Free Essay

Food Inc

In:

Submitted By lindseykachi
Words 2294
Pages 10
Lindsey Kachi
Mrs. Ciallella
English 8C
16 May 2012
Failure to Care for Livestock The respect towards livestock in America is steadily declining through the practice of "factory farming." Factory farming is performed by the few large companies controlling food processing in America, it is vile and takes away humanity from those who continue to do it. It is the process in which farms "manufacture" food in unhealthy environments rather than safely breed livestock. It negatively affects the welfare of animals and the companies put the value of efficiency and profit before the health and safety of the animals. The repercussions of the choice to make these environments unhealthy by large corporations and keep them that way without trying to fix them further the damage to the treatment of livestock and the nutritional damage to America. It is imperative that America takes a stand as a nation to stop the process of factory farming and its effects, before the corporations go too far to the point where it is unstoppable. Factory farming is an increasing epidemic in the world of farming, we need to stop this before it is no longer preventable. A large portion of the population in America actually have no idea how livestock is taken care of by the corporations that they buy from. They do not know that the animals are so carelessly handled, that the animals are looked at as materials rather than actual living produce. In the documentary "Food, Inc." (2010) the producers of the movie actually get an inside view of the process of factory farming. The scene from Chapter 1: "Fast Food to All Food" shows how newly hatched chicks are instantly stamped for the approval of being edible food later on. The unfortunate chicks with birth defects were simply thrown away as if they were lifeless trash, never to lead a normal chick life however short it could've been. The chicks were not even given the chance to have a normal life, the chicks were denied respect for being alive and well regardless of defects. Human beings today are born with birth defects, yet we do not throw away human babies as if they are lifeless trash. One does not simply disregard the life of another no matter how small it may be, animal or human. The safety of animal welfare, and the production of enough food for a large population is achievable, actually it is being achieved at this very moment. Environmental conditions of the animals can be improved and actually improve their health if America just works at it as a nation. Famous Chef hailing from the restaurant, "The Blue Hill," Dan Barber found a way to keep his fish on the menu, in order to do this he went on a trip to Spain. In Spain he met a farmer named Miguel, with the help of his fellow farmers and vast resources, he was able to recreate a complete and healthy farm kind of ecosystem in which he could raise his animals purely without the pain or torture that is realized in factory farming. After seeing this he asks the question, "How are you going to feed the world." Barber despises this question, he says that it has defined our logic for agriculture in the last 50 years, but if we're going to feed a billion people, let America do it right. By creating a world without machine run farms, let America go natural in the way it would produce food, through time and care. Through the process of a safer more natural way of farming, we would see the rights and general animal welfare rise from its plummeting fall in factory farming.

To preserve and heighten the quality of farm animal life in those factory farms, Americans need to improve the living conditions of the animals. Another scene from "Food, Inc." (2010) Chapter 1: "Fast Food to All Food" shows the housing environment and feeding of the chicken farms. These houses are unhealthy and not safe for the chicken, besides the amount of disease that travels through the houses because of overcrowding, they have no leg room to move anywhere. The documentary shows some of the chicken not being able to move at all because their legs cannot even carry their weight. The chicken are left in the dark, literally pitch black darkness, this happens so that they are more calm and don't know what is going on in their surroundings. But that is one of the main reasons it is unhealthy, they literally cannot see what is coming next, they are all gathered up and flung into cages, the workers seemed to have made a game out of it. If America was actually educated in the real production of food in America and were not so desensitized towards the welfare of animals, we would not be facing the problem of factory farming. It can be said that many Americans would deny the consumption of these animals, if they knew how the animals were treated during their growth.
Through the use of factory farming America does see results when it comes to shoveling out food for the general populace, but the relentless disregard of animal welfare is not worth the overly well fed stomachs of Americans. Yes, it is more efficient way of creating food for the greater population of America, yet it does not justify the incorrect and vile treatment of the animals that make up the market of food. As a result, these scenes further prove why America needs to stand up and rebel against the corporate use of factory farming, otherwise America is only going to dig itself a hole it will not be able to get itself out. The lack of education of factory farming or rather agriculture in general in America is very lacking, this proves to be a problem since children don't know how their food was raised to be eaten. America would be able to progressively stop the act of factory farming, if we instill safe and respectable farming values in the early education of children. From the University of California of Berkeley, a site wife and also First Lady to the President of America, Barack Obama, has decided to try and instill good eating habits for children in elementary school and of higher education. With the program she supports, "The Edible Schoolyard," she plans to raise awareness and educate at a younger age, how the food they consume is produced and slowly put an end to the terror of factory farming. As children in elementary school, they were taught that animals live happily in farms only to live on and breed more livestock. But if in these earlier stages of education; were America to expose these problems to the children, just maybe would America be able to progress towards a better state of farming and reduce the use of factory farming. Even if we expose minor points to the epidemic that is factory farming, the children would be all for creating a better life for the animals.
The lack of education in America has led to the continued use of factory farming in large corporation controlled farms today, to continue on the lack of education. People who actually see that this poses a problem for the future of America have been planting the seeds of Agricultural classes across America. They create these classes in middle schools and high schools, but these classes would best serve their value in elementary schools. Author of many books detailing the need of certain kinds of education, published by the University of Chicago Press, Benjamin Marshall Davis says that though agricultural classes would be a great plan, the truth of the matter is that there are not that many qualified teachers to teach these agricultural classes. Along with the ages of the pupils would serve another ladder to climb(469). Through the eyes of Davis, it seems that we need to instill these values of good agriculture to the younger population, but in order to do this, America needs to educate the population between the age of 19 and older, this is so that they may teach the younger population without any sort of bias. This will show them the truth to how bad the situation is getting and hopefully will spark a progressive farming movement. Many realists would probably object that creating a completely new ecosystem out of the blue would take too much time and money. These realists consist of the people of the company of Monsanto. This company of Monsanto advertises good health and welfare for animals, in their websites, but if one looks at the Chapter 1: "Fast Food to All Food" from "Food, Inc." (2010) and see much of the research describing the living conditions of the animals they "take care of," one would see that the people of Monsanto are terrible hypocrites. In this company they believe that creating a completely new way of farming right out of the blue, would destroy the market of farming and that it would take more money to change it completely than to keep it at the state of factory farming. They would be right in a sense that maybe it would take time and money, but not everything has to change right away, it is a due process of progression to a better way of life. At first glance it would seem that most of the general population of America would not care either way if the way animals were taken care of during factory farming was good or bad. But when you take a closer look, the good part of their humanity cries for a better way of taking care of the animals during the farming process. Like Dan Barber was saying, it feels much better to eat knowing your food was raised healthy, rather than tortured to death.
Instead of buying produce from large corporations that only further the harm of animal welfare, look to buy at the more local markets around the area. The reason behind this is that America can give power back to the small family owned farms and make it so that there is a healthier lifestyle for farming livestock around America. In a study of air quality conducted by the Environmental Health Sciences Research Center from the University of Iowa, communities receive better economic benefits by purchasing or just being around small family owned farms, rather than purchasing from the larger corporation like farms. In turn, these small farms give back the money by buying feed and seed from other various local markets, the economy grows together. These farms do not use assembly lines like those of the factory farms, they keep their livestock in a safe, comfortable environment all while improving the nearby economy. It is a sort of domino effect or rather a better way to put it would be that of a snow ball effect. Once the everyone starts buying locally, the care for the animal welfare will be greatly boosted.
A few studies on the effect of fairly large corporate farms in towns show that problems economies face are largely at fault from the large factory farm companies, because of their machines and unhealthy, diseased living conditions of the animals, the odors they emit are disgusting and drive down property values. This study is furthered by the Center for Agricultural and Rural Development from Iowa State University. By increasing the power of small farms, merely by making purchases of their crop or livestock can drive up property values, mainly because the animals would be able to live healthier without the pollution from the constant use of machines. Though the convenience of large companies is very tempting, small farms are the better choice as it will improve lives of the animals and in turn, this would create a better, healthier future for the livestock of America.
Continuing on the thought that eating local would be better, Mark Bittman, food writer and author of the "Minimalist" column in the Dining section of the The New York Times, states that eating local improves the health of everyone, but it is a dying fad. He goes on to say that 100 years ago, "Everybody was a locavore. . . Every family had a cook, usually a mom." A locavore is a person who goes out and eats locally, but like he said, 100 years ago there was not any means of food transportation, everything was eaten locally. This proved to be a great system as it provided a good ecological system for the livestock back in those days. No assembly lines to process our food for us, but safe and healthy living conditions for the animals. Eating locally offers a superior state of healthiness for the animals and a better economy. All of these sources used fixes the mistaken impression that general animal welfare is terrible in the life of a factory farm. In order to get a real good grip of America's health back, we need to stop feeding into these factory farms and provide ourselves a better future. To provide America with a better future everyone must progressively stop buying products from the vile companies that control farm factories, this will presents a better opportunity for a healthier lifestyle not only for the animals but for the human race as well. Educating people at younger ages in order to instill values that would further the progress of healthier eating habits and treatments of animals, but America would regain its respect for life. America needs to take a stand soon and progressively turn away from those farm factories, this is the only way we'll stop the harm to those factory farm animals whom were not given a chance.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Food Inc

...320 The documentary “The Food, INC gave me insight on food production issues that I was unaware of. The manufacturing companies have a strong hold on farmers that prevents the natural way of farming. Farmers spend thousands of dollars purchasing new equipment to make companies such as Tyson happy. These farmers end up borrowing more money than they actually make. The issues in food production include cheap labor, immigration, e-coli contamination, pesticide usage, the fast food industry, and the sanitary conditions for both animals and workers in factories. Companies such as Smithfield recruit immigrants from Mexico to work in their factories. workers are paid very low wage and endure unsafe work conditions. There is an agreement between manufacturing companies and INS so that immigrants to be deported in small numbers. This is done so that the factory’s production is not affected. I was unaware that immigrants work for these large manufacturing companies for such a low wage. These people are exploited by companies such as Smithfield. Some of these workers have been working in United States for over fifteen years. The corporations are robbing livelihood of workers and there only means of survival. We as Americans lobby against immigrant’s presence in the United States. The ham and turkey we buy that is so inexpensive for Thanksgiving dinner is made possible by immigrant workers. The fast food industry has been profitable and...

Words: 1036 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Food Inc

...Food Inc. This film was definitely an eye opener, I was not fully aware of the current methods of food production. One of the main issues that shocked me the most, was the way animals were treated and fed. I felt so repulsed when I saw how the cattle was brutally slaughter. The industry has been doing this for years, and we are not doing anything about it. I never really thought about how the animals were treated. I had an idea that it was probably done in a way that was efficient for the industry to supply meat to multiple supermarket across the U.S. Another thing that I never really thought about, was how fast the meat is supplied to supermarkets. I never asked myself how it is possible for all supermarkets to always have beef, chicken and fish available. We live in a society were everything is fast-paced. It was very astonishing to see that all of the animals we eat are feed with corn to quickly speed up the process of distributing the meat. After seeing the graphic scenes captured, I told myself that I would never eat meat again. However, once I went back home I found myself craving chicken nuggets. When I got hungry, I forgot only for a split second about the movie! But when I remembered I felt so conflicted. It is difficult for me to stop eating meat, but I want to make a difference on the way our food is treated. I think this movie should be watched by everyone, so we can encourage (push) the meat industry to change the way they produce and supply our meat. While I...

Words: 344 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Food Inc

...a large impact on the way all food is processed. The top four meat packers now control over 80% of the market, compared to the past,when the top four meat packers controled 20% In America, whoever has the big bucks dictates how things are run. With money, there is no limit to what can be done. According the Youtube video, “Food Inc.” a perfect example of the desire for more is in the food industry. The narrator makes the argument that profit is put before the consumer’s well being, the legacy of the American farmer, workers safety, and our precious environment (Food Inc.) in many major corporations. I firmly believe that these corporations have put aside and have deliberately tried to hide the truth about how unhealthy the food they produce truly is for the American public. The documentary “Food Inc. produced by Robert Kenner and Eric Schlosser, takes an in depth look at America’s food industry and the terrible but completely legal way our food is genetically engineered. The purpose of this video is to shock the American public with clever filmography and facts about the food Americans consume everyday. The food industry is full of misconceptions. The youtube video, “Food Inc.” declares that the food industry is using deceiving images of agrarian America to sell their product. Images such as lush green fields, picket fences, silos, and 30’s farmhouse, but as the narrator asserts, “it’s the spinning of a pastoral fantasy”. In reality the food being consumed is coming from...

Words: 1655 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Food Inc

...Topic: Food Production and Consumption Choices Food Inc The documentary Food Inc was released in 2008. It targets big corporations in how they produce a product. However, the product they are producing are living beings and these big corporations are taking over the majority of the food production process in the U.S. The economic perspective on this movie with be both from the consumer and the producers/suppliers. I will tie in the motivation of food production for these multi-national corporation and also come with an idea of us, as consumers do in fact have a choice in the products we purchase. Also what are the implication are of our economic choices and what choices I have made after viewing this film. In any business, to become successful you have to be able to supply a demand. Also be able to do so cost efficiently and increase the process t ime. All of these companies that were announced in the film Food Inc, are market-oriented, they produce a product such as chickens, whose intake has been adjusted so they grow faster and larger, they know how to produce them quickly and they also in bring buyers and sellers. With this system it allows them to yield higher profits, because they spend less time in production time of growing their product. One of the companies illustrated is Tyson, they have their employees specialized in order to complete many task in a quicker time frame. Such as the one women in the film, who was stamping or “branding” these baby chickens...

Words: 1218 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Food Inc

...SM 101 Environmental Science VIDEO: Food, Inc. © 2008 by Magnolia Home Entertainment Quoted from the outer case of the DVD – “Food, Inc. lifts the veil on our nation’s food industry, exposing how our nation’s food supply in now controlled by a handful of corporations that often put profit ahead of consumer heath, the livelihood of the American farmer, the safety of workers and our own environment. Food, Inc. reveals surprising – and often shocking truths – about what we eat, how it’s produced and who we have become as a nation.” Please answer the following questions while watching Food, Inc. 1. Approximately how many products are available in the average American grocery store? 47,000 products 2. In what decade did “drive-ins,” the original fast food restaurants, appear on the American landscape? 1930’s 3. What fast food restaurant brought the factory system, or assembly line, to food preparation? McDonald Brothers (McDonalds) 4. Who is the largest purchaser of ground beef in the United States? McDonalds 5. Who is the largest purchaser of potatoes in the United States? Mcdonalds 6. The top 4-5 producers of beef controlled only __25_% of the market in the 1970s, and _80__% of the market today. 7. In the 1950s, it took 70 days to raise a chick to a chicken. Today, it takes only 48 days. How is this possible? Redesigned the chicken to be bigger, all birds coming off the line have to be about the same size. Tyson owns the chickens...

Words: 1143 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Food Inc

...QUESTIONS 1. Food production has become dangerous. A. more B. less 2. The industrial food system began with: A. dine-in restaurants. B. The fast food drive in. 3. Which corporation is the largest purchaser of potatoes? A. Carl’s Junior B. In ‘N Out C. McDonald’s D. None of the above 4. The top four beef packers control percent of the market. A. 30 B. 50 C. 80 D. 99 5. It takes days for today’s chicken to arrive to market. Could not find this in the film (even rewound) so ill guess.. A. 24 B. 48 C. 70 D. 120 6. After the decline of , many farmers in the South turned to raising chickens. A. tobacco B. corn C. soy D. beef 7. Today’s chickens have difficulty walking/standing because of they have been bred to be heavier. A. True B. False 8. Corporations control farmers because of the the farmers have. A. debt B. ethics C. loyalty D. All of the above 9. A typical chicken grower earns annually. A. $18,000 B. $35,000 C. $65,000 D. $100,000 10. Eric Schlosser, the film narrator and author, purpose in creating Food, Inc. was to determine: A. the politics of food. B. the state of the corn farmers. C. the source of his food. D. how food is marketed. 11. Who is responsible for increasing the efficiency of corn growing? A. Breeders B. Pesticides C. Fertilizers D. All of the above 12. A farm bill codifies the rules of the entire food economy. A. True B. False 13. The average American consumes over 200...

Words: 887 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Food Inc

...Food Inc Essay America’s way of eating and growing food has evolved more in the past 50 years than the previous 10,000 years. Which is shocking to me, upon learning how this happened and the consequences of this happening, needless to say I w as really upset. The whole industrial food industry started to take off right along with the fast food industry “boom” in the early 1930’s; being McDonalds their bigger customer. But with McDonalds’s continuous growing need for ground beef, potatoes and vegetables only a few companies were able to supply. Back in the early 1970’s the top four meat distributers,(Tyson,Swift,Cargill and National Beef) controlled only a 30% of the market, now with the American demand for meat and help from the government they control more than 80%, which means billions of dollars in revenue, money that is used to come up with genetically ways to grow more chicken and cattle twice as fast and to quiet the voice of anybody who has something to say about it, with a legion of lawyers. A good example is Tyson; a company that has virtually and genetically changed the chicken as we knew it. Tyson can raise, kill and process a chicken in 49 days, that’s half the time it took before and the chickens weight twice as much. Chickens in these “Chicken Houses” never see the light of day; they walk around ankle deep in feces and put on so much weight and so fast that they are not able to take more than three steps before falling down. This is not only highly unsanitary...

Words: 704 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Food Inc Summary

...Food Inc. 4/6/13 In class last Tuesday we watched a documentary called Food Inc. This film was an eye opener for most people but being that I am a sixth generation farmer I understand how the seed, meat, and poultry corporations work. This film discussed the problems with the food industry today, and what we need to do to change the future of how our food is made and processed. In the first section of this documentary they talked about the food industry as a whole and how most of the food industry is ran by four or five big industries. This should not be how it is ran as off right now and today these companies are monopolies and run unsafe facilities not for just the people that work there but how the production process is ran. This documentary also covered the meat is being produced in unsafe and unnatural way. While feeding cattle corn is a great way to make them larger quicker, it still is not the right way to feed cattle because feeding them too much corn can cause them to die because of a disease called e-coli. When cattle get this disease it sometimes is not caught and the cow gets slaughtered and ends up on our dinner plate and then we receive the disease by eating the meat. This needs to change cows need to be fed grass and hay, and should not be on a corn only diet. This film also covered the poultry industry and how poultry is being grown at a very fast rate and how the chicken houses are not safe or very sanitary. The poultry houses are sealed with no sunlight...

Words: 525 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Food Inc Easy

...Kali Smith 14214249 Feb. 3rd, 2016 AS 2111 Food Inc. The documentary Food Inc. has raised a lot of issues that face how our agriculture system is runs. Its purpose was to give people an insight to what is actually going on in the food industry and to show us what we are actually eating and how it is processed. The creators of Food Inc. uncovered some very disturbing information. From the documentary, I came up with many different issues that the food system has. These issues included: a few huge corporations controlling almost all of the food industry, poor treatment of the farmers, workers and animals, diseases being created from the process, the protections that these huge corporations have a the blindness that consumers face. One of the biggest issues discussed is the fact that only four companies run about 80% of the food industry. They include: Monsanto Company, Tyson Foods, Smithfield Foods, and Perdue Farms. It all started with the fast food industry coming alive. Fast food needs the food to be prepared in massive quantities and a cheaply and quickly as possible. These companies found a way to do just that and took the industry by storm. They turned the kitchen into a factory assembly line and the workers into expendable assets. Food started to be processed differently and animals started to be seen only as their end product. They have gotten so big that it has created a monopoly around the food industry and no one seems to know how to get a leg up on them. With...

Words: 1005 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Acquisition by Notting Foods Inc.

...Notting Foods Inc.—Background Notting Foods Inc. is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. It was founded in 1939 and is now the world’s largest processor and marketer of chicken, beef and pork. The company produces a wide variety of branded, processed food products and is the recognised leader in almost every retail and food service market it serves. With revenues of US$30 billion, Notting has 142 800 employees and more than 360 facilities and offices in 32 US states and 22 countries. Notting Foods’ vision is to be ‘the world’s first choice for protein based foods while maximising shareholder value’. ‘Segment, concentrate and dominate’ has long been its approach to business. The company anticipated consumer demand, segmented a market, concentrated on production and marketing so that it subsequently dominated the segment. Market domination, in conjunction with exacting cost control measures, is the company’s approach to achieving superior profits in fluctuating markets. In 2006, WEALTH magazine ranked Notting Foods Inc. as America’s most admired company in the food production industry. The survey ranked the 10 largest companies by revenues in 66 industries, including large subsidiaries of foreign firms. According to WEALTH, the survey results reflected the opinions of 10 000 executives, directors and securities analysts who rated the companies in their own industries using eight criteria, including innovation, employee talent, use of corporate assets, social responsibility...

Words: 1289 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Film Analysis: Food Inc.

...Food Inc. is a very eye opening documentary to the American way of eating and even the American way of life. The investigative journalist Robert Kenner really digs deep behind the reasons why Americans have become so distanced from the source of their food. It is interesting to see to what extent large corporations control the American economy to the point of deciding what lands on the dinner plate of the lower class families. The interests of the people have become the veil of the interest of the large food pharmaceutical and oil corporations. The documentary shows quite interestingly how the large corporation’s lobbyists want to “protect” the people by furthering the people from the food and by making it tougher for the small family farms...

Words: 264 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Food Inc. Reaction

...Semester Paper: Food, Inc. “The way we eat has changed more in the last 50 years, than in the previous 10,000.” - Michael Pollan, Food inc. This single statement paints a vivid picture in ones mind. Not only is the way we grow our food changing, but we are also changing our bodies. According to the documentary “Food, Inc” , in the 1950’s, it would take farmers about 68 days to fully grow a chicken. Now? It takes about 47 days to fully grow a chicken, and it is twice as big due to the fact that these chickens are injected with hormones. While this literally brings more food to the table, it might not be worth it in the long run. There are many advantages as well as disadvantages that come with the industrialization of food. Using the chicken as an example. In the documentary, they explained that everyone loves white meat, therefor they make the chicken breast incredibly large to produce more meat from one animal. This is good in a sense that more food is being produced, but the truth is, it is changing, physiologically. According to an article written on mericola.com, girls as early of the age of seven are beginning go through puberty changes, something that was not happening until the ages of 12-13. Another disadvantage about the industrialization of food is the stuff we use to grow our food. Example? Most of our fruits and vegetables are grown using pesticides, which are to keep insects off of them. You may say “yeah keeping bugs off is good, i don't want a worm in my apple”...

Words: 969 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Foods Inc.

...Whole Foods is a large international organization with thousands of employees. In the case study, the co-CEO John Mackey explained that the purpose of the organization was a heroic one. He explained that its highest purpose was “try and change and improve the world.” In order to accomplish that goal, he and the team members need to work in coordination to accomplish that goal. So McGregor's Theory Y in Organizational Behavior is prevalent in the way they do business. Management at whole foods is really just the mechanism to help find and bring people into the organization that assist the organization in achieving this goal. He recognizes that employees that are engaged, have the ability to make decisions and are able to do so effectively, and ultimately translates into conscientious customer service are ultimately more happy. When the staff is happy, their level of service is better, and then customers are happy, which equates to more revenue, and more profits (presumably) and in turn results in happy shareholders. It is a perpetuating evolution in business. True efficacy of this theory would dictate that the management team has the versatility to hire in the way they want, and to leverage resources that give them the greatest opportunity to achieve the goal of finding the right people but that subject was not broached in the case study. Whole Foods recognizes that the success of their organization and its ability to achieve profitability and shareholder value is...

Words: 1037 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Food Inc By Robert Kenner

...When discussing food consumption, transparency is an issue that is not addressed as openly as it should be within the food industry. The conditions in which food is produced should be a cause of concern not only for me, but for everyone as well. Unfortunately, the food industry operates within a productivist, capitalistic system (Lappé, 2011). This means that increased production is the focus, and the interests of powerful stakeholders within the industry are protected more than the people. In the film Food Inc. (2008) – where the following information in this paragraph were obtained - filmmaker Robert Kenner exposes the food agribusiness as an industry teeming with corporations that prioritize profits over the health of the consumers, the...

Words: 320 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Documentary Analysis: Food Inc.

...This documentary, reflects the reality that humanity lives currently but it is hidden to our eyes so that we continue living in a world dedicated to the consumerism. Food Inc makes people reflect by exposing issues such as the handling of animals, genetic modifications that are realized every day, the indiscriminate abuse of antibiotics, the violations that exist to the laws of immigration that affect the workers, the constant epidemics of diseases and the increasing rate of people who are obese due to the inability to buy healthy foods, the little time that they have because of their hours of work. These are just some of the aspects that Food Inc film show us how corrupt practices in the food production are favored every day, passing over...

Words: 426 - Pages: 2