I, Abigail Dennis write this opinion to support the majority opinion on the case of Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier.
In the case of Hazelwood vs Kulmeier the major opinion which is the primary ruling in the case held the censorship stating that it did not violate the student rights based on the first Amendment. In this case my opinion reflect the majority opinion due to the fact that I believe the principal acted reasonable based on the safeness and fairness of both the school and the students. Even though these students are consider minors they do share the same rights as adults but only to a certain extent. Base on the judge statement some may believe that the school’s newspaper isn’t a form of public expression. The principal of school has the right by law to monitor was posted in the newspaper since the newspaper is a part of the school curriculum. Based on the laws that were made and the rights of this case I choose the…show more content… v. the State of Florida the majority opinion ruled that it was unconstitutional of curfew ordinance. In this case I favor the minority opinion due to the fact that I believe that the law in this case is constitutional rather than unconstitutional. The minority judge believe that even though the law may since to be flawed the entire law shouldn’t written off as unconstitutional. The justices of the court started a debate on the rights and responsibilities of minors and their parents or guardian. Some justices of the court continue to argue that minor do not share the same rights as an adult due to the fact that their still under their parent or guardian supervision. In this case I tended to choose the loose interpretation of the constitution because the law did not exactly forbid anything. In a sense the state the right whether or not to impose laws based on the safety of the public. When the constitution was written it didn’t specific that minors have limited rights as opposed to the rights of an
