Why do men go to war, Instead of protecting now, it is merely to win. Instead of being for a just cause, it is for a cause based on what others believe. Men no longer fight for what they think is right; instead they fight for what they think their leaders think is right. And, even in the case that they know their leaders are wrong, they must continue to fight. For if they did not, then the essence of 'men' within this 'military' would seem mote. Instead of standing strong and securing their country, they distinctly state their own morals and follow their own conscience. Putting themselves first. In this day and age, this is not acceptable. Men fight wars because they are ordered to do so. Whether right or wrong, the order is still given. And, in the end, we as the people are left to clean up, understand and learn from our leaders mistakes or victories.

There is many different reasons why wars were fought, There is a civil war in the United States of American, the main explanation for the origins of the American civil war is slavery, especially southern anger at the attempts by Northern anti-slavery into the western territories. States right and the tariff issue became entangled in the slavery issue, and were intensified by it. Other important factors were party politics, Abolitionism, Southern nationalism, Northern nationalism, expansionism, sectionalism, economics and modernization in the Antebellum Period. And some of them is because of Confederate soil, The Union was the aggressor, because they believed that a state had no right to secede from the union and that the country had to stay united. As the Confederacy gained victories in the Union forces retreated they moved closer to Union land, and that is why a few battles are on Union soil.

In prehistoric times, 'men' went to war to protect their families or units. They knew that to sacrifice themselves or their enemy was to protect their interest within their family or unit. This same premise still exists today, just in a more complex manner. In the end, the winner makes the rules, and history of the event. In the end, the loser is the one who has lost their side of the argument, at least for this time being. War in a general sense is merely a struggle to understand. It is the struggle for 'men' to say that as we can't reach an agreeable stance through conversation, we will instead reach a mandated stance through provocation. Men do not simply go to war anymore, instead we go fight the 'dogma' of war. Who really wins these wars? No one. Both sides loose heavily when fighting a war. Even as the victor takes the spoils from the losers, the toll on the victor is extreme. In the end the cause of the war is often more, forgotten in the scathing and heating provocation of the many battles that encompass a war. The only outcome of any war is death. And finally though this death the people who caused or initiated, won, or even lost the war must deal with the after effects.

As of the early 21st century, there is still have some country have to mandatory military service and conscription, is the compulsory enlistment of people in a national service most often a military service, also known as compulsory military service, standing labor, military service, etc., means that all citizens meet certain conditions, Conscription dates back to antiquity and continues in some countries to the present day under various names, the modern system of near-universal national conscription for young men dates to the French Revolution in the 1790s, where it became the basis of a very large and powerful military. Most European nations later copied the system in peacetime, so that men at a certain age would serve 1–8 years on active duty and then transfer to the reserve force. As of the early 21st century, many states no longer conscript soldiers, relying instead upon professional militaries with volunteers enlisted to meet the demand for troops. The ability to rely on such an arrangement, however, presupposes some degree of predictability with regard to both war-fighting requirements and the scope of hostilities. Many states that have abolished conscription therefore still reserve the power to resume it during wartime or times of crisis.

Taiwan and Korea IT industry developed, for the sake of the effective use of IT industry professionals, for the sake of the effective use of organs will implement “Research and development of alternative service” system. Since Singapore have been founding in 1965, it has been pursuing for the domestic implementation of permanent resident adult makes national service system, the service period ranging from 22 months to 26 months, depending on the different service units, Draftees will be randomly determined by the ministry of defence of the republic of Singapore armed forces, Singapore police force and Singapore civil defence force. As Singapore and Taiwan reached a military agreement, Singapore’s draftees will be sampled in addition to scheduled domestic service, it will also arrange to serve in Taiwan.