Free Essay

How Far Do You Agree That the Most Important Reason for Wolsey’s Fall from Power Was His Failure to Gain a Divorce for Henry Viii?

In:

Submitted By Ramshaw1
Words 918
Pages 4
The most important reason for Wolsey’s fall from power was his failure to gain a divorce for Henry VIII, how far do you agree?

Wolsey’s dismissal from Henry’s court came in September 1529, though Wolsey had a plethora of failures before, his fall his failure to get a divorce for Henry VIII proved to be the most significant. This is because Wolsey’s strength of position depended on whether he got Henry what he wanted and the divorce was the most obvious case of Wolsey’s failure to do so. For this reason, this essay will argue that the most important reason for the fall of Wolsey was his failure to get a divorce for Henry VIII.

Some argue that Wolsey’s failure was due to his alienation of common people. In his early days, Wolsey sought to ensure that common people got justice through his establishment of the Star Chamber. However, this egalitarian attitude faded during Wolsey’s later years and Wolsey’s own corruptness meant that he fell out of favour with the public. Within the area of the Church, Wolsey was guilty of absenteeism, pluralism and nepotism – appointing his illegitimate son (Thomas Wynter) to high positions in the Church. Furthermore, though his attempt to raise money for Henry’s foreign campaigns came in the form of the Amicable Grant 1525 (a heavy tax) failed, Wolsey was not dismissed on the grounds of this. From this we can see that Wolsey’s alienation from the ‘common’ people did not cause his fall, but something else. Henry did blame the Amicable Grant on Wolsey to save face, but he did not dismiss him. I would argue that the divorce caused Wolsey’s fall rather than the alienation of the people, since Henry’s needs were paramount to anything else. What’s more, Henry’s care for Wolsey as a friend was apparent, due to the fact that he only ordered Wolsey’s execution after Wolsey offended again. This evidence shows that it must have been a personal matter that was of paramount importance that led to Wolsey’s downfall because Henry really did not want to dismiss Wolsey. For these reasons we must turn back to the view that the divorce was the most important factor in causing Wolsey’s fall.

The role of factional intrigue was essential to Wolsey’s fall, however the issue of the divorce allowed factions to denounce Wolsey to Henry with increasing effectiveness leading to the fall of Wolsey. Wolsey came from a humble background, being the son of a butcher, and rose to prominence using his natural intelligence and nous. As mentioned before, Wolsey was (generally) an egalitarian - shown through his creation of proportional taxation in the subsidy and his campaign against enclosure. These factors and his low birth meant that he fell out of favour with the gentry. Furthermore, the conservative and boleynese faction were envious of how much power Wolsey wielded over Henry. This power struggle was the cause of much tension and Wolsey ruffled many feathers when he implemented the Eltham Ordinances (1526) which was aimed at reducing the number of people in the Privy Council – so Wolsey could advise Henry all the more. Though it has been argued that factional plans were sufficient to cause Wolsey’s fall, whether the divorce had been obtained or not, it is clear that the Boleynese faction and Conservatives united to oust Wolsey and the divorce was instrumental in their plan to do so. “the pressure coupled with Anne’s skilful management of her lover was enough to break the trust of almost twenty years and destroy Wolsey.” Starkey
I believe that without the divorce, factional pressure would not have been so potent, therefore the divorce is more significant than factions in causing the fall of Wolsey.

The issue of the divorce was of key importance for Henry and to marry Anne Boleyn was what he wanted the most. Wolsey’s failure to gain a divorce highlighted to Henry that he was not doing what he was employed for: doing things that ensured Henry’s wants and needs were met. Henry’s admiration of Wolsey, however, meant that smaller issues such as the Amicable Grant (1525) were noted, but did not result in dismissal. But the divorce was so much more important to Henry. Henry lusted after the young Anne Boleyn and wanted to be divorced from the middle-aged Catherine of Aragon so he could legitimately consummate his new marriage. Furthermore, Henry’s primary aim thus far was to sire a male heir so the future of the Tudor dynasty would be secured and Catherine was long barren. The issue of divorce was key to fulfil Henry’s carnal and dynastic needs and the defiance of the papacy to the divorce made England and Henry look relatively weak. For these reasons the issue of divorce was important to Henry and what was important to Henry was important for Wolsey to provide. Wolsey not delivering what Henry wanted the most was reason enough for his dismissal.

To conclude, though Wolsey made mistakes in alienating ‘common’ people with his previous failures, it was ultimately his failure to gain the divorce (not fulfilling what Henry wanted the most) that caused his fall from grace. The divorce worked to strengthen factional intrigue, allowing the Boleyn and Conservative faction to profit from this failure and denounce him reducing his influence over Henry. The fact is that without the failure to get the divorce Wolsey would have not fallen in 1529 Henry would not have dismissed him, making this the key reason for the fall of Wolsey.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Amdmc

...Year 12 Henry VIII Revision Guide 1 How to answer questions on the Tudors Section A Essays: How far do the sources agree that? Introduction:    Explain what you can learn from each source Briefly cross reference the sources Provide an argument in response to the question Main paragraphs:     State a similarity or difference between the sources – make sure you focus on ‘How Far’ Select relevant information from the sources to support this point Place this in context using your brief own knowledge Use provenance to explain this similarity/difference Conclusion:  Sum up how far the sources agree based on content and provenance Section B Essays: Do you agree with the view that? Introduction:   State your line of argument – how far do you agree with the view? State the main similarities and differences between the sources Main paragraphs:  State a reason for yes/no. Make sure you phrase this in a way that links to your line of argument and answers the question. Remember that each source will suggest a different reason for yes/no. Support this reason with evidence from the sources and your own knowledge Cross-reference between the sources Weigh up the evidence of the sources. Consider provenance for primary sources and judge secondary sources based on the evidence included and the weight given to certain evidence Link back to your line of argument     Conclusion:  Explain how your argument has been proven with reference to the sources and your own knowledge...

Words: 34668 - Pages: 139

Free Essay

The Tudors

...The Tudors: A Very Short Introduction VERY SHORT INTRODUCTIONS are for anyone wanting a stimulating and accessible way in to a new subject. They are written by experts, and have been published in more than 25 languages worldwide. The series began in 1995, and now represents a wide variety of topics in history, philosophy, religion, science, and the humanities. Over the next few years it will grow to a library of around 200 volumes- a Very Short Introduction to everything from ancient Egypt and Indian philosophy to conceptual art and cosmology. Very Short Introductions available now: ANCIENT P H I L O S O P H Y Julia Annas THE ANGLO-SAXON AGE John Blair ANIMAL RIGHTS David DeGrazia ARCHAEOLOGY Paul Bahn ARCHITECTURE Andrew Ballantyne ARISTOTLE Jonathan Barnes ART HISTORY Dana Arnold ARTTHEORY Cynthia Freeland THE HISTORYOF ASTRONOMY Michael Hoskin ATHEISM Julian Baggini AUGUSTINE HenryChadwick BARTHES Jonathan Culler THE B I B L E John Riches BRITISH POLITICS Anthony Wright BUDDHA Michael Carrithers BUDDHISM DamienKeown CAPITALISM James Fulcher THE CELTS Barry Cunliffe CHOICETHEORY Michael Allingham CHRISTIAN ART Beth Williamson CLASSICS Mary Beard and John Henderson CLAUSEWITZ Michael Howard THE COLD WAR Robert McMahon CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY Simon Critchley COSMOLOGY Peter Coles CRYPTOGRAPHY Fred Piper and Sean Murphy DADAAND SURREALISM David Hopkins DARWIN Jonathan Howard DEMOCRACY Bernard Crick DESCARTES TomSorell DRUGS Leslie Iversen TH E EARTH Martin Redfern EGYPTIAN...

Words: 34946 - Pages: 140

Free Essay

Dale Carneigi

...III CHAPTER IV CHAPTER V CHAPTER VI CHAPTER VII CHAPTER VIII CHAPTER IX CHAPTER X CHAPTER XI CHAPTER XII CHAPTER XIII CHAPTER XIV CHAPTER XV CHAPTER XVI Chapter XVIII CHAPTER XVII CHAPTER XVIII CHAPTER XIX CHAPTER XX CHAPTER XXI CHAPTER XXII CHAPTER XXIII CHAPTER XXIV CHAPTER XXV CHAPTER XXVI CHAPTER XXVII CHAPTER XXVIII CHAPTER XXIX CHAPTER XXX CHAPTER XXXI The Art of Public Speaking BY 2 The Art of Public Speaking BY J. BERG ESENWEIN AUTHOR OF "HOW TO ATTRACT AND HOLD AN AUDIENCE," "WRITING THE SHORT-STORY," "WRITING THE PHOTOPLAY," ETC., ETC., AND DALE CARNAGEY PROFESSOR OF PUBLIC SPEAKING, BALTIMORE SCHOOL OF COMMERCE AND FINANCE; INSTRUCTOR IN PUBLIC SPEAKING, Y.M.C.A. SCHOOLS, NEW YORK, BROOKLYN, BALTIMORE, AND PHILADELPHIA, AND THE NEW YORK CITY CHAPTER, AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF BANKING THE WRITER'S LIBRARY EDITED BY J. BERG ESENWEIN THE HOME CORRESPONDENCE SCHOOL SPRINGFIELD, MASS. PUBLISHERS Copyright 1915 THE HOME CORRESPONDENCE SCHOOL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED TO F. ARTHUR METCALF FELLOW-WORKER AND FRIEND Table of Contents THINGS TO THINK OF FIRST--A FOREWORD * CHAPTER I--ACQUIRING CONFIDENCE BEFORE AN AUDIENCE * CHAPTER II--THE SIN OF MONOTONY DALE CARNAGEY * CHAPTER III--EFFICIENCY THROUGH EMPHASIS AND SUBORDINATION * CHAPTER IV--EFFICIENCY THROUGH CHANGE OF PITCH * CHAPTER V--EFFICIENCY THROUGH CHANGE OF PACE * CHAPTER VI--PAUSE AND POWER * CHAPTER VII--EFFICIENCY THROUGH INFLECTION * CHAPTER VIII--CONCENTRATION IN DELIVERY * CHAPTER IX--FORCE * CHAPTER...

Words: 162622 - Pages: 651

Premium Essay

Harold Bloom

...Bloom’s Classic Critical Views W i l l ia m Sha k e Sp e a r e Bloom's Classic Critical Views alfred, lord Tennyson Benjamin Franklin The Brontës Charles Dickens edgar allan poe Geoffrey Chaucer George eliot George Gordon, lord Byron henry David Thoreau herman melville Jane austen John Donne and the metaphysical poets John milton Jonathan Swift mark Twain mary Shelley Nathaniel hawthorne Oscar Wilde percy Shelley ralph Waldo emerson robert Browning Samuel Taylor Coleridge Stephen Crane Walt Whitman William Blake William Shakespeare William Wordsworth Bloom’s Classic Critical Views W i l l ia m Sha k e Sp e a r e Edited and with an Introduction by Sterling professor of the humanities Yale University harold Bloom Bloom’s Classic Critical Views: William Shakespeare Copyright © 2010 Infobase Publishing Introduction © 2010 by Harold Bloom All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the publisher. For more information contact: Bloom’s Literary Criticism An imprint of Infobase Publishing 132 West 31st Street New York NY 10001 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data William Shakespeare / edited and with an introduction by Harold Bloom : Neil Heims, volume editor. p. cm. — (Bloom’s classic critical views) Includes bibliographical references...

Words: 239932 - Pages: 960