...When people say Black Death, you know it's a bad thing. Yet, what people don't know is there were good effects. From death, to a place populating, to people becoming secular, there were ways the Black Death was both positive and negative. There could’ve been tons of things that started the Renaissance, but the Black Death is the best known. A reason the Black Death is known as terrible than bad iis because of the death part. On Source Text One, paragraph five, it states “It has been estimated that 40% of England’s Priest did in the epidemic.” Thus making everyone think “If 40% of priest died, how many people had died?” at one point or another. Another reason is when Source Text One had written down that “Filled with under qualified and...
Words: 775 - Pages: 4
...develop a set of “rules of thumb” for when they encounter different circumstances. They establish these rules with the hopes of somewhat standardizing their way of thinking as well as how to allocate resources for each instance. The guidelines are generally developed to recognize patterns and opportunities. Hirschhorn recommends managers create a 2 x 2 table to help illustrate this concept and to categorize its different states. Each axis would include a “hi” and “lo” status with the top right box representing the “Hi-Hi” state. The “Hi-Hi” state would represent the situation which required the expert’s immediate attention (Hirschhorn, 2001, p. 12) Below is an example of a polarity map for my argument. Competitive Advantage Goods are manufactured, cost-effectively-wasteful spending does not occur-overhead is at a minimum | Quality goals are...
Words: 856 - Pages: 4
...incredibly successful. She was 16 when she was signed to Def Jam. Since then, she's amassed phenomenal success. After watching Rihanna’s 2013 Grammy performance of her hit song ‘Stay’ it led me to conclude that Rihanna has a Strong personality, an assumption which is based off the application of Evolutionary psychology and Existential psychology concepts. As she sang, the audience could feel her raw emotion, it didn’t feel rehearsed it felt real, which was only suitable since the song can be seen as a representation of the current dilemma she currently faces in her love life with ex lover Chris Brown. Existential Psychology is the study of human existence, however Rollo May focuses on concepts like freedom, responsibility, Authenticity, Death, courage, anxiety, destiny, dasein , daimonic , etc. All of which can be found in the traces of rihanna’s personality that is made visible to us. It is stated that the most important attribute of humans is freedom of choice. In the words of Sartre “Man is nothing else but what he makes of himself, such is the first principle of existentialism” (1957, p.15). Along with this freedom to become whatever type of person we choose, we must assume full responsibility for what we become or what happens to us. So when...
Words: 1217 - Pages: 5
...Why Death Isn’t So Bad For You When it comes to death, many people are often afraid of the unknown. Because everyone may have their own beliefs about what occurs after death, the thought of death can be scary. Nobody, except for perhaps God (if He exists), knows what happens after death. But if death is defined as total, permanent annihilation, then it really is not bad for the person who dies. I do not mean for this statement to be confused with the attitude that there are no bad aspects of death. Death is not bad for the person who dies because they no longer exist, and therefore anything that happens in any world no longer affects them in any way. Also, one does not need to be afraid of death, because in the state of permanent annihilation, they will not be aware of their loss of life. Before discussing why death is not a bad thing for the person who dies, it should first be noted why total, permanent annihilation is not a bad thing. Permanent annihilation means just that; everything is completely destroyed and non-existent forever. In regards to the asymmetry problem, if pre-natal non-existence is not viewed as something bad, why should post-mortem non-existence be viewed as something bad? Non-existence is not bad thing. There is an infinite list of people, objects, and events that have and will never exist. Is it bad for these people and things that they are non-existent? Many argue that the asymmetry problem does not work because pre-natal non-existence...
Words: 1817 - Pages: 8
...George Hammond Intro to Philosophy May 4, 2014 Death, Nonexistence, and the Existence Requirements The existence requirement is the first premise of an argument based on the writings of Epicurus designed to oppose the idea that death is bad. The premise states that something can be bad for you only if you exist. In an attempt to revise the existence requirement so that it is acceptable, but does not conclude with death being bad for you, Kagan introduces a modest and bold version. The modest version states that something can be bad for you only if you exist at some time or the other, while the bold version states that something can be bad for you only if you exist at the same time as that thing. Kagan accepts the modest version, since it allows death to be bad for you even though you don’t exist at the same time as it occurs. Kagan then introduces a problem with accepting this version. If we also accept the deprivation account, which states that death is bad because it deprives us of life, we assume that the more years taken off a potentially long life, the worse death becomes for that person. When we simply eliminate this life altogether, however, it is not bad at all, since the person never existed. In this paper, I’ll address the badness of death (or lack thereof) and the situation of nonexistence, and how these relate to the existence requirement. I will also argue that death is not actually bad on the basis of the invalidity of the deprivation account. I will then...
Words: 2108 - Pages: 9
...Death is rarely something that people look forward to, but is it bad for us? What is it about death that strikes fear into the hearts of millions of people across the world? In this paper, I will aim to answer those questions. Is death bad for us? If yes, why? If death is bad for us, what implications does this have about the rights and wrongs of killing people? I believe that death is in fact bad for us, and I will argue my case in the following paragraphs. Perhaps the greatest reason that people fear death is simply because they do not want to die. However, just because a person does not want something, that does not make it bad for them. For example, a person may dislike vegetables and not want to eat them but that does not make vegetables...
Words: 1980 - Pages: 8
...Epicurus' Death Argument Epicurus' view that death is not to be feared has had an enormous impact on Western thought for over two thousand years, regardless of the strength of his other views. He argued that man should rid himself of the irrational fear of death. Epicurus began his argument with his conclusion, "that death is nothing to us." His basic argument is laid out as follows: 1. Death involves neither pleasure nor pain. 2. The only thing that is bad for us is pain. Thus, death is not bad for us. His basic argument as laid out is a valid one. The conclusion does follow if we accept the premises as true. We must accept the first premise based on Epicurus' metaphysics of atomism and physicalism. If one intends to support or attack Epicurus' argument it must be through the second premise. There are a few arguments that one could use to try and refute the conclusion, but I believe that these are groundless if one takes the time to delineate what Epicurus meant by "death." I will list these and then refute each one individually. First, one might ask why it is that we take precautions against death, such as, wearing seat belts or not walking alone in dark alleyways at night. Second, one might ask why it is then that we have laws against murder. Finally, if I were to tell you that I had given you a poison pill with your morning juice that would cause you to die painlessly in the next four hours you would be understandably upset. ...
Words: 899 - Pages: 4
...Death is treated and perceived in many societies as the taker of human life. Death is loathed treated with fear and is cruel and unforgiving. Similarly I think of death in the same line because it takes away our loved ones from us, it cannot be stopped, is inevitable and brings pain, grieve and sorrow in people's life's .Death always casts a dark shadow over peoples life. Death is treated as all gloom since an individual is severed from the living. The interpretation of death lies in one belief about death and life. The interpretation of death is relative depending on a persons view point on the same. In the biblical and Christian interpretation the death of a person is defined either as being good or bad depending on the kind of life the person lived. Thus for a person who lived a good life thus his death is good unlike one who led a wicked and bad life. From a Christian perspective those who die in sin will live in eternal pain and suffering in a world of fire and brimstone. However for the righteous they hope for greater and wonderful things in the next life. Theirs will be a life of singing and dancing sharing n the glory of God. To them they will head to paradise. Thus death can not be classified as bad and cruel if one has lived a righteous and good life. This is so because such a person always plans to move a better place in the future. Thus death is only a stepping stone or means of transition to a better life hoped for. This is a natural part of a person's life, in...
Words: 1931 - Pages: 8
...and Treatment of Death in Everyman essay paper writing serviceSample Essays > Religion > Perceptions and Treatment of Death in Everyman > Buy an essay ← Womens Rights | Contemporary Issues in Eastern Religion → | Buy Perceptions and Treatment of Death in Everyman essay paper onlineDeath is treated and perceived in many societies as the taker of human life. Death is loathed treated with fear and is cruel and unforgiving. Similarly I think of death in the same line because it takes away our loved ones from us, it cannot be stopped, is inevitable and brings pain, grieve and sorrow in people's life's .Death always casts a dark shadow over peoples life. Death is treated as all gloom since an individual is severed from the living. The interpretation of death lies in one belief about death and life. The interpretation of death is relative depending on a persons view point on the same. In the biblical and Christian interpretation the death of a person is defined either as being good or bad depending on the kind of life the person lived. Thus for a person who lived a good life thus his death is good unlike one who led a wicked and bad life. From a Christian perspective those who die in sin will live in eternal pain and suffering in a world of fire and brimstone. However for the righteous they hope for greater and wonderful things in the next life. Theirs will be a life of singing and dancing sharing n the glory of God. To them they will head to paradise.Thus death can not be classified...
Words: 1975 - Pages: 8
...The world we live in contains a lot of evil, such as World Wars, bombings, mass murders, and everyday discrimination; however, the world also contains a lot of good, such as adoption, helping the homeless, and even countries supporting each other during a war. In the novel The Book Thief by Markus Zusak, Death sees all the good that humans are capable of doing, but he also sees all the bad that they have. While Death is reading Liesel's book, he reads a lot about the good that humans have done, such as how the Hubermann family kept Max in their basement. He also reads the bad that has happened to them, such as how Hans was punished when he went to help the Jew in the Jew Parade. Due to of all these examples, Death is left unsure of how he feels...
Words: 683 - Pages: 3
...everyman must. The play was written using characters name as everyman but at some point within the context of the play, Everyman represents all man kind. The other characters; fellowship, beauty, kindred and deeds are all in close relation with Everyman and represents the other fruits of his existence in this life. God and his messengers, death are characters that everyman wants to avoid. In the play, God has sent down moral laws and rules called “Gods Love” for everyman to follow. All of mankind will be judges for their own transactions. The play was written during the middle ages after Christ. To answer for the life that everyman lives, gods sends a messenger, and the messengers name is death. We all have our own perception of death and the messenger named death. Metaphysically speaking death could be perceived as two separate entities, however in this play, I think the author was collaborating the two thoughts into one personality. I feel like the authors perception of death is that he is the bringer of the day of reckoning and not just a messenger of Gods words and will but the messenger of the reality of Everyman transactions. Death becomes a translator between Gods love and everymans actions. The reason that I feel that the author...
Words: 1003 - Pages: 5
...against Nagel’s position that the loss of intrinsic goods of life after one dies is considered a deprivation that one suffers. Firstly, the paper will explain Nagel’s view on the matter. Secondly, I will expand on my thesis by using examples and basic logic. Nagel proclaims the point that “If death is an evil at all, it cannot be because of its positive features, but only because of what it deprives us of” (1). This quote illustrates that if death were to be considered evil in any sense, then it would not be because of what suffering it might alleviate but rather what good would terminate when our life ends. Nagel also suggests that there are good components which, if added to one’s experience makes life better...
Words: 1275 - Pages: 6
... which is crushing the skull of the fetus. Would natural law allow for the crainomity to take place? Let’s remember that Natural law states once again that we must do good. Preserving the life of the mother and fetus in this scenario are both good actions, due to the fact that abortion is an evil. For the first principal of the double effect it is being met because the attempt is being made to save both the fetus, and the mother. Preserving the lives of both fetus and mother is fulfilling criteria number one. The bad effect is the craniometry which is crushing the fetus's skull. Crushing the skull of the fetus is still preserving the life of the fetus and the mother. The bad affect in this case is unavoidable, therefore meeting criteria to principle number two. The third principle which states the bad effect is the not the means of the good effect but only a side effect is not met. The bad effect is the craniotomy, which is crushing the fetus's skull, must be done in order to save both the life of the fetus and the mother. The mother does not intend the death of her child, but is acknowledged of the fact that part of the skull must be removed. Knowing that the baby will die if no action is taken, would not be a morally ethical decision. If no action is taken both of the parties would be doomed with certain death. This act meets the criteria therefore making it...
Words: 1128 - Pages: 5
...Socrates reply to Meletus with the analogy about horse training does sufficiently refute Meletus. In his analogy when he describes horse training he is basically saying that there are only a few good horse trainers, and everyone else who rides and plays with the horses actually are the ones who are disturbing them. Only those few horse trainers truly know how to treat and train the horses properly. This disproves Meletus statement because Meletus names a lot of people that improve the youth, and Socrates is the only one person who is accused of corrupting them. He switches it on him because he says that he would be as the horse trainer because there are few of them, and in reality all those people who think they are improving the youth are actually the ones are corrupting them, just like the people who play with the horses. So basically says that he is the horse trainer, the youth are the horses and Meletus and the others are the ones...
Words: 3636 - Pages: 15
...for immoral or unjust actions committed by any human otherwise everything in our world would turn into complete chaos. In Socrates’s time people believed heavily in the afterlife and that his or her actions on Earth determined the quality of that life. The gods played a huge role in deciding the fates of everyone depending on how one lived while one was alive. If one lived an unjust and reckless life then it will show because the gods in one’s afterlife will punish him or her. Socrates states, “…bad people are wretched because they are in need of punishment, and that in paying the penalty they are benefited by that god.” There is a problem with waiting until the afterlife for people to be punished because then there would be no order in society. Bad people who are actually bad can get away with living well in the afterlife because during their Earthly life they gained enough wealth to pay the gods to give them a good afterlife. Meanwhile the good people of the world who did a bad thing maybe once or twice will be wrongly punished in the afterlife. In order for everyone to get what he or she deserves, they need to be punished while they are still alive. The way the societies keep everything in line is by appointing government personnel and juries. The appointed officials are given the task of creating fair and reasonable laws that are possible for all to follow. If...
Words: 1240 - Pages: 5
