...deciding which marketing strategy to implement in order to maximize profit. The solution that the company must choose should result in an opportunity for growth for their new line, Clean Edge, with as little loss of sales to their other product lines as possible. In order to do this, the company must use a niche marketing strategy. By doing so, they will be able to reach the growing market that is looking for super-premium razors, an area in which they are not currently targeting, and release a product that competes with the most populated segment within non-disposable razors. By doing this, Paramount will be in line to becoming the market leader, not just in unit sales but also in dollars. Paramount must focus on specifically targeting the social/emotional and aesthetic shavers as they represent a large percentage of non-disposable razor users and have beliefs and values that are in line with the image that Clean Edge is trying to portray. This will result in a more loyal consumer base and create more brand loyalty as consumers will feel as though they have a closer relationship with the company and their needs are being fulfilled. By following the niche marketing approach, the large issue of cannibalization can be avoided. Paramount will be able to have products in each of the 3 non-disposable razor sectors, super-premium, moderate and value without competing against one another, therefore eliminating cannibalization. This would only be possible if a niche marketing strategy was...
Words: 3314 - Pages: 14
...teacher Jerry Baldwin, history teacher Zew Siegl, and writer Gordon Bowker. At first, they sell high-quality coffee beans and equipment. In 1982, the founders were joined by an entrepreneur named Howard Shultz who functioned as the firm's Director of Retail Operations and Marketing (Facts about Starbucks Coffee Company). While Howard Shultz on a trip to Italy, he found Italian "coffee culture". He believed the "coffee culture" could be reproduction in United States. In 1987, Shultz bring Italian “coffee culture” to United States. Starbucks was sweeping the whole of world. Until today, Starbucks have 17003 retail stores in 55 countries (Starbucks story as of October 2, 2011). Starbucks always give us promise- to inspire and nurture the human spirit-one person, one cup and one neighborhood at a time (Facts about Starbucks Coffee Company). Starbucks coffee shops sales coffee; handcrafted beverages; merchandise; fresh food; consumer products; and brand portfolio ((Facts about Starbucks Coffee Company). Outline In the following instructing,it will talk about Starbucks quantity. Firstly, use the product life cycle to identify the product have the curve of the lifetime. Use product development, introduction, growth, maturity, and decline this five stage to make sure what stage the product in. Make sure have new product could replace it. Secondly, competitive advantage tells us that what Starbucks done better than other company. Why Starbucks can survival in the market? And then, use...
Words: 2278 - Pages: 10
...a cutting edge non-disposable razor that was touted to provide the “closest, cleanest, and smoothest shave people had encountered.” Their dilemma was into which part of the non-disposable market they should introduce their “superior” razor into. As we evaluate the environment in which Clean Edge will compete, we identified five key issues to analyze. The issues include new entrants into the market, Radiance’s new razor, the economy, distribution channels, and increased marketing costs. After analyzing these issues, the introduction of the new razor and the increased marketing costs would pose the greatest risk to Clean Edge. Both of the issues have a high impact and high immediacy for Paramount. The new razor that is entering the market has similar technologies that will cause a higher impact for Paramount than any of the other issues. The emerging new entrants into the market, the economy, and the changing distribution channels all have a low impact but high immediacy for Paramount. The changing distribution channels are occurring because of changes in the industry and the increased availability of all the products in this submarket. The products are now being offered at more retail outlets and are occupying more space on retailer’s shelves. After conducting an industry analysis, we have concluded that Paramount’s non-disposable products are involved in a steadily growing market. The U.S. razor market is divided into several smaller submarkets including non-disposable razors...
Words: 1935 - Pages: 8
...more than million dollars in the R& D, marketing and production, in order to design a new product to gain a higher margin. This report is mainly focusing on how Coca-Cola Company Limited uses strategies in order to competitive in the mature market. Firstly, the issues of the Company will be identified, and then SWOT analysis of the company will be conducted. After that, evaluation of alternative strategies will be stated and finally recommendations and implementation will be given. Background Coca-Cola Company Limited is the world largest offerer of non-alcoholic beverages and the most valuable firm in the world. They owned over 300 brands in over 200 countries and serving carbonated soft drink and non-carbonated beverages such as fruit juice, fruit drink, sports drinks, coffees and bottled water. Coca-Cola Co. is operating in their existing brands, and also develops new global and local brands and acquisition of the global or local brands. In 2002, the company has launched new brand product including Diet Lemon Coke, Vanilla Coke and large varieties of fruit taste Fanta including lime, grape, strawberry and passion fruit in Australia. The company has also acquired many new international water brands such as Danone Waters, Sparklettes, Alhambra and Evian brands in US. They also continued collaboration with the Walt Disney Company to market children's soft drinks. Coca-Cola Company Limited has invested a huge amount in marketing campaign to support their brands. The aims...
Words: 3068 - Pages: 13
...Team Project – Part 2 Team 5 – Hawkeye Marketing Stephanie Jensen Moyin Li Joseph Snyder Yuqi Sun Wenzhe Zhang Introduction to Marketing University of Iowa Tippie College of Business 03 April, 2016 Nike Segments Consumers by Athletes and Non-Athletes In a time when most things are no longer in simple black and white, Nike remains binary by segmenting its consumers into two distinct, opposite categories: athletes and non-athletes. While these segments are particularly broad, there’s a reason for it: it would be impractical to target the two groups in the same way. To successfully reach the company’s target markets, Nike employs differentiated marketing strategies. Athletes are mainly targeted with one of Nike’s major marketing strategies: the “hero athlete” (Kalb). The company pairs up with prominent athletes to endorse their brand. Athletes will then wish to be affiliated with these sports figures, so they will go out and buy Nike footwear to accomplish this. Contrastingly, in order to successfully target the non-athletes, Nike employs ad campaigns to inspire and motivate them to continue working hard. Around the London Olympics in 2012, Nike launched a new campaign with ordinary people enjoying themselves in their respective niches. The campaign was titled “Find Your Greatness,” and it included slogans such as, “Greatness doesn’t need a stadium.” This appealed to everyday citizens, because if someone else just like them can enjoy doing something that makes them...
Words: 3056 - Pages: 13
...competitive strategy of Coca-cola and Pepsi over 100 years of rivalry. New challenges of the 21st century included boosting flagging domestic cola sales and finding new revenue streams. Both firms also began to modify their bottling, pricing, and brand strategies. They looked to emerging international markets to fuel growth and broaden their brand portfolios to include noncarbonated beverages like tea, juice, sports drinks, and bottled water. For over a century, Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola had vied for the "throat share" of the world's beverage market. The most intense battles of the cola wars were fought over the $60 billion industry in the United States, where the average American consumes 53 gallons of carbonated soft drinks (CSD) per year. In a "carefully waged competitive struggle," from 1975 to 1995 both Coke and Pepsi had achieved average annual growth of around 10% as both U.S. and worldwide CSD consumption consistently rose. This cozy situation was threatened in the late 1990s, however, when U.S. CSD consumption dropped for two consecutive years and worldwide shipments slowed for both Coke and Pepsi. The case considers whether Coke's and Pepsi's era of sustained growth and profitability was coming to a close or whether this apparent slowdown was just another blip in the course of a century of enviable performance. A rewritten version of an earlier case by Michael E. Porter and David B. Yoffie. Essay: The case study “Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century”...
Words: 3073 - Pages: 13
...qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfgh jklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvb nmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwerty uiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdf ghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxc vbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwer tyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfg hjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwert yuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasd fghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzx cvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwe rtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdf ghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxc vbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwer tyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopas dfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklz xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrt yuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasd fghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzx cvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwe rtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopa sdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjkl ...
Words: 1581 - Pages: 7
...Why, historically, has the soft drink industry been so profitable? Americans enjoy carbonated sugary beverages. The industry itself, because of its tasty product, focuses on marketing and advertising to make a profit. Coke and Pepsi employed the following technique to make the soft drink industry profitable: marketing (Yoffie 21). Coke and Pepsi have dominated the market on soft drinks by offering a product that people enjoy, at a price that the average Joe can afford, and by utilizing marketing strategies and campaigns. Through effective leadership, an environment was created which enabled success and profitability as well as creative strategies and campaigns. Both Coke and Pepsi developed and deployed aggressive marketing campaigns which began generations ago by fighting trademark infringements and continued with cleaver and aggressive sales techniques. By branching into other flavors and types of drinks via mergers and acquisitions, both Coke and Pepsi generated additional revenue from more than just their core beverage. The fierce competition the two Cola Giants created, ensured profitability and world recognition of the American developed carbonated soda. 2. Compare the economics of the concentrate business to that of the bottling business: Why is the profitability so different? The concentrate business has been historically dominated by large magnates such as Coca-Cola and Pepsi. Data, from the case study, detailing the industry breakdown indicates...
Words: 1960 - Pages: 8
...------------------------------------------------- Principles of Marketing Sec- c Group name: “Blue” Multiple choice questions: From chapter 9 1. A firm can obtain new product through_______. a) Acquisition and New-product development. 2. The course of product sales and profit over its lifetime is____. a) Product life cycle (PLC) 3. Options to marketing while decline stage: a) Maintain the product. b) Harvest the product. c) Drop the product. d) All of above. (Ans) From chapter 10, 11 4. Cost based pricing is____. a) Product driven. (Ans) b) Customer driven. c) Produce revenue. 5. TATA Nano, an economical car with a base price of about Rs.100,000/= is the example of______. a) Good value pricing. (Ans). 6. Price with new or no temporary price discounts_____. a) Everyday low pricing. (EDLP) 7. Break even volume_____. a) Fixed costSelling price - Veriable cost 8. The pricing system with high initial prices to “skim” revenue layers from the market is______. a) Market skimming pricing. 9. Product bundle pricing__. a) Not increase the price. b) Low volume of sale. c) Promote the sales of production. (Ans) d) Might other price is high. From chapter 8, part-1: 10. The service or benefit the customer is really buying while purchasing any physical goods or services. a) Core benefit. 11. A major issue in product strategy is. a) Packaging. ...
Words: 1109 - Pages: 5
...International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research Vol.1 Issue 11, November 2012, ISSN 2277 3622 Online available at www.indianresearchjournals.com A STUDY OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SBI AND ICICI BANK DR. ANURAG. B. SINGH*; MS. PRIYANKA TANDON** * Associate Professor LDC Institute of Technical Studies Soraon, Allahabad (Uttar Pradesh) India ** Assistant Professor LDC Institute of Technical Studies Soraon, Allahabad India _____________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT Banking Sector plays an important role in economic development of a country. The banking system of India is featured by a large network of bank branches, serving many kinds of financial services of the people. The State Bank of India, popularly known as SBI is one of the leading bank of public sector in India. SBI has 14 Local Head Offices and 57 Zonal Offices located at important cities throughout the country. ICICI Bank is second largest and leading bank of private sector in India. The Bank has 2,533 branches and 6,800 ATMs in India. The purpose of the study is to examine the financial performance of SBI and ICICI Bank, public sector and private sector respectively. The research is descriptive and analytical in nature. The data used for the study was entirely secondary in nature. The present study is conducted to compare the financial performance of SBI and ICICI Bank on the basis of ratios such as credit...
Words: 5028 - Pages: 21
... Question: Identify the key marketing issues (Company weakness and the main opportunities and threats for company) met by Coke and Pepsi. SWOT | Cola | Pepsi | Strengths | * The flagship of soft drink global market share, approximately 40% * High profit margin by shifting some cost to bottlers * Strong marketing campaign * Expanded manufacturing and distribution system that kept prices low, Coke located in more than 200 countries. | * The biggest market share of non-carb productions in US and the second best selling soft drink brand in the world. * Aggressive marketing strategies using the target customer, Pepsi Generation. * Offered the product innovation. | Weakness | * Decreasing in CSD market. * Having a complex relationship with North American bottlers. * Reacting slowly with new market trends. | * Decreasing in CSD market. * Lack of sensitivity in expanding the global system. * Focusing only young people. | Opportunities | * The soft drink demand in Pacific-Asia Countries increases over 40% steadily. * Entry in the fast growing of energy-drink segment and new packages. * Dominating in Western Europe and much of Latin American. | * Positioning in the Middle East and Southeast Asia. * Growth in healthier beverages. * Growth in Tea Asia and functional drink beverages. * The younger generation structure of the global population. | Threats | * The powerful competitor Pepsi and the growth of new local rivals. * Obesity...
Words: 581 - Pages: 3
...5 3.1 SWOT Analysis 5 3.2 Industry Environment Analysis 7 3.3 Product Analysis through the Marketing Mix 11 4.0 Scenario Analysis 13 5.0 Recommendations 15 5.1 Costing and Budget Analysis 15 5.2 Product Positioning 18 5.3 Brand Name Selection 20 5.4 Contingency Plan 21 6.0 Conclusion 23 1.0 Introduction Paramount Health and Beauty Company (Paramount), a leading name in consumer’s Health, Cleaning, Beauty and Grooming, is all set to launch a new non-disposable razor with cutting edge technology aims to improve men’s shaving experience. Developed after a thorough research & development, the design is technologically superior, and provides superior performance by the use of a vibrating technology. Being the market leader in the non-disposable razor market segment, the launch is expected to propel Paramount into extending the market leadership. The issue at hand is the decision regarding this product positioning, either to market it as a niche product targeting highly involved fastidious groomers looking for superior shaving experience or as a main stream positioning focusing on the broad advantage of the closet possible shave. The case study leverage on the economic analysis, where a simple pro forma income statement that took into account the effects of cannibalization were produced, coupled with consideration from various marketing methodology including the Porter’s 5 Forces and Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunity and Threat (SWOT)...
Words: 4281 - Pages: 18
...Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010 Table of Contents 1 Overview 2 General environmental analysis 3 Industry Analysis 3.1 Industry Structure - U.S. soft drink market share of concentrate producers - Suppliers within the carbonated soft drink industry 3.2 Market Structure - U.S. Liquid Consumption Trend (gallons/capita) - U.S. non-alcoholic refreshment beverage volume 2009 - U.S. soft drink market share – soft drink brands 3.3 Marketing Channels 3.4 Porter’s five forces 4 5 4 2 2 2 2 4 Competitive / corporate strategies of Coke and Pepsi 5 SWOT Analysis 6 Questions 6.1 How has the competition between Coke and Pepsi affected the industry’s profit? 6.2 If it has been such a profitable industry, why have so few firms successfully entered this business over the last century? What are the barriers? Why have Coke and been so successful in launching their products? 6.3 Why, historically, has the soft drink industry been so profitable? 6.4 Compare the economics of the concentrate business to that of the bottling business: Why is the profitability so different? 6.5 How can Coke and Pepsi sustain their profits in the wake of flattening demand and the growing popularity of non-CSDs? 7 9 11 Exam Case Study Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010 1 Overview (Power Point Page (PPP) 2) For more than a century, Coke and Pepsi compete for market share within the world’s beverage market. The most intense battles were fought over the $74 billion carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry in the...
Words: 5606 - Pages: 23
...Table of Contents 1 Overview 2 General environmental analysis 3 Industry Analysis 3.1 Industry Structure - U.S. soft drink market share of concentrate producers - Suppliers within the carbonated soft drink industry 3.2 Market Structure - U.S. Liquid Consumption Trend (gallons/capita) - U.S. non-alcoholic refreshment beverage volume 2009 - U.S. soft drink market share – soft drink brands 3.3 Marketing Channels 3.4 Porter’s five forces 4 5 4 2 2 2 2 4 Competitive / corporate strategies of Coke and Pepsi 5 SWOT Analysis 6 Questions 6.1 How has the competition between Coke and Pepsi affected the industry’s profit? 6.2 If it has been such a profitable industry, why have so few firms successfully entered this business over the last century? What are the barriers? Why have Coke and been so successful in launching their products? 6.3 Why, historically, has the soft drink industry been so profitable? 6.4 Compare the economics of the concentrate business to that of the bottling business: Why is the profitability so different? 6.5 How can Coke and Pepsi sustain their profits in the wake of flattening demand and the growing popularity of non-CSDs? 7 9 11 Exam Case Study Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010 1 Overview (Power Point Page (PPP) 2) For more than a century, Coke and Pepsi compete for market share within the world’s beverage market. The most intense battles were fought over the $74 billion carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry in the United States...
Words: 5585 - Pages: 23
...CRM – The Strategic Imperatives G. SHAINESH Professor of Marketing Indian Institute of Management Bangalore shaineshg@iimb.ernet.in Session Coverage • Explosion of CRM in Marketing and IT • Enablers for the Growth of CRM • Criticality of Customer Relationships • Why Businesses Should Adopt CRM? • Implementing CRM G. Shainesh. IIM Bangalore 2 Explosion of CRM in Marketing & IT • Academics as well as practitioners • Conferences • Journals – Special Issues • Associations & Forums • Centers for CRM • IT Solutions – Siebel, E.piphany, Oracle, SAP, Sage CRM, Microsoft Dynamics, SugarCRM, Salesforce G. Shainesh. IIM Bangalore 3 Enablers for the Growth of CRM • Emergence of service economy, • Emergence of market economy, • Global orientation of businesses, and • Aging population of the economically advanced economies G. Shainesh. IIM Bangalore 4 Enablers for the Growth of CRM ---1 • Emergence of service economy – 60-80% of GDP of developed nations – ~56% in India – greater customer orientation in services due to simultaneity / inseparability – Services early adopters of CRM • hotels, airlines, banking, financial services, telecom and retailing. G. Shainesh. IIM Bangalore 5 Enablers for the Growth of CRM----2 • Emergence of market economy – Deregulation of industries across the world in the 90s • banking, telecommunications, broadcasting and airlines – Market oriented economy necessitated customer focus and boosted the importance...
Words: 1241 - Pages: 5