Premium Essay

Guyuu

In:

Submitted By shreyanshgupta
Words 1175
Pages 5
1/5 11402.12­wp.sxw

Deepak Shivaji Koli. V/s. State of Maharashtra and others.

Mrs.M.R.Bhoir for respondent No.3.

H
CORAM :

ig

Ms.J.B.Kurup, B­Panel AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 2.

ba y

RESERVED ON : PRONOUNCED ON :

P .C. : 1.

om

The petitioner challenges the order dated 15 th October 2012

passed by respondent No.2­ Committee whereby the respondent No.2 invalidated the caste claim of the petitioner. The petitioner claims to be belonging to the Mahadeo Koli, Scheduled Tribe. In support of the caste claim the petitioner submitted various documents which are mentioned in para­2 of the impugned order. The Committee under a tabular format described the school record of the relatives of the petitioner from his paternal side, which is reproduced as under:

B

h

R.K.Mendadkar for the petitioner.

C ou
... ... Petitioner. 11th July 2014. 18th July 2014.

WRIT PETITION NO. 11402 OF 2012

Respondents.

NARESH H. PATIL AND RAVINDRA V . GHUGE, JJ.

::: Downloaded on - 28/08/2014 15:32:15 :::

rt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE

2/5 11402.12­wp.sxw

Sr. No.

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.

119/4 Shivaji Pandu Koli 107/4 Sitaram Bapu Koli 179/4 Parsharam Shankar Koli 40/6 70/6 87/6 Shivaji Pandu Koli Shidram Pandu Koli Kalavati Namdeo Koli

Hindu Maratha

Marathi (Koli) 23/6/32 & 13/1/38 paternal relative Hindu (Maratha) Hindu Koli Hindu Koli Hindu Koli Hindu Koli Hindu Koli Hindu Koli 1/10/41 & 2/1/48 30/6/38 & 1/8/48 15/9/43 30/11/49 paternal relative Father & Real uncle paternal relative

h

200/6 Tanaji Pandurang Koli

ig

245/6 Rangarao Shankar Koli 262/6 Pandurang Ramu Koli

H

om

B

ba y

2.

The

Similar Documents