I, Janet, write this opinion to support the majority opinion on the case of Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier. My views are similar to the majority opinion on the case of Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, because I believe that the censoring of the newspaper pages did not go against the students’ rights. Under the First Amendment, the majority concluded that the principle acted properly since rights of other students were going to be violated in the articles. Additionally, the majority opinion did not think that the Tinker standard applied to Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, since in the Tinker case the personal expression in question was by students’ in person rather than through a school newspaper. The not so popular opinion, in regards to applying the Tinker standard