Premium Essay

Granados Questio

In:

Submitted By Amlet164
Words 533
Pages 3
QUESTION 2: GRANADOS
1. Compute the differential impact capitalization versus expensing would have on net income for each year of the period

2. In which year, if any, will the total annual amount of amortization of past R&D will be at least equal to the R&D expense incurred during that year

In year 4, the total expense incurred is 100.00 and that is equal to the total annual amortization of R&D that has been capitalized until year 3.

3. What would you suggest to the managers of the company, with regard to possible modifications in their accounting policies? (For purposes of this question, ignore the revenue creation potential of R&D to emphasize the mechanical aspects of the procedure of R&D capitalization. In doing so, we implicitly acknowledge that Granados considers capitalization of R&D for the sole purpose of managing short-term earnings).

The first suggestion to the company would be that they complete all the criteria required to capitalize the operation. In general, what they have to prove in a reliable way is that in terms of technical aspects, the intangible asset will be used or sold. Also they need to prove the intention to finish the project, use it or sell it. Likewise, they have to indicate how this asset will generate future economic benefits (a market to the intangible asset or the result obtain of it.). Furthermore, they have to be able to measure reliably the expenditure attributable to the intangible asset during its development.
After the analysis of the impact of the capitalization (and amortization) of R&D against the recognition of this as an expense there are two point to highlight. First, when the company capitalize the R&D amount there will be an effect in the balance sheet, therefore the assets will increase. However, when it is recognize as an expense it only affect the

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Motor Cycle Diaries Review

...The Motorcycle Diaries The Motorcycle Diaries was a telling tale about two men and their journey through South American. Unbeknownst too many viewers are the origins of a story that clings on to the legend of Che Guevara. Both Ernesto Guevara also referred to as Fuser, and his companion Alberto Granado set out on an adventure to see as much as Latin America as they possibly can. Fuser is about to get his medical degree while Alberto is a biochemist. These characters stop nothing short of exploiting their professions to garner sympathy or shelter throughout their journey. Fuser seems to be the more tamed of the too, he seems more focused with the well-being of the people he encounters (example the old man with the tumor), and does not use his profession to lie to people. Alberto on the other hand is more of a rumbustious character. He is loud unafraid to voice his opinion and is quick to challenge Fuser on what he believes to be a better way of handling situations. The turning point of the film is when they both encounter peasants who are being persecuted for their communistic beliefs. Fuser had a moment of realization from this and is concerned over the mistreatment of these people. Towards the films conclusion his trip to Peru enlightens his thinking and he acknowledges that the subdivision in a society are what are suppressing lepers. He makes his final journey through the river despite him having asthma. The story concludes with fuser admitting that he knew all along that...

Words: 339 - Pages: 2