The challenges which are met in today’s healthcare are vast. It would seem that there are obvious reasons for the incorporation of health informatics to justify apparent flaws in the government programs such as Medicaid, TRICARE and Federal Employees Health Benefits Program are three legislative policies which impede its progress. With most disciplines there exists certain parameters which provide the basic focus for which the disciplines fashion themselves around. In all there are seven elements in the public health sector; http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/su6103a5.htm, and in this scope exist, planning and systems design, data collection, data management and collation analysis, interpretation, dissemination, and finally the application to public health programs. Like most new technologies; robust changes to processes can be delivered, but are met with opposition. Health information technology can defeat a lot of the lethargic processes comprised in healthcare management, but arguably by some as the use of terms such as unintended consequences can slow growth to the field and prospects of health information exchange http://www.amia.org/amia2012/panels. It is believed that while the Electronic Health Record would be composed and stored within secured database systems that there is huge risk which exist; patient privacy, as mandated by the Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA).
The opposition that some have towards health informatics are that we do not know how to regulate the content and the management of the same. Impediments include laws and regulations that preserve different data collection and sharing rules, privacy and security concerns, and academic and economic disincentives to sharing and collaboration http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/su6103a5.htm. The questions are where do we end and begin with whom,