Free Essay

Henry Kissinger

In:

Submitted By adeeshekar
Words 1771
Pages 8
Henry Kissinger

Adee L. Shekar

Nova Southeastern University

Henry Kissinger

The year 1923 was not a fortunate time to be born in Eastern Europe into a middle-class Jewish family. Adolf Hitler was busy launching propaganda campaigns and Nazism was quickly on the rise. It was on May 27 when Heinz Alfred Kissinger was born in a small town in Bavaria, Germany. Although the country had been previously known for being more accepting of religious minority groups, the Bavarian Jew, like many other German Jews, were beginning to feel the ostracizing affects of Hitler’s campaign. By the time Heinz was ten years old, Adolf Hitler was in power. Two years later, the Nuremberg Laws were put into effect. In addition to denying the Jewish people citizen, the laws did not allow them to marry gentiles and they could not hold teaching jobs in state-run schools. This was a significant blow for the Kissinger family; Heinz’s father, Louis, was a respected schoolmaster in the city of Furth. Now out of a job and faced with an increasing number of hardships, the Kissinger family left their native country of Germany in 1938 and made their way to the United States. It was during this move that Heinz became known as Henry.

The Kissinger family’s move to Manhattan, New York allowed Henry to thrive and flourish in a society that, although not totally free from prejudices, was based upon the ideas of equal opportunity and freedom. Because he worked at a shaving-brush factory during the day, Henry attended high school at night. Despite English being his second language, the young, ambitious Kissinger became a straight A student. After completing high school, Henry enlisted in and spent four years in the United States Army. During this time, he worked in the Counter-Intelligence Corps and gained valuable experience in a field that would eventually become part of his career.

In the fall of 1947, Henry entered Harvard University as a sophomore philosophy major. Soon after, he moved his major into the Government Department and it was there that he began to make Harvard history. In a surprisingly optimistic and mature 353 page senior thesis, Kissinger wrote about the significance of individual choice and the circumstances in which were sometimes beyond one’s control. He graduated summa cum laude from Harvard in 1950 and he enrolled in the university’s Ph.D program in the Government Department under the guidance of William Yandel Elliot, a Rhodes Scholar and distinguished Harvard professor. Being mentored by such an influential academic was invaluable to Kissinger’s future. During his graduate studies, Henry directed the Harvard International Seminar, a program which received funding from the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations as well as the CIA. The experiences were not only about building contacts with prominent figured and future leaders; Henry was able to set himself apart because of his superb academic quality and his incredible drive and ambition. He graduated with a Ph.D in May of 1954. Within ten years of first entering Harvard University as an undergraduate, Henry Kissinger published two books, which eventually secured him an appointment at Harvard’s International Affairs Department. These accomplishments were nothing short of remarkable considering just a few short years before receiving his doctorate, Henry was working in a shaving brush factory and going to school in the evenings.

The late 1950s and 1960s proved that Henry Kissinger’s career in U.S. foreign policy was on a fast track. He became a tenured professor at Harvard with a national reputation. He was published frequently in such journals as Foreign Affairs, The Reporter, and occasionally in the New York Times. Although not a politician, Kissinger used his connections at Harvard and his growing reputation to form influential relationships with both Democrats and Republicans alike, including New York governor Nelson Rockefeller and former vice president Richard Nixon.

In 1968, Kissinger became the national security adviser to newly elected president Richard Nixon. He kept this post until 1975. From 1973 to 1975, he was the only person to ever hold the positions of secretary of state and national security adviser concurrently. During his time in the White House, the dynamic duo of Kissinger and Nixon worked together to accomplish many important historical events: the eventually ending of the U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, the détente with the Soviet Union that resulted in the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks agreement, the establishment of diplomatic relations with the Peoples Republic of China, and the stability efforts in the Middle East following the 1973 Yom Kippur War.

Without a doubt, Kissinger was instrumental in ending the U.S. involvement in Vietnam. It was also the capstone of his diplomacy and it earned him wide acclaim. The December 1972 issue of Time magazine named Kissinger and Nixon “Men of the Year” titles and a Gallup Poll from 1973 rated Henry as the most admired man in America. Because of the Vietnam War settlement in which he played a big part, Kissinger was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. The prize money was accepted but all funds were donated to a scholarship fund for children of military personnel killed in the Vietnam War. Sadly, the peace accords fell apart soon after President Nixon’s Watergate Scandal began to chip away at his presidency. It only took a few months after Nixon’s resignation for Communism to fully envelop Vietnam again. Even after the 1974 resignation of President Nixon, Kissinger retained his position and the influence over foreign affairs that came along with it. He left office in 1977 when the Ford administration came to an end.

Although criticized for his role in certain U.S. foreign policy situations, some which resulted in indictments, Kissinger has continued to hold prestigious positions in numerous organizations and departments. Since leaving office, he has undoubtedly become one of the most respected and well known elder statesmen in the United States. Recognized by many people as an expert on foreign policy, Kissinger has kept active in the political arena by serving as a presidential adviser, commentator, consultant, and an engaging speaker on international affairs issues. After leaving his government positions, he founded and chaired his own international consulting firm named Kissinger Associates. More recently, he was reported as meeting frequently with former President George W. Bush about the Iraq War and the resulting insurgencies. In 2002, he was appointed by the president to lead an independent investigative panel that would identify possible U.S. intelligence failures prior to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Kissinger accepted but resigned only one month later.

Henry Kissinger was quoted as saying “a leader does not deserve the name unless he is willing occasionally to stand alone”. What does this say about Kissinger’s leadership style? Based upon his early childhood history, nothing came easy to Henry. His rise to the pinnacle of power was not possible without a remarkable hunger for success and perseverance. To start off as a German refugee and to attain positions of such magnitude and importance was unthinkable to anyone that came before Henry Kissinger. It would have also been impossible for him had his family not made the decision to leave Nazi Germany. The choice turned out to be a very wise one as it was later found out that thirteen of Kissinger’s relatives died in the Holocaust death camps. There is no doubt that the leadership qualities he possessed we learned over many years. In fact, Henry was quoted by author and writer of his biography, Walter Issacson, as saying “Living as a Jew under the Nazis, then as a refugee in America, and then as a private in the army, isn’t exactly an experience that builds confidence” (Issacson, 1996). As behavioral theories suggest, leaders are not born; they are made through the process of learning, observation, and teaching. Kissinger took advantage of the opportunities that were presented to him and as a result, he will always have a place in American history. The former managing director of Kissinger’s firm, David Rothkopf, described him as “…one of the most complex characters in recent American history, and he is someone who has, I think, justifiably been in the spotlight both for extraordinary brilliance and competence and at the same time clear defects” (Stolberg, January 2007). Despite being vilified for his involvement in sensitive foreign affairs policies during the Nixon administration, Kissinger was the recipient of numerous awards, including the Nobel Peace Prize, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, and the Medal of Liberty, which was given to ten of America’s most important foreign-born leaders.

Kissinger was a very powerful man and at the end of his career, a well-known leader. He was quoted in an interview as saying, “power is the ultimate aphrodisiac”. Some say he was more powerful than the presidents he worked under in the White House. He was also one of the few government officials, during his time, that understood the media and the importance of public popularity, and he played the media accordingly. At the same time he did not care about the public’s opinion of his politics. His intelligence and style was as a global strategist who used international diplomacy as a grand game to keep a balance between the world’s superpowers and at the same time, keep the United States on top of the superpower heap. Regardless of whether or not Kissinger was vilified or at the same time loved by the public, there is one undeniable fact: he is one of the most brilliant statesmen this country has seen in American history and foreign policy.

References

Chambers II, J.W. (2000). “Paris Peace Agreement”. The Oxford Companion to American Military History. Retrieved November 15, 2011 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O126-ParisPeaceAgreement.html

Hanhimako, J. (2004). The flawed architect: Henry Kissinger and American foreign policy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.

Hersh, S. (1983). The price of Power: Kissinger in the Nixon white house. New York: Summit, 1983.

Isaacson, W. Kissinger. A Biography. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996.

Kissinger, Henry A. (2011). In Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved from http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/319464/Henry-A-Kissinger
Kissinger, Henry. (2005). In Germany and the Americas: Culture, Politics, and History. Retrieved from http://ezproxylocal.library.nova.edu/login?qurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.credoreference.com/entry/abcgeamrle/kissinger_henry
Kissinger, Henry. (2003). In Conspiracy Theories in American History. Retrieved from http://ezproxylocal.library.nova.edu/login?qurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.credoreference.com/entry/abcconspir/kissinger_henry
Stolberg, S. (2007, January 2). Kissinger’s appearance revives memories of Vietnam era. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Book Review "World Order"

...Henry Kissinger’s World Order asks, if today’s leaders can rise above their own definition of world “order”, to achieve peace and global stability. Especially when the “balance of power” is constantly threatened by anarchy and chaos. The reason Kissinger, makes this his core enquiry, is because it addresses a challenge that the human race faces today, one that it might fear the most- a total global chaos. Kissinger uses conflict between different nations as the premise to his argument. He does so by looking at the historical experience of different civilizations, even going back to the Dark Ages, as suggested by the subheading of the book. The author begins by defining World Order as “an inexorably expanding cooperative order of states observing common rules and norms, embracing liberal economic systems, forswearing territorial conquest, respecting national sovereignty and adopting participatory and democratic systems of governance”. But in the introduction, the author also lets us know that “No truly global 'world power' has ever existed”. And what is considered to be the 21st century world order, is just a treaty which was devised in western Europe, without taking into consideration, the other countries and civilisations. Towards the end, Kissinger remarks that the leitmotif of our age is science and technology. With countries making huge advances in technology, they consider the security dilemma, before looking at the zero (sum) game analysis. Technology could thus prove...

Words: 1336 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

The Quest for Utopia

...Brett Stewart The Quest for Utopia An individual’s quest for utopia can also be described as searching for an ideal. In the search for an ideal we look for our desire and perfection in life. The quest for utopia is examined through literature to find out what the ideal is and how it’s obtained or lost. The characters analyzed in this essay strive for perfection, success, and vengeance through their obstacles. The quest for the ideal is important because it shapes imagination, creativity, and lifestyle. Henry A. Kissinger explains where an ideal can be found, when he concludes, “For other nations, utopia is a blessed past never to be recovered; for [some people] it is just beyond the horizon.” Kissinger describes that for some, their ideal is in the past and others it’s in the future. The three pieces of literature examined in this essay are analyzed through Kissinger’s theory. In literature the quest for the ideal can often result in the pursuer’s death, this is shown in “The Great Gatsby,” “Sailing to Byzantium,” and “Hamlet.” Gatsby’s ambition to turn back time and fall in love with Daisy again, ultimately leads him to his downfall. Gatsby wanted to turn time back because Daisy and him were once deeply in love, however after Gatsby left for war she was doubtful he would return. Daisy found a more secure relationship with Tom Buchanan and Gatsby’s new ideal was to fulfill the American Dream and win Daisy over. However the American Dream has no room for love and...

Words: 952 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Effecr of Broken Family to Students

...Analogy Examples Understanding the meaning of an analogy is key to the success of the analogy in communication. Some analogies will be understood by most people that speak the same language. Within small social groups of people, there are often shared analogies that bind the group together. Other analogies are only understood by people living in a certain region or country. Common Analogies and Their Meanings Analogy examples with corresponding meanings are the best way to show the meaning of the word “analogy.” The following is a list of some common analogies and an explanation of their meaning. * The relationship between them began to thaw. This means that the relationship was changing.   * You are as annoying as nails on a chalkboard. You must be pretty annoying for someone to say that. * I am going to be toast when I get home. This is usually said when someone is in trouble with their significant other.   * He is like a rock. This means he is steadfast and strong. * She attended the celebrity roast. The person being roasted is being honored by people making harmless jokes about him or her. * I feel like a fish out of water. This implies that you are not comfortable in your surroundings. * She was offended when I said she was as flaky as a snowstorm. That isn’t a very nice comparison to make. * There are plenty of fish in the sea. Unless you really are a fish, this encourages you to move on and find another potential mate. * She was...

Words: 576 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Essay I

...Lesson 13 Essay I The years that stretched from the election of Richard Nixon in 1968 to the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980 saw the problems of the 1960s come back to haunt the nation. In Vietnam, despite Nixon's efforts to conclude a "peace with honor," the American involvement ended with the victory of the North Vietnamese and a defeat for the United States. The moral authority of the powerful presidency that developed under Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson eroded as a result of Nixon's Watergate scandal. In an effort to avoid similar mistakes, the voters turned out Nixon's successor, Gerald Ford, in 1976 and elected a political newcomer, Jimmy Carter, of Georgia. In spite of their personal decency and hard work, neither Gerald Ford nor Jimmy Carter proved to be strong, effective presidents who could meet the challenges of the 1970s. Ford was the 38th President of the United States, and the only one to have served as both President and Vice President without being elected by the Electoral College. As President, Ford signed the Helsinki Accords, marking a move toward détente in the Cold War. With the invasion of South Vietnam by the communist north nine months into his presidency, U.S. involvement in Vietnam essentially ended. Domestically, Ford presided over arguably the weakest economy since the Great Depression, with growing inflation and a recession during his tenure. One of his more controversial acts was to grant a presidential pardon to President Richard Nixon...

Words: 1518 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

His/135 Final

...Most Significant Events Casey Turner HIS/135 11/20/2011 I am writing this paper to reveal and describe different events that have occured over the past 50 years that have had a direct impact on the United States and affected the way we all live today. There are many economical, social, and political events that have helped shaped not only our country, but many other nations around the world as well. This paper is an attempt to reveal and speculate on some of these important events. 1950’s A growing amount of American people began to speak out about inequality and injustice during the 1950’s and the Rosa Parks bus incident is a perfect example. On December 1, 1955, a 42 year old African American woman who worked as a seamstress named Rosa Parks boarded a Montgomery, Alabama city bus to go home from work. On that bus that day, Rosa Parks started a new era in the American quest for equal rights (Rosa Parks Bus, 2002). Parks sat toward the middle of the bus, right behind the 10 seats that were reserved for white people. The bus ended up getting completely filled up and when a white man that entered the bus did not have a seat, the driver tried to make the four blacks sitting just behind the white section give up their seats so that the white man could sit down. Mrs. Park’s who was already a NAACP activist, quietly refused to do so. For disobeying the bus driver’s orders and not giving up her seat to the white man, she was arrested and convicted of violating segregation...

Words: 1910 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Sleketal System

...make an agreement that would benefit both. His plan was to put China against the Soviet Union and the Soviet Union against China and finally both against North Vietnam. In 1971 Nixon announced his plans of visiting China when Mao Zedong invited an American tennis team to china for some e \xhibition matches. However it wasn’t till February 1972 when Richard Nixon went to China his visit caused a lot of unexpected reactions. This was the first step but very shocking n decisive one for U.S and China new relationship. In January 1973 Nixon ordered a ceasefire of aerial bombings in North Vietnam. A ceasfire is when both countries come into an agreeement were they both accept to stop any agressive actions.The final decision came when Henry Kissinger...

Words: 401 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Watergate Scandal

...It was suggested that the President had tried to repair the damages that were caused the Watergate scandal in the first article. From a speech President Nixon had given, it showed that there were a lot things that still needed to be done regarding the scandal. The article stated that the officials under the Watergate scandal were cheating, lying and engaging in illegal activities while in high positions of the government. The people believed that the president did not stand up to the crisis and that he had only done the bare requirements for the situation at hand. The people stongly believed that President Nixon should have done something more to eliminate the Watergate scandal as soon as it was leaked. The article had also showed that the people were not happy with President Nixon’s actions by only accepting the resignations of H.R. Haldeman and John Ehrlichman, (Genovese, 1999). He had also accepted the resignation of Attorney General Kleindienst and appointed Elliot Richardson and instructed him to handle the crisis. Finally, the President had made the correct decision by dismissing his White House Counsel John Dean. The second article portrays President Nixon as a good, moral leader. It tried to defend the President from being impeached by acknowledging his achievements. The article also showed that he was human and not perfect. The actions of the President by trying to resolve the crisis, led to speculations by the Chicago Tribune's editorial to leave office...

Words: 780 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

My Lai Massacre Research Paper

...In Scandals in Past and Contemporary Politics, edited by political scientist James Newell and historian John Garrard, a political scandal is defined as “a departure or lapse from the normative standards that guide behavior in public office.” A distinction is also made between substantive and procedural scandals. A substantive scandal involves a single, initial scandal, while a procedural scandal involves a cover up which becomes more controversial than the original scandal (Newell and Garrard 78). The My Lai Massacre was most certainly a departure from normative standards, and involved elements of both substantive and procedural scandals. The massacre, which involved the ruthless slaughter of hundreds of Vietnamese civilians, lowered public trust in government and the military, but otherwise, had limited political effects. The My Lai Massacre took place on March 16, 1968 during the Vietnam War ("My Lai murders" 70). Prior to the scandal, Former President Lyndon B. Johnson’s escalation of involvement in the Vietnam War in 1963 was marked with limited success as shown during the Tet Offensive, an aggressive push by the Viet Cong, which began in early 1968. The Tet Offensive was technically a failure for the North Vietnamese forces, but showed their unwillingness to surrender (Wilberding 28). Concurrently, public opposition to the war was brewing, and the morale and confidence of American soldiers were at an all time low (Wilberding 30). The My Lai Massacre took place in My Lai,...

Words: 1676 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Watergate Scandal Research Paper

...gone and his efforts gave many advantages to minorities and women. With New Federalism, Nixon fought heavily to preserve presidency position during Watergate scandal. Kissinger was the former state secretary and also national security adviser, he was appointed by Richard Nixon. According to Kissinger, America was in the period of a painful adjustment to profound global politics transformation, any amoral foreign policy made by Kissinger can be opposed by neocons political movement. Unfortunately, Nixon and Kissinger had achieved less successful in the accommodating to present ideas regarding human rights. Liberals like Massachusetts and new group such as Amnesty International had joined the political movement neocons in calling Ford and Nixon administration to the foreground human rights in concern of the American foreign policy. In 1973 to 1975, Congress enacted the series of laws which banned aid being dispersed to some specific countries which had human rights violators and also accepting the State Department to give reports about human rights in the countries getting American aid. The concept’s significance can be estimated by the fact, Kissinger utilized the words “human rights” 5.5 percent in his public statements on 1974, 13.5 percent in the year 1975 and 39.6 percent in the year 1976. Nonetheless, Kissinger came under the constant criticism from former Governor Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Carter, who is Democratic presidential candidate in 1976. Everything can be recounted in...

Words: 629 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Role Of Watergate In The 1970's

...Watergate is widely believed to be the largest political scandal that the United States has seen. This scandal turned heads with the extensive association with the then United States President Richard Nixon, and many of his administration that aided in the execution and cover up of the events. The Watergate scandal of the 1970’s proved to be one of the most significant political scandal in history which included lies, breaking and entering, cover-ups and the first ever resignation of a United States President from office. The Watergate scandal events originated in 1969, with the composition of President Nixon’s enemies list. The list had a collection of names of opponents and potential opponents that have the possibility of causing trouble...

Words: 385 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

The Most Significant Events

...The Most Significant Events Mary Wright University of Phoenix The American Experience Since 1945 HIS/135 Gladys Vint 11/20/2011 Following World War II there have been many social, economic, and political events that have taken place during this decade. Different people may have various opinions of what event had the most impact or effect on the American people than other events within the same decade. I will attempt to explain the events that I believe are the most significant events of this era. 1950’s Civil Rights Movement The Civil Rights Movement began in the late 1940’s and extended throughout the late 60’s. Many people can recall some of the key events that took place during this time. For example, we all remember reading about Ruby Bridges, Martin Luther King Jr, Rosa Parks, and Malcolm X, and many others that played an important role in the Civil Rights movement. However, Ruby Bridges is the small 6 year old little girl that comes to mind when I think of the beginning of the Civil Rights movement. This young brave little girl was escorted on her first day to school by U.S. Marshalls, as her parents stood close by. She endured being called names and threatened and feared being poisoned if she ate anything besides a packaged bag of potato chips (Davidson, Gienapp, Heymann, Lytle & Stoff, 2006). Ruby was the only students for several weeks until white students finally began coming back to school during the first year since the segregation of the...

Words: 1979 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Watergate

...Sandra Johnson HIST101 25 January 2015 Watergate: The Stain in American History About 40 years ago on August 8, 1974, five men dressed in suits were arrest for breaking into the Democratic National Committee (DNC) Offices in the Watergate Hotel. They were charged with burglary and attempting to wire the DNC offices. This event in history would later be known as "Watergate." After a string of other scandals connected to this robbery took place, President Richard Nixon chose to resign his presidency. During this time, President Nixon maintained his innocence. After reading the two articles in the assignment, I believe American development mixed emotions about the event that took place after the Watergate incident. After reading the Washington Post Editorial,"Watergate: The Unfinished Business", it leads me to believe that President Nixon had some part in the incident that took place. This article totally supports my opinion. The article points out how President's Nixon top officials resigned to aid in the cover-up of his involvement of the Watergate crime and the official could have possibly been forces to resign. My conclusion was different after reading the Harvard Crimson article,"In the Defense of Richard Nixon." This letter was sent to the Chicago Tribune by the Special Assistant to the President after the paper called for President Nixon's resignation. This letter presents a more human side to the President. This letter supports the actions of President...

Words: 549 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Watergate Scandal Summary

...Out of the events in American History that have occurred throughout the period, one of the ones that interests me the most is the Watergate Scandal. With that in mind, the book I chose to read is called Watergate: The Corruption of American Politics and the Fall of Richard Nixon by Fred Emery. Although I had a basic knowledge of the scandal, I learned much by reading this book including those behind it and the coverup itself, in greater detail than I had known before. The book starts off by giving some background information including events that were transpiring during the Nixon administration. Many of these consist with Nixon’s handling of Vietnam and other events such as the Kent State Shootings and then the Pentagon Papers. Through this way, the author introduces the men that were in Nixon’s cabinet and those involved with his administration. Among these men are such familiar names like Bob Haldeman and John Ehrlichman would play large roles in the Watergate Scandal. Emery also then talks about the Committee to re-elect the President or CRP, which then introduces figures like Jeb Magruder, Gordon Liddy, and John Mitchell. After a majority if the players are introduced, the book then goes into the reasonings behind Watergate and Nixon’s paranoid desire to dig up information on those he considered to be on his “enemies list.” This in turn, led to the first break into the office of psychiatrist Daniel Fielding. The office was broken into to get personal and damaging information...

Words: 1496 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Taft Stuck Stuck In The Tub Analysis

...Taft Stuck in the Tub It has been passed around for years, the story of Taft stuck in a tub. The story goes, that William Howard Taft once found himself stuck in a bathtub. It is also said that it took four different men to remove him. The truth behind this story is murky but the following is true. Taft was the 27th President of the United States of America. Born September 15, 1857, in Cincinnati Ohio to Louisa Maria Torrey and Alphonso Taft. And he was one of no less than six children. And he spent his school career at a private school—and went to Yale. Yale, home to the underground organization known as “Skull and Crossbones” which was created—in part by Taft’s father—was a group which he joined during his college career. Following college life he married Helen Herron Taft, from 1886 to 1930. He had three children, Robert A. Taft, Helen Taft Manning, and Charles Phelps Taft II. He later went to the University of Cincinnati Law School and worked part time as a courthouse reporter for the Cincinnati Commercial. Before eventually becoming president. He ran for the presidency as the candidate of the Republican party. And won—he was sworn in—in 1909 and served only one term. When running for his second term he lost terribly. Even though he was originally held up by T.D.R. which has been thought of as the only reason he won the first time. His V.P. was James. S. Sherman—a lesser known man. A major event that occurred under his presidency was the sinking of the unsinkable. The mighty...

Words: 450 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Nixon's Watergate Scandal

...The Watergate scandal rocked the American public to its core. During Nixon’s re-election, operatives involved with his campaign trespassed into the Democratic National Committee Headquarters at the Watergate Hotel because of his involvement in the attempted coverup Nixon was brought up on charges. Then Vice President Agnew resigned in October 1973 over charges of tax evasion and the acceptance of bribes, which resulted in Gerald Ford being appointed as the vice president. Less than a year into Ford’s Vice Presidency, Nixon resigned, leaving Ford to become the first unelected president of the United States ("Gerald Ford"). Gerald Ford accepted the presidency during a time of great mistrust towards the federal government. He recognized his audience needed reaffirmation that the government was there to serve them, that they could trust their leader, and that Ford was worthy of the presidency. His speech opened with, “I assume the Presidency under extraordinary circumstances never before experienced by Americans … I am acutely aware that you have not elected me as your President….” Here Ford acknowledged he was not an elected president. He followed that statement by pronouncing, “I have not sought this enormous responsibility, but I will not shirk it.” At this point, he established that despite not being the man America was supposed to have he planned to be the man it needed. Simultaneously, he wanted to soothe any fears of the his possible corruption. He reminded the nation he...

Words: 1005 - Pages: 5