In this article “Folly of Outrage: Talk Radio's Unethical and Damaging Business Model” some of the focus is about on-air comments or discussion are ruin standard business model and new avenues becoming more acceptable. However nowadays talk radio behavior of becoming immoral and unethical being acceptable by management and ownership. This kind of talk radio is bringing in more listeners, attention, and revenue. In this article, it talks about the outrage of radio and some benefits in the change of moderate day radio. According, (pg.290 paragraph 3) it states “a radio consultant who works with stations around the world, says radio programmers are looking for people with creative expression, but it does not take much work to use profanity or cruel, simplistic ways to talk to people. “What I’m hearing is a lot of lazy radio, like banging on a drum. There is a lot of content without context” (personal communication, June 18, 2013). …show more content…
Instead, radio programmer is just relaying their own opinions, unethical comments and the first amendment to secure their public statements. According, to this article an opposing side give a different opinion about how this rhetoric being said on the radio is not good for business. Towards the end of the article, it talks about how talk show or radio host are starting to be accountability for their on-air commentary. (pg. 291 paragraph 1) Gives an example “The standards for accountability, for responsibility, for doing no harm, have reached an alarmingly low level. Some good news: Accountability is a little higher for local hosts. In February 2012, popular Los Angeles radio hosts John Kobylt and Ken Chiampou, on KFI radio, called Whitney Houston a “crack ‘ho” (Braxton, 2012). They were suspended for a week.” This article great for cases that need a different viewpoint from all