H-1B visa
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
|[pic] |This article may contain original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations.|
| |Statements consisting only of original research may be removed. (November 2009) |

The H-1B is a non-immigrant visa in the United States under the Immigration and Nationality Act, section 101(a)(15)(H). It allows US employers to temporarily employ foreign workers in specialty occupations. If a foreign worker in H-1B status quits or is dismissed from the sponsoring employer, the worker must either apply for and be granted a change of status to another non-immigrant status, find another employer (subject to application for adjustment of status and/or change of visa), or leave the US.
The regulations define a "specialty occupation" as requiring theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge in a field of human endeavor[1] including but not limited to biotechnology, chemistry, architecture, engineering, mathematics, physical sciences, social sciences, medicine and health, education, law, accounting, business specialties, theology, and the arts, and requiring the attainment of a bachelor’s degree or its equivalent as a minimum [2] (with the exception of fashion models, who must be "of distinguished merit and ability").[3] Likewise, the foreign worker must possess at least a bachelor’s degree or its equivalent and state licensure, if required to practice in that field. H-1B work-authorization is strictly limited to employment by the sponsoring employer.

|Contents |
|1 Structure of the Program |
|1.1 Duration of stay |
|1.2 Congressional yearly numerical cap |
|1.3 Tax status of H-1B workers |
|1.4 H-1B and legal immigration |
|1.5 Dependents of H-1B visa holders |
|1.6 Administrative processing |
|2 Evolution of the Program |
|2.1 Changes in the cap and number of applications received |
|2.2 American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act of 2000 |
|2.3 Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008 |
|2.4 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 |
|2.5 Changes in USCIS policy |
|3 Protections for U.S. workers |
|3.1 Labor Condition Application |
|3.1.1 History of the Labor Condition Application form |
|3.2 Employer attestations |
|3.3 Limits on employment |
|3.4 H-1B fees earmarked for U.S. worker education and training |
|4 Criticisms of the program |
|4.1 No labor shortages |
|4.2 Wage depression |
|4.3 Risks for employees |
|4.4 The Out-Sourcing/Off-Shoring Visa |
|4.5 Social Security and Medicare taxes |
|4.6 Departure Requirement on Job Loss |
|5 Fraud prevention |
|6 Similar programs |
|7 H-1B demographics |
|7.1 H-1B Applications Approved |
|7.2 H-1B Visas Issued |
|7.3 Top 10 H-1B rankings |
|8 See also |
|9 Notes |
|10 References |
|11 External links for H-1B information |
|11.1 Other links |

Structure of the Program

Duration of stay

The duration of stay is three years, extendable to six years. An exception to maximum length of stay applies in certain circumstances: • If a visa holder has submitted an I-140 immigrant petition or a labor certification prior to their fifth year anniversary of having the H-1B visa, they are entitled to renew their H-1B visa in one-year or three-year increments until a decision has been rendered on their application for permanent residence. • If the visa holder has an approved I-140 immigrant petition, but is unable to initiate the final step of the green card process due to their priority date not being current, they may be entitled to a three-year extension of their H-1B visa. This exception originated with the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act of 2000.[4] • The maximum duration of the H-1B visa is ten years for exceptional Defense Department project related work.
H-1B holders who want to continue to work in the US after six years, but who have not obtained permanent residency status, must remain outside of the US for one year before reapplying for another H-1B visa. Despite a limit on length of stay, no requirement exists that the individual remain for any period in the job the visa was originally issued for. This is known as H-1B portability or transfer, provided the new employer sponsors another H-1B visa, which may or may not be subjected to the quota. Under current law, H-1B visa has no stipulated grace period in the event the employer-employee relationship ceases to exist.

Congressional yearly numerical cap

The current law limits to 65,000 the number of foreign nationals who may be issued a visa or otherwise provided H-1B status each fiscal year (FY). Laws exempt up to 20,000 foreign nationals holding a master’s or higher degree from U.S. universities from the cap on H-1B visas. In addition, excluded from the ceiling are all H-1B non-immigrants who work at (but not necessarily for) universities and non-profit research facilities.[5] This means that contractors working at, but not directly employed by the institutions may be exempt from the cap. Free Trade Agreements carve out 1,400 H-1B1 visas for Chilean nationals and 5,400 H-1B1 visas for Singapore nationals. However, if these reserved visas are not used, then they are made available in the next fiscal year to applicants from other countries. Thus the number of H-1B visas issued each year is significantly more than the 65,000 cap, with 117,409 having been issued in FY2010,[6] and 129,134 in FY2011.[7]
The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services starts accepting applications on the first business day of April for visas that count against the fiscal year starting in October. For instance, H-1B visa applications that count against the FY 2013 cap could be submitted starting from Monday, April 2, 2012. USCIS accepts H-1B visa applications no more than 6 months in advance of the requested start date. [8] Beneficiaries not subject to the annual cap are those who currently hold H-1B status or have held H-1B status at some point in the past six years.

Tax status of H-1B workers

The taxation of income for H-1B employees depends on whether they are categorized for tax purposes as either non-resident aliens or resident aliens. A non-resident alien for tax purposes is only taxed on income from the United States, while a resident alien for tax purposes is taxed on income from both inside and outside the United States.
The classification is determined based on the "substantial presence test": If the substantial presence test indicates that the H-1B visa holder is a resident, then income taxation is like any other US person and may be filed using Form 1040 and the necessary schedules; otherwise, the visa-holder must file as a non-resident alien using tax form 1040NR or 1040NR-EZ; he or she may claim benefit from tax treaties if they exist between the United States and the visa holder's country of citizenship.
Persons in their first year in the US may choose to be considered a resident for taxation purposes for the entire year, and must pay taxes on their worldwide income for that year. This "First Year Choice" is described in IRS Publication 519 and can only be made once in a person's lifetime. A spouse, regardless of visa status, must include a valid Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) or Social Security number (SSN) on a joint tax return with the H-1B holder.
Tax filing rules for H-1B holders may be complex, depending on the individual situation. Besides consulting a professional tax preparer knowledgeable about the rules for foreigners, the IRS Publication 519, U.S. Tax Guide for Aliens, may be consulted. H-1B visa holders pay Medicare and Social Security taxes, and are eligible for Social Security benefits. They also pay state and federal taxes.

H-1B and legal immigration

Even though the H-1B visa is a non-immigrant visa, it is one of the few visa categories recognized as dual intent, meaning an H-1B holder can have legal immigration intent (apply for and obtain the green card) while still a holder of the visa. In the past the employment-based green card process used to take only a few years, less than the duration of the H-1B visa itself. However, in recent times the legal employment-based immigration process has backlogged and retrogressed to the extent that it now takes many years for skilled professional applicants from certain countries to obtain green cards. Since the duration of the H-1B visa hasn't changed, this has meant that many more H-1B visa holders must renew their visas in one or three-year increments for continued legal status while their green card application is in process.

Dependents of H-1B visa holders

H-1B visa holders can bring immediate family members (spouse and children under 21) to the US under the H4 Visa category as dependents. An H4 Visa holder may remain in the US as long as the H-1B visa holder retains legal status. An H4 visa holder is not eligible to work or get a Social Security number (SSN).[9] An H4 Visa holder may attend school, get a driver's license, and open a bank account in the US. To claim a dependent on a tax return or file a joint tax return, the dependent must obtain an Individual Tax Identification Number (ITIN), which is only used for tax filing purposes.

Administrative processing

When an H-1B worker goes outside of US for vacation, he or she has to get the visa stamped on his passport unless he has already done so for re-entry in the United States. The interview is taken in US Embassy by a visa officer. In some cases, H-1B workers can be required to undergo "administrative processing", involving extra, lengthy background checks. Under current rules, these checks are supposed to take ten days or less, but in some cases, have lasted years.[10]

Evolution of the Program

Changes in the cap and number of applications received

During the early 1990s, the cap was rarely reached. By the mid-1990s, however, the allocation tended fill each year on a first come, first served basis, resulting in frequent denials or delays of H-1Bs because the annual cap had been reached. In 1998, the cap increased to 115,000. The cap increased to 195,000 for FY2001, 2002, and 2003.
In FY2004, the cap reverted to 65,000 when the temporary increase passed by Congress in 2000 expired, where it has remained ever since and has been hit each year. FY2004 was also the first year in which 20,000 additional visas for foreign workers with a master's degree or higher from a US institution became exempt from the annual cap. In its annual report on H-1B visas, released in 2006 November, USCIS stated that it approved 130,497 H-1B visa applications in FY2004 (while 138,965 new visas were issued through consular offices) and 116,927 in FY2005 (while 124,099 new visas were issued via consular offices).[11][12][13][14][15][15][16][17] For FY2007, with applications accepted from 2006 April 1, the entire quota of visas for the year was exhausted within a span of less than 2 months on 2006 May 26,[18] well before the beginning of the financial year concerned. The additional 20,000 Advanced Degree H-1B visas were exhausted on July 26.
For FY2008, the entire quota was exhausted before the end of the first day that applications were accepted, April 2.[19] Under USCIS rules, the 123,480 petitions received on April 2 and April 3 that were subject to the cap were pooled, and then 65,000 of these were selected at random for further processing.[20] The additional 20,000 Advanced Degree H-1B visas for FY2008 was exhausted on April 30. In FY2008, a total of 276,252 visa applications (109,335 initial, 166,917 renewals and extensions) were approved, and 129,464 new initial visas were issued through consular offices.
For FY2009, USCIS announced on 2008 April 8, that the entire quota for visas for the year had been reached, for both 20,000 Advanced and the 65,000 quota. USCIS would complete initial data entry for all filing received during 2008 April 1 to April 7, before running the lottery, while 86,300 new visas were approved.[21] In FY2009, 214,271 visas were approved (86,300 new initial visas, and 127,971 renewed and extended)[22] and 110,367 initial H-1B visas were issued from consular offices.[23]
For FY2010, USCIS announced on 2009 December 21, that enough petitions were received to reach the year cap, while 76,627 new visas were approved, and 117,409 new visas were issued through consular offices.[24]
For FY2011, USCIS announced on 2011 January 27, that enough petitions were received to reach the year cap on January 26, and 106,445 new visas were approved, while 129,134 new visas were issued through consular offices.[25]
For FY2012, USCIS announced on 2011 November 23, that enough petitions were received to reach the year quota on November 22.[26]
For FY2013, USCIS announced on 2012 June 12, that enough petitions were received to reach the year cap on June 11.[27]

American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act of 2000

The American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act of 2000 (AC21) and the U.S. Department of Labor's PERM system for labor certification erased most of the earlier claimed arguments for H-1Bs as indentured servants during the green card process. With PERM, labor certification processing time is now approximately 9 months (as of Mar 2010).[28]
Because of AC21, the H-1B employee is free to change jobs if they have an I-485 application pending for six months and an approved I-140, and if the position they move to is substantially comparable to their current position. In some cases, if those labor certifications are withdrawn and replaced with PERM applications, processing times improve, but the person also loses their favorable priority date. In those cases, employers' incentive to attempt to lock in H-1B employees to a job by offering a green card is reduced, because the employer bears the high legal costs and fees associated with labor certification and I-140 processing, but the H-1B employee is still free to change jobs.
However, many people are ineligible to file I-485 at the current time due to the widespread retrogression in priority dates. Thus, they may well still be stuck with their sponsoring employer for many years. There are also many old labor certification cases pending under pre-PERM rules.

Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008

The Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008, which, among other issues, federalizes immigration in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, stipulates that during a transition period, numerical limitations do not apply to otherwise qualified workers in the H visa category in the CNMI and Guam.[29]

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009

On Feb. 17, 2009, President Obama signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“stimulus bill”), Public Law 111-5.[30] Section 1661 of the ARRA incorporates the Employ American Workers Act (“EAWA”) by Senators Sanders (I-Vt.) and Grassley (R-Iowa) to limit certain banks and other financial institutions from hiring H-1B workers unless they had offered positions to equally or better-qualified US workers, and to prevent banks from hiring H-1B workers in occupations they had laid off US workers from. These restrictions include: 1. The employer must, prior to filing the H-1B petition, take good-faith steps to recruit US workers for the position for which the H-1B worker is sought, offering a wage at least as high as what the law requires for the H-1B worker. The employer must also attest that, in connection with this recruitment, it has offered the job to any US worker who applies who is equally or better qualified for the position. 2. The employer must not have laid off, and will not lay off, any US worker in a job essentially equivalent to the H-1B position in the area of intended employment of the H-1B worker within the period beginning 90 days prior to the filing of the H-1B petition and ending 90 days after its filing.[31]

Changes in USCIS policy

After completing a policy review, the USCIS clarified that individuals who spent more than one year outside of U.S. and did not exhaust their entire six-year term can choose to be re-admitted for the “remainder” of initial six-year period without being subject to the H-1B cap.[32]
After completing a policy review, the USCIS clarified that, "Any time spent in H-4 status will not count against the six-year maximum period of admission applicable to H-1B aliens."[32]
USCIS recently issued a memorandum dated 8 Jan 2010. The memorandum effectively states that there must be a clear "employee employer relationship" between the petitioner (employer) and the beneficiary (prospective visa holder). It simply outlines what the employer must do to be considered in compliance as well as putting forth the documentation requirements to back up the employer's assertion that a valid relationship exists.
The memorandum gives three clear examples of what is considered a valid "employee employer relationship": • an accountant working on and off-site to work • a fashion model • a computer software engineer working off-site
In the case of the software engineer, the petitioner (employer) must agree to do (some of) the following among others: • Supervise the beneficiary on and off-site • Maintain such supervision through calls, reports, or visits • Have a "right" to control the work on a day-to-day basis if such control is required • Provide tools for the job • Hire, pay, and have the ability to fire the beneficiary • Evaluate work products and perform progress/performance reviews • Claim them for tax purposes • Provide (some type of) employee benefits • Use "proprietary information" to perform work • Produce an end product related to the business • Have an "ability to" control the manner and means in which the worker accomplishes tasks
It further states that "common law is flexible" in how to weigh these factors. Though this memorandum cites legal cases and provides examples, such a memorandum in itself is not law and future memoranda could change this.
Some argue that this has effectively "killed the job-shop industry."[citation needed] While clear that, as of 2012, it takes longer to reach the H-1B visa numerical cap, it is not clear whether this is a result of simple political pressure to put the program on hold, or a result of the decreased economic growth.[original research?]

Protections for U.S. workers

Labor Condition Application

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) is responsible for ensuring that foreign workers do not displace or adversely affect wages or working conditions of US workers. For every H-1B petition filed with the USCIS, there must be included a Labor Condition Application (LCA) (not to be confused with the labor certification), certified by the U.S. Department of Labor. The LCA is designed to ensure that the wage offered to the non-immigrant worker meets or exceeds the "prevailing wage" in the area of employment. ("Immigration law has a number of highly technical terms that may not mean the same thing to the average reader." [33] last updated 2011 March 31, visited 2012 November 5) The LCA also contains an attestation section designed to prevent the program from being used to import foreign workers to break a strike or replace US citizen workers.
While an employer is not required to advertise the position before hiring an H-1B non-immigrant pursuant to the H-1B visa approval, the employer must notify the employee representative about the Labor Condition Application (LCA)—or if there is no such representation, the employer must publish the LCA at the workplace and the employer's office.[34][35] Under the regulations, LCAs are a matter of public record. Corporations hiring H-1B workers are required to make these records available to any member of the public who requests to look at them. Copies of the relevant records are also available from various web sites, including the Department of Labor.

History of the Labor Condition Application form

The LCA must be filed electronically using Form ETA 9035E.[36] Over the years, the complexity of the form increased from one page in 1997[37] to three pages in 2008,[38] to five pages as of August 2012.[39]

Employer attestations

By signing the LCA, the employer attests that: [40] • The employer pays H-1B non-immigrants the same wage level paid to all other individuals with similar experience and qualifications for that specific employment, or the prevailing wage for the occupation in the area of employment, whichever is higher. • The employment of H-1B non-immigrants does not adversely affect working conditions of workers similarly employed. • On the date the application is signed and submitted, there is not a strike, lockout, or work stoppage in the course of a labor dispute in the occupation in which H-1B non-immigrants will be employed at the place of employment. If such a strike or lockout occurs after this application is submitted, the employer must notify ETA within three days, and the application is not used to support petition filings with INS for H-1B non-immigrants to work in the same occupation at the place of employment until ETA determines the strike or lockout is over. • A copy of this application has been, or will be, provided to each H-1B non-immigrant employed pursuant to this application, and, as of the application date, notice of this application has been provided to workers employed in the occupation in which H-1B non-immigrants will be employed: o Notice of this filing has been provided to bargaining representative of workers in the occupation in which H-1B non-immigrants will be employed; or o There is no such bargaining representative; therefore, a notice of this filing has been posted and was, or will remain, posted for 10 days in at least two conspicuous locations where H-1B non-immigrants will be employed.
The law requires H-1B workers to be paid the higher of the prevailing wage for the same occupation and geographic location, or the same as the employer pays to similarly situated employees. Other factors, such as age and skill were not permitted to be taken into account for the prevailing wage. Congress changed the program in 2004 to require the Department of Labor to provide four skill-based prevailing wage levels for employers to use. This is the only prevailing wage mechanism the law permits that incorporates factors other than occupation and location.
The approval process for these applications are based on employer attestations and documentary evidence submitted. The employer is advised of their liability if they are replacing a US worker.

Limits on employment

According to the USCIS, "H-1B nonimmigrants may only work for the petitioning U.S. employer and only in the H-1B activities described in the petition. The petitioning U.S. employer may place the H-1B worker on the worksite of another employer if all applicable rules (e.g., Department of Labor rules) are followed. Generally, a nonimmigrant employee may work for more than one employer at the same time. However, each employer must follow the process for initially applying for a nonimmigrant employee."[41]

H-1B fees earmarked for U.S. worker education and training

In 2007, the US Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (ETA), reported on two programs, the High Growth Training Initiative and Workforce Innovation Regional Economic Development (WIRED), which have received or will receive $284 million and $260 million, respectively, from H-1B training fees to educate and train US workers.[citation needed] According to the Seattle Times $1 billion from H1-B fees have been distributed by the Labor Department to build up US workforce skills since 2001. [42]

Criticisms of the program

|[pic] |This article's Criticism or Controversy section may compromise the article's neutral point of view of the subject. |
| |Please integrate the section's contents into the article as a whole, or rewrite the material. (November 2009) |

The H-1B program has caused a number of criticisms.

No labor shortages

Paul Donnelly, in a 2002 article in Computerworld, cited Milton Friedman as stating that the H-1B program acts as a subsidy for corporations.[43] Others holding this view include Dr. Norman Matloff, who testified to the US House Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on Immigration on the H-1B subject. Matloff's paper for the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform claims that there has been no shortage of qualified American citizens to fill American computer-related jobs, and that the data offered as evidence of American corporations needing H-1B visas to address labor shortages was erroneous.[44] The United States General Accounting Office found in a report in 2000 that controls on the H-1B program lacked effectiveness.[45] The GAO report's recommendations were subsequently implemented.
High-tech companies often cite a tech-worker shortage when asking Congress to raise the annual cap on H-1B visas, and have succeeded in getting various exemptions passed. The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA), described the situation as a crisis, and the situation was reported on by the Wall Street Journal, BusinessWeek and Washington Post. Employers applied pressure on congress.[46] Microsoft chairman Bill Gates testified in 2007 on behalf of the expanded visa program on Capitol Hill, "warning of dangers to the U. S. economy if employers can't import skilled workers to fill job gaps".[46] Congress considered a bill to address the claims of shortfall,[47] but in the end did not revise the program.[48]
According to a study conducted by John Miano and the Center for Immigration Studies there is no empirical data to support that claim.[49] Citing studies done at Duke, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Georgetown University and others, critics have also argued that in some years, the number of foreign programmers and engineers imported outnumbered the number of jobs created by the industry.[50] Organizations have also posted hundreds of first hand accounts of H-1B Visa Harm reports directly from individuals negatively impacted by the program, many of whom are willing to speak with the media.[51]
Studies carried out from the 1990s through 2011 by researchers from Columbia U, Computing Research Association (CRA), Duke U, Georgetown U, Harvard U, National Research Council of the NAS, RAND Corporation, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers U, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Stanford U, SUNY Buffalo, UC Davis, UPenn Wharton School, Urban Institute, and US Dept. of Education Office of Education Research & Improvement have reported that the USA has been producing sufficient numbers of able and willing STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) workers, while several studies from Hal Salzman and others have concluded that the USA has been employing only about 30% to 35% of its stock of new able and willing STEM workers. A 2012 IEEE announcement of a conference on STEM education funding and job markets stated "only about half of those with under-graduate STEM degrees actually work in the STEM-related fields after college, and after 10 years, only some 8% still do".[52]

Wage depression

Wage depression is a chronic complaint critics have about the H-1B program: some studies have found that H-1B workers are paid significantly less than U.S. workers.[53][54] It is claimed[55][56][57][58][59][59] that the H-1B program is primarily used as a source of cheap labor. A paper by Harvard Professor George J. Borjas for the National Bureau of Economic Research found that "a 10 percent immigration-induced increase in the supply of doctorates lowers the wage of competing workers by about 3 to 4 percent."[60]
The LCA included in the H-1B petition is supposed to ensure that H-1B workers are paid the prevailing wage in the labor market, or the employer's actual average wage (whichever is higher), but evidence exists that some employers do not abide by these provisions and avoid paying the actual prevailing wage despite stiff penalties for abusers.[61]
Theoretically, the LCA process appears to offer protection to both US and H-1B workers. However, according to the US General Accounting Office, enforcement limitations and procedural problems render these protections ineffective.[62] Ultimately, the employer, not the Department of Labor, determines what sources determine the prevailing wage for an offered position, and it may choose among a variety of competing surveys, including its own wage surveys, provided that such surveys follow certain defined rules and regulations.
The law specifically restricts the Department of Labor's approval process of LCAs to checking for "completeness and obvious inaccuracies".[63] In FY 2005, only about 800 LCAs were rejected out of over 300,000 submitted. Hire Americans First has posted several hundred first hand accounts of individuals negatively impacted by the program, many of whom are willing to speak with the media.[51]
DOL has split the prevailing wage into four levels, with Level One representing about the 17th percentile of wage average Americans earn. About 80 percent of LCAs are filed at this 17th percentile level[citation needed]. This four-level prevailing wage can be obtained from the DOL website,[64] and is generally far lower than average wages[citation needed].
The "prevailing wage" stipulation is allegedly vague and thus easy to manipulate[citation needed], resulting in employers underpaying visa workers. According to Ron Hira, assistant professor of public policy at the Rochester Institute of Technology, the median wage in 2005 for new H-1B information technology (IT) was just $50,000, which is even lower than starting wages for IT graduates with a B.S. degree. The US government OES office's data indicates that 90 percent of H-1B IT wages were below the median US wage for the same occupation.[65]
In 2002, the US government began an investigation into Sun Microsystems' hiring practices after an ex-employee, Guy Santiglia, filed complaints with the U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of Labor alleging that the Santa Clara firm discriminates against American citizens in favor of foreign workers on H-1B visas. Santiglia accused the company of bias against US citizens when it laid off 3,900 workers in late 2001 and at the same time applied for thousands of visas. In 2002, about 5 percent of Sun's 39,000 employees had temporary work visas, he said.[66] In 2005, it was decided that Sun violated only minor requirements and that neither of these violations was substantial or willful. Thus, the judge only ordered Sun to change its posting practices.[67]

Risks for employees

Historically, H-1B holders have sometimes been described as indentured servants,[68] and while the comparison is no longer as compelling, it had more validity prior to the passage of American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act of 2000. Although immigration generally requires short- and long-term visitors to disavow any ambition to seek the green card (permanent residency), H-1B visa holders are an important exception, in that the H-1B is legally acknowledged as a possible step towards a green card under what is called the doctrine of dual intent.
H-1B visa holders may be sponsored for their green cards by their employers through an Application for Alien Labor Certification, filed with the U.S. Department of Labor.[citation needed] In the past, the sponsorship process has taken several years, and for much of that time the H-1B visa holder was unable to change jobs without losing their place in line for the green card. This created an element of enforced loyalty to an employer by an H-1B visa holder. Critics[who?] alleged that employers benefit from this enforced loyalty because it reduced the risk that the H-1B employee might leave the job and go work for a competitor, and that it put citizen workers at a disadvantage in the job market, since the employer has less assurance that the citizen will stay at the job for an extended period of time, especially if the work conditions are tough, wages are lower or the work is difficult or complex. It has been argued that this makes the H-1B program extremely attractive to employers, and that labor legislation in this regard has been influenced by corporations seeking and benefiting from such advantages.[citation needed]
Some recent news reports suggest that the recession that started in 2008 will exacerbate the H-1B visa situation, both for supporters of the program and for those who oppose it.[69] The process to obtain the green card has become so long that during these recession years it has not been unusual that sponsoring companies fail and disappear, thus forcing the H-1B employee to find another sponsor, and lose their place in line for the green card. An H-1B employee could be just one month from obtaining their green card, but if the employee is laid off, he or she may have to leave the country, or go to the end of the line and start over the process to get the green card, and wait as much as 10 more years, depending on the nationality and visa category.[70]
The American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act of 2000 provides some relief for people waiting for a long time for a green card, by allowing H-1B extensions past the normal 6 years, as well as by making it easier to change the sponsoring employer.

The Out-Sourcing/Off-Shoring Visa

Further information: IT Body Shops
In his floor statement on H-1B Visa Reform, Senator Dick Durbin stated "The H-1B visa job lasts for 3 years and can be renewed for 3 years. What happens to those workers after that? Well, they could stay. It is possible. But these new companies have a much better idea for making money. They send the engineers to America to fill spots--and get money to do it--and then after the 3 to 6 years, they bring them back to work for the companies that are competing with American companies. They call it their outsourcing visa. They are sending their talented engineers to learn how Americans do business and then bring them back and compete with those American companies."[71] Critics of H-1B use for outsourcing have also noted that more H-1B visas are granted to companies headquartered in India than companies headquartered in the United States.[72]
Of all Computer Systems Analysts and programmers on H-1B visas in the US, 74 percent were from Asia. This large scale migration of Asian IT professionals to the United States has been cited as a central cause for the quick emergence of the offshore outsourcing industry.[73]
In FY 2009, due to the worldwide recession, applications for H-1B visas by off-shore out-sourcing firms were significantly lower than in previous years,[74] yet 110,367 H-1B visas were issued, and 117,409 were issued in FY2010.

Social Security and Medicare taxes

H-1B employees have to pay Social Security and Medicare taxes as part of their payroll. Like US citizens, they are eligible to receive Social Security benefits even if they leave the United States, provided they have paid Social Security benefits for at least 10 years. Further, the US has bilateral agreements with several countries to ensure that the time paid into the US Social Security system, even if it is less than 10 years, is taken into account in the foreign country's comparable system and vice versa.[75]

Departure Requirement on Job Loss

If an employer lays off an H-1B worker, the employer is required to pay for the laid-off worker's transportation outside the United States.
If an H-1B worker is laid off for any reason, the H-1B program technically does not specify a time allowance or grace period to round up one's affairs irrespective of how long the H-1B worker might have lived in the United States. To round up one's affairs, filing an application to change to another non-immigrant status may therefore become a necessity.
If an H-1B worker is laid off and attempts to find a new H-1B employer to file a petition for him, the individual is considered out of status if there is even a one-day gap between the last day of employment and the date that the new H-1B petition is filed. While some attorneys claim that there is a grace period of 30 days, 60 days, or sometimes 10 days, that is not true according to the law. In practice, USCIS has accepted H-1B transfer applications even with a gap in employment up to 60 days, but that is by no means guaranteed.
Some of the confusion regarding the alleged grace period arose because there is a 10-day grace period for an H-1B worker to depart the United States at the end of his authorized period of stay (does not apply for laid-off workers). This grace period only applies if the worker works until the H-1B expiration date listed on his I-797 approval notice, or I-94 card. 8 CFR 214.2(h)(13)(i)(A).

Fraud prevention

The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services "H-1B Benefit Fraud & Compliance Assessment" of September 2008 concluded 21% of H-1B visas granted originate from fraudulent applications or applications with technical violations.[76] Fraud was defined as a willful misrepresentation, falsification, or omission of a material fact. Technical violations, errors, omissions, and failures to comply that are not within the fraud definition were included in the 21% rate. Subsequently, USCIS has made procedural changes to reduce the number of fraud and technical violations on H-1B applications.
In 2009, federal authorities busted a nationwide H-1B Visa Scam.[77]

Similar programs

In addition to H-1B visas, there are a variety of other visa categories that allow foreign workers to come into the U.S. to work for some period of time.
L-1 visas are issued to foreign employees of a corporation. Under recent rules, the foreign worker must have worked for the corporation for at least one year in the preceding three years prior to getting the visa. An L-1B visa is appropriate for non-immigrant workers who are being temporarily transferred to the United States based on their specialized knowledge of the company's techniques and methodologies. An L-1A visa is for managers or executives who either manage people or an essential function of the company. There is no requirement to pay prevailing wages for the L-1 visa holders. For Canadian residents, a special L visa category is available.
TN-1 visas are part of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and are issued to Canadian and Mexican citizens.[78] TN visas are only available to workers who fall into one of a pre-set list of occupations determined by the NAFTA treaty. There are specific eligibility requirements for the TN Visa.
E-3 visas are issued to citizens of Australia under the Australia free-trade treaty.
H-1B1 visas are a sub-set of H-1B issued to residents of Chile and Singapore under the United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement of 2003; PL108-77 § 402(a)(2)(B), 117 Stat. 909, 940; S1416, HR2738; passed in House 2003-07-24 and the United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement of 2003; PL108-78 § 402(2), 117 Stat. 948, 970-971; S1417, HR2739; passed in House 2003-07-24, passed in senate 2003-07-31, signed by executive (GWBush) 2003-05-06. According to USCIS, unused H-1B1 visas are added into the next year's H-1B base quota of 58,200.
One recent trend in work visas is that various countries attempt to get special preference for their nationals as part of treaty negotiations. Another trend is for changes in immigration law to be embedded in large Authorization or Omnibus bills to avoid the controversy that might accompany a separate vote.
H-2B visa: The H-2B non-immigrant program permits employers to hire foreign workers to come to the U.S. and perform temporary nonagricultural work, which may be one-time, seasonal, peak load or intermittent. There is a 66,000 per year limit on the number of foreign workers who may receive H-2B status.

H-1B demographics

• [pic] H-1B number issued each year for 2006-2008 • [pic] Issued H-1Bs by continent • [pic] Pie chart showing 25% Indian • [pic] By nation in 2005

H-1B Applications Approved

|H-1B Applications Approved by USCIS [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [79] |
|Year |Initial |Renewals+Extensions |Total |
|1999 |134,411 |na |na |
|2000 |136,787 |120,853 |257,640 |
|2001 |201,079 |130,127 |331,206 |
|2002 |103,584 |93,953 |197,537 |
|2003 |105,314 |112,026 |217,340 |
|2004 |130,497 |156,921 |287,418 |
|2005 |116,927 |150,204 |267,131 |
|2006 |109,614 |161,367 |270,981 |
|2007 |120,031 |161,413 |281,444 |
|2008 |109,335 |166,917 |276,252 |
|2009 |86,300 |127,971 |214,271 |
|2010 |76,627 |116,363 |192,990 |
|2011 |106,445 |163,208 |269,653 |

H-1B Visas Issued

|H-1B visas issued by State Department through consular offices |
|Year |H-1B |H-1B1 |
|1990 |794 |na |
|1991 |51,882 |na |
|1992 |44,290 |na |
|1993 |35,818 |na |
|1994 |42,843 |na |
|1995 |51,832 |na |
|1996 |58,327 |na |
|1997 |80,547 |na |
|1998 |91,360 |na |
|1999 |116,513 |na |
|2000 |133,290 |na |
|2001 |161,643 |na |
|2002 |118,352 |na |
|2003 |107,196 |na |
|2004 |138,965 |72 |
|2005 |124,099 |275 |
|2006 |135,421 |440 |
|2007 |154,053 |639 |
|2008 |129,464 |719 |
|2009 |110,367 |621 |
|2010 |117,409 |419 |
|2011 |129,134 |418 |

[80] [81]
[82] [83]
[84] [85]
[86] [87]
[88] [89]
[90] [91]

Top 10 H-1B rankings

|Companies receiving H-1Bs[92][93][94] |
| |
|Rank |
|Company |
|Headquarters |
|Primary Employment Base |
|Received 2006[95] |
|Approved 2009 |
|Approved 2011 total [96] |
|Approved 2011 new |
| |
|1 |
|Infosys |
|Bangalore, Karnataka, India |
|India |
|4,908 |
|440 |
|4,042 |
|3,962 |
| |
|2 |
|Wipro |
|Bangalore, Karnataka, India |
|India |
|4,002 |
|1,964 |
|2,817 |
|2,736 |
| |
|3 |
|Microsoft |
|Redmond, Washington |
|US |
|3,117 |
|1,318 |
|1,586 |
|947 |
| |
|4 |
|Tata Consultancy Services |
|Mumbai, Maharashtra, India |
|India |
|3,047 |
| |
|1,758 |
|1,740 |
| |
|5 |
|Satyam Computer Services |
|Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India |
|India |
|2,880 |
|219 |
| |
| |
| |
|6 |
|Cognizant |
|Teaneck, New Jersey[97] |
|India |
|2,226 |
|233 |
|5,715 |
|4,222 |
| |
|7 |
|Patni Computer Systems |
|Mumbai, Maharashtra, India |
|India |
|1,391 |
|609 |
| |
| |
| |
|8 |
|IBM (India, Private Ltd.) |
|Armonk, New York |
|US |
|1,130 |
|695 |
|1,063 |
|853 |
| |
|9 |
|Oracle Corporation |
|Redwood Shores, California |
|US |
|1,022 |
|272 |
| |
| |
| |
|10 |
|Larsen & Toubro Infotech |
|Mumbai, Maharashtra, India |
|India |
|947 |
|602 |
|1,608 |
|1,204 |
| |
|11 |
|Intel Corporation |
|Santa Clara, California |
|US |
|828 |
|723 |
| |
| |
| |
|12 |
|Ernst & Young LLP |
|London, United Kingdom |
| |
|774 |
|481 |
| |
| |
| |
|13 |
|UST Global |
|Aliso Viejo, California |
| |
| |
|344 |
| |
| |
| |
|14 |
|Deloitte |
|New York City, New York |
| |
|890 |
|328 |
| |
| |
| |
|15 |
|Qualcomm |
|San Diego, California |
| |
|533 |
|320 |
| |
| |
| |
|16 |
|Accenture Inc |
|Bahamas, Bahamas |
| |
|637 |
| |
|1,370 |
|1,347 |
| |
|17 |
|HCL Technologies Ltd |
|Bangalore, Karnataka, India |
| |
|910 |
| |
|1,370 |
|1,033 |
| |
|18 |
|Google |
|Mountain View, California |
| |
|328 |
| |
|615 |
|383 |
| |

|Top 10 universities and schools receiving H-1Bs[92][93][95] |
|School |H-1Bs Received 2006 |
|New York City Public Schools |642 |
|University of Michigan |437 |
|University of Illinois at Chicago |434 |
|University of Pennsylvania |432 |
|Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine |432 |
|University of Maryland |404 |
|Columbia University |355 |
|Yale University |316 |
|Harvard University |308 |
|Stanford University |279 |
|Washington University in St. Louis |278 |
|University of Pittsburgh |275 |

See also

• SKIL Bill • Free trade debate • Labor shortage • Immigration Voice • L-1 visa

Notes

1. ^ 8 U.S.C. 1184(i)(1)(A) 2. ^ 8 U.S.C. 1184(i)(1)(B) 3. ^ 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(i) 4. ^ American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act of 2000 5. ^ American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act, Pub. L.No.106-313, 114 Stat.1251, 2000 S. 2045; Pub. L. No. 106-311, 114 Stat. 1247 (Oct 17, 2000), 2000 HR 5362; 146 Cong. Rec. H9004-06 (October 5, 2000) 6. ^ "NIV Workload by Visa Category FY-2010". Nonimmigrant Visa Statistics. Nonimmigrant Visa Statistics. 2010-Sep-30. Retrieved 2011-Oct-03. 7. ^ State Dept. 2012 Annual Report "State Dept. 2012 Annual Report". Retrieved 2012-Dec-24. 8. ^ "H-1B Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 Cap Season". USCIS. Archived from the original on 2011-08-18. Retrieved 2012-05-28. "H-1B petitions can be filed no more than six months in advance of the requested start date. Therefore, petitions seeking an FY2010 H-1B Cap number with an 2009 Oct. 1 start date can be filed no sooner than 2009 April 1." 9. ^ http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/10096.html#4 10. ^ Alden, Edward (10 April 2011). "America’s ‘National Suicide’". Newsweek. Retrieved 5 July 2011. 11. ^ a b U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Characteristics of H-1B Specialty Occupation Workers Report for Fiscal Year 2004 12. ^ a b U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Characteristics of H-1B Specialty Occupation Workers Report for Fiscal Year 2005 13. ^ a b U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Characteristics of H-1B Specialty Occupation Workers Report for Fiscal Year 2006 14. ^ a b U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Characteristics of H-1B Specialty Occupation Workers Report for Fiscal Year 2007 15. ^ a b c U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Characteristics of H-1B Specialty Occupation Workers Report for Fiscal Year 2008 16. ^ a b U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Characteristics of H-1B Specialty Occupation Workers Report for Fiscal Year 2010 17. ^ a b U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Characteristics of H-1B Specialty Occupation Workers Report for Fiscal Year 2011 18. ^ 2007 H-1B visa limit already reached 19. ^ USCIS REACHES FY2008 H-1B CAP 20. ^ USCIS Runs Random Selection Process For H-1B, USCIS, 2007 April 13 21. ^ USCIS Reaches FY 2009 H-1B Cap 22. ^ U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Characteristics of H-1B Specialty Occupation Workers Report for Fiscal Year 2009 23. ^ "Table XVI(B) Nonimmigrant Visas Issued by Classification (Including Crewlist Visas and Border Crossing Cards) Fiscal Years 2006-2010". Report of the Visa Office 2010 Table of Contents. travel.state.gov. Retrieved 2011-10-03. 24. ^ USCIS FY 2010 H-1B Cap Count 25. ^ USCIS FY 2011 H-1B Cap Count 26. ^ USCIS FY 2012 H-1B Cap Count 27. ^ USCIS FY 2013 H-1B Cap Count 28. ^ Changes to the H-1B and L-1 Visa Application Fees, August 12, 2010 29. ^ Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008 30. ^ uscis.gov 31. ^ FAQ on affect of stimulus legislation on H-1B program, cglawaffiliates.x2cms.com/blog. 32. ^ a b USCIS Interoffice Memorandum from Michael Aytes, Associate Director, Domestic Operations, to all Regional Directors and Service Center Directors, dated December 5, 2006 33. ^ "glossary". USCIS. 34. ^ Overview : H-1B Visas for Temporary Professional Workers, The Law Office of Sheela Murthy, P.C., 2003-09-19, archived from the original on 2010-08-13, retrieved 2010-08-13 35. ^ H-1B Visa, Workpermit.com, archived from the original on 2010-08-13, retrieved 2010-08-13 36. ^ "Important Foreign Labor Certification H-1B Information". 37. ^ "Labor Condition Application for H-1B Nonimmigrants". United States Department of Labor. 1997-Nov-30. Archived from the original on 2012-Aug-23. 38. ^ "Labor Condition Application for Nonimmigrant Workers, Form ETA 9035". United States Department of Labor. 2008-Nov-30. Archived from the original on 2012-Aug-23. 39. ^ "Labor Condition Application for Nonimmigrant Workers ETA Form 9035 & 9035E". United States Department of Labor. Archived from the original on 2012-Aug-23. 40. ^ "Labor Condition Application for H-1B Nonimmigrants". United States Department of Labor. 41. ^ "Nonimmigrant-Based Employment". 27 Jun 2012. 42. ^ http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2018709561_h1b18.html 43. ^ H-1B Is Just Another Gov't. Subsidy 44. ^ ON THE NEED FOR REFORM OF THE H-1B NON-IMMIGRANT WORK VISA IN COMPUTER-RELATED OCCUPATIONS 45. ^ GAO Report on H-1B Foreign Workers 46. ^ a b Wall Street Journal, March, 2007 47. ^ S.1092: Hi-Tech Worker Relief Act of 2007. United States Congress via American Immigration Lawyers Association. 48. ^ S.1092: Hi-Tech Worker Relief Act of 2007. Thomas.gov. United States Library of Congress. Retrieved 2008-06-12. 49. ^ John Miano (June 2008). "H-1B Visa Numbers: No Relationship to Economic Need". Center for Immigration Studies. Retrieved 04/07/2010. 50. ^ Numbers USA (2010). "There Is No Tech Worker Shortage". Numbers USA. Retrieved 04/07/2010. 51. ^ a b "H-1B Visa Harm Report". Hire Americans First. 2010. Retrieved 04/07/2010. 52. ^ STEM education in the USA 53. ^ Low Salaries for Low Skills: Wages and Skill Levels for H-1B Computer Workers, 2005 John M. Miano 54. ^ The Bottom of the Pay Scale: Wages for H-1B Computer Programmers John M. Miano 55. ^ Programmers Guild (2001). "How to Underpay H-1B Workers". Programmers Guild. Retrieved 04/02/2010. 56. ^ NumbersUSA (2010). "Numbers USA". NumbersUSA. Retrieved 04/02/2010. 57. ^ "H-1B Visa Ban for Bailed-out US Firms is Irrational: Montek". Outlook. February 18, 2009. Retrieved 04/02/2010. 58. ^ Ron Hira (Jan 12, 2008). "No, The Tech Skills Shortage Doesn't Exist". Information Week. Retrieved 04/02/2010. 59. ^ a b B. Lindsay Lowell, Georgetown University (October 2007). "Into the Eye of the Storm: Assessing the Evidence on Science and Engineering, Education, Quality, and Workforce Demand". The Urban Institute. Retrieved 04/02/2010. 60. ^ http://www.nber.org/papers/w12085 61. ^ "H-1B Prevailing Wage Enforcement On The Rise – Millions In Back Wages And Fines Ordered", millerjohnson.com. 62. ^ United States General Accounting Office, H-1B Foreign Workers: Better Controls Needed to Help Employers and Protect Workers 63. ^ 8 USC 1182 (n) 64. ^ DOL Foreign Labor Certification Online Wage Library 65. ^ Alice LaPlante (July 14, 2007). "To H-1B Or Not To H-1B?". InformationWeek. Retrieved 04/02/2010. 66. ^ Sun Accused of Worker Discrimination, San Francisco chronicle, June 25, 2002, online text 67. ^ Santiglia v. Sun Microsystems, Inc., ARB No. 03-076, ALJ No. 2003-LCA-2 (ARB July 29, 2005) 68. ^ Grow, Brian (June 6, 2003). "Skilled Workers – or Indentured Servants?". BusinessWeek. 69. ^ "Foreign tech workers touchy subject in U.S. downturn". Reuters. February 19, 2009. 70. ^ US Department of State visa bulletin 71. ^ http://web.archive.org/web/20110108195825/http://durbin.senate.gov/showRelease.cfm?releaseId=280890 72. ^ http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9142152/List_of_H_1B_visa_employers_for_2009 73. ^ Yeoh et al., 'State/Nation/trasnation: Perspectives on Transnationalism in the Asia-Pacific', Routledge, 2004, ISBN 0-415-40279-X, page 167 74. ^ '25% H-1B visas still left!', Times of India, 2009 Oct 2. 75. ^ Social Security Administration: International Agreements 76. ^ http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Resources/Reports/uscis-annual-report-2008.pdf 77. ^ Roy Mark (13 Feb 2009). "Feds Bust Nationwide H-1B Visa Scam". eWeek. Retrieved 04/07/2010. 78. ^ Mexican and Canadian NAFTA Professional Worker 79. ^ U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Characteristics of H-1B Specialty Occupation Workers Report for Fiscal Year 2009 80. ^ U.S. State Department Statistics 81. ^ FY2004-2008 82. ^ FY2006 table16A 83. ^ FY2006 table16B 84. ^ FY2007 table16A 85. ^ FY2007 table16B 86. ^ FY2008 table16A 87. ^ FY2008 table16B 88. ^ FY2009 table16A 89. ^ FY2009 table16B 90. ^ FY2010 table16A 91. ^ FY2010 table16B 92. ^ a b Marianne Kolbasuk McGee (May 17, 2007). "Who Gets H-1B Visas? Check Out This List". InformationWeek. Retrieved 06/02/2007. 93. ^ a b Peter Elstrom (June 7, 2007). "Immigration: Google Makes Its Case". BusinessWeek. Retrieved 04/02/2010. 94. ^ Jacob Sapochnick, Patrick Thibodeau (2009). "List of H-1B visa employers for 2009". ComputerWorld, BusinessWeek. Retrieved 04/07/2010. 95. ^ a b Peter Elstrom (June 7, 2007). "Immigration: Who Gets Temp Work Visas?". BusinessWeek. Retrieved 04/02/2010. 96. ^ ComputerWorld, USCIS 97. ^ "Cognizant Technology Solutions : Contacts". Retrieved 2007-07-05.

References

1. United States Citizenship and Immigration Service, "Characteristics of Specialty Occupation Workers (H-1B)", for FY 2004 and FY 2005, November 2006. 2. "Microsoft Cuts 5,000 Jobs as Recession Curbs Growth (Update5)", Bloomberg, 22 Jan 2009 (Microsoft Lays off 5,000 even as they use 3,117 visas in 2006.) 3. Bill Gates, Chairman of Microsoft, Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearing "Strengthening American Competitiveness for the 21st Century". March 7, 2007 4. Business Week, Immigration: Google Makes Its Case, 7 Jun 2007. 5. Business Week, Who Gets Temp Work Visas? 7 Jun 2007 (Top 200 H-1B Visa Users Chart) 6. Business Week, Immigration Fight: Tech vs. Tech, 25 May 2007. 7. Business Week, Crackdown on Indian Outsourcing Firms, 15 May 2007. 8. Dr. Norman Matloff, Debunking the Myth of a Desperate Software Labor Shortage, Testimony to the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, April 1998, updated December 2002 9. Programmers Guild, PERM Fake Job Ads defraud Americans to secure green cards, Immigration attorneys from Cohen & Grigsby explains how they assist employers in running classified ads with the goal of NOT finding any qualified applicants. 10. Lou Dobbs: Cook County Resolution against H-1b 11. PRWeb, The Programmers Guild Calls on Congress to include U.S. Worker Protections in the Pending SKIL Bill H-1b Visa Legislation 12. CNN, Lou Dobbs, Programmers Guild Interview & Transcript, August 26, 2005 13. Congressional Record: ILLEGAL ALIENS TAKING AMERICAN JOBS, June 18, 2003 (House) 14. Center for Immigration Studies, Backgrounder: The bottom of the pay scale, Wages for H-1B Computer Programmer's, John Milano, 2005. 15. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), Report, EXPORT CONTROLS: Department of Commerce Controls over Transfers of Technology to Foreign Nationals Need Improvement 16. Attestation Requirements of an H-1B Dependent Employer

External links for H-1B information

• U.S. Department of State information on H-1B visa • U.S. GAO Report on H-1B Problems, PDF format • 2010 H-1B Visa Reports: Top H-1B Visa Sponsors by Industry, Occupation, Economic Sector and Locations • H-1B Quota Updates from USCIS

Other links

• Pittsburgh law firm's immigration video sparks an Internet firestorm, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, June 22, 2007 • "Lawmakers Request Investigation Into YouTube Video" Sen. Chuck Grassley and Rep. Lamar Smith ask the Labor Department to look into a video they say documents H-1B abuse by companies. Information Week, June 21, 2007 • H1B Visa Description, Advantages & Requirements • Oct. 2007 study by Georgetown University – The study raises questions about the use of test scores by visa-worker-seeking technology companies to claim that American citizens are not qualified. • "America's New Immigrant Entrepreneurs" – A Duke University Study
|[hide] |
|v |
|t |
|e |
|United States visas |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|A-1 |
|A-2 |
|A-3 |
|B-1 |
|B-2 |
|C-1 |
|C-2 |
|C-3 |
|E-1 |
|E-2 |
|E-3 |
|EB-1 |
|EB-2 |
|EB-3 |
|EB-4 |
|EB-5 |
|F-1 |
|F-2 |
|F-3 |
|G-1 |
|G-2 |
|G-3 |
|G-4 |
|G-5 |
|GB |
|GT |
|H-1B |
|H-1B1 |
|H-1C |
|H-2A |
|H-2B |
|H-3 |
|H-4 |
|I-1 |
|J-1 |
|J-2 |
|K-1 |
|K-2 |
|K-3 |
|K-4 |
|L-1 |
|L-2 |
|M-1 |
|M-2 |
|N-1 |
|N-2 |
|N-3 |
|N-4 |
|N-5 |
|N-6 |
|N-7 |
|O-1 |
|O-2 |
|O-3 |
|P-1 |
|P-2 |
|P-3 |
|P-4 |
|Q-1 |
|R-1 |
|R-2 |
|S-1 |
|T-1 |
|T-2 |
|T-3 |
|T-4 |
|TD |
|TN |
|V-1 |
|V-2 |
|V-3 |
|WB |
|WT |
| |

Categories: • United States visas by type • Employment of foreign-born

Navigation menu

• Create account • Log in • Article • Talk • Read • Edit • View history
Top of Form
[pic]
Bottom of Form

• Main page • Contents • Featured content • Current events • Random article • Donate to Wikipedia

Interaction

• Help • About Wikipedia • Community portal • Recent changes • Contact Wikipedia

Toolbox

Print/export

Languages

• Deutsch • ગુજરાતી • हिन्दी • ಕನ್ನಡ • தமிழ் • తెలుగు • 中文 • Edit links • This page was last modified on 27 March 2013 at 18:46. • Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. • Contact us • Privacy policy • About Wikipedia • Disclaimers • Mobile view • [pic] • [pic]