...Developing a Philosophy of Leadership A leadership philosophy is the way we see ourselves as leaders. This philosophy guides our actions, our behaviors, and our thoughts. Our philosophies are influenced by external and internal forces. We can change who we are as leaders by simply changing our philosophy of leadership. Leadership philosophies can change as you grow to understand yourself within the context of leading. Creating or finding your leadership philosophy means that you must explore and reflect upon your personal values, assumptions, and beliefs about leadership. Personal values are qualities or characteristics that you value. You would rather leave an organization or step down as a leader than violate your values. Your values guide your intentions and they influence how you lead. When your personal values are clear and you are conscious of them, you create a solid foundation for leading. Assumptions are ideas that are assumed or believed to be true. As a leader it is important to understand what assumptions fuel your leadership thinking. Often leaders are not aware of the assumptions because they are operating from certain paradigms that will not allow them to see assumptions. Reflection into one’s leadership is an excellent way to uncover assumptions. Beliefs are ideas that we hold to be true; they shape our realities. If a leader believes that the only individuals in an organization that can make decisions is the management staff, then that belief will...
Words: 1081 - Pages: 5
...Developing a Philosophy of Leadership A leadership philosophy is the way we see ourselves as leaders. This philosophy guides our actions, our behaviors, and our thoughts. Our philosophies are influenced by external and internal forces. We can change who we are as leaders by simply changing our philosophy of leadership. Leadership philosophies can change as you grow to understand yourself within the context of leading. Creating or finding your leadership philosophy means that you must explore and reflect upon your personal values, assumptions, and beliefs about leadership. Personal values are qualities or characteristics that you value. You would rather leave an organization or step down as a leader than violate your values. Your values guide your intentions and they influence how you lead. When your personal values are clear and you are conscious of them, you create a solid foundation for leading. Assumptions are ideas that are assumed or believed to be true. As a leader it is important to understand what assumptions fuel your leadership thinking. Often leaders are not aware of the assumptions because they are operating from certain paradigms that will not allow them to see assumptions. Reflection into one’s leadership is an excellent way to uncover assumptions. Beliefs are ideas that we hold to be true; they shape our realities. If a leader believes that the only individuals in an organization that can make decisions is the management staff, then that belief will...
Words: 1081 - Pages: 5
...The New Thinking on Followership and Leadership Philosophy The New Thinking on Followership and Leadership Philosophy Is good followership more important than good leadership? Followership is defined as the ability or willingness to follow a leader. Leadership is an influence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that reflect their shared purposes. Effective followers can develop productive leader behavior just as effective leaders shape people into good followers. The new thinking on followership and leadership philosophy is very important In my opinion, good followers are just as important as the leader. According to Daft, “without followers, there are no leaders.” (Daft, 2010, pg. 196) People are followers more often than leaders, and effective leaders and followers share similar characteristics. An effective follower is both independent and active in the organization. To be an effective follower, one must not be alienated, conforming, passive, or pragmatic. Most people think of followers as ‘yes-men’ but this is far from the truth. A good leader would not be considered a good or effective leader if his or her followers always agreed with whatever the leader said. Roger Adair states, “A follower shares in an influence relationship among leaders and other followers with the intent to support leaders who reflect their mutual purpose.” There are five levels of rationale that followers...
Words: 3489 - Pages: 14
...Below is a free essay on "Personal Leadership" from Anti Essays, your source for free research papers, essays, and term paper examples. This paper details my personal philosophy of leadership reflecting my views and beliefs of what constitutes a good leader and what good leadership practices are. My personal leadership philosophy includes ideas, views, and beliefs. Creating and writing a philosophy will prove to be a key factor that helps me establish my own set of supervision practices. I do believe that my view of leadership will also evolve over time to reach a style that works well for me and represents my character and my personality. The personal philosophy represented in this paper has been formed mainly through the readings and discussions in this course, in addition to my experience as a supervisor in my organization. I strongly believe that leadership means engaging others to collectively achieve a shared vision of moral purpose for the common good. This process includes creating the shared vision, using good communication skills, building quality relationships, developing a supporting organizational community, guiding the process of implementation, and acting with exceptional character. I believe a successful organization must have a well-articulated set of ideas, norms, and beliefs shared by the leader and all others in the organization. As a supervisor, I have to promote them in a way that touches on the needs and dreams of staff, which brings the vision up...
Words: 335 - Pages: 2
...Entrepreneurial Leadership Contemporary Business, BUS 508 July 17, 2011 Entrepreneurial Leadership Discuss the common elements described in the theories/philosophies of Case, Kouzes, and Drucker including how their principles/strategies relate to the new definition of entrepreneurial leadership presented in Understanding Entrepreneurial Leadership in today’s Dynamic Markets. Knowing what it takes to become an entrepreneur and establish a successful and thriving business is not easy. Entrepreneurs are risk takers and they understand that no matter how small or large the venture there must be a strategy and a business plan in place in order to operate a profitable business. In order to accomplish this there are particular leadership skills, practices, and principles that are required. Social ecologist Peter Drucker, Former AOL CEO and Chairman Steve Case, and leadership scholar James Kouzes each have a different set of common elements, however, they all share similar principles, philosophies, and strategies that define what is expected of an entrepreneur and the relationship between their philosophies and the new era and definition of entrepreneurial leadership. Former AOL CEO and Chairman Steve Case based his philosophy on the 3P’s “People, Passion, and Perseverance”. In the video Steve Case described the realization that the technology industry was out of touch with the people by making technology too complicated to use and that consumers wanted simplicity in technology...
Words: 1592 - Pages: 7
...Personal Philosophy “Leaders become great, not because of their power, but because of their ability to empower others.” John Maxwell. Leadership Philosophy requires a consistent action and fair behavior to be a good leader. Our perception of the environment is part of our personal philosophy. How we interpret and understand each event in our life affect the way we react in different situations. Commitment and effectiveness are ultimately the qualities that determine our leadership philosophy. How we behave is affected daily by our thoughts and should be reflected in the way we respond to situations both at home or work. Leadership is necessary to develop our potential as professionals. We need to maintain a strong conviction to our values and profession to achieve success as a leader. Keeping a clear vision of the future and knowing yourself is vital for assuming a leadership role. My personal philosophy of leadership is to set an example by treating people, as I would like to be treated, and listening actively to their opinion to communicate effectively. A leader should be just, respectful, and responsible while handling problems in a democratic way. Doing so will show confidence and earn the respect of employees. As a leader you need to implement changes effectively by help employees handle them in the work area. For all the above, I acknowledge that I have a personal philosophy of leadership. I am a leader who wants the best for employees, so we can advance the future...
Words: 1050 - Pages: 5
...Introduction This paper will highlight, in detail, my understanding of the concepts and theories of leadership and followership that I have learned over the past seven weeks. I will discuss what my former opinions were and what my ideas have transformed into after researching and explaining what makes a good leader and follower. Philosophy will also be discussed in detail and what I believe the actions one must take to achieve their goals. In this paper, I will also be discussing what my strengths are as a follower and a leader and where I still need to develop in both areas. Definitions of Leadership and Followership There are many ways to define what leadership and followership are. In Eddy and VanDerLinden’s (2006), they explain that...
Words: 1805 - Pages: 8
...assignment/question? Compose my personal moral philosophy from an organizational perspective drawing from the ethical concepts presented in E100. As an Army Officer, an Aviator, and a Soldier I have done my best to internalize the army ethics, talk the talk and walk the walk, to do what is correct even when no one is looking. The question is who gets to decide what correct looks like? Who gets to set the standards? Am I less of an ethically sound Soldier if I choose to walk from my car to my house without my cover on? Or if I allow toxic leadership in my formations because I don’t have the fortitude to speak up? My opinion is one that is rooted in my belief in God. I was raised in a Catholic home. I am not sure of other religions or other forms of Christianity, but I can speak on the values that have been a part of my life as far back as I can remember. I believe in one God and that he sent his only son for the forgiveness of our sins. I believe and I choose to follow the Ten Commandments and the bible. Not without fault mind you, but, I do the best I can, learn from my mistakes and ask for forgiveness. I do not want to solely center my paper and “moral philosophy” on religion, however, I believe this is where my foundation was set in order to make me who I am, and what ethics I believe in today. Describe the meaning of the “Big Three” ethical concepts (duty, outcome, virtue) and explain my reasoning for integrating each of the three within my philosophy. First to define the three concepts...
Words: 1048 - Pages: 5
...Leadership philosophy serves as a basis on how we act as leaders. It is personal; something we choose that defines our expectations, values and acts. My leadership philosophy began to take shape earlier in my career, where I had the opportunity to meet and work for outstanding leaders. Leaders that had the inner drive to always improve and not be afraid of making mistakes. Leaders that taught me not to be satisfied with the “status quo”, especially in times of change and unexpected challenges. They were visionaries that inspired me and set the leadership foundation for my upcoming professional years. I will always remember their attributes, competencies and power to motivate others. Becoming an effective leader is not something...
Words: 563 - Pages: 3
...Clinton Richardson Servant Leadership vs. Traditional Leadership CA 233 Introduction to Leadership Professor Caroline Heckman Leadership has been thought to be a trait, ability, a skill, a behavior, a relationship and an influenced process. There are general descriptions of leadership that can be broken down into many forms. While the traditional style of leadership still exist and is very prevalent, there are several modern leadership styles that have been created throughout the years. One modern style of leadership is servant leadership. This may actually sound like an oxymoron because how can you be a servant and leader at the same time. However, this leadership has been found to very effective in some settings. There has been a rise in new forms of leadership style due to people feeling that the traditional style of leadership just doesn’t work anymore. Traditional leadership has evolved to so many different forms of leadership one that will be discussed specifically is servant leadership. First, I will compare the basis of each type of leadership. I will then compare how both styles of leaders interact to their team and how their team respects them. Lastly, I will also explore the pros can cons of each leadership style. Leadership has evolved throughout the years and it is important to recognize the effectiveness of new forms of leadership. This paper will compare and contrast the values, attributes, interaction and team moral of traditional and servant...
Words: 2690 - Pages: 11
...MY PERSONAL LEADERSHIP PHILOSOPHY “To Lead with STRENGTH” My ultimate purpose in writing this is to share to everyone my personal leadership philosophy – what I believe to be important as we go on with the service. I believe that in imparting this set of guidance, you will come to understand who I am, what rules I live and work by, what you can expect from me and what I expect from you, and how I will evaluate your performance. In view hereof, I hope you will learn to trust my actions and know where I am heading. As I round up my values in life, I found out that the foundation of all my feats as I go up the ladder of my career is my STRENGTH. It always gives me the direction; it serves as my compass. The STRENGTH that I’m referring to here is neither physical nor psychological, but rather the energy to organize myself to effectively and efficiently perform my tasks, and the power to unite all of us so that we are able to attain the Army’s Vision of becoming “a professional, capable and responsive Army that is a source of National Pride.” And being your leader, it is my primary duty to impart this STRENGTH so that each of us here will have a moral compass to guide us through the maze of intellectual, philosophical and emotional issues that encompass our lives and the Army. STRENGTH outlines my character and translates to: Selfless service, Trust, Respect, Empowerment, Nobleness, God, Teamwork, and Humility. Selfless Service: When I speak about selfless service, it...
Words: 1728 - Pages: 7
...My Leadership Philosophy Write a thorough yet concise statement about your approach to leadership to include what you believe about: * Leadership and how it works * The important characteristics, attitudes, behaviors and beliefs of a leader * The role of followers * The role of the context within which leadership takes place. * How all of these things come together in the leadership relationship * How they influence each other Write a thorough yet concise statement about your approach to leadership to include what you believe about: * Leadership and how it works * The important characteristics, attitudes, behaviors and beliefs of a leader * The role of followers * The role of the context within which leadership takes place. * How all of these things come together in the leadership relationship * How they influence each other My Leadership Philosophy My Leadership Philosophy My leadership philosophy is straight forward and deeply rooted in my twenty-five years of experiences in the military. As a leader, I believe that all members are vital to a team. Leaders are made they are not born. I believe it is possible to learn to be a leader. Leaders learn from their experiences and interactions then adapting their leadership style as necessary to deal with different personalities and evolving situations. Good leaders possess a combination of many traits that shape and define their leadership philosophy. The important characteristics...
Words: 592 - Pages: 3
...McRaven The purpose of this paper is to analyze how United States Navy Admiral (Retired) William H. McRaven positively affected the United States military. He had such a profound impact on the military, not because of his accomplishments, but because of his leadership and mentorship. This paper will discuss how Admiral (Retired) McRaven demonstrated each of the Army leader attributes and competencies and the subsequent impact that he had on the military. I will describe how Admiral (Retired) McRaven contributed to my personal growth and development, leading to my personal leadership philosophy. I will conclude with the legacy that I personally hope to leave on the Army....
Words: 2065 - Pages: 9
...ADOLF HITLER- LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES James Latronica Edison State College ADOLF HITLER- LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Even though he is famous for the wrong reasons and perhaps evil ones, Adolf Hitler will be remembered for a long time. He is one of the most famous villains of the 20th century world history. His rule over Germany and parts of Europe left a mark that is felt even today, decades after he died in the war. His rule saw Germany take over more territories than it had in its history prior to that period. For many military professionals, Hitler was a remarkably successful leader. However, his leadership led to the death of millions of people from his home country. While his followers called him a great leader, his enemies, who seem to be the majority, saw him as a threat to humanity. Hitler believed in a country of pure people; a superior race. For him, however, a superior race could not be comprised of Jews and other sickly people. He therefore put all the people he disliked in work camps while continuing to kill the rest. While the leader was relentless, it is noted that he did not have the best judgment. He thought that the superior race was composed of physically strong people. It has, however, been proven that the mind is almost all the time stronger than the body. It is important to acknowledge that, while his methods were wrong, his leadership was effective. He was able to run a country while waging wars...
Words: 2361 - Pages: 10
...Theories of leadership in any period are driven by a set of principles and hopes on the part of the philosopher. A core assumption about leadership is that leaders who succeed have a “vision,” a tangible goal toward which they and their followers can strive towards. While this is true on one spectrum, there are others that believe in the philosophy of Lao Tzu who said, “A good traveler has no fixed plans and is not intent on arriving” (Tzu, 2014). Participative management and leadership style of the modern times was influenced by the philosophers of the past. In modern leadership and management we see Machiavelli’s active rule, not by fortune, but by virtue and prudence. We also see Nietzsche’s will to power, which is more internally driven first and foremost, but the internal becomes outward actions. Finally we see McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y in management styles, with micromanagers or enlightened leaders. McGregor’s Theory X and Machiavelli viewed human beings in a negative light, where they must be controlled by any possible means. However, McGregor’s Theory Y falls more in line with Nietzsche’s philosophy of the will to power, where it is believed that ambition is within each person. Let’s look at each of these philosophers individually and then we will look at the connection between them. In 1532, after the death of Niccolò Machiavelli, one of the first works of modern political philosophy The Prince was published and released. This treatise of leadership and the method...
Words: 1578 - Pages: 7
