The army considers a relationship to be fraternization if “it compromises, or appear to compromise the integrity of supervisory authority or the chain of command.” (2014). Well, what if it doesn't affect the work place or have any adverse actions, and the two parties involve carry themselves in a professional manner, is it fraternization then? Though many people dismiss fraternization as negative, fraternization is necessary. It is a formal way for a supervisor to provide coaching and mentoring. Subordinates with potential are being placed with senior personnel for guidance and development.
The policy for fraternization is un clear fraternization is defined differently from person from person. Dr. Edward Kwapong said fraternization is the very close affiliation with another worker from the workplace that extend way beyond working hours. Discuss Fraternization In The Workplace (July 15, 2014). According to army regulation fraternization is only frowned upon when it brings discredit upon an organization When provided with examples of how some may view fraternization, one might think of the circumstances and understand why organizations would try to enforce this standard. Is it to protect the workforce, or is it set to keep Soldiers from having a relationship outside of the workplace. Whether it is professional or friendly. Here is an example of how fraternization is described a Private First Class (PFC) Jones heard about a chance for a promotion within the unit and needed a recommendation. . Knowing a current supervisor was acquaintance with the hiring authority, PFC Jones ask the supervisor out for some drinks a couple nights a week and he agreed to write a letter of recommendation. In this situation, PFC Jones used charm and
