...Therese Thomas GM597 Business Law Fall 2010 Week 5 Assignment: You Decide Reading these cases, it is a little bite complicated and hard to decide who should prevail. Being the judge in these cases, I think Kenny’s mother, Kyle, and Kenny’s Poor-Man’s Bar can sue Authorit-I for the damage caused by Cartman. They will prevail because this would be considered as a case of negligence which by law, principals which is Authorit-I would be liable for negligent conduct of agents (Cartman) acting within the scope of their employment. Also when running a motivation test, I think that Authorit-I would also be liable if Cartman’s motivation in committing intentional tort was to promote Authorit-I business, Authorit-I is liable for injuries caused by the tort. If Cartman motivation was personal, Authorit-I would not be liable, even if tort occurs during business hours or on premises. Running a work related test, which is only applied in some jurisdictions. Authorit-I would be liable if Cartman commits intentional tort within a work-related time or space, which it was in this case. As far as Cartman suing his employer for wrongful termination, he will definitely not prevail because after hurting couple people there is no need to interview him even if the employee’s handbook said so. I am sure the State police will before anyone else does. In the case of the Jewelry Store suing Authorit-I I believe it would hard to decide who will win this case. I could said that the Jewelry Store might...
Words: 440 - Pages: 2