Prasanna K.C
HUMN210_H5WW
Meghan b Roehl
7th May 2013

One my first answer I choose the correct answer attacking the Motive. It is an obvious choice because in the sentence there is a fallacy of attacking the motive is caused by the senator in a sentence.
Second answer is Look Who's Talking (Tu Quoque) because in this sentence speaker he is unknown about the benefits of exercise.
On my third answer I choose the correct answer again here the answer is bandwagon argument because here the fallacy is committed by threat of rejection by one's peers is substituted for evidence in an argument.
On my fourth question correct answer is Straw Man here the fallacy is made upon the misinterpretation of Mr. Equalminded's idea’s or position.
My fifth answer was also correct where there was a fallacy of appeal to force. Where coercion was made by the speaker.
On my sixth answer the correct answer was begging the question where the premise is directly giving the conclusion.
My seventh answer was wrong where the correct answer was Equivocation. And since I know the correct answer now I can say that Equivocation is the fallacy committed by using words that have two meanings.
On my eighth answer I chose the correct one again which is two wrongs make it right were the fallacy is committed by connecting two wrongs ideology sentences to provide a conclusion.
My ninth answer was again correct where I chose Personal Attack (Ad Hominem) because it was committing a fallacy.
On my tenth answer I was wrong again where I chose band wagon but the correct answer was red herring. Now I know it is a red herring because the sentence is causing the fallacy that misleads or detracts from the issue. the arguments provided in your exercises and practice quiz are bad arguments because in every argument there is a fallacy occurring where the fallacy can be of different types but every