Individual Rights vs. Public Order
In the past, there have been historians and sociologists who believe that there is some variety between public order that emphasizes individual rights and that in turn emphasizes public order. Individual rights will exist no matter what. It’s the different governments that choose to protect them or not. Those governments that do may be considered open-minded. Those governments that don’t may be considered oppressive. Those governments that choose to protect their citizen’s individual rights do so in a manner with advantages and disadvantages to both the individuals and public order.
There are many laws that exist in America and they are in place to keep people of America safe. Individual rights exist to give individuals their freedom, and that identical freedom can be the foundation to cause people to take advantage. People feel they are safe in their everyday lives. Public order is what keeps the world safe from mishaps. The ultimate life is to have freedom and of course everyone wants it; however people can take advantage of that desire and privilege regardless of who they are.
Individuals are given rights which protect them from being mistreated from anyone, such as government officials, although most of the rights are given to keep people from being mistreated from the Justice System. The bill of rights was established to help protect the citizens of America. “The bill of rights is devoted to defending the rights of people who are accused of committing a crime. The rights that do that are the fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth amendment’s. These rights give people the “right to due process of law, fair trial, and freedom from self-incrimination, cruel and unusual punishment and being charged twice for the same crime.” National Constitution center, (2008)
Individual rights are our freedom to do what we want and to