Abstract
Within this paper, I will talk about what is the right way to solve this scenario by exhausting duty-oriented, consequence-oriented, and virtue-ethics reasoning. After all of that, I will discuss what the outcome is when individuals apply different principles of healthcare conclusions as well as how a person determines who is correct when multiple conclusions are found.
Having to Sacrifice One to Save a Dozen More
There will always be difficult conclusions that have to be made with people that work in the medical field. There will always be instances where sacrifices have to be made to save the lives of others.
Introduction
The appropriate action for this scenario is the ethical theory of utilitarianism. The main point of utilitarianism is to maximize serviceableness. When one makes a choice regarding a certain course of action, and one needs to exhaust the decision that will give the largest good for the largest amount of individuals. To do this, one can’t only think about themselves, one must think of all individuals that are involved. Every person that is injured or can prosper from this decision has to be examined so that precise evaluation of the end decision can be made.
What is the appropriate action for this scenario?
In addition, from an ethical point of view, several individuals think that all types of actions are acceptable as long as the profits are larger than costs; however, this isn’t the case at all. The main idea of utilitarianism is to locate the best decision that will augment or produce the largest net benefit once everything has been taken into consideration; there will be strictly one correct option to choose. The correct option will be the option that has the largest benefits. Within this scenario, the scout leader and his scouts, would you say it is a wiser decision to
