted of breaking and entering into a pool hall, and he was also charged of stealing money and alcohol. At his trial, Gideon did not have the sufficient funds to get an attorney, so he asked the judge if he could be appointed an attorney. Gideon’s request was denied by the judge because according to the Florida law, the only time a attorney could be appointed to someone was for poor defendants who were charged with capital offenses. This is the point where the constitutional issue began. Gideon fended for himself as best as he could but failed and was sent to prison. While serving his time, Gideon insisted that he should have been appointed an attorney, so he did research based on the prison library. After he was well informed he petitioned the Supreme Court arguing that he should have been appointed an attorney but his request was denied. And that was his constitutional issue, people should be appointed an attorney if they cannot afford one even if they are not being charged with a capital offense and he claimed...
Words: 532 - Pages: 3
...In 1963, a man named Clarence Earl Gideon was arrested for breaking and entering into a pool hall in Panama City, Florida. His objective was to break into the building’s vending machines to steal money from them. Clarence was a very poor man who ran away from his home at a young age. He had the education of an eighth-grader. Clarence then became a drifter. He committed little crimes in order to gain small amounts of cash here and there. He was often caught and had become a regular in the county jail. Gideon once again found himself in the Florida court house, but this time he was in danger of up to a five-year jail sentence. Clarence was too poor to afford an attorney, and was never granted one. He had to handle every aspect of his trial all...
Words: 669 - Pages: 3
...larceny. He was sentenced to five years in state prison. He applied to the Florida Supreme Court for a writ of habeas corpus, but it was rejected. Gideon had some knowledge of the workings of the Supreme Court...
Words: 695 - Pages: 3
...Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963) Facts: Gideon was charged with breaking and entering with the intent to commit a misdemeanor, which is a felony under Florida law. At trial, Gideon appeared in court without an attorney. In open court, he asked the judge to appoint counsel for him because he could not afford an attorney. The trial judge denied Gideon’s request because Florida law only permitted appointment of counsel for poor defendants charged with capital offenses. At trial, Gideon represented himself – he made an opening statement to the jury, cross-examined the prosecution’s witnesses, presented witnesses in his own defense, declined to testify himself, and made arguments emphasizing his innocence. Despite his efforts, the jury found Gideon guilty and he was sentenced to five years imprisonment. Gideon sought relief from his conviction by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Florida Supreme Court. In his petition, Gideon challenged his conviction and sentence on the ground that the trial judge’s refusal to appoint counsel violated Gideon’s constitutional rights. The Florida Supreme Court denied Gideon’s petition. Gideon next filed a handwritten petition in the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court agreed to hear the case to resolve the question of whether the right to counsel guaranteed under the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution applies to defendants in state court. Issue: A prior decision of the Court’s, Betts v. Brady, 316...
Words: 484 - Pages: 2
...something that has to be guaranteed in most influential country in the world. “Gideon v. Wainwright” has challenged this fairness and changed how the justice and judicial system worked. This court case leaves a remarkable imprint for the future of court rulings and decision making. On August 4th, 1961, a man by the name of Clarence Earl Gideon was convicted of breaking and entering with the intent of committing a misdemeanor. Under Florida law, this was seen as a felony, a pretty serious crime as to go to trial for it. The day of Gideon’s trial, he appeared in court without an attorney. Upon his request for one since he could not afford it, the The trial judge denied his request because under Florida law, the appointment of a representative was only permitted for defendants charged with capital offenses....
Words: 475 - Pages: 2
...their son, but rather Jon Stones. The Sells immediately went to the hospital where a positive identification was made of Scott Sells and Jon Stones. Procedural History The Appellee brought suit against the Appellant citing negligent emotional distress caused by the Appellant mistakenly advising her of her son’s death. The jury in the district court for Adam’s County returned a $15,000 verdict for Joyce Sell. The hospital appealed and the Supreme Court held that Joyce Sell failed to present a prima facie cause of action for negligent emotional distress. This is due to the lack of evidence establishing a medically significant and diagnosable emotional harm. Issue Is the Supreme Court correct in its holding that the Appellee in this case failed to present evidence establishing a medically diagnosable and significant emotional harm as well as a prima facie cause of action for negligent emotional distress? Holding The court ruled the district court’s decision is reversed. The cause is remanded with directions to dismiss. Rationale The court referenced previous case Parrish v. Omaha Pub. Power Dist. in their decision. In that case...
Words: 732 - Pages: 3
...his life due to those nonviolent crimes. In 1961 through 1963 was when the trial of Gideon v. Wainwright played out. On the night of June 3,1961 Clarence was seen at a poolroom in Panama City, FL. He was seen breaking and entering according to eye witnesses, said to have stolen money and alcoholic beverages from the area. When he was taken into custody he asked if they could appoint him a lawyer, since he was homeless and couldn’t afford one. The judge denied his request, because in the state of Florida at the time they only appointed lawyers to the poor who had committed capital crimes, and they saw that his crime was a noncapital crime meaning that he didn’t need a lawyer to be appointed to him unless he...
Words: 949 - Pages: 4
...Gideon v. Wainwright was a very important case for the Supreme Court; it guaranteed the same kind of fair trial in state courts as was expected in federal courts. In 1961 Clarence Gideon was denied an attorney in a state court and he appealed to the Supreme Court arguing this was violating his constitutional right to a fair trial. This was going against a previous decision by a Federal Court of Appeals in 1941. The Supreme Court accepted Gideon's petition and reviewed the decision of the Court of Appeals. In 1963 the Supreme Court decided in favor of Gideon and overruled the previous decision changing the precedent for all state courts. The decision stated that the sixth amendment applied to states and now we are (Krajicek, Clarence Gideon...
Words: 947 - Pages: 4
...Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S 335, is a turning point case in the United States Court history. Under the fourteen Amendments to the U.S Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases to the represent defendants who cannot afford to pay their own attorneys. Gideon was charged with a felony in Florida state court. He came into view before the state Court, informing the Court he was indigent and requested that the Court appoint him an attorney. The Court declined to appoint Gideon an attorney, stating that under Florida law, the only time an indigent defendant is entitled to appoint counsel is when he is charged with a capital offense. Therefore, an indigent defendant with an attorney is a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which Gideon v. Wainwright imposed those requirements upon the states as well....
Words: 662 - Pages: 3
...(law). Although the right to counsel is found at the very end of this amendment, it is just as important as the right to a speedy and public trial, or the right to an impartial jury. In 1961, a man named Clarence Earl Gideon was arrested in the state of Florida. He requested an attorney because he could not afford one, but this request was denied by the judge. Two years later, the Supreme Court heard and decided on a case called Gideon v. Wainwright, where it was stated that the Sixth Amendment’s right to counsel was essential to a fair trial. It therefore became unconstitutional to deny counsel to a poor person facing a felony charge. Gideon v. Wainwright was a remarkable Supreme...
Words: 1633 - Pages: 7
