Premium Essay

Hunting In Richard Connell's The Most Dangerous Game

Submitted By
Words 630
Pages 3
Richard Connell wrote “The Most Dangerous Game” to investigate rather hunting humans is murder. Some people see hunting animals as murder, but Zaroff thinks hunting anything or anybody is the same. Rainsford thinks hunting animals is okay, but hunting humans is murder. These two hunters had completely different ideas of hunting and murdering. Rainsford did not like the fact that General Zaroff thought hunting men was right. Rainsford quotes “I cant believe you are serious General Zaroff. This is a grisly joke.” Zaroff said “Why should I not be serious? I am speaking of hunting.” Then Rainsford says “Hunting? General Zaroff what you speak of is murder.” In the story General Zaroff hunts people because he got bored of hunting animals. He liked to trick people with the channels and direct them in another direction which makes them wreck and make them swim to his island Ship Trap. …show more content…
The next day he ask them if they wanted to hunt or for irvan ( the butler) can torture them. Most pick being hunted because they have a chance, when they hunt he give the supplies and a hunting knife. They also get a three hour head start, in the story they had three days to survive and they win but in the movie they only had to survive a day. If they survived the game Zaroff gives them food and a boat to go back home. No one has ever beat Zaroff in hunting until Rainsford came along. Rainsford is an expert at hunting and Zaroff liked the fact that he would have some

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Hunting In Richard Connell's The Most Dangerous Game

...Hunting is a burning fire, it can be as tame as it is wild; but like all fires, it is easily extinguished. Like in the story, The Most Dangerous Game, the main character Rainsford is burned in the wildfires of the hunt, as he himself is hunted like the very prey he first sought after himself. Due of the experiences he was forced to endure, Rainsford may never seek the embers of his once beloved sport again. Rainsford once thought hunting was the best sport in the world, but as previously stated, his opinions swiftly changed. Rainsford went up against a fellow hunter named General Zaroff, who was almost equal in skill to himself, so good, in fact, that he began hunting a different type of game… humans. He even expresses his disgust, questioning the...

Words: 540 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Most Dangerous Game Literary Analysis

...“The Most Dangerous Game,” by Richard Connell is a short story about conflict. The two main characters are the world renowned hunter, Mr. Sanger Rainsford, and Russian Cossack General Zaroff. In the story, Rainsford is on a friend’s yacht, and while he is on the yacht he is smoking a cigar. He hears a sound that intrigues him. He is curious because it sounded like a gunshot. Curiously, he hops on the railing. While teetering on the yacht’s railing, his cigar falls out of his mouth. He tries to catch it, but it falls into the ocean and he falls off the railing. While struggling to keep afloat in the ocean, Rainsford yells at the top his lungs hoping that someone aboard the yacht will hear him and tell the captain to turn the yacht around. However,...

Words: 1500 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Conflict In Richard Connell's The Most Dangerous Game

...Most short stories have just one or two types of conflict. However, in Richard Connell’s, The Most Dangerous Game, this short story has all three types of conflict. The most common type of conflict in a story, man against man, has General Zaroff hunting Rainsford, and Rainsford fighting for his life. For man against nature, Rainsford battles through all the burdensome obstacles on and around Ship-Trap Island. The last, but not least arduous, conflict is man against himself. Rainsford struggles to keep sane while General Zaroff hunts him. The type of conflict, man against man, may be the most popular type of conflict to be in a story. General Zaroff seeks pleasure in hunting humans, and Rainsford is his prey. “Rainsford’s impulse was to hurl...

Words: 634 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Fiction Essay

...PEOPLE AREN’T WHO YOU BELIEVE THEM TO BE AN ESSAY OF COMPARISION “THE CHILD BY TIGER AND THE MOST DANGEROUS GAME RICHARD CONNELL AND THOMAS WOLFE AUTHORS BRUCE ALLMAN ENGLISH COMPOSITION AND LITERATURE When I read both these short stories , my initial thought was that these have Little in common. Wolfe’s story “Child by Tiger ‘ takes place in the early 20th Century , and so does Connell’s but the places where they are set are very different. Connell’s has an exotic locale and Wolfe’s in the backwoods of the United States Of America. Both stories contain manhunts complete with motivations for the hunts could not be more opposite . In “The Most Dangerous Game “ General Zaroff , the antagonist resorts to hunting humans for sport . He made this clear to the protagonist Rainsford when he said , “Hunting tigers ceased To interest me some years ago.” I have exhausted their possibilities. “No thrill left in tigers , no real threat , no real danger I live for danger “! “ He becomes an expert hunter and decides to hunt a more elevated quarry, one that can reason .. Humans. Hungering...

Words: 796 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Most Dangerous Game Literary Analysis

...The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell shows readers how unethical hunting is. The human condition makes a reader think very carefully about the ethics of everything not just hunting.These ethics make someone question everything that they do.In relation to the human condiion of morals and ethics “The Most Dangerous Game” is in many ways a moral taboo.Throughout the story the many literary elements help make the human condition even more evident along with the literary criticism from outside sources.The human condition is demostrated on many levels ,but all boils down to does the way things are percieved change how you view them. One of the most common literary devices in this story is conflict. The one that most reflects on ethics of...

Words: 592 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Nature In The Most Dangerous Game

...Why do humans want to kill other humans? Hunting animals for a reason to survive is fine, but hunting animals and animals to hang on your wall, isn’t ok. Rainsford, a talented hunter, is on his boat towards Ship-Trap Island. One important lesson readers can learn from Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” is nature brings you into bad situations. First of all, Sanger Rainsford fell off of the boat due to the mighty waves rocking the boat. (Connell 5) This scene shows how events develop the theme since he fell off, he had to fight the sea to make it ashore. (Connell 5) The author uses revealing actions. He shows it when Rainsford fell off of the boat. “His pipe hit a rope and was knocked from his mouth. He reached out for it. A short cry came from his lips as he realized he had reached too far and lost his balance.” (Connell 5) This example shows that not paying attention to nature's warnings makes the situation worse when Rainsford fell off the boat.In conclusion, the author uses revealing actions in the story to show readers about nature can bring you into bad situations....

Words: 517 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Fictional Essay

...Irony, Conflict and Theme in “The Most Dangerous Game” and “The Destructors” English 102 Composition and Literature Spring 2016-D15 LUO Belinda Joseph–L27213212 APA Thesis Statement and Outline “The Most Dangerous Game” and “The Destructors” Thesis Statement: Connell and Greene reveal with the use of irony, conflict and theme, mankind’s human nature, exposing man’s most primal instincts and desires through their characters. I. Irony A. The hunter becomes the hunted. 1. In a conversation about Jaguar hunting with Whitney, Rainsford exclaims, “You’re are a big game hunter, not a philosopher, who cares how a jaguar feels?" (Connell, 1924, p.1). 2. Rainsford is in the place of the prey and Zaroff has the advantage. “It was Rainsford who knew the full meaning of terror”. (Connell, 1924, p.11). 3. Roles reverse and Rainsford kills him in the end. “He had never slept in a better bed”. (Connell, 1924, p.13). B. Unexpected behavior. 4. Trevor the son of an architect becoming a gang leader. (Greene, 1954, p. 1). 5. Moral about Old misery’s money “We aren’t thieves....Nobody is going to steal anything from this house.” (Greene, 1954, p. 6). 6. Food and a blanket is taken to Old Misery “We don’t want you to starve Mr. Thomas” (Greene, 1954, p. 10). II. Conflict C. Rainsford struggle with “Man vs. Self” 7. Rainsford’s survival to stay alive. 8. Rainsford’s wits and state of mind...

Words: 1137 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Analyzing Richard Connell's 'The Most Dangerous Game'

...Yu, Bo-bae Language Arts: Cochran The Most Dangerous Game CER How is the Ending of the “The Most Dangerous Game” ironic? Richard Connell’s suspenseful short story “The Most Dangerous Game” ends with an ironic twist due to the fact that the main character, Sanger Rainsford, gets to experience the feelings of fear the huntee goes through that he thought was just instinct. After Rainsford’s first encounter with General Zaroff, he realizes that he is being hunted down and he thinks, “The Cossack was the cat; he was the mouse. Then it was that Rainsford knew the true meaning of terror” (Connell 12). Before, Rainsford did not believe that the hunted had any feelings or reason, but after he was the one being hunted for a change, he is proven wrong...

Words: 310 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Fiction Essay

...Abstract Rainsford in “The Most Dangerous Game” by Connell, 2014, and T from “The Destructors” Greene, 2014, feel the need to morally adjust their beliefs for a greater purpose. Connell and Greene, showed that when a person is faced to live with an outcome of a situation, it can shake and alter a person’s principles. The key points that the authors reveal in their work is for Rainsford; although he was in disbelief and shocked at the game General Zaroff created, he felt that he was forced to create a plan that would save him from defeat in “The Most Dangerous Game”. T on the other hand felt that Old Misery’s home should not survive in representation of defeat of the bombs that sent so many families from his town underground into the subways and that had lost so much (Greene, 2014). The influences of life and circumstances may alter a person’s belief and decisions for a greater purpose in life for themselves and others. Keywords: beliefs, morals, principles, adjustments Do individual’s moral standards and boundaries alter according to the severity of a situation or their own interpretation of a situation? Rainsford in Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” and Trevor (also known as T) in Graham Greene’s “The Destructors” are faced to question their morals. This relates to Rainsford’s act on the need for survival and T’s belief that the right thing to do for everyone is to demolish what was left from the bombs that attacked their town. Conflict Compare...

Words: 2046 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

The Vital Setting In Richard Connell's The Most Dangerous Game

...The Vital Setting For “The Most Dangerous Game” Richard Connell’s short story “The Most Dangerous Game” has an essential setting for the plot of the story. For instance, General Zaroff has no worry about his prey escaping the island because of the water surrounding the island with nowhere to swim. Without the hazardous rocks surrounding the island with also no land to be seen looking off it Zaroff would be driven to worry about his prey escaping. The water also does not allow people to leave the island because it is in the middle of nowhere. While hunting Rainsford realizes, “He was in a picture with a frame of water, and his operations, clearly, must take place within that frame” (11). The never ending water around the island ensures...

Words: 288 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Essay Comparing The Most Dangerous Game And The Interlopers

...against one another in both stories. They were guess between them ,until one or more men from the stories dies by the other,or both dies. In Richard Connell’s short story,”The Most Dangerous Game,” and Saki’s short story,” The Interlopers,” the main characters, General Zaroff and Ulrich Von Gradwitz are alike in the following ways: Both men hunted on their land,both men haunted humans, and both men had a struggle to survive and outlive the other. The main characters hunted the humans on their own land in both stories. Zaroff and Ulrich both had their own land,so they took their enemies to their land. In “The Most Dangerous Game,” Zaroff knew he owned the land ,but Rainsford, the man he hunts, never knew. Zaroff owned an island and he hunted humans including Rainsford in the island. On the other hand, in “The Intruders,” George trespases onto Ulrich’s land, while they were hunting each other....

Words: 491 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Three Characters In Shirley Jackson's 'Life Among The Savages'

...Three characters from literature have something in common and most unusual in their storybook lives. Charles, General Zaroff, and Bill and Sam have had exotic encounters that relate to one another. They all have done things that are atrocious and unusual. In Shirley Jackson’s “Life Among the Savages,” Charles is a raucous tyke who disrupts his fellow classmates. On the playground across the swing by the slide, Charles bounces a seesaw on a tyke’s head and makes her bleed. Bouncing seesaws, he was spanked like usual. Charles parents are mildly disturbed about their son. But they do not interfere at all. Charles who abuses his peers stays out of serious trouble. Charles appears evil but is not. In the future, Charles will become a...

Words: 258 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Comparing Most Dangerous Game 'And Hunters In The Snow'

...Hunter versus the Hunted Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” and Tobias Wolff’s “Hunters in the Snow” are fictional short stories that share a common theme of the hunter versus the hunted. In “The Most Dangerous Game,” Sanger Rainsford, an avid big game hunter, finds himself trapped on an unforgiving hideaway known as Ship-Trap Island. Meanwhile, in “Hunters in the Snow” a group of young men venture into the wilderness for the thrill of killing a wild animal. In both stories, the protagonists are portrayed as the hunted, as the hunters, and finally, as the victors. Rainsford has seen war, had numerous near death experiences with wild animals and continues to engage in the sport for the love of hunting. He and his shipmates are off to...

Words: 556 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Comparison and Contrast of "The Child by Tiger" and "The Most Dangerous Game"

...Rivera 1 Marcos G. Rivera Prof. Lauren Lund English 102 14 July 2013 Comparison and Contrast of “The Child by Tiger” and “The Most Dangerous Game” The short story “The Child by Tiger” by Thomas Wolfe is a about a religious, talented Negro named Dick Prosser who served in the army and is the servant of a middle class family in the south. This story takes a shocking turn when Dick goes on a killing spree throughout the town and a mob finally reaches him and kills him with no remorse. In Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game”, Sanger Rainsford falls off of a yacht that was heading towards the Amazon for a hunting trip. He swims to an island where he finds himself being the hunted by General Zaroff an aristocrat who had dominated the sport of hunting to the point that he became so bored, he purchased the island to specifically hunt men. None of these men survived his game. That is until Rainsford has no choice but to also participate in this game. At some point of each story, the animalistic act of man hunting man is witnessed. In “The Child by Tiger” Wolfe demonstrates that no matter how strong a person may be mentally, a human will sooner or later have a breaking point. The author in this story may also be trying to make the reader understand how society or environment a person is surrounded by may sometimes lead an individual to commit such horrendous acts of violence. Dick Prosser is seen as a gentle person who suddenly goes through a rampage...

Words: 1102 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Most Dangerous Game Literary Analysis

...The “Most Dangerous Game” was written in 1924 by Richard Connell. In the beginning, after Rainsford falls off his ship and winds up on an ominous island, he meets the affable General Zaroff. At first, Zaroff appears to a very affable person, although Rainsford soon finds out that Zaroff is actually sadistic. To clarify, Rainsford discovers that Zaroff takes joy out of hunting humans for sport. With this in mind, Zaroff spurs on an interesting game of cat and mouse with Rainsford. Symbols, foreshadows, and allusions create suspense for the reader while reading the story. These literary devices all help move the story forward as well as keep the reader on edge. Throughout the story Connell uses symbols to keep readers interested. For example,...

Words: 992 - Pages: 4