...I believe that the electoral college is an integral part of the United States election process and that it is the fairest way to determine the victor in the presidential race. I believe the electoral college is integral to the election process because I value the fundamental ideals of American republicanism, especially that all people are equal and the fairness that our system of government has established. Though I believe that the electoral college is a necessary part of the United States’ election process, there are others who believe that it is unfair, yet they too value equality and fairness. When I first learned that there was an argument against the electoral college system, I was stunned; however, after a deeper investigation of the...
Words: 1806 - Pages: 8
...problematic about the electoral college. According to Levinson, the electoral system is outdated in our new millennium. The evidence he uses to support the argument against the electoral system is that it prevents the popular vote from prevailing and gives advantage to less populated states. This occurs since each state is guaranteed at least three electoral votes and these votes determine the presidency of our country. A specific, argument-supporting example by Levinson explains that three rural states such as the Dakotas and Wyoming attain more electoral votes compared to New Mexico, which has a similar population. This example provides solid evidence that the constitution has overlooked the popular vote. Besides the electoral college, Levinson believes a number of other constitutional flaws exist. The most unreliable feature of the constitution according to Levinson is the power of the House of Representatives on a one-state, one-vote basis to decide a stalemate between the electoral college. This would ultimately...
Words: 829 - Pages: 4
...The electoral college and the election go hand in hand. The electoral college is put into place to elect the president and vice president during the election process. There is debate on whether the voting system should change to a popular vote, a first past the post vote or continue with the electoral college process. The electoral college is a barrier to direct democracy.The electoral college delegates are actually the ones who elect the president. When Americans vote in the presidential election, they are in fact voting for who they want the presidential electors to vote for. Each state has a certain amount of electoral votes based the population of the state, and the votes are equal to the number of senators, and member of the House of Representatives in a state. An example of this is from the website...
Words: 1074 - Pages: 5
...Relevancy of the Electoral College The President is defined as the elected head, or leader, of a republican state. A republic a state in which supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives. The United States of America has proficiently based their processes on electing these officials, known as a President, on this basis. Their process included the voting of citizens in the United States for their [the people's] preferred delegate. The Founding Fathers of the United States developed a system where for the votes of the people to be counted for at a higher rate. This system is known as the Electoral College. The United States’ electoral college system throughout the years have been seen to work exceptionally well but many perceive the Electoral College to be both unfair and controversial. The Electoral College's role throughout the years of elections was ultimately against the true morals of the election process. To identify the controversial issue brought upon by the...
Words: 1679 - Pages: 7
...this election, where both candidates are corrupt and unfit. Also, I feel as though the electoral college should be abolished. Voting is a waste of time because it is the electoral college who ultimately chooses the president and not the American people.Many people don’t understand the logistics of the electoral college and just how much they impact the lives of Americans. In...
Words: 912 - Pages: 4
...is the Electoral College – an indirect voting system and not a national popular vote. This system was implemented by the Founding Fathers about 200 years ago (Shea 2005, 4-6) In recent times the debate about whether the Electoral College is still an effective system considering the circumstances the United States has to face now, is arising more and more. “American society is highly polarized in its perception of the existing election system” (Belenky 2012, ix). This paper has the aim to contrast the arguments against and in favor of the Electoral College and to demonstrate possible alternatives. In the conclusion an answer to the question “Should the Electoral College be reformed?” will be given. 2. How it works The Electoral College, as it is outlined in the 12th Amendment, is a body of electors chosen to elect the President and Vice President of the United States. In Article II of the Constitution the electing procedure is written down. Each state delegates a specific number of electors to the Electoral College, dependent on its representation in Congress (House of Representatives & Senate). According to the fact that each state has two Senators and at least one Representative (dependent on the size of the population in the state), each state has three electors at the minimum (for example Alaska). With 55 electors, California has the largest number at the moment (see illustration 1) (Electoral-vote.com 2013). Figure 1: Blank map of the U.S. with electoral vote ...
Words: 2453 - Pages: 10
...Did you know that in the United States when you vote for president they are not elected by popular vote? They are elected by what is known as electoral votes. When you vote you are voting for electors that then elect the president based on the states votes instead of just electing the president by popular demand. This can be a problem because the people in the electoral college can go against their party. In the chances of a tie then the choice of president is given to the House of Representatives and that might not always give the people a fair vote. The electoral college is not necessary anymore and the President should be nominated through popular vote. To begin, some electors might not even vote for their party's candidate. Bradford Plumer writes, “In the same vein, faithless electors have occasionally refused to vote for their party's candidate and cast a deciding vote for whomever they please…” (Source 2). This shows that even when we vote in electors they may not always vote for the candidate that is in their party. This can make the voting process unfair because people will vote in electors to vote for someone and then they go against it and for for another person. This is just one way that electoral votes are unfair....
Words: 577 - Pages: 3
...Electoral College, Time for Change? By Chris Brady May 21, 2014 Introduction: The history of the Electoral College was born by the founding fathers during the Constitutional Convention. There were roughly four ideas of how to elect a president to the United States. First was the idea of giving the power to Congress to choose the president, but detractors worried that giving the authority to Congress could create corruption, political bargaining, and foreign influence on their choice. Plus this could upset the balance of power that the founding fathers were trying to create with the Constitution. Secondly was the idea of giving the authority to the state legislatures. This idea was swiftly rejected for the fact that many believed that the president could be controlled by the State Legislature and decrease the federal authority and undermine the founding fathers idea of separation of powers. The third idea was to let the president be chosen by a direct popular vote. This was also rejected because the founding fathers believed that because of the lack of information for a candidate a state would just vote for a candidate from that particular state or region. The framers saw the possibility of at worst that no president would emerge with a popular majority sufficient to govern the whole country. They believed that for a best case scenario would be that the choice of president would always be decided by the largest, most populous States with little regard for the smaller ones...
Words: 2193 - Pages: 9
...Christian Llerena BUS 200 Dr. Lasher 3/19/12 The Electoral College is defined as “a body of electors chosen by the voters of each state to elect the President and Vice President of the United States”. The Electoral College system has been a staple in the United States since the ratification of The Constitution, however there is much debate on whether it should remain or be done away with completely. In this essay, I will give a brief history on the Electoral College, how it works, and why it was created in the first place. Despite the shortcomings and limitations of the Electoral College I believe that it should not be abolished because it contributes to the cohesiveness of the country, it maintains a federal system of government, and it maintains the interests of minority groups. To begin with, I will discuss how the Electoral College works. The Electoral College operates by having each state allocate a number of electors equal to the number of its U.S. Senators (always 2) along with the number of its U.S. Representatives (varies from state to state depending on its population). Next, after all their caucuses and primaries, each party nominates their candidates for president and vice president. After that, the people from each state vote for a party’s slate of electors. Whichever party slate gains the most popular votes becomes the slate of electors for that state. Then, the electors meet in their respective state’s capitol and cast their votes for president and vice...
Words: 2029 - Pages: 9
...Chapter 6 Electoral College Assignment Explain the electoral college and its purpose as presented in the videos posted in the "Lecture and Video" tab. Do you think the electoral college is effective? Why? Yes I do believe the Electoral College is effective. I think the Electoral College is one of the most elegant systems in our republic. The key word here is republic and not democracy. We are not a true democracy in the sense that we are ruled by the will of the majority, but rather we are a constitutional republic that employs democratic methods. We have systems that check and balance power between the 3 branches of government, between states and the federal government and balance between majority rule and the rights of the minority. The people who are against the Electoral College are popularists. Meaning one vote per voter and the majority wins. This I believe ignores the right of the minority. If you want to abolish the Electoral College because it misrepresents votes, than why not abolish 2 senators for each state? Wyoming has as many senators as California has. The Senate has tremendous power in the legislature as the upper house. It can start legislation or it is the final deliberating body before a piece of legislation goes to the president’s desk. But it does not equally represent all the people, it represents the states. Also, even the congress has votes that require more than 50% to pass laws. Why? If a majority agrees, majority should win...
Words: 1590 - Pages: 7
...Electoral college represents indirect popular elections. This system is an example of Federalism. Both the States and the Federal Gov't are involved in process: States are electing a federal president. Each state has certain number of electoral votes, which depends on population. As long as a candidate gets just over 50% of the popular vote in the state or just more popular votes than others candidates, he wins 100% on the electoral votes. There are 538 electoral votes. According to the rules of the electoral college, every state, no matter how few people lives here gets 3 votes to start with. The rest is distributed according to the population. At this point, electoral college protects small states from the big states. It gives them voting...
Words: 869 - Pages: 4
...government with the power to decide who to vote. Today’s century, the United States will not allow the people to vote for president and Vice President directly, but they utilize Electoral College to represent voter’s choice. In the Constitution article 2, section 1, clause 2 it states in specific detail how many electors each state is entitled to have. The...
Words: 647 - Pages: 3
...parties and the Electoral College creates the environment for subversion within the political arena undermining national security. The current American political system is no longer working! Corporations and millionaires now own the political parties resulting in political candidates representing the needs and desires of those entities instead of their constituents - the American people. “Six major corporations donated anywhere from five to seven figures to political organizations during the 2010 election cycle” (Wilson 2010). These companies include News Corp., General Electric, National Amusements, Comcast Corp., Time Warner, and Walt Disney Co. An election is impossible to win without the...
Words: 1258 - Pages: 6
...Twain is often credited with saying, “If voting made and difference, they wouldn’t let us do it”. The Electoral College is the current system for electing the president of the United States. The History Channel states, Americans do not actually directly vote for the president of the United States, when Americans vote, they are actually voting for the candidate for which their state's electors are expected to vote for. States are given the number of electors that they have representatives in congress. The number of electors that a state receives is determined proportionately, but a state must have a minimum of three electors with a total number of electors at 538. William C. Kimberly, Deputy Director FEC National Clearinghouse on Election...
Words: 1339 - Pages: 6
...“The voters must have faith in the electoral process for our democracy to succeed.”- Blanche Lincoln, a former U.S. senator. However, it is difficult to have faith in the Electoral College, because of the possibility of faithless electors, Unequal vote weight among states, and excluding third party candidates. The Electoral College should be replaced with a Nationwide vote that would prevent many problems that came with the Electoral College. The Electoral College over the years has proven to be corrupted by faithless electors. One case of faithless electors was in 1836 when an electoral group from Virginia refused to support the democratic candidate, who was running for president. This is not one of the only cases of faithless electors, there have been over 157 faithless electors before 2004. Another case of faithless electors was in 1832 when all 30 electoral representatives from Pennsylvania refused to support the democratic vice President candidate, Martin Van Buren, and voted for the Republican representative instead. If a popular vote had been used, the voters would not have been deceived by their...
Words: 643 - Pages: 3
