...The analysis of Foremostco Inc case From the case we know that Foremostco Inc had a very heavy loss in the business. Because of the mistakes existing in the newly developing program, the computer system was not doing what it was supposed to do and also almost all the important documents were printing out blank, as well as the orders. So a great number of customers felt angry and unforgivable since they did not receive their orders or they were not even billed at all. As a result, Foremostco Inc lost many important customers because they felt angry and disappointed about the Foremostco Inc. Besides, Foremostco Inc also lost a lot of money for developing the damaged and unworkable program. In a word, it was an "Expensive Lesson" for Foremostco Inc. In order to minimize the lost and even win back the market, Foremostco Inc should do some essential remedial measures one by one. First, as the most significant one, Foremostco Inc should stop using and debugging the new program immediately and restart the old system to backup the information of customers and revive the chain of the logistics of the business. Make sure the remaining orders and do everything possible to finish them by schedule. Second, Foremostco Inc should stop receive requirements one day in order to arrange all the information they have now and try to recover some missing information. After that, make a backup for this very important database. These two items are just temporary measures that may reduce the lost...
Words: 1544 - Pages: 7
...The leaders at Foremostco, Inc. made several errors in their decision making that ultimately could have destroyed the company. First, the project was started too late. Second, there was no real project leader who understood everything that needed to take place. Third, too many people were brought in to try and rush the project through while input from employees was never considered. These wrong-doings would prove disastrous as the company tried to change from a basic system to a complex system. When considering a new project, as Foremostco was doing in January 1998 (Upton, 2003), the most important thing you need is a project leader. This clearly was the COO, Penny Roberts. She was determined to replace the UNIX-based, text-based system with a more user friendly Windows-based system with an easy to use graphic user interface (GUI). She was the champion of the project and would support all decisions needed to be made by the project management team. Her decision to let the current IT Manager run the project was probably not a good one. He was more suited to run the old system than try and develop a new one. He was in over his head and would start the downfall of the project. The Triple Constraint As the text states, “Every project is constrained in different ways by its scope, time, and cost goals” (Schwalbe, 2011). Foremostco’s project was no different. The scope of this project was overwhelming. The entire integrated system would have to be developed from scratch...
Words: 1707 - Pages: 7
...Foremostco, Inc. The leaders at Foremostco, Inc. made several errors in their decision making that ultimately could have destroyed the company. First, the project was started too late. Second, there was no real project leader who understood everything that needed to take place. Third, too many people were brought in to try and rush the project through while input from employees was never considered. These wrong-doings would prove disastrous as the company tried to change from a basic system to a complex system. When considering a new project, as Foremostco was doing in January 1998 (Upton, 2003), the most important thing you need is a project leader. This clearly was the COO, Penny Roberts. She was determined to replace the UNIX-based, text-based system with a more user friendly Windows-based system with an easy to use graphic user interface (GUI). She was the champion of the project and would support all decisions needed to be made by the project management team. Her decision to let the current IT Manager run the project was probably not a good one. He was more suited to run the old system than try and develop a new one. He was in over his head and would start the downfall of the project. The Triple Constraint As the text states, “Every project is constrained in different ways by its scope, time, and cost goals” (Schwalbe, 2011). Foremostco’s project was no different. The scope of this project was overwhelming. The entire integrated system would...
Words: 333 - Pages: 2
