a. Kelly
Kelly makes several significant assumptions in this case study: i. That Pat has no experience in quality control; ii. That Pat’s previous work experience would not be helpful for this project; iii. That the budget is not realistic; iv. That there is not enough staff for such a large project; v. That this is the only reasonable project; and iv. That the timeframe for the project is too short.
b. Pat Pat also makes many assumptions, including: i. That she and Kelly will not work well together; ii. That the new project will be complete by August; iii. That there are not enough staff members to complete the project on time; iv. That the project will be profitable; v. That there is a need to spread into new markets; vi. That the team will have internal conflicts; and vii. That the project will be difficult.
c. Cliff Cliff makes various assumptions, as well, including: i. That the iScanner will be incredibly difficult to surpass; ii. That creativity and innovation is necessary for this project; iii. That the iScanner will not leave the market; iv. That the budget can be managed without layoffs; and v. That more can be produced under the new budget.
d. Chris Chris also makes significant assumptions, including: i. That layoffs would not work to cut costs; ii. That costs need to be cut in this department; iii. That product development can produce the same output on the new budget; and iv. That the project will be a success.
3. Explanations of arguments
a. Cliff O’Connor
Mr. O’Connor makes the argument that because sources have reported that there is a significant chance that competitors are improving their products, that AcuScan should work to enter the market. He further argues that it is necessary
